Chroneme

In linguistics, a chroneme is an abstract phonological suprasegmental feature used to signify contrastive differences in the length of speech sounds. Both consonants and vowels can be viewed as displaying this features. The noun ''chroneme'' is derived , and the suffixed ''eme'', which is analogous to the ''eme'' in ''phoneme'' or ''morpheme''. Two words with different meaning that are spoken exactly the same except for length of one segment are considered a minimal pair. The term was coined by the British phonetician Daniel Jones to avoid using the term ''phoneme'' to characterize a feature above the segmental level.

The term is not widely used today, and in the case of English phonetics, Jones' analysis of long and short vowels (e.g. the of ''bead'' and the of ''bit'' ) as distinguished only by the chroneme is now described as "no longer tenable".

Languages can have differences in length of vowels or consonants, but in most of them these differences aren not used phonemically or phonologically as distinctive or contrastive. Even in those languages which do have phonologically contrastive length, a chroneme is only posited in particular languages. Use of a chroneme views as being composed of two segments: and , whereas in a particular analysis, may be considered a single segment with length being one of its features. This may be compared to the analysis of a diphthong like as a single segment or as the sequence of a vowel and consonant: .

The International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) denotes length by doubling the letter or by diacritics above or after the letters:

By languages

English

General American English does not have minimal pairs indicating the existence of chronemes or may theoretically be said to have only one chroneme. Some other dialects, such as Australian English, have contrastive vowel length, but it is not analysed as the consequence of a chroneme.

Other Indo-European languages

Many Indo-European languages, including Classical Latin, have distinctive length in consonants. For example, in Italian:

or Sicilian:

Distinctive length in vowels may be presented by the cŭ + cū minimal pair in the dialect spoken near Palmi, Calabria (Italy):

Uralic languages

A number of Uralic languages, such as Finnish, Hungarian and Estonian have a distinctive moraic chroneme as a phoneme (also arguably called archiphoneme). For example, ''taka-'' "back-", ''takka'' "fireplace" and ''taakka'' "burden" are unrelated words. It is also grammatically important; the third person marker is a chroneme (''menee'' "s/he goes"), and often in the spoken Finnish of the Helsinki area there are grammatical minimal pairs, e.g. nominative ''Stadi'' "Helsinki" vs. partitive ''Stadii''.

In Finnish, Estonian and Sami languages, there are also two allophonic lengths of the chroneme, ''half-long'' and ''over-long''. For example, Finnish imperative ''anna!'' "give!" has a short vowel, ''oma'' "own" has a half-long vowel, and ''Annaa'' (partitive case of the name Anna) has an overlong vowel (without any distinctive tonal variation to distinguish these three). Estonian and Sami also have a three-way distinction in consonants, e.g. ''lina'' "bed sheet", ''linna'' (half-long 'n') "of the city", ''linna'' (over-long 'n') "to the city". Estonian, in which the phonemic opposition is the strongest, uses tonal contour as a secondary cue to distinguish the two; "over-long" is falling as in other Finnic languages, but "half-long" is rising.

Finnish also denotes stress principally by adding more length (approximately 100 ms) to the vowel of the syllable nucleus. This means that Finnish has five different physical lengths. (The half-long vowel is a phonemically short vowel appearing in the second syllable, if the first—and thus stressed—syllable is a single short vowel.) The unstressed short vowels are about 40 ms in physical duration, the unstressed long vowels about 70 ms. The stress adds about 100 ms, giving short stressed as 130–150 ms and long stressed as 170–180 ms. The half-long vowel, which is always short unstressed, is distinctively longer than the standard 40 ms.

Japanese

Japanese is another language in which vowel length is distinctive. For example, ''biru'' is a foreign loan word (clipped from a longer form) that means "building" whereas ''bīru'' is a foreign loan word for "beer". Using a notion intuitive to a speaker of Japanese, it could be said that more than anything, what differentiates ''bīru'' from ''biru'' is an extra mora (or minimal vowel syllable) in the speech rhythm that signifies a lengthening of the vowel . However, upon observation one might also note a rise in pitch and intensity of the longer vowel. It could be said, also, that vowel lengthening—chronemic contrasts—nearly doubles Japanese's rather small inventory of vowel phonemes (though the occurrence of diphthongs also augments vowel counts). Due to native literacy practices, Japanese long vowels are often thought of as sequences of two vowels of the same quality (rather than one vowel of a greater quantity or length) since that is how they are sometimes written.

In the case of consonants of Japanese, if treated phonemically, a medial consonant might appear to double, thus creating a contrast, for example, between the word ''hiki'' (meaning 'pull' or 'influence') and ''hikki'' (meaning 'writing'). In terms of articulation and phonetics, the difference between the two words would be that, in the latter ''hikki'', the doubled closes the first syllable and is realized in the glottis as glottal plosive stop (with some anticipatory articulation evident in the velum of the mouth, where a is usually made) while starting the next syllable as a articulated and realized as the regular velar sound. In effect, this consonant doubling then adds one mora to the overall speech rhythm and timing. Hence, among other contrasts, the word ''hik-ki'' is felt to be one mora or beat longer than ''hi-ki'' by a speaker of Japanese.

Thai

Thai has distinctive length in vowels. For example:

See also

*
*
*

References

Bibliography

* Suomi, Kari. ''Temporal conspiracies for a tonal end: Segmental durations and accentual f0 movement in a quantity language.'' Journal of Phonetics, Volume 33, Issue 3, July 2005, pp. 291–309.
Phonetics of Finnish: Quantity and duration of vowels & consonants

External links

*

{{Suprasegmentals

Phonology