Lead time bias
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

Lead time bias happens when survival time appears longer because diagnosis was done earlier (for instance, by screening), irrespective of whether the patient lived longer. Lead time is duration of time between detection of a disease (by screening or based on a new experimental criteria) and its usual clinical presentation and diagnosis (based on traditional criteria). For instance, it is the time between early detection by screening and the time in which diagnosis would have been made clinically (without screening). It is an important factor when evaluating the effectiveness of a specific test.Lead time bias - General Practice Notebook
/ref>


Relationship between screening and survival

The goal of screening is earlier detection - to diagnose a disease earlier than it would be without screening. Therefore, if screening works, it needs to advance in time the moment of diagnosis. In other words, screening needs to introduce a lead time. However, the lead time itself biases survival statistics: people with disease detected by screening appear to have a longer survival (the time the person has lived after diagnosis) only because screening starts the clock sooner. Consider for instance a disease, where there is no screening, that is diagnosed by symptoms when patients are 60 years old and kill them when they are 65 years old. These patients lived 5 years after the diagnosis. Now, consider that, with screening, the disease is detected when the patients are 55 years old, but they still die when they are 65. They did not live any longer because of earlier detection, but they survived 10 years after the diagnosis (only because the disease was diagnosed 5 years earlier). Therefore, earlier detection alone is not enough to achieve longer survival. Lead time bias affect interpretation of the
five-year survival rate The five-year survival rate is a type of survival rate for estimating the prognosis of a particular disease, normally calculated from the point of diagnosis. Lead time bias from earlier diagnosis can affect interpretation of the five-year surviva ...
, effectively making it appear that people survive longer with cancer even in cases where the course of cancer is the same as in those who were diagnosed later. Consider another example. Early diagnosis by screening may not prolong the life of someone but just determine the propensity of the person to a disease or medical condition such as by DNA testing. No additional life span has been gained and the patient may even be subject to added anxiety as the patient must live for longer with knowledge of the disease. For example, the genetic disorder
Huntington's disease Huntington's disease (HD), also known as Huntington's chorea, is a neurodegenerative disease that is mostly inherited. The earliest symptoms are often subtle problems with mood or mental abilities. A general lack of coordination and an uns ...
is diagnosed when symptoms appear at around 50, and the person dies at around 65. The typical patient, therefore, lives about 15 years after diagnosis. A genetic test at birth makes it possible to diagnose this disorder earlier. If this newborn baby dies at around 65, the person will have "survived" 65 years after diagnosis, without having actually lived any longer than those diagnosed without DNA detection.


See also

*
Length time bias Length time bias (or length bias) is an overestimation of survival duration due to the relative excess of cases detected that are asymptomatically slowly progressing, while fast progressing cases are detected after giving symptoms. Length time b ...


Notes

{{Biases Epidemiology Medical statistics Bias