Design
The AIM-9 was a product of the US Naval Weapons Center at China Lake in theGuidance
The Sidewinder is guided not by the actual position recorded by the detector, but by the ''change'' in position since the last sighting. So if the target remains at 5 degrees left between two rotations of the mirror, the electronics would not output any signal to the control system. Consider a missile fired at right angles to its target; if the missile is flying at the same speed as the target, it should "lead" it by 45 degrees, flying to an impact point far in front of where the target was when it was fired. If the missile is traveling four times the speed of the target, it should follow an angle about 11 degrees in front. In either case, the missile should keep that angle all the way to interception, which means that the angle that the target makes against the detector is constant. It was this constant angle that the Sidewinder attempted to maintain. This " proportional pursuit" system is straightforward to implement and offers high-performance lead calculation almost for free and can respond to changes in the target's flight path, which is much more efficient and makes the missile "lead" the target.History
Origins
First Generation Rear-Aspect Variants
Nearly 100,000 of the first generation (AIM-9B/C/D/E) of the Sidewinder were produced with Raytheon and General Electric as major subcontractors. Philco-Ford produced the guidance and control sections of the early missiles. The NATO version of the first-generation missile was built under license in Germany by Bodenseewerk Gerätetechnik; 9,200 examples were built.AIM-9A (''AAM-N-7 Sidewinder I'') (USN)
AIM-9A was a pre-production of the Sidewinder, first fired successfully in September 1953. Missile production began in 1955, and the first models entered the Navy's fleet service in 1956. Generally, it was a prototype production run, with 240 pieces being produced, and mainly intended for training pilots in air combat techniques. The AIM-9A was initially called the AAM-N-7 before the tri-service designation change in 1962. The AIM-9A and AIM-9B were originally fitted with a non-propulsive attachment (NPA) for their MK 15 and MK 17 rocket motors. If the motor accidentally ignited while kept in storage, during transport, or while it was fitted to the aircraft hardpoints, the NPA would direct the exhaust gases at right angles rather than straight back. In these cases, the missile would not move. While the NPA safety device itself suffered no failures, some ordnance men forgot to remove them after hanging the missiles in the hardpoints. When the pilots attempted to fire the missiles in flight, the hot exhaust gases were redirected directly towards the wings, severely damaging the aircraft. After losing three aircraft in this manner, the US Navy withdrew the NPA from use.AIM-9B (''AAM-N-7 Sidewinder IA'') (USAF/USN)
The AIM-9B is very similar to the AIM-9A, but the "B" has a more sophisticated rear and more aerodynamical front fins. The AIM-9B is a very limited weapon, but it had no serious competitors and counters when it was introduced, causing it to be adopted by the USAF and NATO as a standard weapon, with around 80,000 units being produced from 1958 to 1962. The viewing angle of the AIM-9B's sensor was a minuscule 4 degrees, so at launch, the pilot had to accurately aim the aircraft's sight over or above the target (to account for drag). The speed of the conical scan was very slow, additionally, the uncooled missile had a low sensitivity and was liable to extraneous heat. The AIM-9B was recommended for use on non-threatening targets (like bombers), only from behind (so it can lock on the thermal radiation from the target engines) and only with the sun behind or to the side of the launching aircraft (as the missile would lock onto it due to its thermal radiation). It was famously the first Sidewinder variant to be fired in anger as on 24 September 1958, it achieved the world's first successful kill with an air-to-air missiles, when Taiwanese F-86Fs shot down Communist Chinese MiG-15s using AIM-9Bs supplied and fitted by the U.S. Navy (USN).AIM-9B Derivatives
RB24: A license built AIM-9B Sidewinder from Sweden. K-13/R-3 (AA-2): The K-13/R-3 was a reversed engineered AIM-9B Sidewinder. An engagement on 28 September 1958 in the Taiwan strait resulted in an AIM-9B becoming lodged in a MiG-17 without exploding, allowing it to be removed after landing. The Soviets later became aware that the Chinese had at least one Sidewinder, and after some wrangling, were able to persuade the Chinese to send them one of the captured missiles. K-13/R-3 (AA-2) Variants: K-13/R-3 (Object 300) (AA-2 Atoll): It was the standard variant and entered limited service only two years later in 1960. K-13A/R-3S (Object 310) (AA-2A Atoll): This entered service in 1962. The R-3S was the first version to enter widespread production, in spite of a very long seeker settling time around 22 seconds, as opposed to 11 seconds for the original version. PL-2: Chinese-produced R-3S. A-91: Romanian-produced R-3S. K-13R/R-3R (Object 320) (AA-2B/C Atoll): While the R-3S was being introduced in 1961, work started on a semi-active radar homing (SARH) version for high-altitude use, with 8 km range, similar to the little-usedAIM-9C (''AAM-N-7 Sidewinder IC (SARH)'') (USN)
The lackluster performance of the AIM-9B caused the Navy to look for a successor. And in 1963 the AAM-N-7 ''Sidewinder IC'' was designed, It was developed in two variations: a SARH (semi-active radar homing) variant (AIM-9C) and an IR (AIM-9D) in 1963. The AIM-9C's semi-active radar was exclusively tied to the F-8 Crusader's radar and fire control system (FCS). A total of around 1,000 AIM-9C missiles were launched from 1965 to 1967, but their usage in Vietnam war proved unsuccessful, downing no enemies. A filter modification program for reworked units (to allow high altitude capability up to 18,288m (60,000 feet) This was the only planned modification.AIM-9D "Delta" (''AAM-N-7 Sidewinder IC (IR)'') (USN)
Recognizing the limitations of the initial AIM-9B, the US Navy (USN) worked to improve the missile's performance. They changed the missile nose to an aerodynamical ogival nose. The seeker was improved with a wider field of view beyond 25 degrees and a reduced instantaneous field of view of 2.5 degrees, to reduce foreign thermal interference (from flares). A better nitrogen cooling system was added for the fuze, being the first in the world. This enhanced the missile's head sensitivity. Maneuverability was also improved with a faster tracking rate, as well as a new actuator system. The Sidewinder's range was improved as well, with the new Hercules MK 36 solid-fuel rocket motor allowing the missile to fly up to 18 km. Finally, a new Mk 48 continuous-rod warhead was fitted to the missile for increased damage; this also meant infrared or a radio proximity fuze could be used. These improvements were all added into AIM-9D and went into service with the USN. Around 1,000 AIM-9D units were produced from 1965 to 1969. The primary problem of the AIM-9D was breakup during launch. The AIM-9D was eventually developed into AIM-9G.AIM-9D Derivatives
ATM-9D (USN): AIM-9D used for captive flight target acquisition training. GDU-1/B: AIM-9D used for firing practice.AIM-9E "Echo" (USAF)
The AIM-9E "Echo" was the first version developed solely by the U.S. Air Force (USAF). The AIM-9E allows the expansion of the weapons acquisition envelope, especially at low-altitude, increasing its Probability of Kill (P . It achieved this using a new low-drag conical nose head, being a distinguishing feature of USAF Sidewinders. A magnesium fluoride seeker dome was introduced, along with a more compact optical assembly, an improved guidance control system, new electronics, and significant changes to the internal wiring harnesses. These improvements facilitated a better 100 Hz reticle rate, and a 16.5 deg/sec tracking rate. The most significant design change was the addition of cooling for the PbS detector, adding Peltier (thermoelectric) cooling, giving the advantage of unlimited cooling when positioned on the launch rail, but is only active when electrical power is present. The AIM-9E gives greater range over the AIM-9B, but is worse than the "D". The canard design was changed to a squared tip double delta planform, this helped improve canard behaviour at higher angles of attack (AOA). Over 5,000 AIM-9B's were rebuilt into AIM-9E's. The AIM-9E appeared in Vietnam after the conclusion of the Operation Rolling Thunder in 1968, with the U.S. Air Force (USAF), becoming one of their main missile armaments. Up until Operation Linebacker in 1972 intense air-to-air activity in Vietnam was not present. There were 71 AIM-9E launch attempts from January to October 1972, however, only 6 missiles managed to down an aircraft, with 1 other hitting an aircraft, but not causing complete destruction. Reasons for the poor success rate was listed as "poor air crew training, launches out of the envelope, the tactical situation, marginal tone, tone discrimination, the missile going ballistic, and other malfunctions".AIM-9E Variants
AIM-9E: Standard production model. AIM-9E-2: Some "E" models are equipped with reduced-smoke rocket motors and have the designation AIM-9E-2AIM-9B FGW.2 Sidewinder (AIM-9F)
As the Sidewinder was being acquired by NATO forces, licensed production was given to West Germany and they would produce around 15,000 units. Like the Americans, the West Germans sought to improve the AIM-9B design due to its limitations. The only visible exterior difference is a greenish sensor window, but many tech improvements were added beneath the shell. Unnoticed improvements include solid state electronics (instead of vacuum tubes), carbon dioxide seeker cooling, a new nose dome and superior optical filtering. Conversions were done to European AIM-9Bs to upgrade them to the FGW.2 standard. The official designation is the AIM-9B FGW.2 but it is known as the AIM-9F in US nomenclature.AIM-9G "Golf" (USN)
The AIM-9G was very similar to the AIM-9D in most aspects, and did not differ externally. The AIM-9G was an AIM-9D that used an improved AIM-9D seeker head with SEAM (Sidewinder Extended Acquisition Mode), this allowed the slewing of the optics through a search pattern to acquire the enemy (most likely using a rosette scan), it also allowed the slaving of the optics to a radar or helmet sight. This was connected to the onboard computer of the aircraft, which gave the capability of capturing the target using the data coming from the airborne radar. This meant that the target could be locked without being in the sights, and the missile automatically got pre-launch instructions. The conical scanning speed was also increased greatly. The seeker head was now able to seek in a 25˚ circular scan. This allowed the AIM-9G to have an improved chance of acquiring the target than earlier models. This, along with other upgraded solid-state modules, culminated in the AIM-9G. The improvement was substantial enough that an order of 5,000 AIM-9D seekers was stopped at 1,850 units, with the rest being ordered to AIM-9G seeker specifications instead. Around 2120 AIM-9G were built by Raytheon from 1970 to 1972. The AIM-9G would be used with its predecessor, the AIM-9D, during the Vietnam War, as the US Navy's choice of IR missile. A 46% hit rate with the AIM-9G during Operation Linebackers I and II in 1972 was achieved, of which 14 aircraft were MiG-17s and the other 7 were MiG-21s. This was due to the missile design and USN fighter pilot training at TOPGUN. The United States Air Force attempted to attain AIM-9Gs from the USN, due to bad experience with their AIM-9 Sidewinders models (B, E, and J), but they were incompatible with US Air Force's Sidewinder launchers due to the different cooling mechanisms. (the USN used a nitrogen gas container on the launcher, which the USAF did not use)AIM-9G Derivatives
ATM-9G (USN): AIM-9G used for captive flight target acquisition training.AIM-9H (USN)
Within December 1965, two designers McLean and LaBerge (who were employed by Philco-Ford) came together to create ways to improve the AIM-9G's reliability. One submission was to advance all the remaining missile electronic components from vacuum to solid-state gradually. The US Air Force adhered to this steady replacement of their AIM-9s to solid-state, however the Navy opted for a different approach after Walt Freitag, a USN engineer proposed a full change to solid-state in one missile. The "H" variant had major changes over the AIM-9D/G, which had multiple issues with reliability. One of the issues was the intolerance of the vacuum tubes to repeated 20 ft/sec sink rate landings by US Navy aircraft on carrier decks. The "H" was the first Sidewinder to be fully solid state, replacing the original vacuum tubes. The AIM-9H also included a new lead sulphide detector, using nitrogen cooling. The new guidance package was built using semiconductors. When the engineers redesigned these electronics, they essentially kept the AIM-9G's optical system, but the tracking rate increased further, from the original 12˚ to 20˚ degrees per second, this complementing the more powerful 120 lb.ft actuators that had been installed. They also replaced the thermal battery with a turbo-alternator. The AIM-9H also included a continuous-rod bundle warhead, improving its destructive capability. The AIM-9H was the last and most manoeuvrable of the rear-aspect USN Sidewinders, with USN moving to the all-aspect AIM-9L. The AIM-9H was actually used at the very end of the Vietnam war, with it being introduced into the US navy service in 1972 and being used in Operation Linebacker. A total of around 7,700 AIM-9H units would be manufactured from 1972 to 1974 by Philco-Ford and Raytheon. The AIM-9H was the basis for the all-aspect USAF/USN AIM-9L.AIM-9H Derivatives
ATM-9H: Was a training version of the AIM-9H for captive flight target acquisition.AIM-9K (USN)
The AIM-9K was a planned U.S. Navy (USN) upgrade to the AIM-9H, but the development was abandoned in favour of USAF/USN joint AIM-9L.AIM-9J (USAF)
As the AIM-9E Sidewinder was entering service in Southeast Asia during the conclusion of Operation Rolling Thunder, the USAF started the development the next generation Sidewinders to replace the AIM-9E. In November 1968, the testing of an AIM-9E upgrade the "Extended Performance" began. The missile was designed to give pilots a more capable close-range IR missile against a manoeuvring target. It would eventually be designated the AIM-9J. Preliminary testing of the AIM-9J ended on 3 July 1972, indicating that further in-depth testing and evaluation were necessary prior to replacing the AIM-9B/E. On 8 June 1972, the AIM-9J was authorized for introduction into Southeast Asia under Phase IIA of its evaluation program, and approval to employ it in combat was received on 31 July 1972. The first combat flight of the AIM-9J occurred on 2 August 1972, but it wasn't until 9 September 1972 that the first three AIM-9Js were fired in combat. Only 31 combat firings were attempted before the cease fire in January, 1973. Considering the original intent of its development, the AIM-9J performance was relatively unimpressive in combat. Nevertheless, compared to its competitors (the AIM-7E-2 and the AIM-9E), the AIM-9J did appear relatively successful. The AIM-9J kill rate per missile fired was 13 percent from September to December 1972, compared to 5 percent and 8 percent registered by the AIM-7E-2 and AIM-9E, respectively. When viewed on the basis of effectiveness per engagement, the AIM-9J fared better with 33 percent kills per engagement, versus 11 percent and 15 percent for the AIM-7E-2 and AIM-9E, respectively. The AIM-9J was an upgrade to the AIM-9E. It included: * The partial replacement of old-fashioned tube electronics with solid-state electronics. * A longer-burning gas generator, which increased flight time to 40 seconds. * More powerful actuators, driving new square-tipped double-delta canards. This doubled the single-plane "g" capability. Around 6,700 AIM-9Js were built from 1972 onward. These were mostly converted existing AIM-9B/E missiles.AIM-9J Variants
AIM-9J: The base variant. AIM-9J-1 (AIM-9N): AIM-9J-1 (later redesignated the AIM-9N) was upgrade to the AIM-9J. The AIM-9N had a similar missile configuration to the AIM-9J, but the three main circuit boards were substantially redesigned to help improve seeker performance. Around 7,000 of the AIM-9N were built/rebuilt. AIM-9J-3: AIM-9J-1 with the new SR116 motor.AIM-9P
The AIM-9P Sidewinder missile was a USAF sponsored family of export missiles based on the AIM-9J/N, and would be upgraded multiple times over its lifespan. The AIM-9P was an improved AIM-9J with a new motor, fuze and better reliability. It included a greater engagement range, allowing it to be launched farther from the target. The AIM-9P was more maneuverable than the AIM-9J, and also included improved solid-state electronics that increased reliability and maintainability. The AIM-9P was either a rebuilt B/E or J or all-new production. Deliveries of the AIM-9P began in 1978.AIM-9P Variants
AIM-9P: The base model. AIM-9P-1: Introduced the DSU-15/B AOTD laser proximity fuze, replacing the previous infrared influence fuze with an active optical target detector. AIM-9P-2: Includes a reduced-smoke rocket motor. AIM-9P-3: Includes a reduced-smoke motor, an active optical target detector, an improved guidance and control section, mechanical strengthening to the warhead, guidance system and control section, and a new insensitive munitions warhead. The warhead uses a new explosive material, this explosive material is less sensitive to high temperature and has a longer shelf life. AIM-9P-4: Introduced the ALASCA features and technology found on the AIM-9L/M variants. AIM-9P-5: Added improved IRCCM from the AIM-9M.AIM-9P Derivatives
RB24J: Swedish designation for the AIM-9P-3 Note: the speed of the B model was around 1.7 Mach and the other models above 2.5.Later Generation All-Aspect Variants
AIM-9L (USAF/USN)
AIM-9L Derivatives
DATM-9L (USAF/USN): This is an AIM-9L used to train ground personnel in missile assembly, disassembly, loading, transportation, and storage procedures and techniques. GDU-6/C: Was a training version of the AIM-9L, may have been an earlier designation of the DATM-9L. RB74 (RB24L): The RB74 was the Swedish designation of the AIM-9L. The RB24L was the original designation, but was changed to the RB74.AIM-9M (USAF/USN)
The AIM-9M is an improved AIM-9L inheriting the all-aspect capability of the L model, but providing all-around higher performance. Having a better background rejection and infrared countermeasures discrimination (WGU-4/B), a low-smoke motor to reduce the visual signature of the weapon, and improved guidance control section with counter-countermeasures and improved maintainability and producibility. The AIM-9M uses an annular blast fragmentation warhead. These modifications increase ability to locate and lock-on a target and decrease the missile's chances for detection. It was deployed in large numbers during the 1991AIM-9M Variants
* AIM-9M (USAF/USN): The standard model AIM-9M Model. * AIM-9M-1 (USN): The AIM-9M-1 has very little information other than it uses the same Guidance Control System (GCS) as the AIM-9M-3. * AIM-9M-2: No information other than the confirmation of its existence. * AIM-9M-3 (USN): The only information regarding the AIM-9M-3 is that it uses the same GCS as the AIM-9M-1. * AIM-9M-4 (USN): AIM-9M variant used by United States Navy, using a different GCS, other information on them is currently unknown. * AIM-9M-5: No information other than the confirmation of its existence. * AIM-9M-6 (USN): AIM-9M variant used by United States Navy using a different GCS, other information on them is currently unknown. * AIM-9M-7: Variant modified for Operation Desert Storm/Shield to combat expected threats better. The nature of the upgrade is unknown. * AIM-9M-8 (USN): Principal USN Production variant, this upgrade entailed replacing the motor with the new MK 36 MOD 11, a new guidance section (WGU-4E/B), and AOTD (DSU-15B/B).(This was achieved through the replacement of five circuit cards and the associated parent board) * AIM-9M-9 (USAF): Principal USAF Production variant, this upgrade entailed replacing the motor with the new MK 36 MOD 11, a new guidance section (WGU-4E/B), and AOTD (DSU-15B/B) * AIM-9M-10 (USN): Modified AIM-9-8 variant for use on the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, these are retrofitted AIM-9-8's. The AIM-9M-10 differs by replacement to the wings and forward hanger. * AIM-9M modified for surface-to-air operation, developed by Ukraine from January 2025, claimed to have shot down Russian aircraft in May 2025.AIM-9M Derivatives
* AIM-9Q (USN): The AIM-9Q is an AIM-9M modified with upgraded guidance-control section, further information on the missile is unknown and it was either cancelled or became an AIM-9M sub-variant. * CATM-9M (USAF/USN): A training AIM-9M Used for pilot training in aerial target acquisition and use of aircraft controls/displays. * CATM-9M-1: This was used for AIM-9M-1/3 training. * CATM-9M-2: This was used for AIM-9M-1/3 training. * CATM-9M-4: This was used for AIM-9M-1/3 training. * CATM-9M-6: This was used for AIM-9M-1/3 training. * CATM-9M-8: This was used for AIM-9M-1/3 training. * CATM-9M-12: This was used for AIM-9M-8/9 training. * CATM-9M-14: This was used for AIM-9M-8/9 training. * CATM-9M-27: This variant was used for AIM-9M-10 training. * NATM-9M (USAF/USN): It is a permanent test missile version of the AIM-9M. The modification into a test missile includes the replacing live-test warhead and/or telemetry section.NATM-9M Variants
* NATM-9M-1: No information other than the confirmation of its existence as a test missile. * NATM-9M-2: No information other than the confirmation of its existence as a test missile. * NATM-9M-3: No information other than the confirmation of its existence as a test missile. * NATM-9M-4: No information other than the confirmation of its existence as a test missile.AIM-9R (USN)
The AIM-9R was an improved AIM-9M developed by the navy, it included the new WGU-19/B IIR (Imaging Infrared) seeker, with much better tracking performance and detection performance (during daytime), with the ability to reject both background terrain and clouds, a bigger seeker FOV, and more effective counter-countermeasures capability against known and postulated jamming or seduction techniques. The first live firing occurred in 1990, but in 1992, production was cancelled as a lack of funding due to defense budget cuts.AIM-9S (USN)
The AIM-9S is a modified AIM-9M with the counter-countermeasures (CCM) equipment removed from the guidance-control section. This derivative is used for FMS (Foreign Military Sales), giving the latest Sidewinder technology, to USA allies, without giving away valuable missile technology. A customer of the AIM-9S wasBOA/Box Office
China Lake developed an improved compressed carriage control configuration titled BOA. "Compressed carriage" missiles have smaller control surfaces to allow more missiles to fit in a given space. The surfaces may be permanently "clipped", or may fold out when the missile is launched.AIM-9X (USAF/USN)
Hughes Electronics was awarded a contract for development of the AIM-9X Sidewinder in 1996 after a competition against Raytheon for the next short-range aerial combat missile, though Raytheon purchased the defense portions of Hughes Electronics the following year. The AIM-9X entered service in November 2003 with the USAF (the lead platform was the F-15C) and the USN (the lead platform was the F/A-18C) and is a substantial upgrade to the Sidewinder family featuring an imaging infrared focal-plane array (FPA) seeker with claimed 90° off-boresight capability, compatibility with helmet-mounted displays such as the new U.S. Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS), and a totally new two-axis thrust-vectoring control (TVC) system providing increased turn capability over traditional control surfaces (60 ''g''). Using the JHMCS, a pilot can point the AIM-9X missile's seeker and "lock on" by simply looking at a target, thereby increasing air combat effectiveness. It retains the same rocket motor, fuze and warhead of the AIM-9M, but its lower drag gives it improved range and speed. The AIM-9X also includes an internal cooling system, eliminating the need to use launch-rail nitrogen bottles (U.S. Navy and Marines) or internal argon bottles (USAF). It also features an electronic safe and arm device similar to the AMRAAM, allowing for a reduction in minimum range, and reprogrammable infrared Counter Counter Measures (IRCCM) capability that coupled with the FPA provides improved look down into clutter and performance against the latest IRCM. Though not part of the original requirement, the AIM-9X demonstrated potential for lock-on after launch capability, allowing for possible internal use for theBlock II
Testing work on the AIM-9X Block II version began in September 2008. The Block II adds lock-on after launch capability with a datalink, so the missile can be launched first and then directed to its target afterwards by an aircraft with the proper equipment for 360-degree engagements, such as the F-35 or the F-22. By January 2013, the AIM-9X Block II was about halfway through its operational testing and performing better than expected. NAVAIR reported that the missile was exceeding performance requirements in all areas, including lock-on after launch (LOAL). One area where the Block II needs improvement is helmetless high off-boresight (HHOBS) performance. It is functioning well on the missile, but performance is below that of the Block I AIM-9X. The HHOBS deficiency does not impact any other Block II capabilities, and is planned to be improved upon by a software clean-up build. Objectives of the operational test were due to be completed by the third quarter of 2013. However, as of May 2014 there have been plans to resume operational testing and evaluation (including surface-to-air missile system compatibility). , Raytheon had delivered 5,000 AIM-9X missiles to the armed services. On 18 June 2017, after an AIM-9X did not successfully track a targeted Syrian Air Force Su-22 Fitter, US Navy Lt. Cmdr. Michael "Mob" Tremel flying a F/A-18E Super Hornet used an AMRAAM AAM to successfully destroy the enemy aircraft. There is a theory that the Sidewinder is tested against American and not Soviet/Russian flares. The Sidewinder is used to rejecting American but not Soviet/Russian flares. Similar issues arose from the testing of the AIM-9P model. The missile would ignore American flares but go for Soviet ones due to their "different burn time, intensity and separation." In February 2015, the U.S. Army successfully launched an AIM-9X Block II from the new Multi-Mission Launcher (MML), a truck-mounted missile launch container that can hold 15 of the missiles. The MML is part of the Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2-Intercept (IFPC Inc. 2-I) to protect ground forces againstBlock III
In September 2012, Raytheon was ordered to continue developing the Sidewinder into a Block III variant, even though the Block II had not yet entered service. The USN projected that the new missile would have a 60 percent longer range, modern components to replace old ones, and anCombat
Combat debut: Taiwan Strait, 1958
The first combat use of the Sidewinder came on 24 September 1958 by the Republic of China (Taiwan) Air Force during the Second Taiwan Strait Crisis. At the time, ROCAF North American F-86 Sabres were routinely engaged in air battles with theVietnam War service 1965–1973
Vietnam War AIM-9 claimed aerial combat kills
In total 452 Sidewinders were fired during the Vietnam War, resulting in a kill probability of 18%. The Services and the Department of Defense were shocked by the poor missile performance - pre-war operational tests predicted that the AIM-9 was expected to hit 65% of the time. The missile testing program, however, did not reflect how the missiles would be used. Almost all the tests were against non-maneuvering drone targets at high altitudes, many of them with artificially strengthened radar returns.1982 Falklands War
During the2023 North American balloon & unidentified object shootdowns
On 4 February 2023, an F-22 Raptor operated by the2023 Israel–Gaza war
On 2 November 2023, Israeli Air Force claimed one of its F-35I have shot down an unidentified cruise missile, using an AIM-9X Sidewinder.Russian invasion of Ukraine
On 3 May 2025, the head of the Ukrainian Main Directorate of Intelligence (HUR), lieutenant general Kyrylo Budanov claimed that three MAGURA V7 naval drones armed with AIM-9 Sidewinders modified for surface-to-air operation shot down two Russian Su-30 fighter jets in theSidewinder descendants
Anti-tank variants
Later developments
Larger rocket motor
Under the High Altitude Project, engineers at China Lake mated a Sidewinder warhead and seeker to a Sparrow rocket motor to experiment with usefulness of a larger motor, giving it a longer range.Other ground launch platforms
MIM-72 Chaparral
The MIM-72 Chaparral is an American-made self-propelledMIM-72 Variants
*MIM-72A (USAF): missile was based on the AIM-9D Sidewinder. The main difference is that to reduce drag only two of the fins on the MIM-72A have rollerons, the other two having been replaced by fixed thin fins. The MIM-72's MK 50 solid-fuel rocket motor was essentially identical to the MK 36 MOD 5 used in the AIM-9D Sidewinder. *MIM-72B (USAF): It was a training missile with the radar fuze replaced with an IR model for use against target drones. *MIM-72C Improved Chaparral (USAF): The MIM-72C used the advanced AN/DAW-1B seeker with all-aspect capability, as well as a new doppler radar fuze and M250 blast-frag warhead. The fuze and warhead were adapted from the earlier Mauler program. C models were deployed between 1976 and 1981, reaching operational status in 1978. *MIM-72D: The MIM-72D was built for export, combining the seeker of the "A" with the improved M250 warhead. *MIM-72E (USAF): MIM-72C missiles retrofitted with a new M121 smokeless motor, which greatly reduced the smoke generated on firing allowing for easier follow-up shots and making it harder for enemy aircraft to find the launch site. *MIM-72F: It was an export model, being virtually identical to the MIM-72E, just being newly built . *MIM-72G (USAF): This was the final upgrade to the MIM-72, fitting the missile with the new AN/DAW-2 rosette scan seeker based on the seeker in theAIM-9X MML
In 2016, the AIM-9X was test fired from a Multi-Mission Launcher at the White Sands Missile Range inAIM-9X NASAMS
In May 2019, the AIM-9X Block II was test fired from the National Advanced Surface to Air Missile System ( NASAMS) at the Andøya Space Center inFrankenSAM
In late 2022, theNaval drone platforms
According to Budanov, the HUR began development on a MAGURA V5 unmanned surface vehicle armed with AIM-9 Sidewinders in January 2025. He also told the ''War Zone'' that "We use a couple of models f missileson our Magura-7, but the best results ome fromthe AIM-9."Operators
Current operators
* : AIM-9L/M * * * * * * * * * * * * * * : AIM-9L/I * * * * * * * *Former operators
* * : AIM-9B, AIM-9H * * * * * * * * *Future operators
* : Slovak Air Force bought 100 AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles for theirSee also
Comparable missiles
* * * * * (Turkey) * * * * * * * * * * * AAM-1/ 3/References
Notes
Citations
Bibliography
* Babcock, Elizabeth (1999). ''Sidewinder – Invention and Early Years.'' The China Lake Museum Foundation. 26 pp. A concise record of the development of the original Sidewinder version and the central people involved in its design. * * Bonds, Ray ed. ''The Modern US War Machine''. New York City: Crown Publishers, 1989. . * * * * * * * * McCarthy, Donald J. Jr. ''MiG Killers, A Chronology of U.S. Air Victories in Vietnam 1965–1973''. 2009, Specialty Press, North Branch, MN, U.S.A. * Michel III, Marshall L. ''Clashes, Air Combat Over North Vietnam 1965–1972.'' 1997. * * Westrum, Ron (1999). "''Sidewinder—Creative missile development at China Lake."'' Naval Institute Press.External links
*