Forum For Peace And Reconciliation

The Forum for Peace and Reconciliation ( ga, an Fóram um Shíocháin agus Athmhuintearas) was a forum established by the government of Ireland in October 1994 as part of the Northern Ireland peace process.

Initiation

The Forum was envisaged in paragraph 11 of the Downing Street Declaration of December 1993:Joint Declaration 1993 (Downing St. Declaration)
Department of Foreign Affairs, Ireland
:The Irish Government would make their own arrangements within their jurisdiction to enable democratic parties to consult together and share in dialogue about the political future. The Taoiseach's intention is that these arrangements could include the establishment, in consultation with other parties, of a Forum for Peace and Reconciliation to make recommendations on ways in which agreement and trust between both traditions in Ireland can be promoted and established.

Preparations for the forum were triggered by the ceasefires announced in September 1994 by the republican Provisional IRA and loyalist UVF and UDA, whose associated political parties were thus invited to the forum. Sinn Féin accepted, while the loyalist PUP and UDP rejected, as did the mainstream unionist UUP and DUP. The presence of Sinn Féin alongside constitutional nationalist and centrist parties was considered a significant "confidence building measure"; substantive negotiations involving the unionist parties and the British government would not begin till the following year. The British ambassador was invited to the opening of the forum, but there was no other British involvement. Its terms of reference were:
:The Forum for Peace and Reconciliation is being established by the Government in accordance with their intentions as expressed in the Joint Declaration, for as long as is necessary, to consult on and examine ways in which lasting peace, stability and reconciliation can be established by agreement among all the people of Ireland, and on the steps required to remove barriers of distrust, on the basis of promoting respect for the equal rights and validity of both traditions and identities. It will also explore ways in which new approaches can be developed to serve economic interests common to both parts of Ireland, including in the framework of European Union. It will be a fundamental guiding principle of the Forum and of participation in it that all differences relating to the exercise of the right of self-determination of the people of Ireland, and to all other matters, will be resolved exclusively by peaceful and democratic means. The purposes of the Forum will be to provide, as far as possible, an opportunity to both major traditions as well as to others, to assist in identifying and clarifying issues which could most contribute to creating a new era of trust and co-operation on the island. Participation in the Forum will be entirely without prejudice to the position on constitutional issues held by any Party.

Regular sessions

The forum's structure was modelled on the New Ireland Forum of 1983–84. It was chaired by Catherine McGuinness, then a judge of the Circuit Court, and had a secretariat with six members. McGuinness' Protestant background was hoped to encourage unionist engagement with the forum. It first met in Saint Patrick's Hall in Dublin Castle on 28 October 1994. It had 41 plenary sessions and commissioned several reports, and subcommittees began drafting responses to the reports. After the publication of the Joint Framework Document in February 1995, this became the focus of much of the Forum's deliberations.

The forum was drafting a final report "Paths to a Political Settlement: Realities, Principles and Requirements", which was leaked to the press on 2 February 1996. It was believed that Sinn Féin was objecting to the report's recognition of the " principle of consent"/"Unionist veto". The Forum published the draft in its "95% agreement" state.See Publications The Canary Wharf bombing on 9 February ended the IRA ceasefire and, with the continued participation of Sinn Féin in question, the Forum was adjourned.

Obstacles in the South to Reconciliation

Paragraph 6 of the Downing Street Declaration stated in part:
:In recognition of the fears of the Unionist community and as a token of his willingness to make a personal contribution to the building up of that necessary trust, the Taoiseach will examine with his colleagues any elements in the democratic life and organisation of the Irish State that can be represented to the Irish Government in the course of political dialogue as a real and substantial threat to their way of life and ethos, or that can be represented as not being fully consistent with a modern democratic and pluralist society, and undertakes to examine any possible ways of removing such obstacles.
Several of the reports the Forum commissioned addressed this issue, and a subcommittee was established on Obstacles in the South to Reconciliation.Dáil 5 April 2000 p.22
/ref> It considered the reports and made a draft report recommending changes to the Constitution of Ireland, as well as changing the Irish national anthem and tricolour flag. Details of its draft proposals were leaked in 1998. When the Forum was revived in 2002, the draft report was not published as it was felt the intervening events had rendered it obsolete.

Delegates

There were separate delegations for each political party with elected representatives in either the Republic of Ireland or Northern Ireland, as well as independents, with "a democratic mandate and a commitment to resolving political differences by exclusively peaceful and democratic means". Unionist and loyalist parties refused to participate as delegates, though some unionists made presentations to the delegates in the public sessions. The delegations were proportional to parties' electoral strength, as follows:

There were observers from the European Parliament ( Piet Dankert and Leo Tindemans) and the British-Irish Interparliamentary Body.

Proceedings

The forum's public sessions were typically held once a week. The proceedings were subsequently published by the Stationery Office, Dublin:

Later work

The Northern Ireland Forum established in 1996 became the focus of the peace process, with the relevance of the Forum for Peace and Reconciliation called into question. After the IRA restored its ceasefire, in 1997, new Taoiseach Bertie Ahern envisaged further meetings "on an occasional basis". One was held on 5 December 1997, at which Ahern broached the possibility of amending Articles 2 and 3 of the Constitution; after the 1998 Good Friday Agreement this was effected by a 1999 referendum. Based on the results of 1996 elections to the Northern Ireland Forum, invitations to the 1997 meeting were received and accepted by the Northern Ireland Women's Coalition and Labour Party of Northern Ireland (LPNI) as well as the previous parties. Maurice Hayes replaced Gordon Wilson among the independent Senators.

Asked about the Forum in 1999, Ahern said:
:I said that I believed, in the context of the implementation of the Good Friday Agreement, it would be preferable to see the primary axis for future island-wide consultation being the joint parliamentary forum and the independent consultative forum, envisaged in paragraphs 18 and 19, respectively, of strand two of the Good Friday Agreement. In that event, while it would be a matter for the chairperson and the participating parties, I envisage a final concluding meeting of the forum.
There were suggestions that it be revived in 2000 after the suspension of the Northern Ireland Executive, and again in December. Ahern said at the time, "It might come to that point but there are some other ideas we must try first. If it is going nowhere however, I will consider it". It was reconvened in late 2002 after further suspension of the Assembly following spying allegations. As Catherine McGuinness had in the meantime been appointed to the Supreme Court, Maurice Hayes replaced her as chairman. Compared to the 1997 delegates, the LPNI was absent while the Socialist Party was present. One session discussed the Holy Cross dispute in Belfast. The Forum's 2002–3 meetings failed to ameliorate the deadlock in the peace process.

In 2005, Mark Durkan of the SDLP called for it to be reconvened. In 2007, Ahern told the Dáil, "With the restoration of the devolved institutions in Northern Ireland, there are no current proposals to reconvene the Forum for Peace and Reconciliation." In 2010, the Forum's €5000 line item in the Department of the Taoiseach's annual budget estimate was deleted. In 2011, Senator Paul Bradford enquired anbout the Forum's status and suggested it might be revived as a truth and reconciliation commission. The Reconciliation Networking Forum established in 2006 is an annual forum to which the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade invites groups which promote reconciliation.

Influence

The Forum for Peace and Reconciliation and the National Economic and Social Forum provided a model for the National Forum on Europe established in 2001 after the referendum rejecting the Treaty of Nice.Dáil 12 June 2001 p.16
/ref>

Publications

Some of the Forum's commissioned reports and submissions were published.

*
*
*
*
*
* consisting of five studies commissioned by the subcommittee on Obstacles in the South to Reconciliation:
::

*

See also

* New Ireland Forum (1983–84)
* Northern Ireland Forum (1996)

References

{{Reflist

External links

Official website
(from Internet Archive, last updated 1997)

Sinn Féin documents on the Forum for Peace and Reconciliation
(Sinn Féin website)

Alliance Party submissions to the Forum for Peace and Reconciliation

Organizations established in 1994
1994 in Ireland
Northern Ireland peace process
Political conferences
Public inquiries in Ireland