Cot–caught merger

The ''cot''–''caught'' merger, also known as the merger or low back merger, is a sound change present in some dialects of English where speakers do not distinguish the vowel phonemes in words like ''cot'' versus ''caught''. ''Cot'' and ''caught'' (along with ''bot'' and ''bought'', ''pond'' and ''pawned'', etc.) is an example of a minimal pair that is lost as a result of this sound change. The phonemes involved in the ''cot''–''caught'' merger, the low back vowels, are typically represented in the International Phonetic Alphabet as and or, in most United States English, as and . The merger is typical of most Indian, Canadian, and Scottish English dialects as well as some Irish and U.S. English dialects.

An additional vowel merger, the ''father''–''bother'' merger, which spread through North America in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, has resulted today in a three-way merger in which most Canadian and many U.S. accents have no vowel difference in words like , , and .

However, before (as in ) participates in a separate phenomenon in most North American English dialects: the merger. So the vowel of can be phonemicized as the vowel ; therefore, the sequence can be alternatively transcribed as or .

Overview

The shift causes the vowel sound in words like ''cot'', ''nod'' and ''stock'' and the vowel sound in words like ''caught'', ''gnawed'' and ''stalk'' to merge into a single phoneme; therefore the pairs ''cot'' and ''caught'', ''stock'' and ''stalk'', ''nod'' and ''gnawed'' become perfect homophones, and ''shock'' and ''talk'', for example, become perfect rhymes. The ''cot''–''caught'' merger is completed in the following dialects:

*Some English of the British Isles, outside of England:
**Most Scottish English, towards
** Broad and traditional Irish English, towards
**Some northern Ulster English including in conservative mid Ulster English towards and in Ulster Scots English towards
*Much of the English of North America:
**Certain varieties of American English, including:
*** Pittsburgh English, towards (with the ''father''–''bother'' merger)
***Much of New England English towards (in Boston, particularly towards ), and Northern New England generally, but traditionally not Southern New England
***Western American English (with the ''father''–''bother'' merger) towards
*** Upper Midwestern English, Chicano English, and some Western New England English (with the ''father''–''bother'' merger) towards
**Nearly all Canadian English, including:
*** Standard Canadian English towards (with the ''father''–''bother'' merger)
*** Maritimer and Newfoundland English, towards (with the ''father''–''bother'' merger)
*Much Indian English towards or
*Some Singaporean English

North America

Nowhere is the shift more complex than in North American English. The presence of the merger and its absence are both found in many different regions of the North American continent, where it has been studied in greatest depth, and in both urban and rural environments. The symbols traditionally used to transcribe the vowels in the words ''cot'' and ''caught'' as spoken in American English are and , respectively, although their precise phonetic values may vary, as does the phonetic value of the merged vowel in the regions where the merger occurs.

Even without taking into account the mobility of the American population, the distribution of the merger is still complex; there are pockets of speakers with the merger in areas that lack it, and vice versa. There are areas where the merger has only partially occurred, or is in a state of transition. For example, based on research directed by William Labov (using telephone surveys) in the 1990s, younger speakers in Kansas, Nebraska, and the Dakotas exhibited the merger while speakers older than 40 typically did not. The 2003 Harvard Dialect Survey, in which subjects did not necessarily grow up in the place they identified as the source of their dialect features, indicates that there are speakers of both merging and contrast-preserving accents throughout the country, though the basic isoglosses are almost identical to those revealed by Labov's 1996 telephone survey. Both surveys indicate that, as of the 1990s, approximately 60% of American English speakers preserved the contrast, while approximately 40% merged the phonemes. Further complicating matters are speakers who merge the phonemes in some contexts but not others, or merge them when the words are spoken unstressed or casually but not when they are stressed.

Speakers with the merger in northeastern New England still maintain a phonemic distinction between a fronted and unrounded (phonetically ) and a back and usually rounded (phonetically ), because in northeastern New England (unlike in Canada and the Western United States), the ''cot''–''caught'' merger occurred without the ''father''–''bother'' merger. Thus, although northeastern New Englanders pronounce both ''cot'' and ''caught'' as , they pronounce ''cart'' as .

Labov et al. also reveal that, for about 15% of respondents, a specific – merger before but not before (or other consonants) is in effect, so that ''Don'' and ''dawn'' are homophonous, but ''cot'' and ''caught'' are not. In this case, a distinct vowel shift (which overlaps with the ''cot''–''caught'' merger for all speakers who have indeed completed the ''cot''–''caught'' merger) is taking place, identified as the ''Don''–''dawn'' merger.

Resistance

According to Labov, Ash, and Boberg, the merger in North America is most strongly resisted in three regions:
*The "Inland North", encompassing the eastern and central Great Lakes region (on the U.S. side of the border)
*The "Northeast Corridor" along the Atlantic coast, ranging from Baltimore to Philadelphia to New York City to Providence. However, the merger is common in Boston and further northern New England.
*The "South", somewhat excluding Texas and Florida.

In the three American regions above, sociolinguists have studied three phonetic shifts that can explain their resistance to the merger. The first is the fronting of found in the Inland North, in which the vowel is advanced as far as the cardinal (the open front unrounded vowel), thus allowing the vowel to lower into the phonetic environment of without any merger taking place. The second situation is the raising of the vowel found in Providence, New York City, Philadelphia, and Baltimore, in which the vowel is raised and diphthongized to , or, less commonly, , thus keeping that vowel notably distinct from the vowel . The third situation occurs in the South, in which vowel breaking results in being pronounced as upgliding , keeping it distinct from . None of these three phonetic shifts, however, is certain to preserve the contrast for all speakers in these regions. Some speakers in all three regions, particularly younger ones, are beginning to exhibit the merger despite the fact that each region's phonetics should theoretically block it.

African-American Vernacular English accents have traditionally resisted the ''cot''–''caught'' merger, with pronounced and traditionally pronounced , though now often . Early-2000s research has shown that this resistance may continue to be reinforced by the fronting of , linked through a chain shift of vowels to the raising of the , , and perhaps vowels. This chain shift is called the "African American Shift". However, there is still evidence of AAVE speakers picking up the ''cot''–''caught'' merger in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in Charleston, South Carolina, in Florida and Georgia, and in parts of California.

Origin

In North America, the first evidence of the merger (or its initial conditions) comes from western Pennsylvania as far back as the data shows. From there, it entered Upper Canada (what is now Ontario). In the mid-19th century, the merger also independently began in eastern New England, possibly influencing the Canadian Maritimes, though the merger is in evidence as early as the 1830s in both regions of Canada: Ontario and the Maritimes. Fifty years later, the merger "was already more established in Canada" than in its two U.S. places of origin. In Canadian English, further westward spread was completed more quickly than in English of the United States.

Two traditional theories of the merger's origins have been longstanding in linguistics: one group of scholars argues for an independent North American development, while others argue for contact-induced language change via Scots-Irish or Scottish immigrants to North America. In fact, both theories may be true but for different regions. The merger's appearance in western Pennsylvania is better explained as an effect of Scots-Irish settlement, but in eastern New England,Johnson, Daniel Ezra (2010). "Low Vowels of New England: History and Development". Publication of the American Dialect Society 95 (1): 13–41. . p. 40. and perhaps the American West, as an internal structural development. Canadian linguist Charles Boberg considers the issue unresolved. A third theory has been used to explain the merger's appearance specifically in northeastern Pennsylvania: an influx of Polish- and other Slavic-language speakers whose learner English failed to maintain the distinction.

Scotland

Outside North America, another dialect featuring the merger is Scottish English, where the merged vowel has a quality around �̞ Like in New England English, the ''cot''–''caught'' merger occurred without the ''father''–''bother'' merger. Therefore, speakers still retain the distinction between in and in .

India

The merger is also quite prevalent in Indian English, possibly due to contact with Scottish English. In particular, the vowel may be lengthened to merge with the vowel . However, there are also speakers who maintain a distinction in length and/or quality. Like in Scottish English, this vowel is not usually merged with in General Indian English.

See also

* Phonological history of English open back vowels

Notes

References

Bibliography

*
*
*
*
*
*

Further reading

*

External links

Map of the cot–caught merger from the 2003 Harvard Dialect Survey


* ttp://www.ling.upenn.edu/phono_atlas/maps/Map1.html Description of the cot–caught merger in the Phonological Atlas
Map of the cot–caught merger before and

Chapter 13 of the ''Atlas of North American English''
which discusses the "short-o" configuration of various American accents

{{DEFAULTSORT:Cot-caught merger
Dialects of English
Splits and mergers in English phonology