Adjunction Formula
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
mathematics Mathematics is a field of study that discovers and organizes methods, Mathematical theory, theories and theorems that are developed and Mathematical proof, proved for the needs of empirical sciences and mathematics itself. There are many ar ...
, especially in
algebraic geometry Algebraic geometry is a branch of mathematics which uses abstract algebraic techniques, mainly from commutative algebra, to solve geometry, geometrical problems. Classically, it studies zero of a function, zeros of multivariate polynomials; th ...
and the theory of complex manifolds, the adjunction formula relates the
canonical bundle In mathematics, the canonical bundle of a non-singular algebraic variety V of dimension n over a field is the line bundle \,\!\Omega^n = \omega, which is the nth exterior power of the cotangent bundle \Omega on V. Over the complex numbers, it is ...
of a variety and a
hypersurface In geometry, a hypersurface is a generalization of the concepts of hyperplane, plane curve, and surface. A hypersurface is a manifold or an algebraic variety of dimension , which is embedded in an ambient space of dimension , generally a Euclidea ...
inside that variety. It is often used to deduce facts about varieties embedded in well-behaved spaces such as
projective space In mathematics, the concept of a projective space originated from the visual effect of perspective, where parallel lines seem to meet ''at infinity''. A projective space may thus be viewed as the extension of a Euclidean space, or, more generally ...
or to prove theorems by induction.


Adjunction for smooth varieties


Formula for a smooth subvariety

Let ''X'' be a smooth algebraic variety or smooth complex manifold and ''Y'' be a smooth subvariety of ''X''. Denote the inclusion map by ''i'' and the
ideal sheaf In algebraic geometry and other areas of mathematics, an ideal sheaf (or sheaf of ideals) is the global analogue of an ideal (ring theory), ideal in a ring (mathematics), ring. The ideal sheaves on a geometric object are closely connected to its sub ...
of ''Y'' in ''X'' by \mathcal. The conormal exact sequence for ''i'' is :0 \to \mathcal/\mathcal^2 \to i^*\Omega_X \to \Omega_Y \to 0, where Ω denotes a
cotangent bundle In mathematics, especially differential geometry, the cotangent bundle of a smooth manifold is the vector bundle of all the cotangent spaces at every point in the manifold. It may be described also as the dual bundle to the tangent bundle. This m ...
. The determinant of this exact sequence is a natural isomorphism :\omega_Y = i^*\omega_X \otimes \operatorname(\mathcal/\mathcal^2)^\vee, where \vee denotes the dual of a line bundle.


The particular case of a smooth divisor

Suppose that ''D'' is a smooth
divisor In mathematics, a divisor of an integer n, also called a factor of n, is an integer m that may be multiplied by some integer to produce n. In this case, one also says that n is a '' multiple'' of m. An integer n is divisible or evenly divisibl ...
on ''X''. Its
normal bundle In differential geometry, a field of mathematics, a normal bundle is a particular kind of vector bundle, complementary to the tangent bundle, and coming from an embedding (or immersion). Definition Riemannian manifold Let (M,g) be a Riemannian ...
extends to a
line bundle In mathematics, a line bundle expresses the concept of a line that varies from point to point of a space. For example, a curve in the plane having a tangent line at each point determines a varying line: the ''tangent bundle'' is a way of organis ...
\mathcal(D) on ''X'', and the ideal sheaf of ''D'' corresponds to its dual \mathcal(-D). The conormal bundle \mathcal/\mathcal^2 is i^*\mathcal(-D), which, combined with the formula above, gives :\omega_D = i^*(\omega_X \otimes \mathcal(D)). In terms of canonical classes, this says that :K_D = (K_X + D), _D. Both of these two formulas are called the adjunction formula.


Examples


Degree d hypersurfaces

Given a smooth degree d hypersurface i: X \hookrightarrow \mathbb^n_S we can compute its canonical and anti-canonical bundles using the adjunction formula. This reads as
\omega_X \cong i^*\omega_\otimes \mathcal_X(d)
which is isomorphic to \mathcal_X(-n1d).


Complete intersections

For a smooth complete intersection i: X \hookrightarrow \mathbb^n_S of degrees (d_1, d_2), the conormal bundle \mathcal/\mathcal^2 is isomorphic to \mathcal(-d_1)\oplus \mathcal(-d_2), so the determinant bundle is \mathcal(-d_1d_2) and its dual is \mathcal(d_1d_2), showing
\omega_X \,\cong\, \mathcal_X(-n1)\otimes \mathcal_X(d_1d_2) \,\cong\, \mathcal_X(-n1 d_1 d_2).
This generalizes in the same fashion for all complete intersections.


Curves in a quadric surface

\mathbb^1\times\mathbb^1 embeds into \mathbb^3 as a quadric surface given by the vanishing locus of a quadratic polynomial coming from a non-singular symmetric matrix. We can then restrict our attention to curves on Y= \mathbb^1\times\mathbb^1. We can compute the cotangent bundle of Y using the direct sum of the cotangent bundles on each \mathbb^1, so it is \mathcal(-2,0)\oplus\mathcal(0,-2). Then, the canonical sheaf is given by \mathcal(-2,-2), which can be found using the decomposition of wedges of direct sums of vector bundles. Then, using the adjunction formula, a curve defined by the vanishing locus of a section f \in \Gamma(\mathcal(a,b)), can be computed as : \omega_C \,\cong\, \mathcal(-2,-2)\otimes \mathcal_C(a,b) \,\cong\, \mathcal_C(a2, b2).


Poincaré residue

The restriction map \omega_X \otimes \mathcal(D) \to \omega_D is called the Poincaré residue. Suppose that ''X'' is a complex manifold. Then on sections, the Poincaré residue can be expressed as follows. Fix an open set ''U'' on which ''D'' is given by the vanishing of a function ''f''. Any section over ''U'' of \mathcal(D) can be written as ''s''/''f'', where ''s'' is a holomorphic function on ''U''. Let η be a section over ''U'' of ω''X''. The Poincaré residue is the map :\eta \otimes \frac \mapsto s\frac\bigg, _, that is, it is formed by applying the vector field ∂/∂''f'' to the volume form η, then multiplying by the holomorphic function ''s''. If ''U'' admits local coordinates ''z''1, ..., ''z''''n'' such that for some ''i'', ∂''f''/∂''z''''i'' ≠ 0, then this can also be expressed as :\frac \mapsto (-1)^\frac\bigg, _. Another way of viewing Poincaré residue first reinterprets the adjunction formula as an isomorphism :\omega_D \otimes i^*\mathcal(-D) = i^*\omega_X. On an open set ''U'' as before, a section of i^*\mathcal(-D) is the product of a holomorphic function ''s'' with the form . The Poincaré residue is the map that takes the wedge product of a section of ω''D'' and a section of i^*\mathcal(-D).


Inversion of adjunction

The adjunction formula is false when the conormal exact sequence is not a short exact sequence. However, it is possible to use this failure to relate the singularities of ''X'' with the singularities of ''D''. Theorems of this type are called inversion of adjunction. They are an important tool in modern birational geometry.


The Canonical Divisor of a Plane Curve

Let C \subset \mathbf^2 be a smooth plane curve cut out by a degree d homogeneous polynomial F(X, Y, Z). We claim that the canonical divisor is K = (d-3) \cap H/math> where H is the hyperplane divisor. First work in the affine chart Z \neq 0. The equation becomes f(x, y) = F(x, y, 1) = 0 where x = X/Z and y = Y/Z. We will explicitly compute the divisor of the differential :\omega := \frac = \frac. At any point (x_0, y_0) either \partial f / \partial y \neq 0 so x - x_0 is a local parameter or \partial f / \partial x \neq 0 so y - y_0 is a local parameter. In both cases the order of vanishing of \omega at the point is zero. Thus all contributions to the divisor \text(\omega) are at the line at infinity, Z = 0. Now look on the line . Assume that , 0, 0\not\in C so it suffices to look in the chart Y \neq 0 with coordinates u = 1/y and v = x/y. The equation of the curve becomes :g(u, v) = F(v, 1, u) = F(x/y, 1, 1/y) = y^F(x, y, 1) = y^f(x, y). Hence : \partial f/\partial x = y^d \frac \frac = y^\frac so :\omega = \frac = \frac \frac = u^ \frac with order of vanishing \nu_p(\omega) = (d-3)\nu_p(u). Hence \text(\omega) = (d-3) \cap \/math> which agrees with the adjunction formula.


Applications to curves

The genus-degree formula for plane curves can be deduced from the adjunction formula. Let ''C'' ⊂ P2 be a smooth plane curve of degree ''d'' and genus ''g''. Let ''H'' be the class of a hyperplane in P2, that is, the class of a line. The canonical class of P2 is −3''H''. Consequently, the adjunction formula says that the restriction of to ''C'' equals the canonical class of ''C''. This restriction is the same as the intersection product restricted to ''C'', and so the degree of the canonical class of ''C'' is . By the
Riemann–Roch theorem The Riemann–Roch theorem is an important theorem in mathematics, specifically in complex analysis and algebraic geometry, for the computation of the dimension of the space of meromorphic functions with prescribed zeros and allowed poles. It re ...
, ''g'' − 1 = (''d''−3)''d'' − ''g'' + 1, which implies the formula :g = \tfrac12(d 1)(d 2). Similarly, if ''C'' is a smooth curve on the quadric surface P1×P1 with bidegree (''d''1,''d''2) (meaning ''d''1,''d''2 are its intersection degrees with a fiber of each projection to P1), since the canonical class of P1×P1 has bidegree (−2,−2), the adjunction formula shows that the canonical class of ''C'' is the intersection product of divisors of bidegrees (''d''1,''d''2) and (''d''1−2,''d''2−2). The intersection form on P1×P1 is ((d_1,d_2),(e_1,e_2))\mapsto d_1 e_2 + d_2 e_1 by definition of the bidegree and by bilinearity, so applying Riemann–Roch gives 2g-2 = d_1(d_22) + d_2(d_12) or :g = (d_1 1)(d_2 1) \,=\, d_1 d_2 - d_1 - d_2 + 1. The genus of a curve ''C'' which is the
complete intersection In mathematics, an algebraic variety ''V'' in projective space is a complete intersection if the ideal of ''V'' is generated by exactly ''codim V'' elements. That is, if ''V'' has dimension ''m'' and lies in projective space ''P'n'', there s ...
of two surfaces ''D'' and ''E'' in P3 can also be computed using the adjunction formula. Suppose that ''d'' and ''e'' are the degrees of ''D'' and ''E'', respectively. Applying the adjunction formula to ''D'' shows that its canonical divisor is , which is the intersection product of and ''D''. Doing this again with ''E'', which is possible because ''C'' is a complete intersection, shows that the canonical divisor ''C'' is the product , that is, it has degree . By the Riemann–Roch theorem, this implies that the genus of ''C'' is :g = de(d + e - 4) / 2 + 1. More generally, if ''C'' is the complete intersection of hypersurfaces of degrees in P''n'', then an inductive computation shows that the canonical class of ''C'' is (d_1 + \cdots + d_ - n - 1)d_1 \cdots d_ H^. The Riemann–Roch theorem implies that the genus of this curve is :g = 1 + \tfrac(d_1 + \cdots + d_ - n - 1)d_1 \cdots d_.


In low dimensional topology

Let ''S'' be a complex surface (in particular a 4-dimensional manifold) and let C\to S be a smooth (non-singular) connected complex curve. ThenGompf, Stipsicz, Theorem 1.4.17 2g(C)-2= 2-c_1(S) /math> where g(C) is the genus of ''C'', 2 denotes the self-intersections and c_1(S) /math> denotes the Kronecker pairing .


See also

* Logarithmic form * Poincare residue * Thom conjecture


References

* ''Intersection theory'' 2nd edition, William Fulton, Springer, , Example 3.2.12. * ''Principles of algebraic geometry'', Griffiths and Harris, Wiley classics library, pp 146–147. * ''Algebraic geometry'',
Robin Hartshorne __NOTOC__ Robin Cope Hartshorne ( ; born March 15, 1938) is an American mathematician who is known for his work in algebraic geometry. Career Hartshorne was a Putnam Fellow in Fall 1958 while he was an undergraduate at Harvard University (under ...
, Springer GTM 52, , Proposition II.8.20. {{DEFAULTSORT:Adjunction Formula (Algebraic Geometry) Algebraic geometry