Corpus Aristotelicum

The works of Aristotle, sometimes referred to by modern scholars with the Latin phrase ''Corpus Aristotelicum'', is the collection of Aristotle's works that have survived from antiquity.

According to a distinction that originates with Aristotle himself, his writings are divisible into two groups: the " exoteric" and the "esoteric". Most scholars have understood this as a distinction between works Aristotle intended for the public (exoteric), and the more technical works intended for use within the Lyceum (esoteric). Modern scholars commonly assume these latter to be Aristotle's own (unpolished) lecture notes (or in some cases possible notes by his students). However, one classic scholar offers an alternative interpretation. The 5th century neoplatonist Ammonius Hermiae writes that Aristotle's writing style is deliberately obscurantist so that "good people may for that reason stretch their mind even more, whereas empty minds that are lost through carelessness will be put to flight by the obscurity when they encounter sentences like these".

Not all of these works are considered genuine, but differ with respect to their connection to Aristotle, his associates and his views. Some are regarded by most scholars as products of Aristotle's "school" and compiled under his direction or supervision. Other works, such as ''On Colors'', may have been products of Aristotle's successors at the Lyceum, e.g., Theophrastus and Strato of Lampsacus. Still others acquired Aristotle's name through similarities in doctrine or content, such as ''De Plantis'', possibly by Nicolaus of Damascus. A final category, omitted here, includes medieval palmistries, astrological and magical texts whose connection to Aristotle is purely fanciful and self-promotional.

In several of the treatises, there are references to other works in the corpus. Based on such references, some scholars have suggested a possible chronological order for a number of Aristotle's writings. W. D. Ross, for instance, suggested the following broad chronology (which of course leaves out much): ''Categories'', ''Topics'', ''Sophistici Elenchi'', ''Analytics'', ''Metaphysics Δ'', the physical works, the ''Ethics'', and the rest of the ''Metaphysics''. Many modern scholars, however, based simply on lack of evidence, are skeptical of such attempts to determine the chronological order of Aristotle's writings.

History of the works

According to Strabo and Plutarch, after Aristotle's death, his library of writings went to Theophrastus (Aristotle's successor as head of the Lyceum and the Peripatetic school). After the death of Theophrastus, the peripatetic library went to Neleus of Scepsis.

Some time later, the Kingdom of Pergamon began conscripting books for a royal library, and the heirs of Neleus hid their collection in a cellar to prevent it from being seized for that purpose. The library was stored there for about a century and a half, in conditions that were not ideal for document preservation. On the death of Attalus III, which also ended the royal library ambitions, the existence of the Aristotelian library was disclosed, and it was purchased by Apellicon and returned to Athens in about .

Apellicon sought to recover the texts, many of which were seriously degraded at this point due to the conditions in which they were stored. He had them copied out into new manuscripts, and used his best guesswork to fill in the gaps where the originals were unreadable.

When Sulla seized Athens in , he seized the library and transferred it to Rome. There, Andronicus of Rhodes organized the texts into the first complete edition of Aristotle's works (and works attributed to him). The Aristotelian texts we have today are based on these.

Diogenes Laërtius lists, in his '' Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers'' (), works of Aristotle comprising 156 titles divided into approximately 400 books, which he reports as totaling 445,270 lines of writing; however, many of these are lost or only survive in fragments, and some may have been incorrectly attributed.

Aristotle's works by Bekker numbers

Bekker numbers, the standard form of reference to works in the Corpus Aristotelicum, are based on the page numbers used in the Prussian Academy of Sciences edition of the complete works of Aristotle (''Aristotelis Opera edidit Academia Regia Borussica'', Berlin, 1831–1870). They take their name from the editor of that edition, the classical philologist August Immanuel Bekker (1785–1871).

Fragments

Surviving fragments of the many lost works of Aristotle were included in the fifth volume of Bekker's edition, edited by Valentin Rose. These are not cited by Bekker numbers, however, but according to fragment numbers. Rose's first edition of the fragments of Aristotle was ''Aristoteles Pseudepigraphus'' (1863). As the title suggests, Rose considered these all to be spurious. The numeration of the fragments in a revised edition by Rose, published in the Teubner series,
Aristotelis qui ferebantur librorum fragmenta
', Leipzig, 1886, is still commonly used (indicated by ''R³''), although there is a more current edition with a different numeration by Olof Gigon (published in 1987 as a new vol. 3 in Walter de Gruyter's reprint of the Bekker edition), and a new de Gruyter edition by Eckart Schütrumpf is in preparation.

For a selection of the fragments in English translation, see W. D. Ross, ''Select Fragments''
Oxford 1952
, and Jonathan Barnes (ed.), ''The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation'', vol. 2, Princeton 1984, pp. 2384–2465. A new translation exists of the fragments of Aristotle's '' Protrepticus'', by Hutchinson and Johnson (2015).

The works surviving only in fragments include the dialogues ''On Philosophy'' (or ''On the Good''), ''Eudemus'' (or ''On the Soul''), ''On Justice'', and ''On Good Birth''. The possibly spurious work, '' On Ideas'' survives in quotations by Alexander of Aphrodisias in his commentary on Aristotle's ''Metaphysics''. For the dialogues, see also the editions of Richard Rudolf Walzer, ''Aristotelis Dialogorum fragmenta, in usum scholarum'' (Florence 1934), and Renato Laurenti, ''Aristotele: I frammenti dei dialoghi'' (2 vols.), Naples: Luigi Loffredo, 1987. Additionally, the '' Constitution of the Athenians'' (Greek, ''Athenaiōn Politeia''; Latin, ''Atheniensium Respublica'') was not included in Bekker's edition because it was first discovered in 1879.Peter John Rhodes. ''A Commentary on the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia'' (Oxford University Press), 1981, 1993: introduction, pp. 2–5.

Printed editions

Aristotle's works have been published in many printed editions, either as complete editions of all surviving writings or as partial collections. English complete editions include:
* W. D. Ross translation, 12 vols. (Oxford University Press, 1955)
* Jonathan Barnes translation, 2 vols., 1984

Notes

Sources

; Works cited

*
*
*
*

External links

*

The Ancient Catalogues of Aristotle's Writings. A Survey of Current Research


with an annotated bibliography
* Bekker's Prussian Academy of Sciences edition of the complete works of Aristotle at Archive.org
*:
* Lazaris, S. "L'image paradigmatique: des 'Schémas anatomiques' d'Aristote au 'De materia medica' de Dioscoride", Pallas, 93 (2013), p. 131-16
ext. link
* Oxford Translation of ''The Works of Aristotle'' at Archive.org
*:

{{Authority control

4th-century BC books
Aristotle