Geary V Rankine
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

is an
English land law English land law is the law of real property in England and Wales. Because of its heavy historical and social significance, land is usually seen as the most important part of English property law. Ownership of land has its roots in the feudal sy ...
case, concerning
constructive trusts In trust law, a constructive trust is an equitable remedy imposed by a court to benefit a party that has been wrongfully deprived of its rights due to either a person obtaining or holding a legal property right which they should not possess du ...
, and the establishment of a beneficial interest in an enterprise between a business owner and his or her lover and co-worker. It specifically concerned a case where the latter person received no formal wages and had entered no formal ownership nor partnership agreement nor directly or indirectly contributed in money to the purchase price.


Facts

Mrs Geary and Mr Rankine had been in a relationship since 1990. In 1996, Rankine purchased a guest house with his own savings. The parties had not intended to live in the property or run it themselves; instead having it run by a manager. Difficulties with the manager led Rankine to run the business himself. He realised that he could not run it alone. Geary became involved in the business: cleaning, cooking and looking after guests. Rankine did not pay Geary wages, and she asked for money when she needed it. The relationship deteriorated. Geary brought a claim for an interest in the guest house. She claimed she either had a business Partnership (as defined under the Partnership Act 1890) or a constructive trust as defined by case law.


Judgment

At first instance, the Judge rejected Geary's claim. She appealed. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal,[2012
EWCA Civ 555
/ref> holding that the legal title was solely in Rankine's name and so the burden of establishing a constructive trust was on Geary. The relevant question was whether there was a common intention for Geary to have a beneficial interest in the property, applying ''
Jones v Kernott ''Jones v Kernott'' 011UKSC 53is a decision by the UK Supreme Court concerning the beneficial entitlement to a co-owned family home under a constructive trust. The court ruled there was a 90:10 split of ownership in favour of the main child-car ...
'' 011UKSC 53, which must be determined objectively from the parties' conduct. Geary had shown there was a common intention to run the business together, but it was not correct to therefore reach a conclusion of a common intention that the property in which the business was run, bought by only one of them, would if so belong to both of them. The judge at first instance had not erred in probing the evidence and concluding there was no constructive trust. Lewison 's summative paragraph reads:


See also

*''
Jones v Kernott ''Jones v Kernott'' 011UKSC 53is a decision by the UK Supreme Court concerning the beneficial entitlement to a co-owned family home under a constructive trust. The court ruled there was a 90:10 split of ownership in favour of the main child-car ...
'' 011UKSC 53 *'' Oxley v Hiscock''
004 004, 0O4, O04, OO4 may refer to: * 004, fictional British 00 Agent * 0O4, Corning Municipal Airport (California) * O04, the Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation * Abdul Haq Wasiq, Guantanamo detainee 004 * Junkers Jumo 004 turbojet engine * La ...
EWCA Civ 546 *
Stack v Dowden ''Stack v Dowden'' [2007UKHL 17is a leading English property law case concerning the division of interests in family property after the breakdown of a cohabitation relationship. Facts Mr Stack and Ms Dowden were in a long-term relationship with ...
[2007] UKHL 17


Notes

{{DEFAULTSORT:Geary V Rankine 2012 in United Kingdom case law English land case law Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases