Commission V Germany (other)

	Commission V Germany (other) ''Commission v Germany'' may refer to: '' Commission v Germany'' (1987), in which article 34 TFEU did not permit the German Beer Tax Act to limit the definition of "beer" to just products that contained only malted barley, hops, yeast, water. '' Commission v Germany'' (2007), on freedom of capital, holding it was "disproportionate" to limit big shareholders' votes and for Lower Saxony to have a golden share, for the government's stated aim of protecting workers or minority shareholders. See also ''Commission v France (other) ''Commission v France'' (or Commission of the European Communities v French Republic) refers to several different cases heard by the European Court of Justice, which the European Commission brought against France for infringing European Union law ...'' '' Commission v Ireland (other)'' '' Commission v Italy (other)'' '' Commission v United Kingdom (other)'' {{Caselaw disambiguation Court of Justice of the European U ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Germany (1987) ''Commission v Germany'' (1987Case 178/84is an EU law case, concerning the free movement of goods in the European Union. Facts The Biersteuergesetz (Beer Tax Act, often referred to as the Reinheitsgebot or Beer Purity Law) originally from 1516, banned marketing of beer with any additives. It also reserved the name ‘Bier’ for malted barley, hops, yeast and water only. Maize and rice being used meant the product could not be called ‘Bier’. French brewers claimed the restrictions were protectionist to exclude imported beer. Germany argued that Germans drank a lot of beer, and long term effects of additives were unknown. Consumers were used to linking the word ‘Bier’ only to those products with the traditional ingredients. Judgment ECJ held the rule could not be justified. It examined international scientific research and the EU’s scientific committee for food work, the codex alimentarius of the UN and the WHO and found that additives posed no risk to public heal ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Germany (2007) ''Commission v Germany'' (2007C-112/05is an EU law case, relevant for UK enterprise law, concerning European company law. Following a trend in cases such as ''Commission v United Kingdom'', and '' Commission v Netherlands'', it struck down public oversight, through golden shares of Volkswagen by the German state of Lower Saxony. Soon afterwards, the management practices leading to the Volkswagen emissions scandal began. Facts The Commission claimed that the Volkswagen Act 1960 provisions on golden shares violated free movement of capital under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union article 63. The VA 1960 §2(1) restricted the number of shareholder voting rights to 20% of the company, and §4(3) allowed a minority of 20% of shareholders to block any decisions. The Lower Saxony government held those shares. Germany argued that the 1960 law was based on a private agreement between workers, trade unions and the state, and so was not within the free movement of capital ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
picture info	Commission V France (other) ''Commission v France'' (or Commission of the European Communities v French Republic) refers to several different cases heard by the European Court of Justice, which the European Commission brought against France for infringing European Union law. This includes breach of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), or a failure to implement European Union Directives: In '' Commission v France (1984)'C-202/82 France and Italy require that pasta products be manufactured from durum wheat and do not contain common wheat. France used a different method of analysis to Italy when testing whether pasta contained common wheat. In '' Commission v France (1987)'C-196/85 France's system of differential tax treatment for natural sweet wines and liqueur wines did not violate the Treaty of Rome 1957, Article 95. In '' Commission v France (1988)'C-312/86 France had failed to adopt all measures to implement Directive 76/207 on gender discrimination by allowing certain privilege ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR:* [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Ireland (other) ''Commission v Ireland'' refers to several different cases heard by the European Court of Justice, which the European Commission brought against Ireland for infringing European Union law. This includes breach of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), or a failure to implement European Union Directives: In ''Commission v Ireland'' (1982) Case 249/81, the Irish government was wrong to fund and manage the "Buy Irish" campaign because it breached (what is now) TFEU article 34, by restricting free movement of goods. See also ''Commission v France (other)'' ''Commission v Germany (other)'' ''Commission v United Kingdom (other) ''Commission v United Kingdom'' may refer to: * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-337/89) (1992), an EU law case concerning water quality standards and enforcement under the Drinking Water Directive * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-484/04) (20 ...'' '' Commission v Italy (other)'' {{Caselaw disamb ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR:* [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Italy (other) ''Commission v Italy'' may refer to: In ''Commission v Italy (1968)'', Italy was not allowed to tax the export of art treasures. This case was important because it helped define the meaning of the word "goods" under European Law. In ''Commission v Italy (1972)'', Italy failed to enforce EU Dairy Regulations on time. In ''Commission v Italy (2003)'', Italy had wrongly limited the use of the word "chocolate" to products without vegetable fat. In ''Commission v Italy (2009)'', Italy wrongly banned motorcycles and mopeds from pulling trailers, which affected imported goods because Italian manufacturers didn't make such goods. In ''Commission v Italy (2011)'', Italy could not require lawyers to abide by maximum tariffs, unless the client agreed, because this discouraged lawyers from other Member States from moving to Italy. See also ''Commission v France (other)'' ''Commission v Germany (other)'' ''Commission v Ireland (other)'' ''Commission v United K ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR:* [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V United Kingdom (other) ''Commission v United Kingdom'' may refer to: * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-337/89) (1992), an EU law case concerning water quality standards and enforcement under the Drinking Water Directive * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-484/04) (2006), a European labour law and UK labour lawcase concerning the Working Time Directive, which is relevant for the Working Time Regulations 1998 * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-516/22) (2024) See also ''Commission v France (other)'' ''Commission v Germany (other) ''Commission v Germany'' may refer to: '' Commission v Germany'' (1987), in which article 34 TFEU did not permit the German Beer Tax Act to limit the definition of "beer" to just products that contained only malted barley, hops, yeast, water. '' ...'' '' Commission v Italy (other)'' '' Commission v Ireland (other)'' {{Caselaw disambiguation Court of Justice of the European Union case law ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]

	Commission V Germany (other) ''Commission v Germany'' may refer to: '' Commission v Germany'' (1987), in which article 34 TFEU did not permit the German Beer Tax Act to limit the definition of "beer" to just products that contained only malted barley, hops, yeast, water. '' Commission v Germany'' (2007), on freedom of capital, holding it was "disproportionate" to limit big shareholders' votes and for Lower Saxony to have a golden share, for the government's stated aim of protecting workers or minority shareholders. See also ''Commission v France (other) ''Commission v France'' (or Commission of the European Communities v French Republic) refers to several different cases heard by the European Court of Justice, which the European Commission brought against France for infringing European Union law ...'' '' Commission v Ireland (other)'' '' Commission v Italy (other)'' '' Commission v United Kingdom (other)'' {{Caselaw disambiguation Court of Justice of the European U ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Germany (1987) ''Commission v Germany'' (1987Case 178/84is an EU law case, concerning the free movement of goods in the European Union. Facts The Biersteuergesetz (Beer Tax Act, often referred to as the Reinheitsgebot or Beer Purity Law) originally from 1516, banned marketing of beer with any additives. It also reserved the name ‘Bier’ for malted barley, hops, yeast and water only. Maize and rice being used meant the product could not be called ‘Bier’. French brewers claimed the restrictions were protectionist to exclude imported beer. Germany argued that Germans drank a lot of beer, and long term effects of additives were unknown. Consumers were used to linking the word ‘Bier’ only to those products with the traditional ingredients. Judgment ECJ held the rule could not be justified. It examined international scientific research and the EU’s scientific committee for food work, the codex alimentarius of the UN and the WHO and found that additives posed no risk to public heal ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Germany (2007) ''Commission v Germany'' (2007C-112/05is an EU law case, relevant for UK enterprise law, concerning European company law. Following a trend in cases such as ''Commission v United Kingdom'', and '' Commission v Netherlands'', it struck down public oversight, through golden shares of Volkswagen by the German state of Lower Saxony. Soon afterwards, the management practices leading to the Volkswagen emissions scandal began. Facts The Commission claimed that the Volkswagen Act 1960 provisions on golden shares violated free movement of capital under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union article 63. The VA 1960 §2(1) restricted the number of shareholder voting rights to 20% of the company, and §4(3) allowed a minority of 20% of shareholders to block any decisions. The Lower Saxony government held those shares. Germany argued that the 1960 law was based on a private agreement between workers, trade unions and the state, and so was not within the free movement of capital ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
picture info	Commission V France (other) ''Commission v France'' (or Commission of the European Communities v French Republic) refers to several different cases heard by the European Court of Justice, which the European Commission brought against France for infringing European Union law. This includes breach of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), or a failure to implement European Union Directives: In '' Commission v France (1984)'C-202/82 France and Italy require that pasta products be manufactured from durum wheat and do not contain common wheat. France used a different method of analysis to Italy when testing whether pasta contained common wheat. In '' Commission v France (1987)'C-196/85 France's system of differential tax treatment for natural sweet wines and liqueur wines did not violate the Treaty of Rome 1957, Article 95. In '' Commission v France (1988)'C-312/86 France had failed to adopt all measures to implement Directive 76/207 on gender discrimination by allowing certain privilege ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR:* [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Ireland (other) ''Commission v Ireland'' refers to several different cases heard by the European Court of Justice, which the European Commission brought against Ireland for infringing European Union law. This includes breach of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), or a failure to implement European Union Directives: In ''Commission v Ireland'' (1982) Case 249/81, the Irish government was wrong to fund and manage the "Buy Irish" campaign because it breached (what is now) TFEU article 34, by restricting free movement of goods. See also ''Commission v France (other)'' ''Commission v Germany (other)'' ''Commission v United Kingdom (other) ''Commission v United Kingdom'' may refer to: * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-337/89) (1992), an EU law case concerning water quality standards and enforcement under the Drinking Water Directive * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-484/04) (20 ...'' '' Commission v Italy (other)'' {{Caselaw disamb ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR:* [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V Italy (other) ''Commission v Italy'' may refer to: In ''Commission v Italy (1968)'', Italy was not allowed to tax the export of art treasures. This case was important because it helped define the meaning of the word "goods" under European Law. In ''Commission v Italy (1972)'', Italy failed to enforce EU Dairy Regulations on time. In ''Commission v Italy (2003)'', Italy had wrongly limited the use of the word "chocolate" to products without vegetable fat. In ''Commission v Italy (2009)'', Italy wrongly banned motorcycles and mopeds from pulling trailers, which affected imported goods because Italian manufacturers didn't make such goods. In ''Commission v Italy (2011)'', Italy could not require lawyers to abide by maximum tariffs, unless the client agreed, because this discouraged lawyers from other Member States from moving to Italy. See also ''Commission v France (other)'' ''Commission v Germany (other)'' ''Commission v Ireland (other)'' ''Commission v United K ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR:* [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]
	Commission V United Kingdom (other) ''Commission v United Kingdom'' may refer to: * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-337/89) (1992), an EU law case concerning water quality standards and enforcement under the Drinking Water Directive * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-484/04) (2006), a European labour law and UK labour lawcase concerning the Working Time Directive, which is relevant for the Working Time Regulations 1998 * ''Commission v United Kingdom'' (C-516/22) (2024) See also ''Commission v France (other)'' ''Commission v Germany (other) ''Commission v Germany'' may refer to: '' Commission v Germany'' (1987), in which article 34 TFEU did not permit the German Beer Tax Act to limit the definition of "beer" to just products that contained only malted barley, hops, yeast, water. '' ...'' '' Commission v Italy (other)'' '' Commission v Ireland (other)'' {{Caselaw disambiguation Court of Justice of the European Union case law ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu]