Möbius inversion formula

In mathematics, the classic Möbius inversion formula is a relation between pairs of arithmetic functions, each defined from the other by sums over divisors. It was introduced into number theory in 1832 by August Ferdinand Möbius.

A large generalization of this formula applies to summation over an arbitrary locally finite partially ordered set, with Möbius' classical formula applying to the set of the natural numbers ordered by divisibility: see incidence algebra.

Statement of the formula

The classic version states that if and are arithmetic functions satisfying

: $g(n)=\sum_f(d)\quad\textn\ge 1$

then

:$f(n)=\sum_\mu(d)g\left(\frac\right)\quad\textn\ge 1$

where is the Möbius function and the sums extend over all positive divisors of (indicated by $d \mid n$ in the above formulae). In effect, the original can be determined given by using the inversion formula. The two sequences are said to be Möbius transforms of each other.

The formula is also correct if and are functions from the positive integers into some abelian group (viewed as a -module).

In the language of Dirichlet convolutions, the first formula may be written as

:$g=\mathit*f$

where denotes the Dirichlet convolution, and is the constant function . The second formula is then written as

:$f=\mu * g.$

Many specific examples are given in the article on multiplicative functions.

The theorem follows because is (commutative and) associative, and , where is the identity function for the Dirichlet convolution, taking values , for all . Thus
:$\mu * g = \mu * (\mathit * f) = (\mu * \mathit) * f = \varepsilon * f = f$.
There is a product version of the summation-based Möbius inversion formula stated above:

:$g(n) = \prod_ f(d) \iff f(n) = \prod_ g\left(\frac\right)^, \forall n \geq 1.$

Series relations

Let

:$a_n=\sum_ b_d$

so that

:$b_n=\sum_ \mu\left(\frac\right)a_d$

is its transform. The transforms are related by means of series: the Lambert series

:$\sum_^\infty a_n x^n = \sum_^\infty b_n \frac$

and the Dirichlet series:

:$\sum_^\infty \frac = \zeta(s)\sum_^\infty \frac$

where is the Riemann zeta function.

Repeated transformations

Given an arithmetic function, one can generate a bi-infinite sequence of other arithmetic functions by repeatedly applying the first summation.

For example, if one starts with Euler's totient function , and repeatedly applies the transformation process, one obtains:

# the totient function
#, where is the identity function
#, the divisor function

If the starting function is the Möbius function itself, the list of functions is:
#, the Möbius function
# where $\varepsilon(n) = \begin 1, & \textn=1 \\ 0, & \textn>1 \end$ is the unit function
#, the constant function
#, where is the number of divisors of , (see divisor function).

Both of these lists of functions extend infinitely in both directions. The Möbius inversion formula enables these lists to be traversed backwards.

As an example the sequence starting with is:

:f_n =
\begin
\underbrace_ * \varphi & \text n < 0 \\ px \varphi & \text n = 0 \\ px \varphi * \underbrace_ & \text n > 0
\end

The generated sequences can perhaps be more easily understood by considering the corresponding Dirichlet series: each repeated application of the transform corresponds to multiplication by the Riemann zeta function.

Generalizations

A related inversion formula more useful in combinatorics is as follows: suppose and are complex-valued functions defined on the interval such that

:$G(x) = \sum_F\left(\frac\right)\quad\mboxx\ge 1$

then

:$F(x) = \sum_\mu(n)G\left(\frac\right)\quad\mboxx\ge 1.$

Here the sums extend over all positive integers which are less than or equal to .

This in turn is a special case of a more general form. If is an arithmetic function possessing a Dirichlet inverse , then if one defines

:$G(x) = \sum_\alpha (n) F\left(\frac\right)\quad\mboxx\ge 1$

then

:$F(x) = \sum_\alpha^(n)G\left(\frac\right)\quad\mboxx\ge 1.$

The previous formula arises in the special case of the constant function , whose Dirichlet inverse is .

A particular application of the first of these extensions arises if we have (complex-valued) functions and defined on the positive integers, with

:$g(n) = \sum_f\left(\left\lfloor \frac\right\rfloor\right)\quad\mbox n\ge 1.$

By defining and , we deduce that

:$f(n) = \sum_\mu(m)g\left(\left\lfloor \frac\right\rfloor\right)\quad\mbox n\ge 1.$

A simple example of the use of this formula is counting the number of reduced fractions , where and are coprime and . If we let be this number, then is the total number of fractions with , where and are not necessarily coprime. (This is because every fraction with and can be reduced to the fraction with , and vice versa.) Here it is straightforward to determine , but is harder to compute.

Another inversion formula is (where we assume that the series involved are absolutely convergent):

:$g(x) = \sum_^\infty \frac\quad\mbox x\ge 1\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad f(x) = \sum_^\infty \mu(m)\frac\quad\mbox x\ge 1.$

As above, this generalises to the case where is an arithmetic function possessing a Dirichlet inverse :

:$g(x) = \sum_^\infty \alpha(m)\frac\quad\mbox x\ge 1\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad f(x) = \sum_^\infty \alpha^(m)\frac\quad\mbox x\ge 1.$

For example, there is a well known proof relating the Riemann zeta function to the prime zeta function that uses the series-based form of
Möbius inversion in the previous equation when $s = 1$. Namely, by the Euler product representation of $\zeta(s)$ for
$\Re(s) > 1$

:$\log\zeta(s) = -\sum_ \log\left(1-\frac\right) = \sum_ \frac \iff P(s) = \sum_ \frac \log\zeta(ks), \Re(s) > 1.$

These identities for alternate forms of Möbius inversion are found in.
A more general theory of Möbius inversion formulas partially cited in the next section on incidence algebras is constructed by Rota in. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00531932.pdf/ref>

Multiplicative notation

As Möbius inversion applies to any abelian group, it makes no difference whether the group operation is written as addition or as multiplication. This gives rise to the following notational variant of the inversion formula:

:$\mbox F(n) = \prod_ f(d),\mbox f(n) = \prod_ F\left(\frac\right)^.$

Proofs of generalizations

The first generalization can be proved as follows. We use Iverson's convention that onditionis the indicator function of the condition, being 1 if the condition is true and 0 if false. We use the result that
:$\sum_\mu(d)=\varepsilon (n),$
that is, $1 * \mu = \varepsilon$, where $\varepsilon$ is the unit function.

We have the following:
:\begin
\sum_\mu(n)g\left(\frac\right)
&= \sum_ \mu(n) \sum_ f\left(\frac\right)\\
&= \sum_ \mu(n) \sum_ \sum_ =mnf\left(\frac\right)\\
&= \sum_ f\left(\frac\right) \sum_ \mu(n) \sum_ \left =\frac\right\qquad\text\\
&= \sum_ f\left(\frac\right) \sum_ \mu(n) \\
&= \sum_ f\left(\frac\right) \varepsilon (r) \\
&= f(x) \qquad\text \varepsilon (r)=0\textr=1
\end

The proof in the more general case where replaces 1 is essentially identical, as is the second generalisation.

On posets

For a poset , a set endowed with a partial order relation $\leq$, define the Möbius function $\mu$ of recursively by

:$\mu(s,s) = 1 \text s \in P, \qquad \mu(s,u) = - \sum_ \mu(s,t), \quad \text s < u \text P.$

(Here one assumes the summations are finite.) Then for $f,g: P \to K$, where is a commutative ring, we have

:$g(t) = \sum_ f(s) \qquad \text t \in P$

if and only if

:$f(t) = \sum_ g(s)\mu(s,t) \qquad \textt \in P.$

(See Stanley's ''Enumerative Combinatorics'', Vol 1, Section 3.7.)

Contributions of Weisner, Hall, and Rota

See also

* Farey sequence
* Inclusion–exclusion principle

Notes

References

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

External links

*

{{DEFAULTSORT:Mobius Inversion Formula
Arithmetic functions
Enumerative combinatorics
Order theory

ru:Функция Мёбиуса#Обращение Мёбиуса