HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
algebraic geometry Algebraic geometry is a branch of mathematics, classically studying zeros of multivariate polynomials. Modern algebraic geometry is based on the use of abstract algebraic techniques, mainly from commutative algebra, for solving geometrical ...
, a branch of
mathematics Mathematics is an area of knowledge that includes the topics of numbers, formulas and related structures, shapes and the spaces in which they are contained, and quantities and their changes. These topics are represented in modern mathematics ...
, an adequate equivalence relation is an
equivalence relation In mathematics, an equivalence relation is a binary relation that is reflexive, symmetric and transitive. The equipollence relation between line segments in geometry is a common example of an equivalence relation. Each equivalence relation ...
on algebraic cycles of smooth projective varieties used to obtain a well-working theory of such cycles, and in particular, well-defined intersection products. Pierre Samuel formalized the concept of an adequate equivalence relation in 1958. Since then it has become central to theory of motives. For every adequate equivalence relation, one may define the category of pure motives with respect to that relation. Possible (and useful) adequate equivalence relations include ''rational'', ''algebraic'', ''homological'' and ''numerical equivalence''. They are called "adequate" because dividing out by the equivalence relation is functorial, i.e. push-forward (with change of codimension) and pull-back of cycles is well-defined. Codimension 1 cycles modulo rational equivalence form the classical group of divisors modulo linear equivalence. All cycles modulo rational equivalence form the Chow ring.


Definition

Let ''Z''*(''X'') := Z 'X''be the free abelian group on the algebraic cycles of ''X''. Then an adequate equivalence relation is a family of
equivalence relation In mathematics, an equivalence relation is a binary relation that is reflexive, symmetric and transitive. The equipollence relation between line segments in geometry is a common example of an equivalence relation. Each equivalence relation ...
s, ''∼X'' on ''Z''*(''X''), one for each smooth projective variety ''X'', satisfying the following three conditions: # (Linearity) The equivalence relation is compatible with addition of cycles. # (
Moving lemma In algebraic geometry, Chow's moving lemma, proved by , states: given algebraic cycles ''Y'', ''Z'' on a nonsingular quasi-projective variety ''X'', there is another algebraic cycle ''Z' '' on ''X'' such that ''Z' '' is rationally equivalent In al ...
) If \alpha, \beta \in Z^(X) are cycles on ''X'', then there exists a cycle \alpha' \in Z^(X) such that \alpha ''~X'' \alpha' and \alpha' intersects \beta properly. # (Push-forwards) Let \alpha \in Z^(X) and \beta \in Z^(X \times Y) be cycles such that \beta intersects \alpha \times Y properly. If \alpha ''~X'' 0, then (\pi_Y)_(\beta \cdot (\alpha \times Y)) ''~Y'' 0, where \pi_Y : X \times Y \to Y is the projection. The push-forward cycle in the last axiom is often denoted :\beta(\alpha) := (\pi_Y)_(\beta \cdot (\alpha \times Y)) If \beta is the graph of a function, then this reduces to the push-forward of the function. The generalizations of functions from ''X'' to ''Y'' to cycles on ''X × Y'' are known as correspondences. The last axiom allows us to push forward cycles by a correspondence.


Examples of equivalence relations

The most common equivalence relations, listed from strongest to weakest, are gathered in the following table.


Notes


References

* * {{DEFAULTSORT:Adequate Equivalence Relation Algebraic geometry Equivalence (mathematics)