Unirational
In mathematics, a rational variety is an algebraic variety, over a given field ''K'', which is birationally equivalent to a projective space of some dimension over ''K''. This means that its function field is isomorphic to :K(U_1, \dots , U_d), the field of all rational functions for some set \ of indeterminates, where ''d'' is the dimension of the variety. Rationality and parameterization Let ''V'' be an affine algebraic variety of dimension ''d'' defined by a prime ideal ''I'' = ⟨''f''1, ..., ''f''''k''⟩ in K _1, \dots , X_n/math>. If ''V'' is rational, then there are ''n'' + 1 polynomials ''g''0, ..., ''g''''n'' in K(U_1, \dots , U_d) such that f_i(g_1/g_0, \ldots, g_n/g_0)=0. In other words, we have a x_i=\frac(u_1,\ldots,u_d) of the variety. Conversely, such a rational parameterization induces a field homomorphism of the field of functions of ''V'' into K(U_1, \dots , U_d). But this homomorphism is not necessarily onto. If such a parameterizatio ... [...More Info...]       [...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]   |
|
Unirationality
In mathematics, a rational variety is an algebraic variety, over a given field ''K'', which is birationally equivalent to a projective space of some dimension over ''K''. This means that its function field is isomorphic to :K(U_1, \dots , U_d), the field of all rational functions for some set \ of indeterminates, where ''d'' is the dimension of the variety. Rationality and parameterization Let ''V'' be an affine algebraic variety of dimension ''d'' defined by a prime ideal ''I'' = ⟨''f''1, ..., ''f''''k''⟩ in K _1, \dots , X_n/math>. If ''V'' is rational, then there are ''n'' + 1 polynomials ''g''0, ..., ''g''''n'' in K(U_1, \dots , U_d) such that f_i(g_1/g_0, \ldots, g_n/g_0)=0. In other words, we have a x_i=\frac(u_1,\ldots,u_d) of the variety. Conversely, such a rational parameterization induces a field homomorphism of the field of functions of ''V'' into K(U_1, \dots , U_d). But this homomorphism is not necessarily onto. If such a parameterization ... [...More Info...]       [...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]   |
|
Castelnuovo's Theorem
In algebraic geometry, a branch of mathematics, a rational surface is a surface birationally equivalent to the projective plane, or in other words a rational variety of dimension two. Rational surfaces are the simplest of the 10 or so classes of surface in the Enriques–Kodaira classification of complex surfaces, and were the first surfaces to be investigated. Structure Every non-singular rational surface can be obtained by repeatedly blowing up a minimal rational surface. The minimal rational surfaces are the projective plane and the Hirzebruch surfaces Σ''r'' for ''r'' = 0 or ''r'' ≥ 2. Invariants: The plurigenera are all 0 and the fundamental group is trivial. Hodge diamond: where ''n'' is 0 for the projective plane, and 1 for Hirzebruch surfaces and greater than 1 for other rational surfaces. The Picard group is the odd unimodular lattice I1,''n'', except for the Hirzebruch surfaces Σ2''m'' when it is the even unimodular lattice II1,1. Castelnuovo's theorem Guido Caste ... [...More Info...]       [...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]   |
|
Zariski Surface
In algebraic geometry, a branch of mathematics, a Zariski surface is a surface over a field of characteristic ''p'' > 0 such that there is a dominant inseparable map of degree ''p'' from the projective plane to the surface. In particular, all Zariski surfaces are unirational. They were named by Piotr Blass in 1977 after Oscar Zariski who used them in 1958 to give examples of unirational surfaces in characteristic ''p'' > 0 that are not rational. (In characteristic 0 by contrast, Castelnuovo's theorem implies that all unirational surfaces are rational.) Zariski surfaces are birational to surfaces in affine 3-space ''A''3 defined by irreducible polynomials of the form :z^p = f(x, y).\ The following problem was posed by Oscar Zariski in 1971: Let ''S'' be a Zariski surface with vanishing geometric genus. Is S necessarily a rational surface? For ''p'' = 2 and for ''p'' = 3 the answer to the above problem is negative as shown in 1977 by Piotr Blass in his U ... [...More Info...]       [...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]   |
|
Transcendence Degree
In mathematics, a transcendental extension L/K is a field extension such that there exists an element in the field L that is transcendental over the field K; that is, an element that is not a root of any univariate polynomial with coefficients in K. In other words, a transcendental extension is a field extension that is not algebraic. For example, \mathbb and \mathbb are both transcendental extensions of \mathbb. A transcendence basis of a field extension L/K (or a transcendence basis of L over K) is a maximal algebraically independent subset of L over K. Transcendence bases share many properties with bases of vector spaces. In particular, all transcendence bases of a field extension have the same cardinality, called the transcendence degree of the extension. Thus, a field extension is a transcendental extension if and only if its transcendence degree is nonzero. Transcendental extensions are widely used in algebraic geometry. For example, the dimension of an algebraic varie ... [...More Info...]       [...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]   |
|
Plurigenus
In mathematics, the pluricanonical ring of an algebraic variety ''V'' (which is nonsingular), or of a complex manifold, is the graded ring :R(V,K)=R(V,K_V) \, of sections of powers of the canonical bundle ''K''. Its ''n''th graded component (for n\geq 0) is: :R_n := H^0(V, K^n),\ that is, the space of sections of the ''n''-th tensor product ''K''''n'' of the canonical bundle ''K''. The 0th graded component R_0 is sections of the trivial bundle, and is one-dimensional as ''V'' is projective. The projective variety defined by this graded ring is called the canonical model of ''V'', and the dimension of the canonical model is called the Kodaira dimension of ''V''. One can define an analogous ring for any line bundle In mathematics, a line bundle expresses the concept of a line that varies from point to point of a space. For example, a curve in the plane having a tangent line at each point determines a varying line: the ''tangent bundle'' is a way of organis ... ''L'' over ... [...More Info...]       [...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]   |
|
Arithmetic Genus
In mathematics, the arithmetic genus of an algebraic variety is one of a few possible generalizations of the genus of an algebraic curve or Riemann surface. Projective varieties Let ''X'' be a projective scheme of dimension ''r'' over a field ''k'', the ''arithmetic genus'' p_a of ''X'' is defined asp_a(X)=(-1)^r (\chi(\mathcal_X)-1).Here \chi(\mathcal_X) is the Euler characteristic of the structure sheaf \mathcal_X. Complex projective manifolds The arithmetic genus of a complex projective manifold of dimension ''n'' can be defined as a combination of Hodge numbers, namely :p_a=\sum_^ (-1)^j h^. When ''n=1'', the formula becomes p_a=h^. According to the Hodge theorem, h^=h^. Consequently h^=h^1(X)/2=g, where ''g'' is the usual (topological) meaning of genus of a surface, so the definitions are compatible. When ''X'' is a compact Kähler manifold, applying ''h''''p'',''q'' = ''h''''q'',''p'' recovers the earlier definition for projective varieties. Kähler manifolds By u ... [...More Info...]       [...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]   |
|
Riemann–Hurwitz Formula
In mathematics, the Riemann–Hurwitz formula, named after Bernhard Riemann and Adolf Hurwitz, describes the relationship of the Euler characteristics of two surfaces when one is a ''ramified covering'' of the other. It therefore connects ramification with algebraic topology, in this case. It is a prototype result for many others, and is often applied in the theory of Riemann surfaces (which is its origin) and algebraic curves. Statement For a compact, connected, orientable surface S, the Euler characteristic \chi(S) is :\chi(S)=2-2g, where ''g'' is the genus (the ''number of handles''). This follows, as the Betti numbers are 1, 2g, 1, 0, 0, \dots. For the case of an (''unramified'') covering map of surfaces :\pi\colon S' \to S that is surjective and of degree N, we have the formula :\chi(S') = N\cdot\chi(S). That is because each simplex of S should be covered by exactly N in S', at least if we use a fine enough triangulation of S, as we are entitled to do since the Euler ... [...More Info...]       [...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]   |
|
Genus Of A Curve
In mathematics, genus (: genera) has a few different, but closely related, meanings. Intuitively, the genus is the number of "holes" of a surface. A sphere has genus 0, while a torus has genus 1. Topology Orientable surfaces The genus of a connected, orientable surface is an integer representing the maximum number of cuttings along non-intersecting closed simple curves without rendering the resultant manifold disconnected. It is equal to the number of handles on it. Alternatively, it can be defined in terms of the Euler characteristic \chi, via the relationship \chi=2-2g for closed surfaces, where g is the genus. For surfaces with b boundary components, the equation reads \chi=2-2g-b. In layman's terms, the genus is the number of "holes" an object has ("holes" interpreted in the sense of doughnut holes; a hollow sphere would be considered as having zero holes in this sense). A torus has 1 such hole, while a sphere has 0. The green surface pictured above has 2 holes of the ... [...More Info...]       [...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]   |
|
Projective Line
In projective geometry and mathematics more generally, a projective line is, roughly speaking, the extension of a usual line by a point called a '' point at infinity''. The statement and the proof of many theorems of geometry are simplified by the resultant elimination of special cases; for example, two distinct projective lines in a projective plane meet in exactly one point (there is no "parallel" case). There are many equivalent ways to formally define a projective line; one of the most common is to define a projective line over a field ''K'', commonly denoted P1(''K''), as the set of one-dimensional subspaces of a two-dimensional ''K''-vector space. This definition is a special instance of the general definition of a projective space. The projective line over the reals is a manifold; see '' Real projective line'' for details. Homogeneous coordinates An arbitrary point in the projective line P1(''K'') may be represented by an equivalence class of '' homogeneous coordi ... [...More Info...]       [...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]   |
|
Rational Map
In mathematics, in particular the subfield of algebraic geometry, a rational map or rational mapping is a kind of partial function between algebraic varieties. This article uses the convention that varieties are irreducible. Definition Formal definition Formally, a rational map f \colon V \to W between two varieties is an equivalence class of pairs (f_U, U) in which f_U is a morphism of varieties from a non-empty open set U\subset V to W, and two such pairs (f_U, U) and (_, U') are considered equivalent if f_U and _ coincide on the intersection U \cap U' (this is, in particular, vacuously true if the intersection is empty, but since V is assumed irreducible, this is impossible). The proof that this defines an equivalence relation relies on the following lemma: * If two morphisms of varieties are equal on some non-empty open set, then they are equal. f is said to be dominant if one (equivalently, every) representative f_U in the equivalence class is a dominant morphism, i.e. ... [...More Info...]       [...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]   |
|
Jacob Lüroth
Jacob Lüroth (18 February 1844, Mannheim, German Confederation, Germany – 14 September 1910, Munich, German Empire, Germany) was a German mathematician who proved Lüroth's theorem and introduced Lüroth quartics. His name is sometimes written Lueroth, following the common Umlaut (diacritic)#Printing conventions in German, printing convention for umlauted characters. He began his studies in astronomy at the University of Bonn, but switched to mathematics when his poor eyesight made taking astronomical observations impossible. He received his doctorate in 1865 from Heidelberg University, for a thesis on Pascal's theorem. From 1868 he was at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, where he became a professor in 1869, and from 1880 he was a professor at the Technical University of Munich, succeeding Felix Klein. In 1883, he became a professor at the University of Freiburg, where he remained until his retirement. Following up on Carl Friedrich Gauss's work on statistics, Lüroth ... [...More Info...]       [...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]   |
|
Field Extension
In mathematics, particularly in algebra, a field extension is a pair of fields K \subseteq L, such that the operations of ''K'' are those of ''L'' restricted to ''K''. In this case, ''L'' is an extension field of ''K'' and ''K'' is a subfield of ''L''. For example, under the usual notions of addition and multiplication, the complex numbers are an extension field of the real numbers; the real numbers are a subfield of the complex numbers. Field extensions are fundamental in algebraic number theory, and in the study of polynomial roots through Galois theory, and are widely used in algebraic geometry. Subfield A subfield K of a field L is a subset K\subseteq L that is a field with respect to the field operations inherited from L. Equivalently, a subfield is a subset that contains the multiplicative identity 1, and is closed under the operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and taking the inverse of a nonzero element of K. As , the latter definition implies K and L ... [...More Info...]       [...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]   |