Description
The chuckmuck is constructed from a stiff leather purse with a thick curved steel striker attached by rivets to its base. The sides and flap of the purse are either sewn or fixed by ornamental metal plates or small plaques. Inside are kept a piece of flint and a little tinder (pulped woody material such as plant roots). On the top fold a thin metal plate with 1 - 3 small hooks allows the pouch to be hung from the belt with a chuckmuck strap: a chain, leather thong or embroidered cloth. Chuckmucks vary in size and decoration, with the circular boss in the centre of the flap, which operates as a hook to keep the purse closed, sometimes being decorated by a semi-precious stone such as coral or turquoise. Other decorations on the mounts are in silver, brass or iron with geometric patterns, floral designs, Tibetan motifs, or in the animal style. The steel striker is occasionally engraved: with two dragons or Chinese characters. The University of Washington database contains a collection of fire steels including early chuckmucks on plates 45-48 from several countries. The chuckmuck is hung from the belt in both Mongolian and Tibetan traditional dress for men and women. For this reason it is sometimes described as aHistory
The container for a flint-and-steel kit can come in two main forms: the tinderbox and the tinder pouch. A fire lighting kit for 'striking a light' was essential until the gradual introduction of the match in the mid 19th century. The form of the chuckmuck is so different from other tinder pouches worldwide that they were separately catalogued by Bryant and May in the 1920s. The decorated stiff leather purse of the chuckmuck with its attached curved striker make it a design classic among flint and steel kits. The chuckmuck design appears in many cultures from the 17th century or earlier, stretching from theEtymology
Chuckmuck is derived via the British Indian word ''chakmak'' from theChuckmuck
For a few decades in mid 19th century, ''chuckmuck'' and ''chakmak'' were used almost interchangeably as the ‘Indian’ word for any type of fire-steel. The first known use of the word ''chuckmuck'' comes from 1843 from British India: ''“the coolness of the British soldier is shewn by his sitting down and lighting his chuckmuck and enjoying the solace of his pipe while the arrows of death were bustling around his ears”''. In central India, north west of Mumbai, a British officer describes a local guide: ''“Round his waist was a broad leather belt, hung round with numerous pouches…and a chuckmuck, or leather bag, with flint, steel and tinder.”'' This would best be described as a tinder pouch, and, that of the pipe smoking soldiers a simple metal tube with striker. A camping book in 1871 details ''"a very convenient and portable means of carrying fire, sold under the name of "strike-a-light" or "chuckmuck"; it is formed of a brass tube of 1in. caliber and 3in. in length, which has a cap and a sliding bottom to it : it is filled of tinder….it contains also a gun flint or bit of agate, and its chain passes through an oval of steel or case-hardened iron”'' costing around a shilling - clearly one of the plethora of short-lived metal tinderbox designs. However, after the 1889 publication of Hindu-koh by Donald Macintyre (VC), a prominent British Gurkha officer, containing the first known illustration and description of a chuckmuck, the word became more strictly defined in academic circles. Macintyre actually made his hunting trip, on which the book is based, in the Himalaya in 1853-4, and was a prominent fellow of the Royal Geographical Society and other Indian societies. The museum categorisation of ''chuckmuck'' dates from this time. After that, all academic descriptions, where they were catalogued in English, used the word to refer to the classic design of the chuckmuck. ''Chakmak'' does not appear to have been used as a descriptive term outside India. ''Chuckmuck'' was defined as an Anglo-Indian word. It continues to be used in books in English about the history of fire-lighting.Chakmak
Catholic missionaries had a presence in Western Tibet from 1624 to 1640. The initial reports of the Jesuit António de Andrade, including dictionaries, were supplemented by many others in the 19th century on the eastern fringes of the Tibetan plateau, leading to an 1899 dictionary citing ''lcags ma'' and ''lcags mag'', pronounced as ''chagmag'', as vulgar slang for ''me lcags'', itself often transliterated as ''mechag''. In Nepal, a traditional kukri features two little knives attached at the back of the sheath. One is called a ''chakmak''. It is blunt on both sides and it works like a knife sharpener or when struck on a limestone creates sparks to start fire. ''Chakmak'', as an Indian word, was widely used in reports and books in British India. ''“In Ladakh both men and women wore in their waste-clothes or girdles a chakmak (or leather case ornamented with brass, containing a flint, steel and tinder)”''. William Moorcroft, extensively catalogued the Himalayan regions around Ladakh in the 1820s, noting ''“Every man carries a knife hanging from his girdle, and a chakmak,or steel for striking a light”''. As he was describing Tibetan dress, these were of the classic chuckmuck design. In 1891 William Woodville Rockhill recorded some of Salar language, an archaic Turkic dialect spoken near Lanzhou between the Tibetan plateau and Mongolia. He derived the Salar word ''cha’-ma'' fromIn other languages
*In Mongolian, ''kete'' *In Japanese, ''hiuchi-bukuro''References
{{Firelighting Tibetan art Tibetan culture Firelighting using percussion Firelighting materials