Contents
1 History
1.1 Convention and background
2 Nominating process 3 Selection criteria
3.1 Cultural criteria 3.2 Natural criteria 3.3 Legal status of designated sites
4 Extensions and other modifications 5 Endangered sites 6 Statistics 7 Countries with ten or more sites 8 Consequences 9 Further reading 10 See also 11 References 12 External links
History[edit] See also: World Heritage Committee
Convention concerning the Protection of the World's Cultural and Natural Heritage
Signed 16 November 1972
Location Paris, France
Effective 17 December 1975
Condition 20 ratifications
Ratifiers
193 (189
UN member states
UN member states plus the Cook Islands, the Holy See, Niue,
and Palestine)
Depositary
Director-General of the
United Nations
United Nations Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization
Languages Arabic, English, French, Russian, and Spanish
In 1954, the government of
Egypt
Egypt decided to build the new Aswan High
Dam, whose resulting future reservoir would eventually inundate a
large stretch of the
Nile
Nile valley containing cultural treasures of
ancient
Egypt
Egypt and ancient Nubia. In 1959, the governments of
Egypt
Egypt and
Sudan
Sudan requested
UNESCO
UNESCO to assist their countries to protect and rescue
the endangered monuments and sites. In 1960, the Director-General of
UNESCO
UNESCO launched an appeal to the Member States for an International
Campaign to Save the Monuments of Nubia.[7] This appeal resulted in
the excavation and recording of hundreds of sites, the recovery of
thousands of objects, as well as the salvage and relocation to higher
ground of a number of important temples, the most famous of which are
the temple complexes of Abu Simbel and Philae. The campaign, which
ended in 1980, was considered a success. As tokens of its gratitude to
countries which especially contributed to the campaign's success,
Egypt
Egypt donated four temples: the
Temple of Dendur
Temple of Dendur was moved to the
Metropolitan Museum of Art
Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City, the
Temple of Debod
Temple of Debod was
moved to the
Parque del Oeste
Parque del Oeste in Madrid, the
Temple of Taffeh
Temple of Taffeh was
moved to the
Rijksmuseum van Oudheden
Rijksmuseum van Oudheden in the Netherlands, and the
Temple of Ellesyia
Temple of Ellesyia to
Museo Egizio
Museo Egizio in Turin.[8]
The project cost $80 million, about $40 million of which was
collected from 50 countries.[citation needed] The project's success
led to other safeguarding campaigns: saving
Venice
Venice and its lagoon in
Italy, the ruins of
Mohenjo-daro
Mohenjo-daro in Pakistan, and the
Borobodur
Borobodur Temple
Compounds in Indonesia.
UNESCO
UNESCO then initiated, with the International
Council on Monuments and Sites, a draft convention to protect the
common cultural heritage of humanity.[citation needed]
Convention and background[edit]
The United States initiated the idea of cultural conservation with
nature conservation. The
White House
White House conference in 1965 called for a
"World Heritage Trust" to preserve "the world's superb natural and
scenic areas and historic sites for the present and the future of the
entire world citizenry". The International Union for Conservation of
Nature developed similar proposals in 1968, and they were presented in
1972 to the
United Nations
United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in
Stockholm. Under the World Heritage Committee, signatory countries are
required to produce and submit periodic data reporting providing the
World Heritage Committee
World Heritage Committee with an overview of each participating
nation's implementation of the World Heritage Convention and a
"snapshot" of current conditions at World Heritage properties.
A single text was agreed on by all parties, and the "Convention
Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage"
was adopted by the General Conference of
UNESCO
UNESCO on 16 November 1972.
The Convention came into force on 17 December 1975. As of May 2017, it
has been ratified by 193 states parties,[9] including 189 UN member
states plus the Cook Islands, the Holy See, Niue, and the State of
Palestine. Only four
UN member states
UN member states have not ratified the
Convention: Liechtenstein, Nauru, Somalia and Tuvalu.[10]
Nominating process[edit]
A country must first list its significant cultural and natural sites;
the result is called the Tentative List. A country may not nominate
sites that have not been first included on the Tentative List. Next,
it can place sites selected from that list into a Nomination File.
The Nomination
File
File is evaluated by the International Council on
Monuments and Sites and the World Conservation Union. These bodies
then make their recommendations to the World Heritage Committee. The
Committee meets once per year to determine whether or not to inscribe
each nominated property on the World Heritage List and sometimes
defers or refers the decision to request more information from the
country which nominated the site. There are ten selection criteria –
a site must meet at least one of them to be included on the list.[11]
Selection criteria[edit]
Up to 2004, there were six criteria for cultural heritage and four
criteria for natural heritage. In 2005, this was modified so that
there is now only one set of ten criteria. Nominated sites must be of
"outstanding universal value" and meet at least one of the ten
criteria.[12] These criteria have been modified or/amended several
times since their creation.
Cultural criteria[edit]
Site#252: Taj Mahal, an example of cultural heritage site
"represents a masterpiece of human creative genius and cultural significance" "exhibits an important interchange of human values, over a span of time, or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town-planning, or landscape design" "to bear a unique or at least exceptional testimony to a cultural tradition or to a civilization which is living or which has disappeared" "is an outstanding example of a type of building, architectural, or technological ensemble or landscape which illustrates a significant stage in human history" "is an outstanding example of a traditional human settlement, land-use, or sea-use which is representative of a culture, or human interaction with the environment especially when it has become vulnerable under the impact of irreversible change" "is directly or tangibly associated with events or living traditions, with ideas, or with beliefs, with artistic and literary works of outstanding universal significance"[13]
Natural criteria[edit]
Site#156: Serengeti National Park, an example of natural heritage site
Site#274: Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu, an example of mixed heritage site
"contains superlative natural phenomena or areas of exceptional natural beauty and aesthetic importance" "is an outstanding example representing major stages of Earth's history, including the record of life, significant on-going geological processes in the development of landforms, or significant geomorphic or physiographic features" "is an outstanding example representing significant on-going ecological and biological processes in the evolution and development of terrestrial, fresh water, coastal and marine ecosystems, and communities of plants and animals" "contains the most important and significant natural habitats for in-situ conservation of biological diversity, including those containing threatened species of outstanding universal value from the point of view of science or conservation"
Legal status of designated sites[edit]
UNESCO
UNESCO designation as a
World Heritage Site
World Heritage Site provides prima facie
evidence that such culturally sensitive sites are legally protected
pursuant to the Law of War, under the Geneva Convention, its articles,
protocols and customs, together with other treaties including the
Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event
of Armed Conflict and international law.
Thus, the
Geneva Convention
Geneva Convention treaty promulgates:
"Article 53. PROTECTION OF CULTURAL OBJECTS AND OF PLACES OF WORSHIP.
Without prejudice to the provisions of the Hague Convention for the
Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict of 14
May 1954,' and of other relevant international instruments, it is
prohibited:[14]
(a) To commit any acts of hostility directed against the historic monuments, works of art or places of worship which constitute the cultural or spiritual heritage of peoples; (b) To use such objects in support of the military effort; (c) To make such objects the object of reprisals."
Extensions and other modifications[edit]
A country may request to extend or reduce the boundaries, modify the
official name, or change the selection criteria of one of its already
listed sites. Any proposal for a significant boundary change or modify
the site's selection criteria must be submitted as if it were a new
nomination, including first placing it on the Tentative List and then
onto the Nomination File.[11]
A request for a minor boundary change, one that does not have a
significantly impact on the extent of the property or affect its
"outstanding universal value", is also evaluated by the advisory
bodies before being sent to the Committee. Such proposals can be
rejected by either the advisory bodies or the Committee if they judge
it to be a significant change instead of a minor one.[11]
Proposals to change the site's official name is sent directly to the
Committee.[11]
Endangered sites[edit]
Main articles:
List of World Heritage in Danger
List of World Heritage in Danger and Former UNESCO
World Heritage Sites
A site may be added to the
List of World Heritage in Danger
List of World Heritage in Danger if there
are conditions that threaten the characteristics for which the
landmark or area was inscribed on the World Heritage List. Such
problems may involve armed conflict and war, natural disasters,
pollution, poaching, or uncontrolled urbanization or human
development. This danger list is intended to increase international
awareness of the threats and to encourage counteractive measures.
Threats to a site can be either proven imminent threats or potential
dangers that could have adverse effects on a site.[15]
The state of conservation for each site on the danger list is reviewed
on a yearly basis, after which the committee may request additional
measures, delete the property from the list if the threats have ceased
or consider deletion from both the List of World Heritage in Danger
and the World Heritage List.[11]
Only two sites have ever been delisted: the
Arabian Oryx Sanctuary in
Oman and the
Dresden Elbe Valley
Dresden Elbe Valley in Germany. The Arabian Oryx
Sanctuary was directly delisted in 2007, instead of first being put on
the danger list, after the Omani government decided to reduce the
protected area's size by 90 percent.[16] The
Dresden Elbe Valley
Dresden Elbe Valley was
first placed on the danger list in 2006 when the World Heritage
Committee decided that plans to construct the Waldschlösschen Bridge
would significantly alter the valley's landscape. In response, the
Dresden City Council attempted to stop the bridge's construction, but
after several court decisions allowed the building of the bridge to
proceed, the valley was removed from the World Heritage List in
2009.[17]
The first global assessment to quantitatively measure threats to
Natural World Heritage Sites found that 63 percent of sites have been
damaged by increasing Human pressures including encroaching roads,
agriculture infrastructure and settlements over the last two decades.
These activities endanger Natural World Heritage Sites and could
compromise their unique values. Of the Natural World Heritage Sites
which contain forest, 91 percent of those experienced some loss since
the year 2000. Many Natural World Heritage sites are more threatened
than previously thought and require immediate conservation action.
Statistics[edit]
See also: World Heritage Sites by country, Lists of World Heritage
Sites, List of World Heritage in Danger, and List of World Heritage
Sites by year of inscription
There are 1073 World Heritage Sites located in 167 states. Of these,
832 are cultural, 206 are natural and 35 are mixed properties. The
World Heritage Committee
World Heritage Committee has divided the world into five geographic
zones which it calls regions: Africa, Arab States, Asia and the
Pacific, Europe and North America, and Latin America and the
Caribbean.
Russia and the
Caucasus
Caucasus states are classified as European, while
Mexico and the Caribbean are classified as belonging to the Latin
America & Caribbean zone, despite their location in North America.
The
UNESCO
UNESCO geographic zones also give greater emphasis on
administrative, rather than geographic associations. Hence, Gough
Island, located in the South Atlantic, is part of the Europe &
North America region because the government of the United Kingdom
nominated the site.
The table below includes a breakdown of the sites according to these
zones and their classification:[18][19]
Zone/region Cultural Natural Mixed Total % State Parties with inscribed properties
Africa 51 37 5 93 9% 35
Arab States 74 5 3 82 8% 18
Asia and the Pacific 177 64 12 253* 24% 36
Europe and North America 434 62 10 506* 47% 50
Latin America and the Caribbean 96 38 5 139* 13% 28
Total 832 206 35 1073 100% 167
*The properties "Uvs Nuur Basin" and "Landscapes of Dauria" (Mongolia, Russian Federation) are trans-regional properties located in Europe and Asia and the Pacific region. They are counted here in the Asia and the Pacific region. *The property "The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an Outstanding Contribution to the Modern Movement" (Argentina, Belgium, France, Germany, India, Japan, Switzerland) is a trans-regional property with component sites located in four regions - Europe, Asia and the Pacific, North America, and Latin America and the Caribbean. It is counted here in Europe.[verification needed] Countries with ten or more sites[edit] Countries with ten or more World Heritage Sites, as of July 2017.
Consequences[edit]
Despite the successes of World Heritage listing in promoting
conservation, the
UNESCO
UNESCO administered project has attracted criticism
from some for perceived under-representation of heritage sites outside
Europe, disputed decisions on site selection and adverse impact of
mass tourism on sites unable to manage rapid growth in visitor
numbers.[20][21]
A sizable lobbying industry has grown around the awards because World
Heritage listing has the potential to significantly increase tourism
revenue from sites selected. Site listing bids are often lengthy and
costly, putting poorer countries at a disadvantage. Eritrea's efforts
to promote
Asmara
Asmara are one example.[22]
In 2016, the Australian government was reported to have successfully
lobbied for
Great Barrier Reef
Great Barrier Reef conservation efforts to be removed from
a
UNESCO
UNESCO report titled 'World Heritage and Tourism in a Changing
Climate'. The Australian government's actions were in response to
their concern about the negative impact that an 'at risk' label could
have on tourism revenue at a previously designated
UNESCO
UNESCO World
Heritage site.[23][24]
A number of listed World Heritage locations such as George Town,
Penang and
Casco Viejo, Panama
Casco Viejo, Panama have struggled to strike the balance
between the economic benefits of catering to greatly increased visitor
numbers and preserving the original culture and local communities that
drew the recognition.[25]
Library resources about World Heritage Site
Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries
Further reading[edit]
Bowden, Mark, Sharon Soutar, David Field, Martyn Barber, Neil Linford,
Paul Linford, and Andy Payne. The Stonehenge Landscape: Analysing the
Stonehenge World Heritage Site. Swindon: Historic England, 2015.
Clarke, Ronald J., T. C Partridge, and Kathleen Kuman. Caves of the
Ape-Men: South Africa's Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site.
Pretoria: S.E. Publications, 2010.
Cowling, R. M. Table Mountain: A World Heritage Site? Cape Town:
University of Cape Town, 1995.
Covert, Lisa Pinley. San Miguel De Allende: Mexicans, Foreigners, and
the Making of a World Heritage Site. Lincoln: University of Nebraska
Press, 2017.
Darvill, Timothy. Stonehenge World Heritage Site: An Archaeological
Research Framework. London: English Heritage, 2005.
Ellerbe, Jenny, and Diana M. Greenlee. Poverty Point: Revealing the
Forgotten City : a
UNESCO
UNESCO World Heritage Site. Baton Rouge:
Louisiana State University Press, 2015.
Geary, David. The Rebirth of Bodh Gaya: Buddhism and the Making of a
World Heritage Site. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2017.
Hodges, Richard. Eternal Butrint: A
UNESCO
UNESCO
World Heritage Site
World Heritage Site In
Albania. London: General Penne, 2006.
MacDonald, George F. Ninstints. Haida World Heritage Site. Vancouver:
University of British Columbia Press in association with the U.B.C.
Museum of Anthropology, 1983.
Mills, Nigel. Presenting the Romans: Interpreting the Frontiers of the
Roman Empire World Heritage Site. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 2013.
Owadally, A. W. Le Morne: A World Heritage Site. Quatre Bornes,
Mauritius: A.W. Owadally, 2009.
Sandford, Robert W., and James Thorsell. Ecology & Wonder In the
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks World Heritage Site. Edmonton, Alberta:
AU Press, 2010.
Weise, Kai, Bhupesh Thapa, Manindra Shrestha, and Abhaya Subba.
Kathmandu Valley World Heritage Site: Potential Areas for Cooperation.
Kathmandu: UNESCO, Kathmandu Office, 2004.
See also[edit]
GoUNESCO
Index of conservation articles
UNESCO
UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Lists
Memory of the World Programme
References[edit]
^ Centre,
UNESCO
UNESCO World Heritage. "The Criteria for Selection".
whc.unesco.org. Retrieved 1 February 2018.
^ "World Heritage". Archived from the original on 30 June 2009.
^ "The World Heritage Committee".
UNESCO
UNESCO World Heritage Site. Archived
from the original on 9 November 2006. Retrieved 14 October 2006.
^ Convention Concerning the Protection of World's Cultural and Natural
Heritage Archived 4 July 2010 at the Wayback Machine.
^ World Heritage List Archived 14 October 2013 at the Wayback
Machine.,
UNESCO
UNESCO World Heritage Sites official sites.
^ Sites in
Germany
Germany and Italy bring to 19 the number of sites inscribed
on the World Heritage List this year Archived 27 June 2013 at the
Wayback Machine.,
UNESCO
UNESCO World Heritage Sites official sites.
^ Monuments of Nubia-International Campaign to Save the Monuments of
Nubia
Nubia Archived 29 April 2009 at the Wayback Machine. World Heritage
Convention, UNESCO
^ The Rescue of Nubian Monuments and Sites Archived 27 February 2015
at the Wayback Machine., UNESCO
^
UNESCO
UNESCO World Heritage Centre. "States Parties -
UNESCO
UNESCO World
Heritage Centre". whc.unesco.org. Retrieved 18 March 2018.
^ Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and
Natural Heritage: Treaty status Archived 19 July 2013 at the Wayback
Machine..
^ a b c d e "The Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the
World Heritage Convention". UNESCO. Archived from the original on 14
July 2017. Retrieved 10 July 2017.
^ "Criteria for Selection". World Heritage. Archived from the original
on 12 June 2016. Retrieved 14 October 2006.
^ "
UNESCO
UNESCO World Heritage, The Criteria for Selection". Archived from
the original on 12 June 2016.
^ UN General Assembly (1979) [8 June 1977]. "UN Treaty No. 17512"
(PDF). 'Volume 1125-1' UN. Treaty Series. p. 27. Archived (PDF)
from the original on 9 March 2012.
^ "List of World Heritage in Danger". UNESCO. Archived from the
original on 21 March 2015. Retrieved 10 July 2017.
^ "Oman's Arabian Oryx Sanctuary: first site ever to be deleted from
UNESCO's World Heritage List". UNESCO. Archived from the original on
18 January 2008. Retrieved 10 July 2017.
^ "Dresden is deleted from UNESCO's World Heritage List". UNESCO.
Archived from the original on 7 July 2017. Retrieved 10 July
2017.
^
UNESCO
UNESCO World Heritage Centre. "World Heritage List Statistics".
unesco.org. Archived from the original on 14 May 2011.
^
UNESCO
UNESCO World Heritage Centre. "
UNESCO
UNESCO World Heritage Centre - World
Heritage List". unesco.org. Archived from the original on 27 October
2014.
^ Barron, Laignee (30 August 2017). "'Unesco-cide': does world
heritage status do cities more harm than good?". The Guardian. London.
Retrieved 3 September 2017.
^ Vallely, Paul (7 November 2008). "The Big Question: What is a World
Heritage Site, and does the accolade make a difference?". The
Independent. Archived from the original on 27 October 2016.
^ "Modernist masterpieces in unlikely Asmara". The Economist. 20 July
2016. Archived from the original on 15 July 2017.
^ Slezak, Michael (26 May 2016). "Australia scrubbed from UN climate
change report after government intervention". The Guardian. Archived
from the original on 27 October 2016.
^ Hasham, Nicole (17 September 2015). "Government spent at least
$400,000 lobbying against
Great Barrier Reef
Great Barrier Reef 'danger' listing". The
Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 28 December
2016.
^ Maurel, Cholé. "The unintended consequences of
UNESCO
UNESCO world
heritage listing". The Conversation. Retrieved 4 September 2017.
External links[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to World Heritage Sites.
Wikivoyage has a travel guide for
UNESCO
UNESCO World Heritage List.
UNESCO
UNESCO World Heritage portal – Official website (in English and
French)
The World Heritage List – Official searchable list of all Inscribed
Properties
KML file of the World Heritage List – Official KML version of the
list for
Google Earth
Google Earth and NASA Worldwind
UNESCO
UNESCO Information System on the State of Conservation of World
Heritage properties - Searchable online tool with over 3.400 reports
on World Heritage sites
Official overview of the World Heritage Forest Program
Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural
Heritage – Official 1972 Convention Text in 7 languages
The 1972 Convention at Law-Ref.org – Fully indexed and crosslinked with other documents
Protected Planet — View all natural world heritage sites in the
World Database on Protected Areas
World Heritage Site
World Heritage Site – Smithsonian Ocean Portal
Time magazine. The Oscars of the Environment –
UNESCO
UNESCO World Heritage
Site
UNESCO
UNESCO chair in ICT to develop and promote sustainable tourism in
World Heritage Sites
v t e
Lists of World Heritage Sites
Africa Americas
North America Central America Caribbean South America
Asia
Eastern Northern and Central Southeast Southern Western
Europe
Eastern Northern Southern Western
Oceania
World Heritage in Danger Former sites By country By year of inscription
United Nations
United Nations portal
Environment portal
Culture portal
Authority control
LCCN: sh98000794 GND: 4402276-1 N