Origins
Administration
The head of the ''fiscus'' in the first years was the '' a rationibus'', originally a freedman due to Augustus' desire to place the office in the hands of a servant free of the class demands of the traditional society. In succeeding years the corruption and reputation of the freedman forced new and more reliable administrators. From the time of''Fiscus incomes
The incomes of the emperor's chest could derive from taxes or from other sources.Incomes from taxes
* The first noteworthy tax is the provincial tax imposed to the imperial provinces. It is essentially a 10% of the entire amount of taxes due, imposed only on those able to generate profits (females, children and old people were not subjected). These incomes were especially used for national defense. * There was also the ''vicesima hereditatium'', a tax of 5% of the inheritances. * Another important tax was the ''dogana'', with a variable percentage going from 1.5% up to 5%. * Luxury objects imported from the east, for instance spices, silk and precious stones were subject of a customs tax 25% of their value. * The last one was on the turnover, but it isn't known in which measure.Non-fiscal incomes
* Incomes received as inheritance by the emperor. This type was one of the most relevant income sources for the ''fiscus''; it was a custom among the Romans to leave as inheritance something to the emperor. * The lost portion of an inheritance (''bona caduca''), that is the part of the inheritance that couldn't be received by the heir. There were some reasons for which someone couldn't receive the whole inheritance or part of it. For example, the ''Lex Papia Poppaea Nuptialis'' (9 BC) established that some people couldn't inherit, namely: the ''caelibes'' (unmarried men between 25 and 60 years old and unmarried women between 20 and 50 years old) they lost the 100% of their capacity to inherit, the ''orbi'' (married people without sons) who lost the 50% of their capacity to inherit, the ''pater solitarius'' (i.e. who had sons from a previous marriage but didn't marry again) for them the lost capacity isn't known. There are also laws concerning the unworthiness of the heirs. * The vacant inheritance (''bona vacantia''), that is the case in which the inheritance was without any heirs, neither legal nor designated. If the deceased was a citizen of one of the imperial provinces the ''fiscus'' became owner (but, in this case, it also inherited any eventual debts). * The inheritance of the “implicit guarantor”. Is a very peculiar kind of guarantor who was relevant in case the deceased asked him (but with an unspecified formula) to transfer the inheritance once received. This disposition was meant to avoid the use of this figure, because it was usually used to avoid some other legislative dispositions. * State's assets incomes: national mines’ incomes and leasing of public lands (''tributum soli''). * Incomes from the sale of war's treasuries. * Incomes from the discovery of treasuries, the half of the treasure found in the imperial provinces had to be delivered to the ''fiscus'.'' * Incomes from fines. * The goods of the convicted (''bona damnatorum''), i.e. all the good of people sentenced to deprivation of life or freedom or citizenry right, had to be delivered to the ''fiscus''.Nature of the ''fiscus''
There are three different theories about the nature of the ''fiscus.'' The first theory takes the ''fiscus'' as the private capital of the emperor. The second theory states that the ''fiscus'' was a public capital entrusted to the emperor to maintain public order. It should have been used only for public welfare aims. Supporting this thesis there are the facts that some emperors, like Augustus, made its accounting public, that the emperor could leave as inheritance the ''fiscus'' only to his heir to the throne, and thatReforms and developments
From its very introduction the ''fiscus'' started a continuous process of enforcement with respect to the ''aerarium'', until the word ''aerarium'' ended up representing only the municipal chest of Rome. With Diocletian came a series of massive reforms, and total control over the finances of the empire fell to the new stronger central government. With these reforms the distinction between ''aerarium'' and ''fiscus'' was definitely abolished, even though some historians believe this union was already realized under the empire of Septimius Severus. In the late imperial period, probably under Constantine, the ''fiscus'' was renamed ''largitiones'', and it was entrusted to the ''comes sacrarum largitionum'' ( count of the sacred largess) a proper appointed minister of finance. He maintained the general treasury and the intake of all the revenues.Other ''fisci''
Beside the fiscus but independently from it Vespasian created the ''fiscus Alexandrinus'' and the ''fiscus Asiaticus'' to receive Egyptian and Asian revenues, formerly directed to the ''aerarium.'' He also created the ''fiscus Iudaicus,'' to which the Jewish population was subjected.See also
*References
Further reading
* *{{cite journal , last1=Brunt , first1=P. A. , title=The 'Fiscus' and its Development , journal=The Journal of Roman Studies , date=1966 , volume=56 , pages=75–91 , doi=10.2307/300135 , jstor=300135 , url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/300135 , issn=0075-4358, url-access=subscription * Francesca Milazzo, ''Res publica e priceps, vicende politiche, mutamenti istituzionali e ordinamento giuridico da Cesare ad Adriano,'' Atti del convegno internazionale di diritto romano, Copanello 25-27 May 1994 * Sara Galeotti, "Il fiscus Caesaris nella dottrina romanistica del XIX e XX secolo," ''teoria e storia del diritto privato'' 10 2017 * Filippo E. Vassalli, ''Concetto e natura del fisco,'' Fratelli Bocca editore, Torino 1908External links