HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In computational complexity theory, PSPACE is the set of all decision problems that can be solved by a Turing machine using a polynomial amount of space.


Formal definition

If we denote by SPACE(''t''(''n'')), the set of all problems that can be solved by Turing machines using ''O''(''t''(''n'')) space for some function ''t'' of the input size ''n'', then we can define PSPACE formally asArora & Barak (2009) p.81 :\mathsf = \bigcup_ \mathsf(n^k). PSPACE is a strict superset of the set of context-sensitive languages. It turns out that allowing the Turing machine to be
nondeterministic Nondeterminism or nondeterministic may refer to: Computer science * Nondeterministic programming *Nondeterministic algorithm In computer programming, a nondeterministic algorithm is an algorithm that, even for the same input, can exhibit diffe ...
does not add any extra power. Because of
Savitch's theorem In computational complexity theory, Savitch's theorem, proved by Walter Savitch in 1970, gives a relationship between deterministic and non-deterministic space complexity. It states that for any function f\in\Omega(\log(n)), :\mathsf\left(f\lef ...
,Arora & Barak (2009) p.85 NPSPACE is equivalent to PSPACE, essentially because a deterministic Turing machine can simulate a non-deterministic Turing machine without needing much more space (even though it may use much more time).Arora & Barak (2009) p.86 Also, the complements of all problems in PSPACE are also in PSPACE, meaning that co-PSPACE PSPACE.


Relation among other classes

The following relations are known between PSPACE and the complexity classes NL, P, NP, PH,
EXPTIME In computational complexity theory, the complexity class EXPTIME (sometimes called EXP or DEXPTIME) is the set of all decision problems that are solvable by a deterministic Turing machine in exponential time, i.e., in O(2''p''(''n'')) time, wh ...
and
EXPSPACE In computational complexity theory, is the set of all decision problems solvable by a deterministic Turing machine in exponential space, i.e., in O(2^) space, where p(n) is a polynomial function of n. Some authors restrict p(n) to be a linear func ...
(note that ⊊, meaning strict containment, is not the same as ⊈): :\begin \mathsf\\ \mathsf\\ \mathsf\\ \mathsf\end From the third line, it follows that both in the first and in the second line, at least one of the set containments must be strict, but it is not known which. It is widely suspected that all are strict. The containments in the third line are both known to be strict. The first follows from direct diagonalization (the space hierarchy theorem, NL ⊊ NPSPACE) and the fact that PSPACE NPSPACE via
Savitch's theorem In computational complexity theory, Savitch's theorem, proved by Walter Savitch in 1970, gives a relationship between deterministic and non-deterministic space complexity. It states that for any function f\in\Omega(\log(n)), :\mathsf\left(f\lef ...
. The second follows simply from the space hierarchy theorem. The hardest problems in PSPACE are the PSPACE-complete problems. See PSPACE-complete for examples of problems that are suspected to be in PSPACE but not in NP.


Closure properties

The class PSPACE is closed under operations union, complementation, and Kleene star.


Other characterizations

An alternative characterization of PSPACE is the set of problems decidable by an
alternating Turing machine In computational complexity theory, an alternating Turing machine (ATM) is a non-deterministic Turing machine (NTM) with a rule for accepting computations that generalizes the rules used in the definition of the complexity classes NP and co-NP. ...
in polynomial time, sometimes called APTIME or just AP.Arora & Barak (2009) p.100 A logical characterization of PSPACE from
descriptive complexity ''Descriptive Complexity'' is a book in mathematical logic and computational complexity theory by Neil Immerman. It concerns descriptive complexity theory, an area in which the expressibility of mathematical properties using different types of log ...
theory is that it is the set of problems expressible in second-order logic with the addition of a transitive closure operator. A full transitive closure is not needed; a commutative transitive closure and even weaker forms suffice. It is the addition of this operator that (possibly) distinguishes PSPACE from PH. A major result of complexity theory is that PSPACE can be characterized as all the languages recognizable by a particular interactive proof system, the one defining the class IP. In this system, there is an all-powerful prover trying to convince a randomized polynomial-time verifier that a string is in the language. It should be able to convince the verifier with high probability if the string is in the language, but should not be able to convince it except with low probability if the string is not in the language. PSPACE can be characterized as the quantum complexity class QIP. PSPACE is also equal to PCTC, problems solvable by classical computers using closed timelike curves, as well as to BQPCTC, problems solvable by
quantum computer Quantum computing is a type of computation whose operations can harness the phenomena of quantum mechanics, such as superposition, interference, and entanglement. Devices that perform quantum computations are known as quantum computers. Though ...
s using closed timelike curves.


PSPACE-completeness

A language ''B'' is '' PSPACE-complete'' if it is in PSPACE and it is PSPACE-hard, which means for all ''A'' ∈ PSPACE, A \leq_\text B, where A \leq_\text B means that there is a
polynomial-time many-one reduction In computational complexity theory, a polynomial-time reduction is a method for solving one problem using another. One shows that if a hypothetical subroutine solving the second problem exists, then the first problem can be solved by transforming ...
from ''A'' to ''B''. PSPACE-complete problems are of great importance to studying PSPACE problems because they represent the most difficult problems in PSPACE. Finding a simple solution to a PSPACE-complete problem would mean we have a simple solution to all other problems in PSPACE because all PSPACE problems could be reduced to a PSPACE-complete problem.Arora & Barak (2009) p.83 An example of a PSPACE-complete problem is the
quantified Boolean formula problem In computational complexity theory, the language TQBF is a formal language consisting of the true quantified Boolean formulas. A (fully) quantified Boolean formula is a formula in quantified propositional logic where every variable is quantified ( ...
(usually abbreviated to QBF or TQBF; the T stands for "true").


Notes


References

* * Section 8.2–8.3 (The Class PSPACE, PSPACE-completeness), pp. 281–294. * Chapter 19: Polynomial space, pp. 455–490. * Chapter 8: Space Complexity * {{DEFAULTSORT:Pspace Complexity classes