B41 Nuclear Bomb
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

The B-41 (also known as Mk-41) was a
thermonuclear weapon A thermonuclear weapon, fusion weapon or hydrogen bomb (H-bomb) is a second-generation nuclear weapon design. Its greater sophistication affords it vastly greater destructive power than first-generation nuclear bombs, a more compact size, a lowe ...
deployed by the United States
Strategic Air Command Strategic Air Command (SAC) was a United States Department of Defense Specified Command and a United States Air Force (USAF) Major Command responsible for command and control of the strategic bomber and intercontinental ballistic missile compon ...
in the early 1960s. It was the most powerful nuclear bomb ever developed by the United States, with a maximum yield of . A top secret document (DCI Briefing to the JCS, 1963), states “The US has stockpiled bombs of 9 MT and 23 MT...” which would likely be referring to the actual yield(s). The B-41 was the only three-stage thermonuclear weapon fielded by the U.S.The B-41 (Mk-41) Bomb
Nuclear Weapon Archive. (accessed April 8, 2015).


History

In June 1955, the
US Department of Defense The United States Department of Defense (DoD, USDOD, or DOD) is an executive department of the U.S. federal government charged with coordinating and supervising the six U.S. armed services: the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, Space Force, ...
requested a feasibility study for a Class B (over weight) bomb and warhead. By mid-1956, US Air Force Strategic Air Command produced a requirement for a Class B bomb, while the DoD produced a requirement for a Class B warhead. The University of California's Radiation Laboratory (now
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) is a Federally funded research and development centers, federally funded research and development center in Livermore, California, United States. Originally established in 1952, the laboratory now i ...
) proposed the use of the existing Bassoon device that was test fired in the Zuni and Tewa shots of Operation Redwing. Stockpiling of this new weapon was planned for January 1959. Dirty and clean (low fission fraction) versions of the device were proposed, with the clean version being dependent on a nuclear test in Operation Hardtack I. The nomenclature of TX-41 and XW-41 was assigned to the weapon in November 1956, and in December plans were made to conduct drop tests of the weapon from the B-47 bomber. A laydown version of the bomb was requested, however development of such a weapon would add 1 to 2 more years to its development. A non-laydown weapon was subsequently requested. The weapon's military characteristics were approved in February 1957. The weapon was to be carried by the B-47, B-52, B-66 and systems 110A and 125A. The bomb would be able to withstand without damage the various flight stresses. Fuzing would include contact and air-burst modes, and would be selectable in flight. Contact fuzing would act as a backup for airburst fuzing and a parachute to slow the rate of fall would be developed. Compatibility with the Navaho missile and B-58 bomb pod was also requested. By March 1957, it was decided to place equal emphasis on the clean and dirty versions of the weapon. By this point the weapon was to be in diameter, with a warhead length of and weight of , while the bomb was to have a length of and weigh . Compatibility with the B-58 was canceled in May 1957, and the warhead version of the weapon was canceled in July 1957. In July 1957, tests of the contact fuze were made by firing shells through the nose of the bomb. These tests showed that there was sufficient time between contact and the firing signal being sent for the fuze design to work correctly. In August 1957, the primary of the device in a device mockup was tested during shot Smoky of Operation Plumbbob, yielding . The device was subsequently tested in shots Sycamore, Poplar and Pine of Hardtack I in 1958. Sycamore, a clean test, was a fizzle, producing only instead of the predicted . Poplar was a retest of Sycamore with a predicted yield of and only fission yield. The actual yield was . Pine was a three-stage variant of the clean device, with a predicted yield of , but the test only yielded . In June 1958, the requirement to be able to select air and ground burst fuzing modes from the cockpit was canceled. This change meant that fuzing selection had to be made on the ground before takeoff. In August 1958, the first production date for the weapon slipped to May 1960. Issues with the weapon now meant that compatibility was limited to the B-47 and B-52 bombers. Compatibility with the B-70 would require significant changes to the aircraft. Further, due to the new emphasis on low level releases to avoid radar detection and due to the fact that the TX-41 could only be dropped from high altitude, the question of continuing the program was raised. One item raised in support of continuing the program was that the bomb could replace the Mark 36 bomb. Another proposal was to delay the program and include a full-fuzing (FUFO) capability into the weapon that would allow for laydown delivery. However, in September 1958, the Radiation Laboratory and Sandia informed Field Command that to add FUFO to the weapon would require a completely new weapon, including nuclear testing. In November 1958 it was decided that the weapon would always be deployed in the parachute retarded condition, and thus an option selector switch was no longer needed. In December, Sandia raised issues with the safety of the weapon and proposed additional safing devices. This was provided with additional switches in the aircraft monitor station. In January 1959, the previous decision to only use parachute retarded fuzing was reversed and it was asked to reinstate the fuzing selector. Pilot production of the weapon was authorised in April 1959 and full production authorised in September 1959. Early production of the Mark 41 Mod 0 was achieved in September 1960 and production continued until June 1962. Approximately 500 bombs were produced. The weapon was replaced by the more versatile B53 bomb between November 1963 and July 1976.


Design

The weapon was long, with a body diameter of . It weighed . It was carried only by the
B-52 Stratofortress The Boeing B-52 Stratofortress is an American long-range, subsonic aircraft, subsonic, jet-powered strategic bomber. The B-52 was designed and built by Boeing, which has continued to provide support and upgrades. It has been operated by the ...
and
B-47 Stratojet The Boeing B-47 Stratojet (Boeing company designation Model 450) is a retired American long- range, six-engined, turbojet-powered strategic bomber designed to fly at high subsonic speed and at high altitude to avoid enemy interceptor aircraft ...
. It could be deployed in free-fall or retarded free-fall, and had both air burst and ground burst fuzing. The weapon did not have a laydown fuzing capability as the design of the physics package did not make that possible without extensive redesign and further nuclear testing. The B-41 was the only three-stage thermonuclear weapon fielded by the US. Two versions were deployed: The Mk-41Y1, a yield, dirty version with a tertiary stage encased with U-238 (
natural uranium Natural uranium (NU or Unat) is uranium with the same isotopic ratio as found in nature. It contains 0.711% uranium-235, 99.284% uranium-238, and a trace of uranium-234 by weight (0.0055%). Approximately 2.2% of its radioactivity comes from ura ...
); and the Mk-41Y2, a yield, clean version with a lead-encased tertiary. It was the highest-yield nuclear weapon ever fielded by the United States, and had the highest publicly known yield-to-weight ratio of any weapon.


Efficiency

During its operational lifetime, the B-41 was the most efficient known thermonuclear weapon in terms of yield to actual weight, with a ratio (based on a yield). Its blast yield was to that of the '' AN602 Tsar Bomba'', which delivered a blast of , depending on its own configuration as a clean or dirty bomb. However even at the Tsar Bomb's theoretical maximum yield of , it would still only achieve a yield to weight ratio of ~ , thus the B-41 has the highest yield to weight ratio of any weapon ever created.


W41 warhead

In November 1956, development of the W41, a
warhead A warhead is the section of a device that contains the explosive agent or toxic (biological, chemical, or nuclear) material that is delivered by a missile, rocket (weapon), rocket, torpedo, or bomb. Classification Types of warheads include: *E ...
version of the B41, began at
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) is a Federally funded research and development centers, federally funded research and development center in Livermore, California, United States. Originally established in 1952, the laboratory now i ...
. Investigated as a possible warhead for the SM-64 Navaho, a cruise missile then in development, work on the warhead continued through July 1957, when the project was canceled.


Gallery

File:B41 Dominic 1.jpg File:B41 Dominic 2.jpg File:B41 Dominic 3.jpg


See also

* List of nuclear weapons *
Nuclear weapon yield The explosive yield of a nuclear weapon is the amount of energy released such as blast, thermal, and nuclear radiation, when that particular nuclear weapon is detonated. It is usually expressed as a ''TNT equivalent'', the standardized equivalen ...


Notes


References

{{United States nuclear devices Cold War aerial bombs of the United States Nuclear bombs of the United States Military equipment introduced in the 1960s