Victims
Neelofar Jan, aged 22 and Aasiya Jan, aged 17, were sisters-in-law and resided in Bongam, Shopian. Neelofar Jan was married to Shakeel Ahmed Ahangar and the couple had a two-year-old son. Aasiya Jan was the daughter of Abdul Gani Ahangar.Initial stages of investigations
Local villagers stated that the two women were raped and the murdered by members of security forces. A protest called by Syed Ali Shah Geelani of the Hurriyat called for a shutdown of business, but later turned violent, as a consequence of which the administration declared a curfew. A press release by the police on 30 May stated "Post-mortem conducted revealed no marks on the dead bodies including private parts." No FIR was registered for either rape or murder and the government of Jammu and Kashmir ordered for a judicial probe by Justice Muzaffar Jan into the incident because of people's lack of faith in police investigations. Concerns arose after the doctor who conducted the post-mortem admitted to the Central Bureau of Investigation that the vaginal swabs that she had submitted to them for testing were fabricated from discarded lab items, and that she had not taken any swabs from the victims. Later, testing by the Central Forensic Laboratory proved that the samples submitted after post-mortem did not match the victims. On 7 June 2009, Jammu and Kashmir police filed FIR of rape and murder following widespread protest across the state.Case history
While on 31 May 2009, the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, Omar Abdullah, appointed Muzaffar Jan to carry out the probe and complete the inquiry in one month's time. The Superintendent of Police, Dr Haseeb Mughal, and The Chief Prosecuting Officer, Abdul Majid Dar, were to assist in the probe, headed by Justice (retired) Muzaffar Jan. The report would be subsequently tabled in the state assembly to make it public. The notification issued in this regard by the Home Department said that the Commission shall: * ascertain whether there had been any foul play in their death and, if so, identify the person/persons responsible. * perform all other functions necessary for holding of inquiry and submit its report within one month from the date of the notification. * ascertain whether there was any failure on the part of any government department in the conduct of any investigation or handling of the post-incident situation. * The Commission, appointed in exercise of powers conferred by Section 3 of the J&K Commission of Inquiry Act, shall recommend action as deemed necessary against the person/persons involved/responsible and suggest action as may be necessary to ensure non-repetition of such incidents. The government has further directed that the provisions of sub-section 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Section 5 of Commission of Inquiry Act shall be applicable to the Commission.Outcome of Justice Jan commission
The final report filed by Justice Jan Commission is summarised in seven parts.Timeline of probe and police findings and fact-finding committee
Rejection of probe
The High Court Bar Association, on 1 June 2009, rejected the probe ordered by the government demanding a sitting Judge of High Court or Chief Justice to carry out the probe instead of a retired Justice, Muzaffar Jan, while separatist leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani demanded Amnesty International to probe the incident and also urged the High Court Bar Association to probe the matter at their own level so that the people could know the truth. However, the Advocate General of Jammu and Kashmir, Muhammad Ishaq Qadri commented that the Commission of Inquiry headed by a sitting or a retired judge does not make any difference regarding the legality of its findings, which are recommendatory in nature in both the cases. Unionist leader of the opposition in the assembly and the PDP president, Mahbooba Mufti, also rejected the government's inquiry commission into the case, and called upon the prime minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh, to review the performance of the state's ruling coalition personally as according to her, it had failed to extent of not registering an FIR of rape and murder in the case.Protests, arrests and curfew
As soon as the news about the incident spread in the Kashmir valley, pre-mediated protests started. These protests were followed by the strike call by the secessionist leaders. Demands for justice, self-determination and removal of the Indian forces started, as planned. As soon as the protests started, police and Indian armed forces in order to halt the protests tried to control them peacefully and fired tear gas canisters as a last resort. Many separatist leaders were put under house arrest or jailed. The CBI probe resulted in exhuming the bodies for examination and it was found that Asiya's hymen was intact, thereby ruling out rape.Curfew
See also
* Rape in Kashmir Conflict * 1991 Kunan Poshpora incident * Kathua Rape Case * Zakoora and Tengpora massacre * Gawakadal massacre * Sopore massacre * Rape in IndiaReferences
* 42.^https://www.greaterkashmir.com/news/more/news/greenland-school-loses-its-topper/External links