|
List Of Statements Undecidable In ZFC
The mathematical statements discussed below are independent of ZFC (the canonical axiomatic set theory of contemporary mathematics, consisting of the Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms plus the axiom of choice), assuming that ZFC is consistent. A statement is independent of ZFC (sometimes phrased "undecidable in ZFC") if it can neither be proven nor disproven from the axioms of ZFC. Axiomatic set theory In 1931, Kurt Gödel proved his incompleteness theorems, establishing that many mathematical theories, including ZFC, cannot prove their own consistency. Assuming ω-consistency of such a theory, the consistency statement can also not be disproven, meaning it is independent. A few years later, other arithmetic statements were defined that are independent of any such theory, see for example Rosser's trick. The following set theoretic statements are independent of ZFC, among others: * the continuum hypothesis or CH (Gödel produced a model of ZFC in which CH is true, showing that CH ca ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Mathematics
Mathematics is a field of study that discovers and organizes methods, Mathematical theory, theories and theorems that are developed and Mathematical proof, proved for the needs of empirical sciences and mathematics itself. There are many areas of mathematics, which include number theory (the study of numbers), algebra (the study of formulas and related structures), geometry (the study of shapes and spaces that contain them), Mathematical analysis, analysis (the study of continuous changes), and set theory (presently used as a foundation for all mathematics). Mathematics involves the description and manipulation of mathematical object, abstract objects that consist of either abstraction (mathematics), abstractions from nature orin modern mathematicspurely abstract entities that are stipulated to have certain properties, called axioms. Mathematics uses pure reason to proof (mathematics), prove properties of objects, a ''proof'' consisting of a succession of applications of in ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Martin's Axiom
In the mathematical field of set theory, Martin's axiom, introduced by Donald A. Martin and Robert M. Solovay, is a statement that is independent of the usual axioms of ZFC set theory. It is implied by the continuum hypothesis, but it is consistent with ZFC and the negation of the continuum hypothesis. Informally, it says that all cardinals less than the cardinality of the continuum, 𝔠, behave roughly like ℵ0. The intuition behind this can be understood by studying the proof of the Rasiowa–Sikorski lemma. It is a principle that is used to control certain forcing arguments. Statement For a cardinal number ''κ'', define the following statement: ;MA(''κ''): For any partial order ''P'' satisfying the countable chain condition (hereafter ccc) and any set ''D'' = ''i''∈''I'' of dense subsets of ''P'' such that '', D, '' ≤ ''κ'', there is a filter ''F'' on ''P'' such that ''F'' ∩ ''D''''i'' is non- empty for every ''D''''i'' ∈ ' ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Supercompact Cardinal
In set theory, a supercompact cardinal is a type of large cardinal independently introduced by Solovay and Reinhardt. They display a variety of reflection properties. Formal definition If \lambda is any ordinal, \kappa is \lambda-supercompact means that there exists an elementary embedding j from the universe V into a transitive inner model M with critical point \kappa, j(\kappa)>\lambda and :^\lambda M\subseteq M \,. That is, M contains all of its \lambda-sequences. Then \kappa is supercompact means that it is \lambda-supercompact for all ordinals \lambda. Alternatively, an uncountable cardinal \kappa is supercompact if for every A such that \vert A\vert\geq\kappa there exists a normal measure over , in the following sense. is defined as follows: : := \. An ultrafilter U over is ''fine'' if it is \kappa-complete and \ \in U, for every a \in A. A normal measure over is a fine ultrafilter U over with the additional property that every function f: \to A such th ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Stanislaw Ulam
Stanislav and variants may refer to: People *Stanislav (given name), a Slavic given name with many spelling variations (Stanislaus, Stanislas, Stanisław, etc.) Places * Stanislav, Kherson Oblast, a coastal village in Ukraine * Stanislaus County, California * Stanislaus River, California * Stanislaus National Forest, California * Place Stanislas, a square in Nancy, France, World Heritage Site of UNESCO * Saint-Stanislas, Mauricie, Quebec, a Canadian municipality * Stanizlav, a fictional train depot in the game '' TimeSplitters: Future Perfect'' * Stanislau, German name of Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine Schools * St. Stanislaus High School, an institution in Bandra, Mumbai, India * St. Stanislaus High School (Detroit) * Collège Stanislas de Paris, an institution in Paris, France * California State University, Stanislaus, a public university in Turlock, CA * St Stanislaus College (Bathurst) St Stanislaus' College is an Australian independent Roman Catholic secondary day and boar ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Measurable Cardinal
In mathematics, a measurable cardinal is a certain kind of large cardinal number. In order to define the concept, one introduces a two-valued measure (mathematics), measure on a cardinal ''κ'', or more generally on any set. For a cardinal ''κ'', it can be described as a subdivision of all of its subsets into large and small sets such that ''κ'' itself is large, ∅ and all singleton (mathematics), singletons (with ''α'' ∈ ''κ'') are small, set complement, complements of small sets are large and vice versa. The intersection of fewer than ''κ'' large sets is again large. It turns out that uncountable cardinals endowed with a two-valued measure are large cardinals whose existence cannot be proved from ZFC. The concept of a measurable cardinal was introduced by Stanisław Ulam in 1930. Definition Formally, a measurable cardinal is an uncountable cardinal number ''κ'' such that there exists a ''κ''-additive, non-trivial, 0-1-valued measure (mathematics), measure ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Mahlo Cardinal
In mathematics, a Mahlo cardinal is a certain kind of large cardinal number. Mahlo cardinals were first described by . As with all large cardinals, none of these varieties of Mahlo cardinals can be proven to exist by ZFC (assuming ZFC is consistent). A cardinal number In mathematics, a cardinal number, or cardinal for short, is what is commonly called the number of elements of a set. In the case of a finite set, its cardinal number, or cardinality is therefore a natural number. For dealing with the cas ... \kappa is called strongly Mahlo if \kappa is strongly inaccessible and the set U = \ is stationary in \kappa. In other words, \kappa is strongly inaccessible, and for any unbounded set S\subseteq\kappa of cardinals, there is a strongly inaccessible cardinal \lambda < \kappa which is a limit of members of . A cardinal is called weakly Mahlo if is weakly inaccessible and the set of weakly inaccessible ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Inaccessible Cardinal
In set theory, a cardinal number is a strongly inaccessible cardinal if it is uncountable, regular, and a strong limit cardinal. A cardinal is a weakly inaccessible cardinal if it is uncountable, regular, and a weak limit cardinal. Since about 1950, "inaccessible cardinal" has typically meant "strongly inaccessible cardinal" whereas before it has meant "weakly inaccessible cardinal". Weakly inaccessible cardinals were introduced by . Strongly inaccessible cardinals were introduced by and ; in the latter they were referred to along with \aleph_0 as ''Grenzzahlen'' ( English "limit numbers"). Every strongly inaccessible cardinal is a weakly inaccessible cardinal. The generalized continuum hypothesis implies that all weakly inaccessible cardinals are strongly inaccessible as well. The two notions of an inaccessible cardinal \kappa describe a cardinality \kappa which can not be obtained as the cardinality of a result of typical set-theoretic operations involving only sets of c ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Large Cardinal
In the mathematical field of set theory, a large cardinal property is a certain kind of property of transfinite cardinal numbers. Cardinals with such properties are, as the name suggests, generally very "large" (for example, bigger than the least α such that α=ωα). The proposition that such cardinals exist cannot be proved in the most common axiomatization of set theory, namely ZFC, and such propositions can be viewed as ways of measuring how "much", beyond ZFC, one needs to assume to be able to prove certain desired results. In other words, they can be seen, in Dana Scott's phrase, as quantifying the fact "that if you want more you have to assume more". There is a rough convention that results provable from ZFC alone may be stated without hypotheses, but that if the proof requires other assumptions (such as the existence of large cardinals), these should be stated. Whether this is simply a linguistic convention, or something more, is a controversial point among distinct ph ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Suslin Hypothesis
In mathematics, Suslin's problem is a question about totally ordered sets posed by and published posthumously. It has been shown to be independent of the standard axiomatic system of set theory known as ZFC; showed that the statement can neither be proven nor disproven from those axioms, assuming ZF is consistent. (Suslin is also sometimes written with the French transliteration as , from the Cyrillic .) Formulation Suslin's problem asks: Given a non-empty totally ordered set ''R'' with the four properties # ''R'' does not have a least nor a greatest element; # the order on ''R'' is dense (between any two distinct elements there is another); # the order on ''R'' is complete, in the sense that every non-empty bounded subset has a supremum and an infimum; and # every collection of mutually disjoint non-empty open intervals in ''R'' is countable (this is the countable chain condition for the order topology of ''R''), is ''R'' necessarily order-isomorphic to the real line R? If ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Implication Chains Of Undecidable ZFC Statements
Implication may refer to: Logic * Logical consequence (also entailment or logical implication), the relationship between statements that holds true when one logically "follows from" one or more others * Material conditional (also material implication), a logical connective and binary truth function typically interpreted as "If ''p'', then ''q''" ** Material implication (rule of inference), a logical rule of replacement ** Implicational propositional calculus, a version of classical propositional calculus that uses only the material conditional connective * Strict conditional or strict implication, a connective of modal logic that expresses necessity * ''modus ponens'', or implication elimination, a simple argument form and rule of inference summarized as "''p'' implies ''q''; ''p'' is asserted to be true, so therefore ''q'' must be true" Linguistics * Implicature, what is suggested in an utterance, even though neither expressed nor strictly implied * Implicational universal o ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Aronszajn Tree
In set theory, an Aronszajn tree is a tree of uncountable height with no uncountable branches and no uncountable levels. For example, every Suslin tree is an Aronszajn tree. More generally, for a cardinal ''κ'', a ''κ''-Aronszajn tree is a tree of height ''κ'' in which all levels have size less than ''κ'' and all branches have height less than ''κ'' (so Aronszajn trees are the same as \aleph_1-Aronszajn trees). They are named for Nachman Aronszajn, who constructed an Aronszajn tree in 1934; his construction was described by . A cardinal ''κ'' for which no ''κ''-Aronszajn trees exist is said to have the tree property (sometimes the condition that ''κ'' is regular and uncountable is included). Existence of κ-Aronszajn trees Kőnig's lemma states that \aleph_0-Aronszajn trees do not exist. The existence of Aronszajn trees (=\aleph_1-Aronszajn trees) was proven by Nachman Aronszajn, and implies that the analogue of Kőnig's lemma does not hold for uncountable trees ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
