Origins
Apocalyptic elements can be detected in the prophetic books of Joel and Zechariah, while Isaiah chapters 24–27 and 33 present well-developed apocalypses. The second half of the Book of Daniel (chs. 7–12) offers a fully matured and classic example of this genre of literature.Unfulfilled prophecy
The non-fulfillment of prophecies served to popularize the methods of apocalyptic in comparison with the non-fulfillment of the advent of the Messianic kingdom. Thus, though Jeremiah had promised that after seventy years Israelites should be restored to their own land, and then enjoy the blessings of the Messianic kingdom under the Messianic king, this period passed by and things remained as of old. Some believe that the Messianic kingdom was not necessarily predicted to occur at the end of the seventy years of the Babylonian exile, but at some unspecified time in the future. The only thing for certain that was predicted was the return of the Jews to their land, which occurred when Cyrus the Persian conquered Babylon in . Thus, the fulfillment of the Messianic kingdom remained in the future for the Jews. Haggai and Zechariah explained the delay by the failure of Judah to rebuild the temple, and so hope of the kingdom persisted, until in the first half of the 2nd century the delay is explained in the Books of Daniel and Enoch as due not to man's shortcomings but to the counsels of God. Regarding the 70 years of exile predicted in Jeremiah 29:10, the Jews were first exiled in 605 BCE in the reign of king Jehoiakim and were allowed to return to their land in c. 536 BCE when King Cyrus conquered Babylon. This period was approximately 70 years, as prophesied by Jeremiah. Others connect the 70 years of Jeremiah with the 70 weeks of years mentioned by the angel in Daniel 9. Enoch 85 interprets the 70 years of Jeremiah as the 70 successive reigns of the 70 angelic patrons of the nations, which are to come to a close in his own generation. The Book of Enoch, however, was not considered inspired Scripture by the Jews, so that any failed prophecy in it is of no consequence to the Jewish faith. The Greek empire of the East was overthrown by Rome, and prompted a new interpretation of Daniel. The fourth and last empire was declared to be Roman by the Apocalypse of Baruch chapters 36–40 and 4 Ezra 10:60–12:35. Again, these two books were not considered inspired Scripture by the Jews, and thus were not authoritative on matters of prophecy. In addition, earlier in Daniel chapter 7 and also in chapter 2, the fourth world empire is considered to be Rome since Babylon, Medo-Persia (Traditions
Another source of apocalyptic thought was primitive mythological and cosmological traditions, in which the eye of the seer could see the secrets of the future. Thus the six days of the world's creation, followed by a seventh of rest, were regarded as at once a history of the past and a forecasting of the future. As the world was made in six days its history would be accomplished in six thousand years, since each day with God was as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day; and as the six days of creation were followed by one of rest, so the six thousand years of the world's history would be followed by a rest of a thousand years.Object and contents
The object of this literature in general was to reconcile the righteousness of God with the suffering condition of His righteous servants on earth. EarlyComparison to prophecy
Message
Some may distinguish between the messages of the prophets and the messages of proto-apocalyptic and apocalyptic literature by saying that the message of the prophets was primarily a preaching of repentance and righteousness needed for the nation to escape judgment; the message of the apocalyptic writers was of patience and trust for that deliverance and reward were sure to come. Neither the prophets nor the apocalyptic authors are without conflict between their messages, however, and there are significant similarities between prophecy and apocalyptic writings. Apocalyptic literature shares with prophecy revelation through the use of visions and dreams, and these often combine reality and fantasy. In both cases, a heavenly interpreter is often provided to the receiver so that he may understand the many complexities of what he has seen. The oracles in Amos, Hosea, First Isaiah, and Jeremiah give a clear sense of how messages of imminent punishment develop into the later proto-apocalyptic literature, and eventually into the thoroughly apocalyptic literature of Daniel 7–12. The fully apocalyptic visions in Daniel 7–12, as well as those in the New Testament's Revelation, can trace their roots to the pre-exilic latter biblical prophets; the sixth century BCE prophets Ezekiel, Isaiah 40–55 and 56–66, Haggai 2, and Zechariah 1–8 show a transition phase between prophecy and apocalyptic literature.Dualistic theology
Prophecy believes that this world is God's world and that in this world His goodness and truth will yet be vindicated. Hence the prophet prophesies of a definite future arising out of and organically connected with the present. The apocalyptic writer despairs of the present and directs his hopes to the future, to a new world standing in essential opposition to the present. This becomes a dualistic principle, which, though it can largely be accounted for by the interaction of certain inner tendencies and outward sorrowful experience on the part of Judaism, may ultimately be derived from Mazdean influences. This principle, which shows itself in the conception that the various nations are under angelic rulers, who are in a greater or less degree in rebellion against God, as in Daniel and Enoch, grows in strength with each succeeding age, till at last Satan is conceived as "the ruler of this world" or "the god of this age."Conception of history
Apocalyptic writing took a wider view of the world's history than did prophecy. Whereas prophecy had to deal with governments of other nations, apocalyptic writings arose at a time when Israel had been subject for generations to the sway of one or other of the great world-powers. Hence to harmonize Israel's difficulties with belief in God's righteousness, apocalyptic writing had to encompass such events in the counsels of God, the rise, duration and the downfall of each empire in turn, until, finally the lordship of the world passed into the hands of Israel, or the final judgment arrived. These events belonged in the main to the past, but the writer represented them as still in the future, arranged under certain artificial categories of time definitely determined from the beginning in the counsels of God and revealed by Him to His servants, the prophets.Hebrew Bible
Characteristics
TheCanonical
Proto-apocalyptic
* Isaiah 24–27; 33; 34–35 *Apocalyptic
* Daniel 7–12 Some are possibly falsely attributed works ( pseudepigraphic) except for the passages from Ezekiel and Joel. Of the remaining passages and books, some consider large sections of Daniel attributable to the Maccabean period, with the rest possibly to the same period. Some consider Isaiah 33 to be written about 163 BCE; Bernhard Duhm, ''Das Buch Jesaia übersetzt und erklärt'', Göttingen 1902 (second edition), and Karl Marti. Zechariah 12–14 about 160 BCE; Isaiah 24–27 about 128 BCE; and Isaiah 34–35 sometime in the reign ofNon-canonical
* 1 Enoch (although considered to be a deuterocanonical text within the Beta Israel Jewish community) * 2 Enoch * 3 Enoch * Apocalypse of Abraham * Apocalypse of Adam * Apocalypse of Moses * Apocalypse of Sedrach * Apocalypse of Zephaniah * Apocalypse of Zerubbabel * Aramaic Apocalypse * Gabriel's Revelation * Genesis Apocryphon *New Testament
In the transition from Jewish literature to that of early Christianity, there is a continuation of the tradition of apocalyptic prophecy. Christianity preserved the Jewish apocalyptic tradition (as Judaism developed into Rabbinism) and gave it a Christian character by a systematic process of interpolation. Christianity cultivated this form of literature and made it the vehicle of its own ideas. Christianity saw itself as the spiritual representative of what was true in prophecy and apocalyptic.Canonical
* Matthew 24 * The Sheep and the Goats * Mark 13 * 2 Thessalonians 2 * 1 Timothy 4 * 2 Peter 3 *Jude 14-15 * Book of RevelationNon-canonical
* Apocalypse of Golias * Apocalypse of Paul * Apocalypse of Peter * Apocalypse of Pseudo-Methodius * Apocalypse of Samuel of Kalamoun * Apocalypse of Stephen * Apocalypse of Thomas * Coptic Apocalypse of ElijahGnostic
* Gnostic Apocalypse of Peter * First Apocalypse of James * Second Apocalypse of James * Coptic Apocalypse of PaulSee also
* ''Apocalypse'' Series * Apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic fiction * Apocalypticism *Notes
References
* * Charlesworth, James H. ed., ''The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha'', Vol. 1: ''Apocalyptic Literature and Testaments'', Gsrden City, New York: Doubleday & Co., 1983. * Collins, John Joseph ''The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to Jewish Apocalyptic Literature'', (The Biblical Resource Series), Grand Rapids: Eerdman, 1998 (second edition). * Coogan, Michael ''A Brief Introduction to the Old Testament'', Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009. * Cook, David, ''Contemporary Muslim Apocalyptic Literature'' (Religion and Politics), Syracure, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2005. * Cook, Stephen L., ''The Apocalyptic Literature: Interpreting Biblical Texts'', Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2003. * Frye, Northrop, 1957. ''Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays'', Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1957. * Goswiller, Richard, ''Revelation'', Pacific Study Series, Melbourne, 1987. * Reddish, Mitchell G. ''Apocalyptic Literature: A Reader'', Peabody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson Publishers, 1998.External links
* (Thorough historical introduction). * (A coincise introduction to the Apocalypse of John) * * (sourced in {{DEFAULTSORT:Apocalyptic Literature Apocrypha Christian literary genres Literary genres Religious literature