Chandrasekhar–Wentzel Lemma
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
vector calculus Vector calculus or vector analysis is a branch of mathematics concerned with the differentiation and integration of vector fields, primarily in three-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb^3. The term ''vector calculus'' is sometimes used as a ...
, Chandrasekhar–Wentzel lemma was derived by
Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar (; 19 October 1910 – 21 August 1995) was an Indian Americans, Indian-American theoretical physicist who made significant contributions to the scientific knowledge about the structure of stars, stellar evolution and ...
and
Gregor Wentzel Gregor Wentzel (17 February 1898 – 12 August 1978) was a German physicist known for development of quantum mechanics. Wentzel, Hendrik Kramers, and Léon Brillouin developed the Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin approximation in 1926. In his early y ...
in 1965, while studying the stability of rotating liquid drop. The lemma states that ''if \mathbf S is a surface bounded by a simple closed contour C, then'' :\mathbf L = \oint_C \mathbf x\times(d\mathbf x\times\mathbf n) = -\int_(\mathbf x\times\mathbf n)\nabla\cdot\mathbf n\ dS. Here \mathbf x is the position vector and \mathbf n is the unit normal on the surface. An immediate consequence is that if \mathbf S is a closed surface, then the line integral tends to zero, leading to the result, : \int_(\mathbf x\times\mathbf n)\nabla\cdot\mathbf n\ dS =0, or, in index notation, we have :\int_x_j\nabla\cdot\mathbf n\ dS_k = \int_ x_k \nabla \cdot \mathbf n\ dS_j. That is to say the tensor :T_ = \int_x_j\nabla\cdot\mathbf n\ dS_i defined on a closed surface is always symmetric, i.e., T_=T_.


Proof

Let us write the vector in index notation, but
summation convention In mathematics, especially the usage of linear algebra in mathematical physics and differential geometry, Einstein notation (also known as the Einstein summation convention or Einstein summation notation) is a notational convention that implies s ...
will be avoided throughout the proof. Then the left hand side can be written as :L_i = \oint_C x_i(n_jx_j+n_kx_k) + dx_j(-n_ix_j)+dx_k(-n_ix_k) Converting the line integral to surface integral using Stokes's theorem, we get :L_i = \int_ \left\\ dS. Carrying out the requisite differentiation and after some rearrangement, we get :L_i = \int_ \left \fracx_k\frac(n_i^2+n_k^2) + \frac x_j\frac(n_i^2+n_j^2)+n_jx_k\left(\frac + \frac\right) - n_kx_j \left(\frac + \frac\right)\right dS, or, in other words, :L_i = \int_ \left \mathbf n, ^2 - (x_jn_k-x_kn_j)\nabla\cdot\mathbf n\right dS. And since , \mathbf n, ^2=1, we have :L_i = - \int_(x_jn_k-x_kn_j)\nabla\cdot\mathbf n\ dS, thus proving the lemma.


References

{{DEFAULTSORT:Chandrasekhar-Wentzel lemma Vector calculus