HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

''Colautti v. Franklin'', 439 U.S. 379 (1979), was a
United States Supreme Court The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that involve a point ...
abortion Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy by removal or expulsion of an embryo or fetus. An abortion that occurs without intervention is known as a miscarriage or "spontaneous abortion"; these occur in approximately 30% to 40% of pregn ...
rights case, which held
void for vagueness In American constitutional law, a statute is void for vagueness and unenforceable if it is too vague for the average citizen to understand, and a constitutionally-protected interest cannot tolerate permissible activity to be chilled within the r ...
part of Pennsylvania's 1974 Abortion Control Act. The section in question was the following:
(a) Every person who performs or induces an abortion shall prior thereto have made a determination based on his experience, judgment or professional competence that the fetus is not viable, and if the determination is that the fetus is viable or if there is sufficient reason to believe that the fetus may be viable, shall exercise that degree of professional skill, care and diligence to preserve the life and health of the fetus which such person would be required to exercise in order to preserve the life and health of any fetus intended to be born and not aborted and the abortion technique employed shall be that which would provide the best opportunity for the fetus to be aborted alive so long as a different technique would not be necessary in order to preserve the life or health of the mother.
Doctors who failed to adhere to the provisions of this section were liable to civil and criminal prosecution "as would pertain to him had the fetus been a child who was intended to be born and not aborted." Franklin and others sued, arguing that the provision was both vague and overbroad. In a 6–3 decision written by ''
Roe Roe ( ) or hard roe is the fully ripe internal egg masses in the ovaries, or the released external egg masses, of fish and certain marine animals such as shrimp, scallop, sea urchins and squid. As a seafood, roe is used both as a cooked ing ...
'' author
Harry Blackmun Harry Andrew Blackmun (November 12, 1908 – March 4, 1999) was an American lawyer and jurist who served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1970 to 1994. Appointed by Republican President Richard Nixon, Blac ...
, the Supreme Court agreed, finding that requiring a determination "if... the fetus is viable or if there is sufficient reason to believe the fetus may be viable" was insufficient and impermissibly vague guidance for physicians who might face criminal liability if a jury disagrees with their judgment.


See also

* List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 439 * ''
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth ''Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth'', 428 U.S. 52 (1976), is a Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court case on abortion. The plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of a Missouri statute regulating abo ...
'' (1976), upholding a viability-related statute against allegations of vagueness. * ''
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health ''City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health'', 462 U.S. 416 (1983), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court affirmed its abortion rights jurisprudence. In an opinion by Justice Powell, the ...
'' (1983), struck down an abortion restriction on grounds of unconstitutional vagueness


External links

* {{Abortion United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court United States abortion case law 1979 in United States case law Void for vagueness case law