Diphthongization

In historical linguistics, vowel breaking, vowel fracture, or diphthongization is the sound change of a monophthong into a diphthong or triphthong.

Types

Vowel breaking may be unconditioned or conditioned. It may be triggered by the presence of another sound, by stress, or in no particular way.

Assimilation

Vowel breaking is sometimes defined as a subtype of diphthongization, when it refers to harmonic ( assimilatory) process that involves diphthongization triggered by a following vowel or consonant.

The original pure vowel typically breaks into two segments. The first segment matches the original vowel, and the second segment is harmonic with the nature of the triggering vowel or consonant. For example, the second segment may be (a back vowel) if the following vowel or consonant is back (such as velar or pharyngeal), and the second segment may be (a front vowel) if the following vowel or consonant is front (such as palatal).

Thus, vowel breaking, in the restricted sense, can be viewed as an example of assimilation of a vowel to a following vowel or consonant.

Unconditioned

Vowel breaking is sometimes not assimilatory and is then not triggered by a neighboring sound. That was the case with the Great Vowel Shift in English in which all cases of and changed to diphthongs.

Stress

Vowel breaking sometimes occurs only in stressed syllables. For instance, Vulgar Latin open-mid and changed to diphthongs only when they were stressed.

Indo-European languages

English

Vowel breaking is a very common sound change in the history of the English language, occurring at least three times (with some varieties adding a fourth) listed here in reverse chronological order:

Southern American English

Vowel breaking is characteristic of the "Southern drawl" of Southern American English, where the short front vowels have developed a glide up to and then in some areas back down to schwa: ''pat'' , ''pet'' , ''pit'' .

Great Vowel Shift

The Great Vowel Shift changed the long vowels to diphthongs, which became Modern English .
* Old English ' > Modern English ''ice''
* Old English ' > Modern English ''house''

Middle English

In early Middle English, a vowel was inserted between a front vowel and a following (pronounced in this context), and a vowel was inserted between a back vowel and a following (pronounced in this context).

That is a prototypical example of the narrow sense of "vowel breaking" as described above: the original vowel breaks into a diphthong that assimilates to the following consonant, gaining a front before a palatal consonant and before a velar consonant.

Old English

In Old English, two forms of harmonic vowel breaking occurred: breaking and retraction and back mutation.

In prehistoric Old English, breaking and retraction changed stressed short and long front vowels ''i, e, æ'' to short and long diphthongs spelled ''io, eo, ea'' when followed by ''h'' or by ''r, l'' + another consonant (short vowels only), and sometimes ''w'' (only for certain short vowels):
* Proto-Germanic > Anglo-Frisian > Old English ''feallan'' "fall"
* PG > OE ''eorþe'' "earth"
* PG > OE ''liornian'' "learn"

In late prehistoric Old English, back mutation changed short front ''i, e, æ'' to short diphthongs spelled ''io, eo, ea'' before a back vowel in the next syllable if the intervening consonant was of a certain nature. The specific nature of the consonants that trigger back umlaut or block it varied from dialect to dialect.

Old Norse

Proto-Germanic stressed short ''e'' becomes ''ja'' or (before ''u'') ''jǫ'' regularly in Old Norse except after ''w, r, l''. Examples are:
* PG *''ek(a)'' "I" → (east) ON ''jak'', Swedish ''jag'', Danish and Norwegian Bokmål ''jeg'', and Icelandic ''ek'' → ''ég'' (but Jutlandic ''æ, a'', Nynorsk ').
** Faroese has both. The standard form is ', while the dialects of Suðuroy have ''jeg''.
* PG *''hertōn'' "heart" → ON ''hjarta'', Swedish ''hjärta'', Faroese ''hjarta'', Norwegian Nynorsk ''hjarta'', Danish ''hjerte''
* PG *''erþō'' "earth" → Proto-Norse *''erþū'' → ON ''jǫrð'', Swedish, Danish, Norwegian ''jord'', Faroese ''jørð''

According to some scholars, the diphthongisation of ''e'' is an unconditioned sound change, whereas other scholars speak about epenthesis or umlaut.

German and Yiddish

The long high vowels of Middle High German underwent breaking during the transition to Early New High German: → . In Yiddish, the diphthongization affected the long mid vowels as well: →
* MHG ' → NHG ', ("eternal")
* MHG ' → NHG ', ("high")
* MHG ' → NHG ', ("nice")
* MHG ' → NHG ', ("to cut")
* MHG ' → NHG ', ("friend")
* MHG ' → NHG ', ("skin")

This change started as early as the 12th century in Upper Bavarian and reached Moselle Franconian only in the 16th century. It did not affect Alemannic or Ripuarian dialects, which still retain the original long vowels.

In Yiddish, the diphthongization applied not only to MHG long vowels but also to in words of Hebrew (in stressed open syllables) or Slavic origin:
* → ("Pesach")
* → (" menorah")
* Old Czech: ''chřěn'' → ("chrain")
* → ("basket")

Scottish Gaelic

Vowel breaking is present in Scottish Gaelic with the following changes occurring often but variably between dialects: Archaic Irish ''eː'' → Scottish Gaelic ''iə'' and Archaic Irish ''oː'' → Scottish Gaelic ''uə'' Specifically, central dialects have more vowel breaking than others.

Romance languages

Many Romance languages underwent vowel breaking. The Vulgar Latin open vowels ''e'' and ''o'' in stressed position underwent breaking only in open syllables in French and Italian, but in both open and closed syllables in Spanish. Vowel breaking was mostly absent in Catalan, in which and became diphthongs only before a palatal consonant: Latin coxa 'thigh', octō 'eight', lectum 'bed' > Old Catalan , , . The middle vowel was subsequently lost if a triphthong was produced: Modern Catalan cuixa, vuit, llit (cf. Portuguese coxa, oito, leito). Vowel breaking was completely absent in Portuguese. The result of breaking varies between languages: ''e'' and ''o'' became ''ie'' and ''ue'' in Spanish, ''ie'' and ''uo'' in Italian and ''ie'' and ''eu'' in French.

In the table below, words with breaking are bolded.

Romanian

Romanian underwent the general Romance breaking only with , as it did not have :
* Latin ''pellis'' > Romanian ''piele'' "skin"

It underwent a later breaking of stressed ''e'' and ''o'' to ''ea'' and ''oa'' before a mid or open vowel:
* Latin ''porta'' > Romanian ''poartă'' "gate"
* Latin ''flōs'' (stem ''flōr-'') > Romanian ''floare'' "flower"

Sometimes a word underwent both forms of breaking in succession:
* Latin ''petra'' > Early Romanian ''pietră'' > Romanian ''piatră'' "stone" (where ''ia'' results from hypothetical *''iea'')

The diphthongs that resulted from the Romance and the Romanian breakings were modified when they occurred after palatalized consonants.

Quebec French

In Quebec French, long vowels are generally diphthongized when followed by a consonant in the same syllable (even when a final �is optionally made silent).

* ''tard'' → ; but not in ''tardif'' (because short a)
* ''père'' →
* ''fleur'' → ; but not in ''fleuriste'' (long œ is at end of syllable)
* ''fort'' → ; but not ''forte'' (short o)
* ''autre'' → ; but not ''autrement'' (long o is at end of syllable)
* ''neutre'' → ; but not ''neutralité'' (long ø is at end of syllable)
* ''pince'' → ; or → ; but not ''pincer''
* ''onze'' → ; but not ''onzième''

Proto-Indo-European

Some scholars believe that Proto-Indo-European (PIE) ''i, u'' had vowel-breaking before an original laryngeal in Greek, Armenian and Tocharian but that the other Indo-European languages kept the monophthongs:

* PIE *' → *' "alive" → Gk. ''zōós'', Toch. B ''śāw-, śāy-'' (but Skt. ''jīvá-'', Lat. ''vīvus'')
* PIE *' → *' "front side" → Gk. ''prósōpon'' "face", Toch. B ''pratsāko'' "breast" (but Skt. ''prátīka-'')
* PIE *' → *' "long" → Gk. ''dērós'', Arm. *''twār'' → ''erkar'' ( Skt. ''dūrá-'', Lat. ''dūrus'').

However, the hypothesis has not been widely adopted.

Austronesian languages

Some languages in Sumatra have vowel breaking processes, almost exclusively in syllable-final position. In Minangkabau, the Proto-Malayic vowels ''*i'' and ''*u'' are broken to ''ia'' and ''ua'' before word-final ''*h'', ''*k'', ''*l'', ''*ŋ'', ''*r'' (''*təlur'' > ''*təluar'' > ''talua'' "egg"). In Rejang, the Proto-Malayo-Polynesian vowels ''*ə'', ''i'', and ''u'' are broken to ''êa'', ''ea'', and ''oa'' before any of word-final consonants above except ''*k'' and ''*ŋ'' (''*tənur'' > ''*tənoar'' > ''tênoa'' "egg"). This process has been transphonologized by loss of ''*l'' and ''*r'' and merging of several word-final consonants into a glottal stop (''*p'', ''*t'', ''*k'' in Minangkabau, or ''*k'', ''*h'' in most dialects of Rejang except Kebanagung).

Word-final Proto-Malayo-Polynesian ''*-i'' and ''*-u'' were also broken in Sumatra. In Rejang, these vowels are broken into ''-ai'' and ''-au'' in ''Pesisir'' dialect, or into ''-êi'' and ''-êu'' elsewhere.

Although Acehnese is also spoken in Sumatra, the entire Chamic family has undergone vowel breaking separately. Final open ''*-i'' and ''*-u'' were broken in Proto-Chamic into ''*-ɛy'' and ''*-ɔw''. However, they remained when closed by another consonant (final ''*-r'' was lost in native words). The following are the outcomes for the diphthongs:

Following its split from Proto-Chamic, several daughter languages have undergone further vowel breaking. In Acehnese, ''*a:'' normally became ''ɯə'', but when preceded by a nasal, it became ''ɯ'' instead.

See also

* Smoothing (phonetics)
* Unpacking (linguistics)

References

Bibliography

*Crowley, Terry. (1997) ''An Introduction to Historical Linguistics.'' 3rd edition. Oxford University Press.
*

{{DEFAULTSORT:Vowel Breaking
Vowel shifts