Perfection of Wisdom

A Tibetan painting with a Prajñāpāramitā sūtra at the center of the mandala

Prajñāpāramitā ( sa, प्रज्ञापारमिता) means "the Perfection of Wisdom" or "Transcendental Knowledge" in Mahāyāna and Theravāda Buddhism. Prajñāpāramitā refers to a perfected way of seeing the nature of reality, as well as to a particular body of Mahāyāna scriptures (sūtras) which discusses this wisdom. It also refers to the female deity Prajñāpāramitā Devi, a personification of wisdom also known as the "Great Mother" (Tibetan: ''Yum Chenmo'').

The word ''Prajñāpāramitā'' combines the Sanskrit words '' prajñā'' "wisdom" (or "knowledge") with ''pāramitā'' "perfection" or " transcendent". Prajñāpāramitā is a central concept in Mahāyāna Buddhism and is generally associated with ideas such as emptiness (''śūnyatā''), 'lack of svabhāva' (essence), the illusory (''māyā'') nature of things, how all phenomena are characterized by "non-arising" ( ''anutpāda'', i.e. unborn) and the madhyamaka thought of Nāgārjuna. Its practice and understanding are taken to be indispensable elements of the Bodhisattva path.

According to Edward Conze, the Prajñāpāramitā Sūtras are "a collection of about forty texts ... composed somewhere on the Indian subcontinent between approximately 100 BC and AD 600." Some Prajnāpāramitā sūtras are thought to be among the earliest Mahāyāna sūtras.

History

The Earliest Texts

Western scholars have traditionally considered the earliest sūtra in the Prajñāpāramitā class to be the ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'' or "Perfection of Wisdom in 8,000 Lines", which was probably put in writing in the 1st century BCE. This chronology is based on the views of Edward Conze, who largely considered dates of translation into other languages. This text also has a corresponding version in verse format, called the ', which some believe to be slightly older because it is not written in standard literary Sanskrit. However, these findings rely on late-dating Indian texts, in which verses and mantras are often kept in more archaic forms.

According to Edward Conze, the PP literature developed in nine stages: (1) An urtext similar to the first two chapters of the Sanskrit ''Ratnagunasaṃcaya Gāthā;'' (2) Chapters 3 to 28 of the ''Ratnagunasaṃcaya'' are composed, along with the prose of the ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā''. This base text was further expanded with (3) material from the ''Abhidharma'', and (4) concessions to the "Buddhism of Faith" (referring to Pure Land references in the sūtra). This process led to (5) further expansion into larger PP sūtras as well as (6) contraction into the shorter sūtras (i.e. Diamond Sūtra, Heart Sūtra, down to the ''Prajñāpāramitā in One Letter''). This expanded corpus formed the basis for the (7) Indian PP Commentaries, (8) Tantric PP works and (9) Chinese Chan texts. Jan Nattier also defends the view that the ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā'' developed as various layers were added over time. However, Matthew Orsborn has recently argued, based on the chiastic structures of the text that the entire ''sūtra'' may have been composed as a single whole (with a few additions added on the core chapters).

A number of scholars have proposed that the Mahāyāna Prajñāpāramitā teachings were first developed by the Caitika subsect of the Mahāsāṃghikas. They believe that the ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'' originated amongst the southern Mahāsāṃghika schools of the Āndhra region, along the Kṛṣṇa River. These Mahāsāṃghikas had two famous monasteries near Amarāvati Stupa and Dhānyakataka, which gave their names to the Pūrvaśaila and Aparaśaila schools.Guang Xing. ''The Concept of the Buddha: Its Evolution from Early Buddhism to the Trikaya Theory.'' 2004. p. 66 Each of these schools had a copy of the ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'' in Prakrit. Guang Xing also assesses the view of the Buddha given in the ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'' as being that of the Mahāsāṃghikas. Edward Conze estimates that this sūtra originated around 100 BCE.

In 2012, Harry Falk and Seishi Karashima published a damaged and partial Kharoṣṭhī manuscript of the ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā''. It is radiocarbon dated to ca. 75 CE, making it one of the oldest Buddhist texts in existence. It is very similar to the first Chinese translation of the ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā'' by Lokakṣema (ca. 179 CE) whose source text is assumed to be in the Gāndhārī language; Lokakṣema's translation is also the first extant translation of the Prajñāpāramitā genre into a non-Indic language. Comparison with the standard Sanskrit text shows that it is also likely to be a translation from Gāndhāri as it expands on many phrases and provides glosses for words that are not present in the Gāndhārī. This points to the text being composed in Gāndhārī, the language of Gandhara (the region now called the Northwest Frontier of Pakistan, including Peshawar, Taxila and Swat Valley). The "Split" manuscript is evidently a copy of an earlier text, confirming that the text may date before the 1st century CE.

In contrast to western scholarship, Japanese scholars have traditionally considered the '' Diamond Sūtra'' (''Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'') to be from a very early date in the development of Prajñāpāramitā literature.Williams, Paul. ''Mahāyāna Buddhism: the Doctrinal Foundations''. London, UK: Routledge. . p.42 The usual reason for this relative chronology which places the ''Vajracchedikā'' earlier is not its date of translation, but rather a comparison of the contents and themes. Some western scholars also believe that the ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'' was adapted from the earlier ''Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra''.

Examining the language and phrases used in both the ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā'' and the ''Vajracchedikā'', Gregory Schopen also sees the ''Vajracchedikā'' as being earlier than the ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā''.Schopen, Gregory. ''Figments and Fragments of Mahāyāna Buddhism in India.'' 2005. pp. 31-32 This view is taken in part by examining parallels between the two works, in which the ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā'' seems to represent the later or more developed position. According to Schopen, these works also show a shift in emphasis from an oral tradition (''Vajracchedikā'') to a written tradition (''Aṣṭasāhasrikā'').

Later Indian Developments

The ''Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā prajñāpāramitā'' ''Sūtra'' (T. ''Shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa stong phrag nyi shu lnga pa''; C. ''Mohe bore boluomi jing'', 摩訶般若波羅蜜經) is one of the largest PP sutras, comprising three volumes of the Tibetan Kangyur (26-28). It was also one of the most important and popular PP sutras in India, seeing as how there are numerous Indian commentaries on this text, including commentaries by Vimuktisena, Haribhadra, Smṛtijñānakīrti, and Ratnakarashanti. The sutra also survives in the original Sanskrit, which was found in Gilgit. It also exists in four Chinese translations.

According to Nattier, the ''Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā'' is basically the ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā'' base text which has been "sliced" up and filled with other material, increasing the length of the text considerably. This process of expansion continued, culminating in the massive ''Śatasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'' (100,000 lines), the largest of the PP sutras.

According to Joseph Walser, there is evidence that the ''Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'' (25,000 lines) and the ''Śatasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'' (100,000 lines) have a connection with the Dharmaguptaka sect, while the ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'' (8,000 lines) does not.

Other PP texts were also composed which were much shorter and had a more independent structure from the ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā.'' Regarding the shorter PP texts, Conze writes, "two of these, the ''Diamond Sūtra'' and the ''Heart Sūtra'' are in a class by themselves and deservedly renowned throughout the world of Northern Buddhism. Both have been translated into many languages and have often been commented upon.". Jan Nattier argues the Heart Sutra to be an apocryphal text composed in China from extracts of the ''Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā'' and other texts c. 7th century. Red Pine, however, does not support Nattiers argument and believes the Heart Sutra to be of Indian origin.

After the rise of Vajrayana Buddhism, Tāntric Prajñāpāramitā texts were produced from the year 500 CE on and include sutras such as the Adhyardhaśatikā Prajñāpāramitā (150 lines). Additionally, Prajñāpāramitā terma teachings are held by some Tibetan Buddhists to have been conferred upon Nāgārjuna by the Nāgarāja "King of the Nāgas", who had been guarding them at the bottom of the sea.

Prajñāpāramitā in Central Asia

By the middle of the 3rd century CE, it appears that some Prajñāpāramitā texts were known in Central Asia, as reported by the Chinese monk Zhu Shixing, who brought back a manuscript of the ''Prajñāpāramitā'' of 25,000 lines:

China

In China, there was extensive translation of many Prajñāpāramitā texts beginning in the second century CE. The main translators include: Lokakṣema (支婁迦讖), Zhī Qīan (支謙), Dharmarakṣa (竺法護), Mokṣala (無叉羅), Kumārajīva (鳩摩羅什, 408 CE), Xuánzàng (玄奘), Făxián (法賢) and Dānapāla (施護). These translations were very influential in the development of East Asian Mādhyamaka and on Chinese Buddhism.

Xuanzang (fl. c. 602–664) was a Chinese scholar who traveled to India and returned to China with three copies of the '' Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra'' which he had secured from his extensive travels.Wriggins, Sally Hovey (2004). ''The Silk Road Journey with Xuanzang''. Boulder, Colorado: WestviewPress. . p.206 Xuanzang, with a team of disciple translators, commenced translating the voluminous work in 660 CE using the three versions to ensure the integrity of the source documentation. Xuanzang was being encouraged by a number of the disciple translators to render an abridged version. After a suite of dreams quickened his decision, Xuanzang determined to render an unabridged, complete volume, faithful to the original of 600 fascicles.

An important PP text in East Asian Buddhism is the '' Dazhidulun'' (大智度論, T no. 1509), a massive commentary on the ''Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā'' translated by Kumārajīva (344–413 CE). There are also later commentaries from Zen Buddhists on the Heart and Diamond sutra and Kūkai's commentary (9th century) is the first-known Tantric commentary.

Tibet

The PP sutras were first brought to Tibet in the reign of Trisong Detsen (742-796) by scholars Jinamitra and Silendrabodhi and the translator Ye shes sDe.Brunnholzl, Karl; Gone Beyond: The Prajnaparamita Sutras The Ornament Of Clear Realization And Its Commentaries In The Tibetan Kagyu Tradition (Tsadra) 2011, page 42. Tibetan Buddhist scholasticism generally studies the PP sutras through the '' Abhisamayālaṅkāra'' and its numerous commentaries. The focus on the '' Abhisamayālaṅkāra'' is particularly pronounced in the Gelug school, who according to Georges Dreyfus "take the ''Ornament'' as the central text for the study of the path" and "treat it as a kind of Buddhist encyclopedia, read in the light of commentaries by Je Dzong-ka-ba, Gyel-tsap Je, and the authors of manuals onastic textbooks"

Texts

Manuscript of the Perfection of Wisdom in 8000 lines

The Main Prajñāpāramitā Sūtras

An Indian commentary on the '' Mahāyānasaṃgraha'', entitled ''Vivṛtaguhyārthapiṇḍavyākhyā'' (''A Condensed Explanation of the Revealed Secred Meaning,'' Derge No. 4052), lists eight Prajñāpāramitā sūtras which were "taught to bodhisattvas" and are seen as superior (from the Sravakayana sutras) because they are superior "in eliminating conceptually imaged forms".Hamar, Imre. ''Reflecting Mirrors: Perspectives on Huayan Buddhism.'' 2007. p. 94

The eight texts are listed according to length and are the following:

# ''Triśatikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'': 300 lines, alternatively known as the '' Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'' (''Diamond Sūtra'')
# ''Pañcaśatikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'': 500 lines
# ''Saptaśatikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'': 700 lines, the bodhisattva Mañjuśrī's exposition of Prajñāpāramitā
# ''Sārdhadvisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'': 2,500 lines, from the questions of Suvikrāntavikrāmin Bodhisattva
# ''Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'': 8,000 lines
# '' Aṣṭadaśasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'': 18,000 lines
# '' Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'': 25,000 lines.
# '' Śatasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra'': 100,000 lines.

Xuánzăng's Prajñāpāramitā Library

The Chinese scholar and translator Xuánzăng (玄奘, 602-664) is known for his translation of a massive Sanskrit collection of Prajñāpāramitā sutras called "the Xuánzàng Prajñāpāramitā Library" or "The Great Prajñāpāramitāsūtra" (般若 波羅蜜 多 經, pinyin: ''bōrě bōluómì duō jīng''). Xuánzăng returned to China with three copies of this Sanskrit work which he obtained in South India and his translation is said to have been based on these three sources. In total it includes 600 scrolls, with 5 million Chinese characters.

This collection consists of 16 Prajñāpāramitā texts:

* ''Prajñāpāramitā sūtra in 100,000 verses'' (scrolls 1-400)
* ''Prajñāpāramitā sūtra in 25,000 verses'' (scrolls 401-478)
* ''Prajñāpāramitā sūtra in 18,000 verses'' (scrolls 479-537)
* ''Prajñāpāramitā sutra in 8,000 verses'' (scrolls 538-555)
* An abridged version of the ''Prajñāpāramitā sūtra in 8,000 verses'' (scrolls 556-565)
* ''Devarājapravara prajñāpāramitā sūtra'' - a part of the ''Questions of Suvikrānta'' (scrolls 566-573)
* ''Prajñāpāramitā sūtra in 700 verses'' (scrolls 574-575)
* ''Nāgaśripa-priccha Prajñāpāramitā'' (scroll 576)
* '' The Diamond Sutra'' (scroll 577)
* ''Prajñāpāramitā sūtra in 150 verses'' (scroll 578)
* ''Ārya pañcapāramitānirdeśa nāma mahāyāna sūtra'' (bokrull 579-592)
* ''The questions of Suvikrānta'' (scroll 593-600)

In the Tibetan Kangyur

Tibetan prajñāpāramitā manuscript depicting Sakyamuni Buddha and Prajñāpāramitā devi, 13th century

In the Tibetan Buddhist tradition, the '' Abhisamayālaṅkāra'' is traditionally said to be a commentary to seventeen Prajñāpāramitā (PP) source texts. These are seen as the most important PP sutras and they collectively known as the "Seventeen Mothers and Sons" (Wyl. ''yum sras bcu bdun'').Karma Phuntsho (2005). ''Mipham's Dialectics and the Debates on Emptiness: To Be, Not to Be or Neither'', p. 232. Routledge.

The Six Mothers are:

# ''The Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred Thousand Lines'' (Sanskrit: ''śatasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā,'' Wylie: ''sher phyin stong phrag brgya pa/ \('bum/\)''), Tohoku (Toh) Catalogue # 8.
# ''The Perfection of Wisdom in Twenty-five Thousand Lines'' (''Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā­prajñāpāramitā'', ''sher phyin stong phrag nyi shu lnga pa/ \(nyi khri/\)''), Toh 9.
# ''The Perfection of Wisdom in Eighteen Thousand Lines'' (''Aṣṭā­daśasāhasrikā­prajñā­pāramitā'', ''sher phyin khri brgyad stong pa''), Toh 10.
# ''The Transcendent Perfection of Wisdom in Ten Thousand Lines'' (''Daśasāhasrikā­prajñā­pāramitā'', ''shes phyin khri pa''), Toh 11.
# ''The Perfection of Wisdom in Eight Thousand Lines'' (''Aṣṭasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā'', ''sher phyin brgyad stong pa/''), Toh 12.
# ''The Verses that Summarize the Perfection of Wisdom'' (''Prajñāpāramitāsaṃcayagāthā, shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa sdud pa tshigs su''), Toh 13.

The Eleven Sons are:

# ''The Perfection of Wisdom in Seven Hundred Lines'' (''saptaśatikāprajñāpāramitā''), Toh 24.
# ''The Perfection of Wisdom in Five Hundred Lines'' (''pañcaśatikāprajñāpāramitā''), Toh 15.
# ''The Illustrious Perfection of Wisdom in Fifty Lines'' (''bhagavatī­prajñāpāramitāpañcāśatikā''), Toh 18.
# ''The Principles of the Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred and Fifty Lines'' (''prajñāpāramitānayaśatapañcaśatikā''), Toh 17.
# ''The Twenty-five Entrances to the Perfection of Wisdom'' (''pañcaviṃśatikāprajñāpāramitāmukha''), Toh 20.
# ''The Perfection of Wisdom in a Few Syllables'' (''svalpākṣaraprajñāpāramitā''), Toh 22.
# ''The Perfection of Wisdom Mother in One Syllable'' (''ekākṣarīmātāprajñāpāramitā''), Toh 23.
# ''The Perfection of Wisdom for Kauśika'' (''kauśikaprajñāpāramitā''), Toh 19
# ''The Perfection of Wisdom Teachings “The Questions of Suvikrāntavikrāmin”'' (''suvikrāntavikrāmiparipṛcchā­prajñāpāramitānirdeśa''), Toh 14.
# ''The Sūtra on the Perfection of Wisdom "The Diamond Cutter"'' (''vajracchedikā''), Toh 16.
# ''The Heart of the Perfection of Wisdom, the Blessed Mother'' (''Bhagavatī­prajñā­pāramitā­hṛdaya''), Toh 21.

In the Prajñāpāramitā section of the Kangyur, there are also other Prajñāpāramitā sutras besides the seventeen Mothers and Sons:

* ''The Hundred and Eight Names of the Perfection of Wisdom (prajñāpāramitānāmāṣṭaśataka),'' Toh 25.
* ''The Perfection of Wisdom for Sūryagarbha (sūryagarbhaprajñāpāramitā),'' Toh 26.
* ''The Perfection of Wisdom for Candragarbha (candragarbhaprajñāpāramitā),'' Toh 27.
* ''The Perfection of Wisdom for Samantabhadra (samantabhadraprajñāpāramitā),'' Toh 28.
* ''The Perfection of Wisdom for Vajrapāṇi (vajrapāṇiprajñāpāramitā),'' Toh 29.
* ''The Perfection of Wisdom for Vajraketu (vajraketuprajñāpāramitā),'' Toh 30.

Commentaries and translations

There are various Indian and later Chinese commentaries on the Prajñāpāramitā sutras, some of the most influential commentaries include:

* '' Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa'' (大智度論, T no. 1509) a massive and encyclopedic text translated into Chinese by the Buddhist scholar Kumārajīva (344–413 CE). It is a commentary on the ''Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā''. This text claims to be from the Buddhist philosopher Nagarjuna (c. 2nd century) in the colophon, but various scholars such as Étienne Lamotte have questioned this attribution. This work was translated by Lamotte as ''Le Traité de la Grande Vertu de Sagesse'' and into English from the French by Gelongma Karma Migme Chodron.Lamotte, Etienne; Gelongma Karma Migme Chodron. THE TREATISE ON THE GREAT VIRTUE OF WISDOM OF NĀGĀRJUNA (MAHĀPRAJÑĀPĀRAMITĀŚĀSTRA) VOL. I CHAPTERS I – XV COMPOSED BY THE BODHISATTVE NĀGĀRJUNA AND TRANSLATED BY THE TRIPIṬAKADHARMĀCĀRYA KUMĀRAJIVA OF THE LAND OF KOUTCHA UNDER THE LATER TS’IN
* '' Abhisamayālaṅkāra'' (''Ornament of clear realization''), the central ''Prajñāpāramitā'' shastra in the Tibetan tradition. It is traditionally attributed as a revelation from the Bodhisattva Maitreya to the scholar Asanga (fl. 4th century CE), known as a master of the Yogachara school. The Indian commentary on this text by Haribadra, the '' Abhisamayalankaraloka'', has also been influential on later Tibetan texts. There is also another Indian commentary to the AA by Vimuktisena.
* ''Śatasāhasrikā-pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikāṣṭādaśasāhasrikā-prajñāpāramitā-bṛhaṭṭīkā'', often attributed to Vasubandhu (4th century).
* ''Satasahasrika-paramita-brhattika'', attributed to Daṃṣṭrāsena.
* Dignāga's ''Prajnaparamitarthasamgraha-karika''.
* Ratnākaraśānti's ''Prajñāpāramitopadeśa''.

Themes in Prajñāpāramitā sutras

Core themes

The Bodhisattva and Prajñāpāramitā

A key theme of the Prajñāpāramitā sutras is the figure of the Bodhisattva (literally: awakening-being) which is defined in the 8,000-line Prajñāpāramitā sutra as:

:"One who trains in all dharmas henomenawithout obstruction 'asakti, asaktatā'' and also knows all dharmas as they really are."

A Bodhisattva is then a being that experiences everything "without attachment" (''asakti'') and sees reality or suchness (''Tathātā'') as it is. The Bodhisattva is the main ideal in Mahayana (Great Vehicle), which sees the goal of the Buddhist path as becoming a Buddha for the sake of all sentient beings, not just yourself:

:They make up their minds that 'one single self we shall tame ... one single self we shall lead to final Nirvana.'
:A Bodhisattva should certainly not in such a way train himself.
:On the contrary, he should train himself thus: "My own self I will place in Suchness he true way of things and, so that all the world might be helped,
:I will place all beings into Suchness, and I will lead to Nirvana the whole immeasurable world of beings."

A central quality of the Bodhisattva is their practice of Prajñāpāramitā, a most deep (''gambhīra'') state of knowledge which is an understanding of reality arising from analysis as well as meditative insight. It is non-conceptual and non-dual (''advaya'') as well as transcendental. Literally, the term could be translated as "knowledge gone to the other (shore)", or transcendental knowledge. The Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra says:

:This is known as the Prajñāpāramitā of the bodhisattvas; not grasping at form, not grasping at sensation, perception, volitions and cognition.

A further passage in the 8,000-line Prajñāpāramitā sutra states that Prajñāpāramitā means that a Bodhisattva stands in emptiness ( shunyata) by not standing (''√sthā'') or supporting themselves on any dharma (phenomena), whether conditioned or unconditioned. The dharmas that a Bodhisattva does "not stand" on include standard listings such as: the five aggregates, the sense fields ( ayatana), nirvana, Buddhahood, etc. This is explained by stating that Bodhisattvas "wander without a home" (''aniketacārī''); "home" or "abode" meaning signs (''nimitta'', meaning a subjective mental impression) of sensory objects and the afflictions that arise dependent on them. This includes the absence, the "not taking up" (''aparigṛhīta'') of even "correct" mental signs and perceptions such as "form is not self", "I practice Prajñāpāramitā", etc. To be freed of all constructions and signs, to be signless (''animitta'') is to be empty of them and this is to stand in Prajñāpāramitā. The Prajñāpāramitā sutras state that all Buddhas and Bodhisattvas in the past have practiced Prajñāpāramitā. Prajñāpāramitā is also associated with ''Sarvajñata'' (all-knowledge) in the Prajñāpāramitā sutras, a quality of the mind of a Buddha which knows the nature of all dharmas.

According to Karl Brunnholzl, Prajñāpāramitā means that "all phenomena from form up through omniscience being utterly devoid of any intrinsic characteristics or nature of their own." Furthermore, "such omniscient wisdom is always nonconceptual and free from reference points since it is the constant and panoramic awareness of the nature of all phenomena and does not involve any shift between meditative equipoise and subsequent attainment."

Edward Conze outlined several psychological qualities of a Bodhisattva's practice of Prajñāpāramitā:Conze, Edward; The Ontology of the Prajnaparamita, Philosophy East and West Vol.3 (1953) PP.117-129, University of Hawaii Press

*Non-apprehension (''anupalabdhi'')
*No settling down or "non-attachment" (''anabhinivesa'')
*No attainment (''aprapti''). No person can "have," or "possess," or "acquire," or "gain" any dharma.
*Non-reliance on any dharma, being unsupported, not leaning on any dharma.
*"Finally, one may say that the attitude of the perfected sage is one of non-assertion."

Other Bodhisattva qualities

The Prajñāpāramitā sutras also teach of the importance of the other pāramitās (perfections) for the Bodhisattva such as Ksanti (patience): "Without resort to this patience (kṣānti) they odhisattvascannot reach their respective goals".

Another quality of the Bodhisattva is their freedom from fear (''na √tras'') in the face of the seemingly shocking doctrine of the emptiness of all dharmas which includes their own existence. A good friend (''kalyanamitra'') is useful in the path to fearlessness. Bodhisattvas also have no pride or self-conception (''na manyeta'') of their own stature as Bodhisattvas. These are important features of the mind of a bodhisattva, called bodhicitta. The Prajñāpāramitā sutras also mention that bodhicitta is a middle way, it is neither apprehended as existent (''astitā'') or non-existent (''nāstitā'') and it is "immutable" (''avikāra'') and "free from conceptualization" (''avikalpa'').

The Bodhisattva is said to generate "great compassion" (''maha-karuṇā'') for all beings on their path to liberation and yet also maintain a sense of equanimity (upekṣā) and distance from them through their understanding of emptiness, due to which, the Bodhisattva knows that even after bringing countless beings to nirvana, "no living being whatsoever has been brought to nirvana." Bodhisattvas and Mahāsattvas are also willing to give up all of their meritorious deeds for sentient beings and develop skillful means ( upaya) in order to help abandon false views and teach them the Dharma. The practice of Prajñāpāramitā allows a Bodhisattva to become:

"a saviour of the helpless, a defender of the defenceless, a refuge to those without refuge, a place to rest to those without resting place, the final relief of those who are without it, an island to those without one, a light to the blind, a guide to the guideless, a resort to those without one and....guide to the path those who have lost it, and you shall become a support to those who are without support."

Tathātā

''Tathātā'' (Suchness or Thusness) and the related term ''Dharmatā'' (the nature of Dharma), and Tathāgata are also important terms of the Prajñāpāramitā texts. To practice Prajñāpāramitā means to practice in accord with 'the nature of Dharma' and to see the Tathāgata (i.e. the Buddha). As the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra states, these terms are generally used equivalently: "As the suchness (''tathatā'') of dharmas is immovable (''acalitā''), and the suchness (''tathatā'') of dharmas is the ''Tathāgata''." The Tathāgata is said in the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra to "neither come nor go". Furthermore, the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra includes a list of synonyms associated with Tathāgata as also being "beyond coming and going", these include: 1. Suchness (''tathatā''); 2. Unarisen (''anutpāda''); 3. Reality limit (''bhūtakoṭi''); 4. Emptiness ("Śūnyatā"); 5. Division (''yathāvatta''); 6. Detachment (''virāga''); 7. Cessation (''nirodha''); 8. Space element (''ākāśadhātu''). The sutra then states:

Apart from these dharmas, there is no Tathāgata. The suchness of these dharmas, and the suchness of the Tathāgatas, is all one single suchness (''ekaivaiṣā tathatā''), not two, not divided (''dvaidhīkāraḥ''). ... beyond all classification (''gaṇanāvyativṛttā''), due to non-existence (''asattvāt'').

Suchness then does not come or go because like the other terms, it is not a real entity (''bhūta'', ''svabhāva''), but merely appears conceptually through dependent origination, like a dream or an illusion.

Edward Conze lists six ways in which the ontological status of dharmas is considered by the Prajñāpāramitā:

#Dharmas are non-existent because they have no own-being (svabhava).
#Dharmas have a purely nominal existence. They are mere words, a matter of conventional expression.
#Dharmas are "without marks, with one mark only, ie., with no mark." A mark (''laksana'') being a distinctive property which separates it from other dharmas.
#Dharmas are isolated (''vivikta''), absolutely isolated (''atyantavivikta'').
#Dharmas have never been produced, never come into existence; they are not really ever brought forth, they are unborn (''ajata'').
#Non-production is illustrated by a number of similes, i.e., dreams, magical illusions, echoes, reflected images, mirages, and space.

It is through seeing this Tathātā that one is said to have a vision of the Buddha (the Tathāgata), seeing this is called seeing the Buddha's Dharmakaya (Dharma body) which is a not his physical body, but none other than the true nature of dharmas.

Negation and emptiness

Most modern Buddhist scholars such as Lamotte, Conze and Yin Shun have seen Śūnyatā (emptiness, voidness, hollowness) as ''the'' central theme of the Prajñāpāramitā sutras. Edward Conze writes:

It is now the principal teaching of Prajñāpāramitā with regard to own-being that it is "empty." The Sanskrit term is ''svabhāva-śūnya''. This is a '' tatpuruṣa'' compound (one in which the last member is qualified by the first without losing its grammatical independence), in which svabhava may have the sense of any oblique case. The Mahayana understands it to mean that dharmas are empty of any own-being, i.e.,that they are not ultimate facts in their own right, but merely imagined and falsely discriminated, for each and every one of them is dependent on something other than itself. From a slightly different angle this means that dharmas, when viewed with perfected gnosis, reveal an own-being which is identical with emptiness, i.e in their own-being they are empty.

The Prajñāpāramitā sutras commonly use apophatic statements to express the nature of reality as seen by Prajñāpāramitā. A common trope in the Prajñāpāramitā sutras is the negation of a previous statement in the form 'A is not A, therefore it is A', or more often negating only a part of the statement as in, "XY is a Y-less XY". Japanese Buddhologist, Hajime Nakamura, calls this negation the 'logic of not' (''na prthak''). An example from the Diamond Sutra of this use of negation is:

:As far as 'all dharmas' are concerned, Subhuti, all of them are dharma-less. That is why they are called 'all dharmas.'Harrison, Paul. Vajracchedika Prajñaparamita Diamond Cutting Transcendent Wisdom

The rationale behind this form is the juxtaposition of conventional truth with ultimate truth as taught in the Buddhist two truths doctrine. The negation of conventional truth is supposed to expound the ultimate truth of the emptiness (Śūnyatā) of all reality - the idea that nothing has an ontological essence and all things are merely conceptual, without substance.

The Prajñāpāramitā sutras state that dharmas should not be conceptualized either as existent, nor as non existent, and use negation to highlight this: "in the way in which dharmas exist (''saṃvidyante''), just so do they not exist (''asaṃvidyante'')".

Māyā

The Prajñāpāramitā sutras commonly state that all dharmas (phenomena), are in some way like an illusion (''māyā''), like a dream (''svapna'') and like a mirage. The '' Diamond Sutra'' states:

:"A shooting star, a clouding of the sight, a lamp, An illusion, a drop of dew, a bubble, a dream, a lightning's flash, a thunder cloud—this is the way one should see the conditioned."

Even the highest Buddhist goals like Buddhahood and Nirvana are to be seen in this way, thus the highest wisdom or prajña is a type of spiritual knowledge which sees all things as illusory. As Subhuti in the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra states:

:"Even if perchance there could be anything more distinguished, of that also I would say that it is like an illusion, like a dream. For not two different things are illusions and Nirvāṇa, are dreams and Nirvāṇa."

This is connected to the impermanence and insubstantial nature of dharmas. The Prajñāpāramitā sutras give the simile of a magician (''māyākāra'': 'illusion-maker') who, when seemingly killing his illusory persons by cutting off their heads, really kills nobody and compare it to the bringing of beings to awakening (by 'cutting off' the conceptualization of self view; Skt: ''ātmadṛṣṭi chindati'') and the fact that this is also ultimately like an illusion, because their aggregates "are neither bound nor released". The illusion then, is the conceptualization and mental fabrication of dharmas as existing or not existing, as arising or not arising. Prajñāpāramitā sees through this illusion, being empty of concepts and fabrications.

Perceiving dharmas and beings like an illusion (''māyādharmatā'') is termed the "great armor" (''mahāsaṃnaha'') of the Bodhisattva, who is also termed the 'illusory man' (''māyāpuruṣa'').

Later additions

According to Paul Williams, another major theme of the Prajñāpāramitā sutras is "the phenomenon of laudatory self reference—the lengthy praise of the sutra itself, the immense merits to be obtained from treating even a verse of it with reverence, and the nasty penalties which will accrue in accordance with karma to those who denigrate the scripture."

According to Edward Conze, the Prajñāpāramitā sutras added much new doctrinal material in the later layers and the larger texts. Conze lists the later accretions as:Conze, Edward, THE PERFECTION OF WISDOM IN EIGHT THOUSAND LINES & ITS VERSE SUMMARY, http://huntingtonarchive.org/resources/downloads/sutras/02Prajnaparamita/Astasahasrika.pdf

#Increasing sectarianism, with all the rancor, invective and polemics that that implies
#Increasing scholasticism and the insertion of longer and longer Abhidharma lists
#Growing stress on skill in means, and on its subsidiaries such as the Bodhisattva's Vow and the four means of conversion, and its logical sequences, such as the distinction between provisional and ultimate truth
#A growing concern with the Buddhist of faith, with its celestial Buddhas and Bodhisattva and their Buddha-fields;
#A tendency towards verbosity, repetitiveness and overelaboration
#Lamentations over the decline of the Dharma
#Expositions of the hidden meaning which become the more frequent the more the original meaning becomes obscured
#Any reference to the Dharma body of the Buddha as anything different from a term for the collection of his teachings
#A more and more detailed doctrine of the graded stages (bhūmi) of a Bodhisattva's career.

Prajñāpāramitā in visual art

In Buddhist art, Prajñāpāramitā is often personified as a ''bodhisattva-devi'' (female bodhisattva) called Prajñāpāramitādevi.

Prajñāpāramitādevi is found in Himalayan art as well as in ancient Javanese art and in Cambodian art.

Prajñāpāramitā in Ancient Indonesia

Mahayana Buddhism took root in ancient Java Sailendra court in the 8th century CE. The Mahayana reverence of female buddhist deity started with the cult of Tara enshrined in the 8th-century Kalasan temple in Central Java. Some of Prajnaparamita's important functions and attributes can be traced to those of the goddess Tara. Tara and Prajnaparamita are both referred to as mothers of all Buddhas, since Buddhas are born from wisdom. The Sailendra dynasty was also the ruling family of Srivijaya in Sumatra. During the reign of the third Pala king Devapala (815–854) in India, Srivijaya Maharaja Balaputra of Sailendras also constructed one of Nalanda's main monasteries in India itself. Thereafter manuscript editions of the ''Ashtasahasrika Prajnaparamita Sutra'' circulating in Sumatra and Java instigated the cult of the Goddess of Transcendent Wisdom.Asian Art

In the 13th century, the tantric buddhism gained royal patronage of king Kertanegara of Singhasari, and thereafter some of Prajnaparamita statues were produced in the region, such as the Prajnaparamita of Singhasari in East Java and Prajnaparamita of Muaro Jambi Regency, Sumatra. Both of East Java and Jambi Prajnaparamitas bear resemblance in style as they were produced in same period; however, unfortunately, Prajnaparamita of Jambi is headless and was discovered in poor condition.

The statue of Prajnaparamita of East Java is probably the most famous depiction of the goddess of transcendental wisdom, and is considered the masterpiece of classical ancient Java Hindu-Buddhist art in Indonesia. It was discovered in the Cungkup Putri ruins near Singhasari temple, Malang, East Java. Today the beautiful and serene statue is displayed on 2nd floor Gedung Arca, National Museum of Indonesia, Jakarta.

Selected English translations

References

Literature

*
* Müller, F. Max, trans (1894)
Buddhist Mahâyâna texts Vol.2
Oxford, Clarendon Press. (The Vagrakkedikâ, the larger Pragñâ-pâramitâ-hridaya-sûtra, the smaller Pragñâ-pâramitâ-hridaya-sûtra)
*
*

*

External links

Lapis Lazuli Texts

Bibliography of the Prajnaparamita Literature
Lotsawa House
Translations of several Tibetan texts on the Prajnaparamita

{{Buddhism topics

Mahayana sutras
Female buddhas and supernatural beings
Wisdom
Buddhist philosophical concepts