World Journal

''World Journal'' () is a Pan-Blue Taiwanese broadsheet newspaper published in North America. It is the largest Chinese language newspaper in the United States and one of the largest Chinese language newspapers outside of Greater China, with a daily circulation of 350,000. The newspaper is headquartered in the Whitestone neighborhood of Queens in New York City.

''World Journal'' is published in major cities in the United States with large overseas Chinese populations including New York as well as Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, and San Francisco. The publication is widely sold in many Chinatowns and major suburbs. Subscription is available in the United States and Canada.

History

The newspaper began on February 12, 1976. The headquarters located to nearby Whitestone, Queens, in 1980, where it has since remained.

The ''World Journal'' is one of three major Chinese-language dailies among the Chinese American community. The publication is owned by the same media conglomerate that runs the ''United Daily News'' in Taiwan and carries a significant Taiwanese American administrative presence. Until the mid-1990s, it was viewed as hostile to the People's Republic of China, in part because the paper referred to people from mainland China as "Communist Chinese". Furthermore, its coverage on mainland China usually comprised only one article or so each day out of dozens of pages and sections.

However, the newspaper has changed since it began increasing its coverage of mainland China. Following the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, such coverage increased to two pages per day. While the paper still attempts to maintain an anti-communist stance, it has become increasingly sensitive to the tastes of its large Chinese immigrant readership which has grown since the 1990s with the expanded access to permanent resident green cards in the United States following the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre. Another reason for the shift was rooted in the newspaper's sympathy to the Chinese democracy movement.

Like its parent the ''United Daily News'', the ''World Journal'' is widely seen as taking an editorial line that favors the Pan-Blue coalition and the Kuomintang. Consequently, this editorial position has made it much less hostile toward the People's Republic since the 1990s. Immediately after the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, the newspaper no longer referred indiscriminately to all mainland Chinese as "Communist Chinese," and additionally praised pro-democracy efforts on the mainland. During the mid-1990s, it began to give credit to the positive progress made in mainland China, and by the late-1990s, it began to criticize wrongdoings within the Chinese democracy movement and in the West in the same manner with which it criticizes corruption within the Chinese communist regime. After 2000, there has also been an increase in the representation of mainland Chinese immigrants on the newspaper's reporting staff, and the paper has published readers' letters voicing different views from the pro-Taiwan independence stance that have also made it popular among mainland Chinese immigrants to the United States.

The ''World Journal''s recent competitor is ''The China Press''.

''World Journal'' ceased publication in Canada on January 1, 2016, to better focus its business in the United States.

Controversies

Alleged ties to the Chinese Communist Party

According to a 2001 report by the Jamestown Foundation, ''World Journal'' was one of the four major Chinese newspapers found in the U.S. that "has recently begun bowing to pressure from the Beijing government." The other three which were ''Sing Tao Daily'', ''Ming Pao Daily News'', and ''The China Press'' had already been "either directly or indirectly controlled by the government of Mainland China".

The report referenced an instance of self-censorship by ''World Journal'' in its efforts to develop business ties with Mainland China in which Chinese Consulates in both New York and San Francisco have pressured the papers local offices to not publish ads related to Falun Gong. The New York office reportedly acquiesced in full and did not publish the ads, while the San Francisco office acquiesced in part by burying the ads among the paper's least viewed pages.

Labor law violation

On January 10, 2007, a Southern California jury found the Monterey Park-based ''Chinese Daily News'' responsible for failing to give employees breaks, lunches, and overtime, and awarded the plaintiffs $2.5 million. The plaintiffs alleged that they worked over twelve hours per day, were not provided accurate pay statements, and were unfairly interfered with during unionization attempts. In 2001, the employees voted to join the Communication Workers of America, but the National Labor Relations Board vacated the union vote after finding that the election was tainted. ''Chinese Daily News'' appealed the ruling in the district court, with proceedings held in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal and the U.S. Supreme Court.

In 2011, after the U.S. Supreme Court decided ''Dukes v. Wal-Mart'', the U.S. Supreme Court remanded the case back to the Ninth Circuit for reconsideration in light of Dukes. On September 13, 2013, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal rejected the district court's grant of class certification under FRCP Rule 23(b)(3). Upon remand at the district court level, Plaintiffs once again moved for class certification, and the district court recertified the class.

''Chinese Daily News'' thereafter filed a FRCP Rule 23(f) Petition to Appeal, which the Ninth Circuit granted on August 22, 2014. This matter is currently pending briefing at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal. The Los Angeles area-based ''Chinese Daily News'' was later amalgamated into the New York City-headquartered ''World Journal''.

Discrimination against breastfeeding women

On October 21, 2013, ''World Journal'' published a controversial article that allegedly discriminated against breastfeeding women. Titled "Breastfeeding photos embarrass Chinese-American to death," the article cited anonymous resources, labeled breastfeeding photos as "R-rated-photos," described those photos as "disturbing" and "disgusting." The article received strong reaction among Chinese American Community and the Taiwanese Breastfeeding Association launched a protection against ''World Journal''. Media Watch criticized that the report was "misleading" and "biased."

It was also reported that ''World Journal'' allegedly failed to accommodate employees' legal nursing needs. Chinese American journalist and author To-wen Tseng blogged about her experience of being forced to pump her breast milk in a bathroom stall, and was harassed by colleagues for attempting to wash pumping accessories in the office kitchen. In November 2013, Legal Aid Society-Employment Law Center submitted a lawyer's letter to ''World Journal'', requesting a policy change and supervisor training regarding nursing employee's legal rights.

The ''World Journal'' disputed the employee's claims, but agreed to settle the case. On August 25, 2014, ''World Journal'' made a policy change as requested and paid for the damage.settlement agreement between LAS-ELC and World Journal 08-25-2014.

See also

*''The China Press''

References

External links

''World Journal''''World Journal'' - East Coast Boston/New England Branch

{{Newspapers in Massachusetts

Asian-American press
Chinese-language newspapers (Traditional Chinese)
Chinese-language newspapers published in the United States
Chinese-American culture in New York City
National newspapers published in the United States
Daily newspapers published in New York City
Publications established in 1976
Non-English-language newspapers published in New York (state)
Publications disestablished in 2016
2016 disestablishments in Canada
Defunct newspapers published in Canada