2010 DePuy Hip Recall
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

The 2010 DePuy Hip Replacement Recall was instituted when DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., a division of
Johnson & Johnson Johnson & Johnson (J&J) is an American multinational pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical technologies corporation headquartered in New Brunswick, New Jersey, and publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Its common stock is a c ...
, recalled its ASR XL Acetabular metal-on-metal
hip replacement Hip replacement is a surgery, surgical procedure in which the hip joint is replaced by a prosthetic implant (medicine), implant, that is, a hip prosthesis. Hip replacement surgery can be performed as a total replacement or a hemi/semi(half) repl ...
system on August 24, 2010.


Background

The recall came after data from a study indicated that the five year failure rate of this product is approximately 13%, or 1 in 8 patients. At the beginning of 2011, DePuy Orthopaedics said they were phasing out the ASR Hip Implant because of declining sales, but never mentioned the high failure rate data from an
Australia Australia, officially the Commonwealth of Australia, is a country comprising mainland Australia, the mainland of the Australia (continent), Australian continent, the island of Tasmania and list of islands of Australia, numerous smaller isl ...
n implant registry. In March 2011, ''
The New York Times ''The New York Times'' (''NYT'') is an American daily newspaper based in New York City. ''The New York Times'' covers domestic, national, and international news, and publishes opinion pieces, investigative reports, and reviews. As one of ...
'' reported that DePuy issued its first warning to doctors and patients about the high early failure rate. However, at this point, they still had not issued a recall of the product. In fact, they claimed any statements referencing a recall were false.


Lawsuits

About 93,000 persons worldwide received an ASR implant. Shine Lawyers commenced an Australian class action in the
Federal Court of Australia The Federal Court of Australia is an Australian superior court which has jurisdiction to deal with most civil disputes governed by federal law (with the exception of family law matters), along with some summary (less serious) and indictable (mo ...
on September 27, 2011, against DePuy International Pty Ltd and Johnson and Johnson Medical Pty Ltd. Both lawsuits claimed that the DePuy ASR hip replacement was defectively designed, that DePuy knew that there were problems with the
implant Implant can refer to: Medicine *Implant (medicine), or specifically: **Brain implant **Breast implant **Buttock augmentation, Buttock implant **Cochlear implant **Contraceptive implant **Dental implant **Fetal tissue implant **Implantable cardiov ...
early on but did not do anything to let patients or their surgeons know about the possible problems.


United States

The first
lawsuit A lawsuit is a proceeding by one or more parties (the plaintiff or claimant) against one or more parties (the defendant) in a civil court of law. The archaic term "suit in law" is found in only a small number of laws still in effect today ...
in the United States against DePuy Orthopaedics was filed on June 15, 2010. Through the multidistrict litigation process, the cases were centralized in different courts depending on the exact implant at issue. The United States
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation The judiciary (also known as the judicial system, judicature, judicial branch, judiciative branch, and court or judiciary system) is the system of courts that adjudicates legal disputes/disagreements and interprets, defends, and applies the law ...
(JPML) issued a ruling on December 7, 2010 that determined the fate of the United States lawsuits relating to the ASR XL Acetabular Hip System implants. Its ruling stated that all cases filed across the country "are transferred to the Northern District of Ohio and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable David A. Katz for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings." On January 26, 2011, Judge Katz entered an order in the multidistrict litigation naming the leadership counsel for both the plaintiffs and the defendants. Ben Gordon, Eric Kennedy, Ellen Relkin, Mark Robinson, Christopher Seeger, and Steven Skikos were named on the plaintiffs' Executive Committee. Robert Tucker and Susan Sharko were named as defendants' Co-Lead Counsel. In 2013, Johnson & Johnson announced that it would pay $2.5 billion to settle claims related to the ASR XL implants globally. Johnson & Johnson retained an option to withdraw the settlement if too few claimants signed up, but in May 2014 it announced it would not withdraw the global settlement. Settlements began at a base of $250,000. Johnson & Johnson continued to deny culpability.


Pinnacle implant litigation

On May 24, 2011, the JPML centralized all cases relating to the Pinnacle Acetabular Cup System in the Northern District of Texas before judge James E. Kinkeade. The Pinnacle litigation centralized in the Northern District of Texas proceeded to a series of bellwether trials for selected plaintiffs from different states. In a first trial with a single Montana plaintiff, the jury found for DePuy. In a second trial with five Texas plaintiffs, the jury awarded $502 million to the plaintiffs, consisting of $142 million in actual damages and $360 million in punitive damages. The judge reduced this to a total judgment of $151 million based on the Texas limitation on punitive damages. In a third trial with six California plaintiffs, the jury awarded $1.04 billion to the plaintiffs, consisting of $30 million in actual damages and over $1 billion in punitive damages.


India

Of the total number of people receiving the implants, about 4,700 were in India. As of 2018, J&J committed to working with the Indian government to support all Indian ASR patients. In late 2018, an Indian government report, the accuracy of which has been disputed by J&J, proposed that each patient who had a faulty implant should receive a lump sum payment of (). J&J had previously provided to cover diagnostic and surgical costs to patients with defective implants, but the Indian government was concerned that these monies included no compensatory funds.


References

{{Reflist


Further reading


Medical Device Alert: DePuy ASR TM acetabular cups used in hip resurfacing arthroplasty and total hip replacement
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is an executive agency of the Department of Health and Social Care in the United Kingdom which is responsible for ensuring that medicines and medical devices work and are accepta ...
, MDA/2010/044, 25 May 2010
Medical Device Alert: All metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is an executive agency of the Department of Health and Social Care in the United Kingdom which is responsible for ensuring that medicines and medical devices work and are accepta ...
, MDA/2012/008, 28 February 2012
4 Corners Investigative Journalism report into ASR Hip Replacements
Quentin McDermott, 16 May 2011, Australian Broadcasting Corporation

Quentin McDermott and Peter Cronau, 26 May 2014, Australian Broadcasting Corporation


External links


ASR Hip Replacement Recall site
DePuy Hip Recall Product recalls Johnson & Johnson Multidistrict litigation United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio cases