Continental OL-1430

The Continental XI-1430 ''Hyper engine'' (often identified as the IV-1430) was a liquid-cooled aircraft engine developed in the United States by a partnership between the US Army Air Corps and Continental Motors. It was the "official" result of the USAAC's hyper engine efforts that started in 1932, but never entered widespread production as it was not better than other available engines when it finally matured. In 1939, the I-1430-3 was designated as the engine to power the Curtiss XP-55, an extremely radical (for the time) pusher-engine fighter design that would not reach production.Balzer p 28

Development

In the late 1920s Harry Ricardo wrote a paper on the sleeve valve design that led to the USAAC's hyper engine efforts. He claimed that the 1 hp/in³ goal was impossible to achieve with poppet valve type engines. The USAAC engineering team at Wright Field decided to test this claim by beating it. The I-1430 was the result of an experimental effort at Wright Field to build a high-power cylinder using conventional poppet valves. The engineers, led by Sam Heron, used a variety of techniques to raise the allowable RPM, which was the key to increased power without requiring a larger engine.White p 375

The USAAC was interested in very large bomber designs, and in engines that could be buried in the wings in order to improve streamlining.Balzer p 27 From this requirement they designed a 12-cylinder horizontally opposed engine using twelve separate "hyper" cylinders. Although this sort of arrangement, with entirely separate cylinders from each other and the crankcase, was common for liquid-cooled Central Powers World War I-era inline-6 aviation engines, as in the German Mercedes D.III of nearly two decades earlier – and had been used for the 1918-era Allied Liberty L-12 liquid-cooled aviation engine with significant success – it had fallen from use in favor of engines featuring a monobloc engine design philosophy, with a cylinder block that combined the cylinders and the crankcase, leading to much stiffer engines, that were better able to handle increased power.Neal p 36

The USAAC proposed an engine of about 1200 cubic inches (20 L), hoping the engine's smaller size would lead to reduced drag and hence improved range. By 1932, the USAAC's encouraging efforts led the Army to sign a development contract with Continental Motors Company for the continued development of the engine design. The contract limited Continental's role to construction and testing, leaving the actual engineering development to the Army.White pp 375, 376

A second cylinder was added to Hyper No. 1 to make a horizontal-opposed engine for evaluation of an opposed-piston 12-cylinder engine. After running the modified engine with different combinations of cylinder bore and stroke, it was found that the high coolant temperatures required to maintain the required output were impractical. A third high-performance single-cylinder engine was then constructed with lower operating parameters. This one-cylinder engine was designated "Hyper No. 2", and became the test bed for developing the cylinders that would become the Continental O-1430 ("O" for "opposed") engine. It would require a ten-year development period which changed the layout to first an upright V-12 engine and later, an inverted V-12 engine, before becoming reliable enough to consider for full production as the Continental I-1430 in 1943.White p 376

During development, interest in the "buried engine" concept faded. Improvements in conventional streamlining, notably the NACA cowling, eliminated the need for a buried engine for improved performance. Additionally, with bomber designs like the B-17, using radial engines for power, starting to enter production, the need for new bomber designs became less pressing and the Army turned its attention to new pursuit models. For this role the O-1430 was not terribly useful, so Continental modified the basic design into a V-12, and then into an inverted-V-12, the I-1430.White p 391

Design

The I-1430 featured cylinders with "hemispherical" combustion chambers and, like the 1936-designed Junkers Jumo 211 inverted V12 German aviation powerplant, using twin exhaust valves, with the I-1430 adding sodium-filled exhaust valves in its own multi-valve design. Although it retained separate cylinders, the change to a V-layout allowed the individual cylinder heads to be cast as a single piece. Mounted at either end, a Y-shaped plate provided stiffness, while containing the camshaft drives. Continental built the first I-1430 engine in 1938 and successfully tested it in 1939.Balzer p 28 At the time it was an extremely competitive design, offering at least from a 23-liter displacement; the contemporary Rolls-Royce Merlin offered about from 27 L displacement, while the contemporary German competitor to the 35-litre displacement Junkers Jumo 211 engine, the Daimler-Benz DB 601 inverted V12, offered slightly more power at , but was much larger, at 33 L displacement, with some 19,000 examples produced in its various versions.

While the engine was producing exceptional power for its displacement, the reason it was not put into production may have had to do with its weight. Both the Rolls-Royce/Packard Merlin V-1650 and the Allison V-1710 were in production, with similar power and better Power/Weight Ratios. The V-1710 was 1395 lbs, 385 pounds lighter than I-1430 with a power-to-weight ratio of 1.05. The Merlin V-1650 weighed in at 1640, 25 pounds more than the smaller and unproven Continental with about the same power/weight ratio of about 1.00. It did not seem the XI-1430 would be the solution to any important problem. It was not until 1943 that the IV-1430 was tested extensively in the Lockheed XP-49, a modified version of the P-38 Lightning.Balzer p 28 It was also to be used in the production version of the Bell XP-76, which was canceled before production began.Balzer p 28 In 1944 it was also tested in the McDonnell XP-67.Balzer p 28

Interest in the design had largely disappeared by then; piston engines with the same power or greater ratings were widely available, the Merlin for example had improved tremendously and was offering at least , and the military and aircraft builders were already starting to focus on jet engines.

Only twenty-three I-1430 series engines were delivered, later redesignated the XI-1430 to indicate the purely experimental use.National Museum of the USAF, I-1430 fact sheet

A 24-cylinder H-style engine, the XH-2860, based on the XI-1430 was designed but probably not built.

See also

References

Notes

Bibliography

*
*
*
* Neal, Robert J.; Packard as an Aero Engine Builder – Spark-Ignition Engines: 1923–1939 ''Torque Meter'' Vol. 7 No. 3 Summer 2008 at
Aircraft Engine Historical Society

External links

National Museum of the US Air Force

{{US military piston aeroengines

I-1430
1930s aircraft piston engines
Abandoned military aircraft engine projects of the United States
Inverted V12 aircraft engines