|
Time Hierarchy Theorem
In computational complexity theory, the time hierarchy theorems are important statements about time-bounded computation on Turing machines. Informally, these theorems say that given more time, a Turing machine can solve more problems. For example, there are problems that can be solved with ''n''2 time but not ''n'' time, where ''n'' is the input length. The time hierarchy theorem for deterministic multi-tape Turing machines was first proven by Richard E. Stearns and Juris Hartmanis in 1965. It was improved a year later when F. C. Hennie and Richard E. Stearns improved the efficiency of the universal Turing machine. Consequent to the theorem, for every deterministic time-bounded complexity class, there is a strictly larger time-bounded complexity class, and so the time-bounded hierarchy of complexity classes does not completely collapse. More precisely, the time hierarchy theorem for deterministic Turing machines states that for all time-constructible functions ''f''(''n''), :\mat ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Computational Complexity Theory
In theoretical computer science and mathematics, computational complexity theory focuses on classifying computational problems according to their resource usage, and explores the relationships between these classifications. A computational problem is a task solved by a computer. A computation problem is solvable by mechanical application of mathematical steps, such as an algorithm. A problem is regarded as inherently difficult if its solution requires significant resources, whatever the algorithm used. The theory formalizes this intuition, by introducing mathematical models of computation to study these problems and quantifying their computational complexity, i.e., the amount of resources needed to solve them, such as time and storage. Other measures of complexity are also used, such as the amount of communication (used in communication complexity), the number of logic gate, gates in a circuit (used in circuit complexity) and the number of processors (used in parallel computing). O ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Space Hierarchy Theorem
In computational complexity theory, the space hierarchy theorems are separation results that show that both deterministic and nondeterministic machines can solve more problems in (asymptotically) more space, subject to certain conditions. For example, a deterministic Turing machine can solve more decision problem In computability theory and computational complexity theory, a decision problem is a computational problem that can be posed as a yes–no question on a set of input values. An example of a decision problem is deciding whether a given natura ...s in space ''n'' log ''n'' than in space ''n''. The somewhat weaker analogous theorems for time are the time hierarchy theorems. The foundation for the hierarchy theorems lies in the intuition that with either more time or more space comes the ability to compute more functions (or decide more languages). The hierarchy theorems are used to demonstrate that the time and space complexity classes form a hierarchy where classes w ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
NEXPTIME
In computational complexity theory, the complexity class NEXPTIME (sometimes called NEXP) is the set of decision problems that can be solved by a non-deterministic Turing machine using time 2^. In terms of NTIME, :\mathsf = \bigcup_ \mathsf(2^) Alternatively, NEXPTIME can be defined using deterministic Turing machines as verifiers. A language ''L'' is in NEXPTIME if and only if there exist polynomials ''p'' and ''q'', and a deterministic Turing machine ''M'', such that * For all ''x'' and ''y'', the machine ''M'' runs in time 2^ on input * For all ''x'' in ''L'', there exists a string ''y'' of length 2^ such that * For all ''x'' not in ''L'' and all strings ''y'' of length 2^, We know : and also, by the time hierarchy theorem, that : If , then ( padding argument); more precisely, if and only if there exist sparse languages in NP that are not in P. Alternative characterizations In descriptive complexity, the sets of natural numbers that can be recognized in NEXPTIME ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
NP (complexity)
In computational complexity theory, NP (nondeterministic polynomial time) is a complexity class used to classify decision problems. NP is the Set (mathematics), set of decision problems for which the Computational complexity theory#Problem instances, problem instances, where the answer is "yes", have mathematical proof, proofs verifiable in polynomial time by a deterministic Turing machine, or alternatively the set of problems that can be solved in polynomial time by a nondeterministic Turing machine.''Polynomial time'' refers to how quickly the number of operations needed by an algorithm, relative to the size of the problem, grows. It is therefore a measure of efficiency of an algorithm. * NP is the set of decision problems ''solvable'' in polynomial time by a nondeterministic Turing machine. * NP is the set of decision problems ''verifiable'' in polynomial time by a deterministic Turing machine. The first definition is the basis for the abbreviation NP; "Nondeterministic alg ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
2-EXP
In computational complexity theory, the complexity class 2-EXPTIME (sometimes called 2-EXP, sometimes also written 2EXPTIME) is the set of all decision problems solvable by a deterministic Turing machine in O(22''p''(''n'')) time, where ''p''(''n'') is a polynomial function of ''n''. In terms of DTIME, : \mathsf = \bigcup_ \mathsf \left( 2^ \right) . Comparison with other complexity classes We know : P ⊆ NP ⊆ PSPACE ⊆ EXPTIME ⊆ NEXPTIME ⊆ EXPSPACE ⊆ 2-EXPTIME ⊆ ELEMENTARY. 2-EXPTIME can also be reformulated as the space class AEXPSPACE, the problems that can be solved by an alternating Turing machine in exponential space. This is one way to see that EXPSPACE ⊆ 2-EXPTIME, since an alternating Turing machine is at least as powerful as a deterministic Turing machine. 2-EXPTIME is one class in a hierarchy of complexity classes with increasingly higher time bounds. The class 3-EXPTIME is defined similarly to 2-EXPTIME but with a triply exponential time bound 2^. ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
EXPTIME
In computational complexity theory, the complexity class EXPTIME (sometimes called EXP or DEXPTIME) is the set of all decision problems that are solvable by a deterministic Turing machine in exponential time, i.e., in O(2''p''(''n'')) time, where ''p''(''n'') is a polynomial function of ''n''. EXPTIME is one intuitive class in an exponential hierarchy of complexity classes with increasingly more complex oracles or quantifier alternations. For example, the class 2-EXPTIME is defined similarly to EXPTIME but with a doubly exponential time bound. This can be generalized to higher and higher time bounds. EXPTIME can also be reformulated as the space class APSPACE, the set of all problems that can be solved by an alternating Turing machine in polynomial space. EXPTIME relates to the other basic time and space complexity classes in the following way: P ⊆ NP ⊆ PSPACE ⊆ EXPTIME ⊆ NEXPTIME ⊆ EXPSPACE. Furthermore, by the time hierarchy theorem and the space hiera ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
P (complexity)
In computational complexity theory, P, also known as PTIME or DTIME(''n''O(1)), is a fundamental complexity class. It contains all decision problems that can be solved by a deterministic Turing machine using a polynomial amount of computation time, or polynomial time. Cobham's thesis holds that P is the class of computational problems that are "efficiently solvable" or " tractable". This is inexact: in practice, some problems not known to be in P have practical solutions, and some that are in P do not, but this is a useful rule of thumb. Definition A language ''L'' is in P if and only if there exists a deterministic Turing machine ''M'', such that * ''M'' runs for polynomial time on all inputs * For all ''x'' in ''L'', ''M'' outputs 1 * For all ''x'' not in ''L'', ''M'' outputs 0 P can also be viewed as a uniform family of Boolean circuits. A language ''L'' is in P if and only if there exists a polynomial-time uniform family of Boolean circuits \, such that * For all n \in ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Exponential Hierarchy
In computational complexity theory, the exponential hierarchy is a hierarchy of complexity classes that is an exponential time analogue of the polynomial hierarchy. As elsewhere in complexity theory, “exponential” is used in two different meanings (linear exponential bounds 2^ for a constant ''c'', and full exponential bounds 2^), leading to two versions of the exponential hierarchy.Anuj Dawar, Georg Gottlob, Lauri Hella, Capturing relativized complexity classes without order, Mathematical Logic Quarterly 44 (1998), no. 1, pp. 109–122. This hierarchy is sometimes also referred to as the ''weak'' exponential hierarchy, to differentiate it from the ''strong'' exponential hierarchy. EH The complexity class EH is the union of the classes \Sigma^\mathsf_k for all ''k'', where \Sigma^\mathsf_k=\mathsf^ (i.e., languages computable in nondeterministic time 2^ for some constant ''c'' with a \Sigma^\mathsf_ oracle) and \Sigma^\mathsf_0 = \mathsf. One also defines :\Pi^\maths ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
NTIME
In computational complexity theory, the complexity class NTIME(''f''(''n'')) is the set of decision problems that can be solved by a non-deterministic Turing machine which runs in time ''O''(''f''(''n'')). Here ''O'' is the big O notation, ''f'' is some function, and ''n'' is the size of the input (for which the problem is to be decided). Meaning This means that there is a non-deterministic machine which, for a given input of size ''n'', will run in time ''O''(''f''(''n'')) (i.e. within a constant multiple of ''f''(''n''), for ''n'' greater than some value), and will always "reject" the input if the answer to the decision problem is "no" for that input, while if the answer is "yes" the machine will "accept" that input for at least one computation path. Equivalently, there is a deterministic Turing machine ''M'' that runs in time ''O''(''f''(''n'')) and is able to check an ''O''(''f''(''n''))-length certificate for an input; if the input is a "yes" instance, then at least one certifi ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Big O Notation
Big ''O'' notation is a mathematical notation that describes the asymptotic analysis, limiting behavior of a function (mathematics), function when the Argument of a function, argument tends towards a particular value or infinity. Big O is a member of a #Related asymptotic notations, family of notations invented by German mathematicians Paul Gustav Heinrich Bachmann, Paul Bachmann, Edmund Landau, and others, collectively called Bachmann–Landau notation or asymptotic notation. The letter O was chosen by Bachmann to stand for '':wikt:Ordnung#German, Ordnung'', meaning the order of approximation. In computer science, big O notation is used to Computational complexity theory, classify algorithms according to how their run time or space requirements grow as the input size grows. In analytic number theory, big O notation is often used to express a bound on the difference between an arithmetic function, arithmetical function and a better understood approximation; one well-known exam ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Simulation
A simulation is an imitative representation of a process or system that could exist in the real world. In this broad sense, simulation can often be used interchangeably with model. Sometimes a clear distinction between the two terms is made, in which simulations require the use of models; the model represents the key characteristics or behaviors of the selected system or process, whereas the simulation represents the evolution of the model over time. Another way to distinguish between the terms is to define simulation as experimentation with the help of a model. This definition includes time-independent simulations. Often, computer simulation, computers are used to execute the simulation. Simulation is used in many contexts, such as simulation of technology for performance tuning or optimizing, safety engineering, testing, training, education, and video games. Simulation is also used with scientific modelling of natural systems or human systems to gain insight into their functio ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Cantor's Diagonal Argument
Cantor's diagonal argument (among various similar namesthe diagonalisation argument, the diagonal slash argument, the anti-diagonal argument, the diagonal method, and Cantor's diagonalization proof) is a mathematical proof that there are infinite sets which cannot be put into one-to-one correspondence with the infinite set of natural numbersinformally, that there are sets which in some sense contain more elements than there are positive integers. Such sets are now called uncountable sets, and the size of infinite sets is treated by the theory of cardinal numbers, which Cantor began. Georg Cantor published this proof in 1891, English translation: but it was not his first proof of the uncountability of the real numbers, which appeared in 1874. However, it demonstrates a general technique that has since been used in a wide range of proofs, including the first of Gödel's incompleteness theorems and Turing's answer to the ''Entscheidungsproblem''. Diagonalization arguments ar ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
