Dwaita

Dvaita Vedanta (); (originally known as Tattvavada; IAST: ''Tattvavāda''), is a sub-school in the Vedanta tradition of Hindu philosophy. The term Tattvavada literally means "arguments from a realist viewpoint". The Tattvavada (Dvaita) Vedanta sub-school was founded by the 13th-century Indian philosopher-saint Madhvacharya. Madhvacharya believed in three entities: God, ''jiva'' (soul), and ''jada'' (''maya'', matter). The Dvaita Vedanta school believes that God and the individual souls ( jīvātman) exist as distinct realities, and these are dependent, being said that Vishnu (Narayana) is independent (''svatantra''), and Souls are dependent (''paratantra'') on him.

The Dvaita school contrasts with the other two major sub-schools of Vedanta, the Advaita Vedanta of Adi Shankara which posits nondualism—that ultimate reality (Brahman) and human soul ( Ātman) are identical and all reality is interconnected oneness, and Vishishtadvaita of Ramanuja which posits qualified nondualism—that ultimate reality (Brahman) and human soul are different but with the potential to be identical. Sanyasis of the Dvaita Vedanta tradition belong to the ēkadaṇḍi order.

Etymology

''Dvaita'' (द्वैत) is a Sanskrit word that means "duality, dualism".Sir Monier Monier-Williams
Dvaita
A Sanskrit-English Dictionary: Etymologically and Philologically Arranged with Special Reference to Cognate Indo-European Languages, Oxford University Press (Reprinted: Motilal Banarsidass), , page 507. The term refers to any premise, particularly in theology on the material and the divine, where two principles (truths) or realities are posited to exist simultaneously and independently.. Madvacharya's "Dvaita" differs from dualism as generally understood. Whereas dualism generally is understood as two independent and equal entities — good and evil eternally fighting for supremacy, for Madhvacharya, duality lies in classification of the entire spectrum of reality into two parts:

*independent entity: Creator Benefactor and Destroyer of the Universe which is One
*the dependent reality: all else is dependent on Him

Indologist B. N. Krishnamurti Sharma says: "The English term ''Dualism'' is inadequate to express the full content and depth of meaning that Madhva has put into the term ''Dvaita'', as it is to be implied to his system. Even the Sanskrit word ''Dvaita'' is not literally capable of expressing more than the fundamental principles accepted. B. N. K. Sharma suggested to use the term ''Svatantra-Advitiya-Brahmavāda'' as an alternative name to Madhva's system. Sharma says, Satyadhyana Tirtha of Uttaradi Math approved this. B. N. K. Sharma further states that "the term ''Svatantra-Advitiya-Brahmavāda'' is capable of conveying directly rather than by implication or definition, the highest reach of its thought and its metaphysical ideology do often stressed by Madhva and so well expounded by Jayatirtha". It may be seen that such a term would do justice to both the aspects of reality—the finite and the infinite".

Quoting the term ''Advitīyatva'', Sharma also states that "the term ''Advitīyatva'' has been interpreted by Madhva, in the ''Chandogya Bhashya'', in terms of "absence of peer and superior" to Brahman, conceding by implication, the existence, the reality of "lesser reals" like matter and souls under the aegis of God. The first part of the text has been taken to emphasize the unity of God-head by excluding internal distinctions of substance and attributes in Brahman in conformity with text like ''नेह नानास्ति किंचना'', which are understood as nagating some internal distinctions (''nānātva'') alone in Brahman. The only internal distinctions that are logically conceivable in Brahman, are those of attributes. This is negated by the way of significant negation. The adjunct ''Svatantra'' would thus serve to emphasize the transcendence of the supreme over the other reals and its immanence in them and show how the conception of Brahman, here, differs from the ''Nirviśeṣādvaita'' of Adi Shankara. Quoting the term ''Svatantra-Advitiya-Brahmavāda'', Sharma also says: "It would also stand terminologically balanced with the distinctions of other Vēdantic systems like ''Nirviśeṣādvaita'', ''śuddhādvaita'', and ''Viśiṣṭādvaita''. It would also lay direct emphasis on the primacy of the supreme as the ''Para-Siddhanta'' of the Madhva's thought, and put the teachings about the finite in their proper place as constituting the ''Apara-Siddhānta'' (subsidiary truths)".

Aluru Venkata Rao opines that the term ''Dvaita'' is not suitable for Madhva's philosophy, hence it should not be used. Instead, he suggests to use the term ''Pūrnabrahmavāda''.

Philosophy

Dvaita Vedanta is a dualistic interpretation of the Vedas systematized by the 13th-century Indian philosopher-saint Madhvacharya, which espouses dualism by theorizing the existence of two separate realities. The first and the only independent reality (''svatantra-tattva''), states the Dvaita school, is that of Vishnu as the ultimate reality (Brahman) and Supreme God. Vishnu is the supreme Self, in a manner similar to the monotheistic God in other major religions. He is believed to be almighty, eternal, Helmuth von Glasenapp: Madhva's Philosophie des Vishnu-Glaubens, Geistesströmungen des Ostens vol. 2, Bonn 1923, Einleitung (p. *1-2). always existing, everlasting, all-knowing, and compassionate. The second reality is that of dependent (''asvatantra-tattva'' or ''paratantra'') but equally real universe that exists with its own separate essence. Everything that is composed of the second reality, such as individual soul, matter, and the like exist with their own separate reality. The distinguishing factor of this philosophy, as opposed to monistic Advaita Vedanta, is that God takes on a personal role and is seen as a real eternal entity that governs and controls the universe.

Like Ramanuja, for Madhvacharya too, Vishnu is the One Independent Supreme principle. But this is not sectarian; For Acharya Madhva, words like "Narayana", "Vishnu", etc, when etymologically derived, give the meaning of transcendence, immanence, abode of infinite auspicious attributes,infinite bliss, etc. Madhvacharya posits God as being personal and ''saguna'', that is endowed with attributes and qualities (in human terms, which are not believed to be able to fully describe God).Glasenapp: Madhva's Philosophie des Vishnu-Glaubens, p. 30–31. To Madhvacharya, the metaphysical concept of Brahman in the Vedas was Vishnu. He stated: "''Brahmaśabdaśca Viṣṇaveva''", that Brahman can only refer to Vishnu. Scriptures which say different are declared as non-authoritative by him.Glasenapp: Madhva's Philosophie des Vishnu-Glaubens, p. 28–29. To him, Vishnu was not just any other deva, but rather the one and only Supreme Being. According to him, the devas are souls of deceased persons who were rewarded for good deeds by being reincarnated into the heavenly worlds and becoming following organs of God's will,Glasenapp: Madhva's Philosophie des Vishnu-Glaubens, p. 67–68. which would also be the case with Vayu and Lakshmi. He also believes that they are mortal, and that some of them could sink into lower stages of existence after death. Therefore, he believes that only God shall be worshipped through them, and that worshipping them on their own behalf is an apostasy which emerged during Treta Yuga, and did not yet exist during Satya Yuga.Glasenapp: Madhva's Philosophie des Vishnu-Glaubens, p. 71. According to him, this must also be noticed regarding murtis.Glasenapp: Madhva's Philosophie des Vishnu-Glaubens, p. 85..

''The Reals''

This system admits of a two-fold classification of "Reals"- into the Independent and Dependent reality; the Independent Reality is One, and is Vishnu. The dependent reality comprises of all else- the jivas, the jadas and also the abhava padarthas.

''The Brahman''

Brahman is Vishnu, He is Supreme, abode of auspicious attributes, free from blemishes, and Infinite in every sense of the term. There is no gradation of Brahman into Saguna and Nirguna; Nirguna is understood as being free from all kinds of imperfections and is itself a guna (attribute) of the Supreme.

''Jivas''

The jivas are eternal and infinite in number. Therefore, for the jivas, Creation is the obtainment of visheshas- the bodies in successive births.

The individual souls (''jiva'') are depicted as reflections, images or shadows of the divine (bimba-pratibimba), but never in any way (even after ''moksha'', or liberation) identical with the divine. Being a reflection of God, each ''jiva'' has a nature with some characteristics (truth, conscious, bliss) of God in varying degree which is under the influence of ''karma'' in bondage and expands to its distinct full intrinsic capacity in ''moksha''. Liberated ''jivas'' do not attain equality with Brahman and also are not equal to each other. jivas are qualitatively different from each other and have an intrinsic svabhava- nature that impels them into karma, good or evil.

''Jadas''

The jadas are the other dependent reality is subject to the cycle of creation and dissolution.

Five fundamental, eternal and real differences are described in Dvaita school:
# Between the individual souls (or jīvātman) and God (paramathma or Vishnu).
# Between matter (inanimate, insentient) and God.
# Between individual souls (jīvātman).
# Between matter and jīvātman.
# Between various types of matter.

The theory of five differences is that "the ''jiva'' is different from every other entity including all ''jivas''". These five differences are said to explain the nature of the universe. The world is called ''prapañca'' (''pañca'' "five") by the Dvaita school for this reason.

Madhva differed significantly from traditional Hindu beliefs owing to his concept of eternal damnation. According to him, there are three different classes of souls: One class, '' Mukti-yogyas'', which would qualify for liberation, another, the '' Nitya-samsarins'', which would be subject to eternal rebirth or eternal transmigration and a third class, '' Tamo-yogyas'', which would be condemned to eternal hell ( Andhatamisra).Tapasyananda, Swami. ''Bhakti Schools of Vedanta'' pg. 173-187.

''Moksha'' (liberation)

''Moksha'' (liberation) therefore is described as the realization that all finite reality is essentially dependent on the Supreme. God is believed to have shown the way to attain ''moksha'' through several avatars. Bhakti Yoga is an essential part of Dvaita Vedanta. By devotion to God and God's grace, ''jiva'' attains ''moksha''. Moksha is the expression and manifestation of the innate bliss in the soul that has been all along covered by ajnana and bondage. While Divine Grace is a must for this, Mukti is not possible without jnana (Jnanenaiva paramam padam- Sri Madhvacharya in Anubhashya, a small metric composition on the Brahmasutras). However, the concept of jnana differs significantly from that of other schools; Jnana may be described as a direct knowledge and vision (aparokshajnana) of the indwelling form of the Lord through study of scriptures, righteous living spanning births and devotion to the Lord with full understanding of his transendental attributes. However, bad karma results in condemnation from God.

''Sadhana and Liberation''

According to Madhvacharya, the ''jiva'' is unaware of its real nature due to ignorance (''avidyā'') caused by ''maya'', and thus, is unable to realize its expression of intrinsic attributes. Some ''jivas'' are predestined to attain ''moksha'', while others are predestined to eternally suffer.. While this may seem cruel, it is actually a corollary of the three-fold classification of the svabhava or the intrinsic nature of the jivas.

Liberation for each ''jiva'' means realizing its innate bliss by removal of covering of ''maya''. Liberation can only be achieved by the grace of God with self-effort on the part of the ''jiva''. Practicing ''vairāgya'' allows ''Mukti-yogyas'' (''jivas'' qualified for liberation) to gain freedom from worldly attachments and develop faith in God. Self-effort which makes a ''jiva'' worthy for liberation involves ''karma'' (good work), Jnana Yoga (knowledge) and Bhakti Yoga (devotion). S''ādhaka'' performs such sadhana through ''śravaṇa'', '' manana'' and '' nididhyasana''. Madhva also placed a great importance on a Guru's guidance and blessings to understand the jnana from scriptures. According to Madhva, ''śravaṇa'' and ''manana'' are the only means for nidhiyasana. This sadhana leads the sadhaka to ''aparoksa-jnana'' (spiritual realisation) and liberation through grace of God.

Thus the path to liberation consists of: Jnana, bhakti, jnana and bhakti again.

# righteous living
# study of shastras and obtaining indirect knowledge of God, reflection and meditation on His infinite auspicious attributes and as benefactor of all of the Universe
# Love of God( paroksha jnana and bhakti)
# Direct vision of God (aparokshajnana) that cuts all karma except prarabhdha
# sadhana continues and at the end of the Brahma-kalpa, shedding of all coils including the last- the linga deha and entering Vaikunta.

Avidya

Dvaita philosophers challenge the Advaita Vedanta view that ignorance explains the appearance of multiplicty in a singular, unchanging reality. Madhva questions the possibility of liberation if both the universe and ignorance are mere illusions connected to Brahman. Madhva further argues that there is no similarity between Brahman and the cosmos to justify such an illusion.

Madhva questions the idea that ''avidya'' is unique to individual selves, arguing that if individuality itself is a misconception, then avidya must also inherently belong to Brahman. He also criticizes the idea of an unreal feature superimposed on Brahman by Advaitins to explain individual differences, seeing it as circular: if ignorance creates this feature, then ignorance must be part of Brahman, making differences and ignorance real, contradicting the foundational goal of liberation in Advaita philosophy.

Influence

* Dvaita Vedanta and Madhvacharya's historical influence in Hinduism, state Kulandran and Kraemer, has been salutary, but not extensive.Sabapathy Kulandran and Hendrik Kraemer (2004), Grace in Christianity and Hinduism, James Clarke, , pages 177-179
* According to Sharma, the influence of Dvaita Vedanta ideas have been most prominent on the Chaitanya school of Bengal Vaishnavism, and in Assam.
* Madhva's theology influenced later scholars such as Nimbarka, Vallabha, and Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. B.N.K. Sharma notes that Nimbarka's theology is a loose ''réchauffé'' of Madhva's in its most essential aspects.

See also

* Madhvacharya
* Madhwa Brahmins
* Dvaita literature
* Madhavendra Puri
* Gaudiya Vaishnavism
* Achintya Bheda Abheda
* Brahma-Madhva-Gaudiya Sampradaya

References

Bibliography

*
*
*
*
*

External links

Tatvavada

{{Authority control

Dualism in cosmology
Dvaita Vedanta
Vedanta
Schools and traditions in ancient Indian philosophy
Hindu philosophical concepts