History
Historical background, pre-1996
Before ''Agos'' introduced themselves in public life inFounding years, 1996 to 2007
The establishments of ''Agos'' allowed for a cultural impact by engaging in politics, politicing the''"We have not only introduced the Armenian community's problems to the Turkish society, but we also presented the Turkish society's problems to the Armenian community. ... Agos became a reference point for international press, international political circles, and intellectuals."''In the founding years, one of ''Agos'' main concerns was the ever decreasing population of the Armenian community and the weakening of civil institutions in Turkey. Furthermore ''Agos'' paid significant attention to the effect of globalization and gave space to ideas about cultural identity and nation-state building. Many authors, including Hrant Dink, criticised the Armenians in Turkey for being a closed community; They suggested that the community should embrace the idea of living together with the rest of the population. ''Agos'', as a newspaper, created several controversies regarding the existence and meaning of an Armenian identity. In 2003, the newspaper changed its policy regarding the understanding of Armenian identity. At this time, Dink wrote on this issue in a serial called 'On the Armenian identity'. In this serial, Dink discussed: * The importance of the fourth generation of the Armenian diaspora; * The relevance of publicly discussing the Genocide; * The relationship between the Church and Armenian identity; * The concept of "double identity"; * Diaspora and dissolution of nation based identity; Dink proposed solutions according to his own vision. After publishing this serial the public labelled him as enemy of the Turks. A trial followed and Dink was convicted for insulting Turkey, the Turkish nation, and Turkish government institutions based on article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code.
After assassination, 2007 to present
Following Dink's assassination on the 19th of January in 2007, close to 100.000 people filled the streets of Istanbul speaking out as minorities to the system. Costing him his own life and becoming a martyr, Dink's death kick-started a transformative moment, allowing Armenians to speak out more boldly on the affairs of 1915. Ethnic-Turks being sympathetic to ''Agos cause and showing solidarity allowed ''Agos'' to spread their message; Aris Nalci, an Agos journalist, said in 2010:''"I lost my fear in 2007. If I speak I can be killed, if I don't speak, I can be killed, so why would I not speak?"''After the
Governance
Editors-In-Chief
Finances & Reach
Financially Independent
The newspaper, which is also a non-profit organisation, stands on its own feet with the revenues of memberships, sales, and advertisements. The mindset behind this being that funding from any foundation or institution should be refused because it would restrict the freedom of expression and independency. In an interview with Pakrat Estukyan, one of ''Agos most vocal speakers since Hrant Dink's death, he would proudly say:''"Agos does not belong to a particular capitalist enterprise defending mostly its owners’ interests, as is the case for most of the newspapers in Turkey. Agos belongs to the workers of the newspaper. It does not represent the interests of the capital; it only represents the interests and the stance of its workers."''In 2018, editor-in-chief Yetvart Danzikyan underlined that the economic sustainability of the newspaper is not painless since the culture of access to newspapers for free is common in Turkey.
Foundation Process
To ensure their autonomy, the founders of ''Agos'' declined the idea of sponsorships and instead would internally find the necessary money. 18.000-20.000 dollars were collected by the founders and employees. An extra 20.000 dollars would come from a loan at a non-disclosed bank. Adding to that Sarkis Seropyan, ''Agos''''"The ones who founded the newspaper or started working from the first day on, financially contributed to its foundation process. We did not get any money or financial support from any other resources ... It was Hrant Dink who contributed the most, as he was already a small-scale businessman. ... During its foundation process, everybody got a share from the newspaper in proportion to what he/she financially had contributed."''
Reached Numbers
In 1996, the first year of the newspaper, they would print and sell 1.800 copies per week. In 2001, after a steady increase, the physical version of the newspaper sold 3.000 copies per week. In a sample from June 2003, ''Agos'' would print and sell 5.324 copies per week. In 2006, ''Agos'' would print and sell 6.000 copies per week; 3.000 would be sold to Armenians within Türkiye, 2.000 would go to foreign countries, and 1.000 to non-Armenians within Turkey. In 2007, in the weeks after the assassination of Hrant Dink, the sales would reach 50.000 copies per week. In 2015, the physical version of the newspaper sells 4.000-5.000 copies per week plus an extra 500 subscribers abroad. In 2023, the physical version of the newspaper sold 3.000 copies per week, this is purely from subscribers within Turkey.Discourse of the Newspaper
Main Subjects
''Agos'' has a dissenting and independent position both within the Armenian community and its relations with the State. The newspaper focuses on the topics regarding human rights infringements and democratic progress in Turkey; Accusations against the Community; the Turkish-Armenian dialogue; the Armenian cultural legacy; And defects within the Armenian community, such as non-transparency within the Turkish administration. Furthermore, approximately 80 percent of the diaspora could not understand Armenian texts; The newspaper aimed to increase the language skills of the community as well. Introducing new perspectives in the public dialogue and showing the cultural identity was initially due to the precarious positions of Armenians in Turkey. At the time, many of those negative connotations came to life by claims regarding the ASALA organisation. In a commission led by Hrant Dink and other Armenian intellectuals, Agos would set out to focus on: *Improving the status of the Armenians in public life by changing the treatment from politicians and by changing the mainstream media coverage (or at the very least providing an alternative in ''Agos''). *Creating more equality between citizens of the Turkish Republic by preserving Armenian architectural heritage, historical heritage, improving quality of textbooks within education, and protecting the Armenian language; * Normalising public discussion about generational and cultural trauma builds up after a suppressive history.Cultural Significance
As a minority newspaper, ''Agos'' politicised the Armenian community and reinforced their appearance in Turkish public discourse. Before Agos, the emphasis on the collective trauma of the 1915 events (the Armenian Genocide) was hidden within Turkey.Koç Gabrielsen, Y. (2015). ''Agos and Armenian community: an inquiry on the reformulation of Armenian identity in Turkey /'' h.D. - Doctoral Program Middle East Technical University. p.62-65 ''Agos'' and specifically Hrant Dink reconciled and confronted the public domain with the minorities' struggle and traumas in a proactive manner, instead of waiting for Turkish governmental approval. Agos operated highly sensitively by using the term "genocide" Furthermore, ''Agos'' called for the limitation of power for the Armenian Patriarchate and its representation of the community in general. TheContemporary Discussion
After reaching a certain number of readers, ''Agos'' changed its supportive methodology regarding the Church and claimed that the Armenian community should follow a more secular approach.Rumelili, B., & Keyman, F. (2015). Enacting multi-layered citizenship: Turkey’s Armenians’ struggle for justice and equality. ''Citizenship Studies'', ''20''(1), p.76 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2015.1107027 This change is considered one of the radical shifts in the newspaper's publishing policy. In 2025, ''Agos'' comprehensively covered the Turkish protests that took place after the detention and arrest of Ekrem Imamoğlu and many opposition members.Klopotowski, J. D. (2025). First they came for the Armenians. ''UC Berkeley: Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism''. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0bt6t8ck. p.14 The online editor, Nazan Özcan, underlined about this:''"(...) there is no one left to speak out for them—no one except for those, like at Agos, whose understanding of the past tells them that no group in a polity is guaranteed civil rights when another’s rights are under attack."''
References
Further reading
*External links