The Info List - Kurgan Culture

Pontic Steppe

Domestication of the horse Kurgan Kurgan
culture Steppe cultures

Bug-Dniester Sredny Stog Dnieper-Donets Samara Khvalynsk Yamna

Mikhaylovka culture





Eastern Europe

Usatovo Cernavodă Cucuteni

Northern Europe

Corded ware

Baden Middle Dnieper

Bronze Age

Pontic Steppe

Chariot Yamna Catacomb Multi-cordoned ware Poltavka Srubna

Northern/Eastern Steppe

Abashevo culture Andronovo Sintashta


Globular Amphora Corded ware Beaker Unetice Trzciniec Nordic Bronze Age Terramare Tumulus Urnfield Lusatian


BMAC Yaz Gandhara grave

Iron Age




Thraco-Cimmerian Hallstatt Jastorf




Painted Grey Ware Northern Black Polished Ware

Peoples and societies

Bronze Age

Anatolians Armenians Mycenaean Greeks Indo-Iranians

Iron Age





Scythians Persians Medes



Gauls Celtiberians Insular Celts

Hellenic peoples Italic peoples Germanic peoples Paleo-Balkans/Anatolia:

Thracians Dacians Illyrians Phrygians

Middle Ages




Balts Slavs Albanians Medieval Europe


Medieval India


Greater Persia

Religion and mythology


Proto-Indo-European religion Proto-Indo-Iranian religion






Buddhism Jainism





Yazidism Yarsanism






Paleo-Balkans Greek Roman Celtic

Irish Scottish Breton Welsh Cornish


Anglo-Saxon Continental Norse


Latvian Lithuanian

Slavic Albanian


Fire-sacrifice Horse sacrifice Sati Winter solstice/Yule

Indo-European studies


Marija Gimbutas J.P. Mallory


Copenhagen Studies in Indo-European


Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture The Horse, the Wheel and Language Journal of Indo-European Studies Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch Indo-European Etymological Dictionary

v t e

The Kurgan
hypothesis (also known as the Kurgan
theory or Kurgan model) or steppe theory is the most widely accepted proposal to identify the Proto-Indo-European homeland
Proto-Indo-European homeland
from which the Indo-European languages spread out throughout Europe and parts of Asia.[note 1] It postulates that the people of a Kurgan
culture in the Pontic steppe north of the Black Sea
Black Sea
were the most likely speakers of the Proto-Indo-European language
Proto-Indo-European language
(PIE). The term is derived from the Russian kurgan (курган), meaning tumulus or burial mound. The Kurgan
hypothesis was first formulated in the 1950s by Marija Gimbutas, who used the term to group various cultures, including the Yamna, or Pit Grave, culture and its predecessors. David Anthony instead uses the core Yamna culture
Yamna culture
and its relationship with other cultures as a point of reference. Marija Gimbutas
Marija Gimbutas
defined the Kurgan
culture as composed of four successive periods, with the earliest ( Kurgan
I) including the Samara and Seroglazovo cultures of the Dnieper- Volga
region in the Copper Age (early 4th millennium BC). The people of these cultures were nomadic pastoralists, who, according to the model, by the early 3rd millennium BC had expanded throughout the Pontic-Caspian steppe and into Eastern Europe.[3] Three genetic studies in 2015 gave partial support to Gimbutas's Kurgan
theory regarding the Indo-European Urheimat. According to those studies, haplogroups R1b and R1a, now the most common in Europe (R1a is also common in South Asia) would have expanded from the Russian and Ukrainian steppes, along with the Indo European languages; they also detected an autosomal component present in modern Europeans which was not present in Neolithic Europeans, which would have been introduced with paternal lineages R1b and R1a, as well as Indo European Languages.[4][5][6]


1 History

1.1 Predecessors 1.2 Overview

2 Kurgan

2.1 Cultural horizon 2.2 Stages of culture and expansion 2.3 Timeline 2.4 Further expansion during the Bronze Age

3 Revisions

3.1 Invasion vs. diffusion scenarios 3.2 Anthony's "Revised Steppe Theory"

4 See also 5 Notes 6 References 7 Bibliography 8 Further reading 9 External links

History[edit] Predecessors[edit] Arguments for the identification of the Proto-Indo-Europeans
as steppe nomads from the Pontic-Caspian region had already been made in the 19th century by German philologists Theodor Benfey[7] and especially Otto Schrader.[8][9] In his standard work[10] about PIE and to a greater extent in a later abbreviated version,[11] Karl Brugmann
Karl Brugmann
took the view that the urheimat could not be identified exactly at that time, but he tended toward Schrader's view. However, after Karl Penka's 1883[12] rejection of non-European origins, most scholars favoured a Northern European origin. The view of a Pontic origin was still strongly favoured, e.g., by the archaeologists V. Gordon Childe[13] and Ernst Wahle.[14] One of Wahle's students was Jonas Puzinas, who in turn was one of Gimbutas' teachers. Gimbutas, who acknowledges Schrader as a precursor,[15] was able to marshal a wealth of archaeological evidence from the territory of the Soviet Union (and other countries then belonging to the eastern bloc) not readily available to scholars from western countries,[16] enabling her to achieve a fuller picture of prehistoric Europe. Overview[edit] When it was first proposed in 1956, in The Prehistory of Eastern Europe, Part 1, Marija Gimbutas's contribution to the search for Indo-European origins was an interdisciplinary synthesis of archaeology and linguistics. The Kurgan
model of Indo-European origins identifies the Pontic-Caspian steppe as the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) urheimat, and a variety of late PIE dialects are assumed to have been spoken across the region. According to this model, the Kurgan
culture gradually expanded until it encompassed the entire Pontic-Caspian steppe, Kurgan
IV being identified with the Yamna culture
Yamna culture
of around 3000 BC. The mobility of the Kurgan
culture facilitated its expansion over the entire region, and is attributed to the domestication of the horse and later the use of early chariots.[note 2] The first strong archaeological evidence for the domestication of the horse comes from the Sredny Stog culture
Sredny Stog culture
north of the Azov Sea
Azov Sea
in Ukraine, and would correspond to an early PIE or pre-PIE nucleus of the 5th millennium BC.[note 2] Subsequent expansion beyond the steppes led to hybrid, or in Gimbutas's terms "kurganized" cultures, such as the Globular Amphora culture to the west. From these kurganized cultures came the immigration of Proto- Greeks
to the Balkans
and the nomadic Indo-Iranian cultures to the east around 2500 BC. Kurgan
culture[edit] Cultural horizon[edit] Gimbutas defined and introduced the term " Kurgan
culture" in 1956 with the intention of introducing a "broader term" that would combine Sredny Stog
Sredny Stog
II, Pit-Grave
and Corded ware
Corded ware
horizons (spanning the 4th to 3rd millennia in much of Eastern and Northern Europe).[note 3] The model of a " Kurgan
culture" brings together the various cultures of the Copper Age
Copper Age
to Early Bronze Age
Bronze Age
(5th to 3rd millennia BC) Pontic-Caspian steppe to justify their identification as a single archaeological culture or cultural horizon, based on similarities among them. The eponymous construction of kurgans (mound graves) is only one among several factors. As always in the grouping of archaeological cultures, the dividing line between one culture and the next cannot be drawn with hard precision and will be open to debate. Cultures that Gimbutas considered as part of the " Kurgan

Bug-Dniester (6th millennium) Samara (5th millennium) Khvalynsk (5th millennium) Dnieper-Donets (5th to 4th millennia) Sredny Stog
Sredny Stog
(mid-5th to mid-4th millennia) Maikop- Dereivka
(mid-4th to mid-3rd millennia) Yamna (Pit Grave): This is itself a varied cultural horizon, spanning the entire Pontic-Caspian steppe from the mid-4th to the 3rd millennium. Usatovo culture
Usatovo culture
(late 4th millennium)

Stages of culture and expansion[edit]

Overview of the Kurgan

Gimbutas' original suggestion identifies four successive stages of the Kurgan

I, Dnieper/ Volga
region, earlier half of the 4th millennium BC. Apparently evolving from cultures of the Volga
basin, subgroups include the Samara and Seroglazovo cultures. Kurgan
II–III, latter half of the 4th millennium BC. Includes the Sredny Stog culture
Sredny Stog culture
and the Maykop culture
Maykop culture
of the northern Caucasus. Stone circles, anthropomorphic stone stelae of deities. Kurgan
IV or Pit Grave
Pit Grave
culture, first half of the 3rd millennium BC, encompassing the entire steppe region from the Ural to Romania.

In other publications[17] she proposes three successive "waves" of expansion:

Wave 1, predating Kurgan
I, expansion from the lower Volga
to the Dnieper, leading to coexistence of Kurgan
I and the Cucuteni-Trypillian culture. Repercussions of the migrations extend as far as the Balkans
and along the Danube
to the Vinča culture in Serbia
and Lengyel culture
Lengyel culture
in Hungary. Wave 2, mid 4th millennium BC, originating in the Maykop culture
Maykop culture
and resulting in advances of "kurganized" hybrid cultures into northern Europe around 3000 BC (Globular Amphora culture, Baden culture, and ultimately Corded Ware culture). According to Gimbutas this corresponds to the first intrusion of Indo-European languages
Indo-European languages
into western and northern Europe. Wave 3, 3000–2800 BC, expansion of the Pit Grave
Pit Grave
culture beyond the steppes, with the appearance of the characteristic pit graves as far as the areas of modern Romania, Bulgaria, eastern Hungary
and Georgia, coincident with the end of the Cucuteni-Trypillian culture
Cucuteni-Trypillian culture
and Trialeti culture
Trialeti culture
in Georgia (c.2750 BC).


4500–4000: Early PIE. Sredny Stog, Dnieper-Donets and Samara cultures, domestication of the horse (Wave 1). 4000–3500: The Pit Grave
Pit Grave
culture (a.k.a. Yamna culture), the prototypical kurgan builders, emerges in the steppe, and the Maykop culture in the northern Caucasus. Indo-Hittite models postulate the separation of Proto-Anatolian before this time. 3500–3000: Middle PIE. The Pit Grave
Pit Grave
culture is at its peak, representing the classical reconstructed Proto-Indo-European society with stone idols, predominantly practicing animal husbandry in permanent settlements protected by hillforts, subsisting on agriculture, and fishing along rivers. Contact of the Pit Grave culture with late Neolithic Europe
Neolithic Europe
cultures results in the "kurganized" Globular Amphora and Baden cultures (Wave 2). The Maykop culture
Maykop culture
shows the earliest evidence of the beginning Bronze Age, and Bronze weapons and artifacts are introduced to Pit Grave territory. Probable early Satemization. 3000–2500: Late PIE. The Pit Grave
Pit Grave
culture extends over the entire Pontic steppe
Pontic steppe
(Wave 3). The Corded Ware culture
Corded Ware culture
extends from the Rhine
to the Volga, corresponding to the latest phase of Indo-European unity, the vast "kurganized" area disintegrating into various independent languages and cultures, still in loose contact enabling the spread of technology and early loans between the groups, except for the Anatolian and Tocharian branches, which are already isolated from these processes. The Centum-Satem break is probably complete, but the phonetic trends of Satemization
remain active.

Further expansion during the Bronze Age[edit] Main article: Indo-European migrations The Kurgan
hypothesis describes the initial spread of Proto-Indo-European during the 5th and 4th millennia BC.[18] As used by Gimbutas, the term "kurganized" implied that the culture could have been spread by no more than small bands who imposed themselves on local people as an elite. This idea of the PIE language and its daughter-languages diffusing east and west without mass movement proved popular with archaeologists in the 1970s (the pots-not-people paradigm).[19] The question of further Indo-Europeanization of Central and Western Europe, Central Asia and Northern India during the Bronze Age is beyond its scope, far more uncertain than the events of the Copper Age, and subject to some controversy. The rapidly developing field of archaeogenetics and genetic genealogy since the late 1990s has not only confirmed a migratory pattern out of the Pontic Steppe at the relevant time,[4][5][6] it also suggests the possibility that the population movement involved was more substantial than anticipated.[20] Revisions[edit] Invasion vs. diffusion scenarios[edit] Gimbutas believed that the expansions of the Kurgan
culture were a series of essentially hostile, military incursions where a new warrior culture imposed itself on the peaceful, matrilinear (hereditary through the female line), matrifocal, though egalitarian cultures of "Old Europe", replacing it with a patriarchal warrior society,[21] a process visible in the appearance of fortified settlements and hillforts and the graves of warrior-chieftains:

The process of Indo-Europeanization was a cultural, not a physical, transformation. It must be understood as a military victory in terms of successfully imposing a new administrative system, language, and religion upon the indigenous groups.[22]

In her later life, Gimbutas increasingly emphasized the authoritarian nature of this transition from the egalitarian process of the "nature/Gaia" Mother Goddess to a patriarchal society and the worship of the patristic / father / sun / weather God (Zeus, Dyaus). Contrary to several critics'[who?] opinions, matriarchal hierarchical structures in Gimbutas' opinion are the same as a patriarchal society, not the actual opposite: an egalitarian society without hierarchy. J. P. Mallory (in 1989) accepted the Kurgan
hypothesis as the de facto standard theory of Indo-European origins, but he recognized criticism of any alleged, but not actually stated (the slow accumulation of influence through coecerion or extortion – Gimbutas' actual main scenario – was often taken as general and immediate raiding and then conquest) "radical" scenario of military invasion:

One might at first imagine that the economy of argument involved with the Kurgan
solution should oblige us to accept it outright. But critics do exist and their objections can be summarized quite simply: Almost all of the arguments for invasion and cultural transformations are far better explained without reference to Kurgan
expansions, and most of the evidence so far presented is either totally contradicted by other evidence, or is the result of gross misinterpretation of the cultural history of Eastern, Central, and Northern Europe.[23]

Anthony's "Revised Steppe Theory"[edit] David Anthony's The Horse, the Wheel and Language
The Horse, the Wheel and Language
describes his "Revised Steppe Theory". David Anthony considers the term "Kurgan culture" so lacking in precision as to be useless, instead using the core Yamna culture
Yamna culture
and its relationship with other cultures as a point of reference.[24] He points out that

The Kurgan
culture was so broadly defined that almost any culture with burial mounds, or even (like the Baden culture) without them could be included.[24]

He does not include the Maykop culture
Maykop culture
among those that he considers to be IE-speaking, presuming instead that they spoke a Caucasian language.[25] See also[edit]

Hamangia culture Animal sacrifice Ashvamedha Shaft tomb Late Glacial Maximum


Archaeogenetics of Europe Haplogroup R1a

Competing hypotheses

Proto-Indo-European Urheimat

Armenian hypothesis Anatolian hypothesis Out of India theory Paleolithic Continuity Theory


^ See:

Mallory: "The Kurgan
solution is attractive and has been accepted by many archaeologists and linguists, in part or total. It is the solution one encounters in the Encyclopædia Britannica and the Grand Dictionnaire Encyclopédique Larousse."[1] Strazny: "The single most popular proposal is the Pontic steppes (see the Kurgan

^ a b Parpola in Blench & Spriggs (1999:181). "The history of the Indo-European words for 'horse' shows that the Proto-Indo-European speakers had long lived in an area where the horse was native and/or domesticated (Mallory 1989:161–63). The first strong archaeological evidence for the domestication of the horse comes from the Ukrainian Srednij Stog culture, which flourished c. 4200–3500 BC and is likely to represent an early phase of the Proto-Indo-European culture (Anthony 1986:295f.; Mallory 1989:162, 197–210). During the Pit Grave culture (c. 3500–2800 BC), which continued the cultures related to Srednij Stog and probably represents the late phase of the Proto-Indo-European culture – full-scale pastoral technology, including the domesticated horse, wheeled vehicles, stock breeding and limited horticulture, spread all over the Pontic steppes, and, c. 3000 BC, in practically every direction from this centre (Anthony 1986, 1991; Mallory 1989, vol. 1). ^ >Gimbutas (1970) page 156: "The name Kurgan
culture (the Barrow culture) was introduced by the author in 1956 as a broader term to replace and Pit-Grave
(Russian Yamna), names used by Soviet scholars for the culture in the eastern Ukraine
and south Russia, and Corded Ware, Battle-Axe, Ochre-Grave, Single-Grave
and other names given to complexes characterized by elements of Kurgan
appearance that formed in various parts of Europe"


^ Mallory 1989, p. 185. ^ Strazny 2000, p. 163. ^ Gimbutas 1985, p. 190. ^ a b Haak; et al. (2015). "Massive migration from the steppe is a source for Indo-European languages
Indo-European languages
in Europe". bioRxiv 013433 .  ^ a b Allentoft; et al. (2015). "Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia". Nature. 522: 167–172. doi:10.1038/nature14507.  ^ a b Mathieson; et al. (2015). "Eight thousand years of natural selection in Europe". bioRxiv 016477 .  ^ Theodor Benfey, Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft und orientalischen Philologie in Deutschland seit dem Anfange des 19. Jahrhunderts, mit einem Rückblick auf die früheren Zeiten (Munich: J.G. Cotta, 1869), 597–600. ^ Otto Schrader, Sprachvergleichung und Urgeschichte, vol. 2. Jena, Ger.: Hermann Costanoble, 1890. ^ Rydberg, Viktor (1907). Teutonic Mythology. 1. London, UK: Norrœna. p. 19. Archived from the original on 2013-01-21.  ^ Karl Brugmann, Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen, vol. 1.1, Strassburg 1886, p. 2. ^ Karl Brugmann, Kurze vergleichende Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen, vol. 1, Strassburg 1902, p. 22-23. ^ Karl Penka, Origines Ariacae: Linguistisch-ethnologische Untersuchungen zur ältesten Geschichte der arischen Völker und Sprachen (Vienna: Taschen, 1883), 68. ^ Vere Gordon Childe, The Aryans: A Study of Indo-European Origins (London: Kegan Paul, 1926). ^ Ernst Wahle (1932). Deutsche Vorzeit, Leipzig 1932. ^ Gimbutas, Marija (1963). The Balts. London, UK: Thames & Hudson. p. 38. Archived from the original on 2013-10-30.  ^ Anthony 2007, pp. 18, 495. ^ Bojtar 1999, p. 57. ^ The New Encyclopædia Britannica, 15th edition, 22:587–588 ^ Razib Khan, Facing the ocean, Discover Magazine, 28 August 2012. ^ Haak 2015. ^ Gimbutas 1982, p. 1. ^ Gimbutas, Dexter & Jones-Bley 1997, p. 309. ^ Mallory 1991, p. 185. ^ a b Anthony 2007, pp. 306–307, "Why not a Kurgan
Culture?" ^ Anthony 2007, p. 297.


Anthony, David W. (2007), The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World, Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-05887-3  Anthony, David; Vinogradov, Nikolai (1995), "Birth of the Chariot", Archaeology, 48 (2), pp. 36–41, JSTOR 41771098  Blench, Roger; Spriggs, Matthew, eds. (1999), Archaeology and Language, III: Artefacts, languages and texts, London: Routledge  Bojtar, Endre (1999), Foreword to the Past: A Cultural History of the Baltic People, Central European University Press  Dexter, Miriam Robbins; Jones-Bley, Karlene, eds. (1997), The Kurgan Culture and the Indo-Europeanization of Europe: Selected Articles From 1952 to 1993, Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man, ISBN 0-941694-56-9 . Gimbutas, Marija (1956), The Prehistory of Eastern Europe. Part I: Mesolithic, Neolithic and Copper Age
Copper Age
Cultures in Russia and the Baltic Area, Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum . Gimbutas, Marija (1970), "Proto-Indo-European Culture: The Kurgan Culture during the Fifth, Fourth, and Third Millennia B.C.", in Cardona, George; Hoenigswald, Henry M.; Senn, Alfred, Indo-European and Indo-Europeans: Papers Presented at the Third Indo-European Conference at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 155–197, ISBN 0-8122-7574-8 . Gimbutas, Marija (1982), "Old Europe in the Fifth Millenium B.C.: The European Situation on the Arrival of Indo-Europeans", in Polomé, Edgar C., The Indo-Europeans in the Fourth and Third Millennia, Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers, ISBN 0-89720-041-1  Gimbutas, Marija (Spring–Summer 1985), "Primary and Secondary Homeland of the Indo-Europeans: comments on Gamkrelidze-Ivanov articles", Journal of Indo-European Studies, 13 (1&2): 185–201  Gimbutas, Marija; Dexter, Miriam Robbins; Jones-Bley, Karlene (1997), The Kurgan
Culture and the Indo-Europeanization of Europe: Selected Articles from 1952 to 1993, Washington, D. C.: Institute for the Study of Man, ISBN 0-941694-56-9  Gimbutas, Marija; Dexter, Miriam Robbins (1999), The Living Goddesses, Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press, ISBN 0-520-22915-0  Haak, W.; Lazaridis, I.; Patterson, N.; Rohland, N.; Mallick, S.; Llamas, B.; Brandt, G.; Nordenfelt, S.; Harney, E.; Stewardson, K.; Fu, Q.; Mittnik, A.; Bánffy, E.; Economou, C.; Francken, M.; Friederich, S.; Pena, R. G.; Hallgren, F.; Khartanovich, V.; Khokhlov, A.; Kunst, M.; Kuznetsov, P.; Meller, H.; Mochalov, O.; Moiseyev, V.; Nicklisch, N.; Pichler, S. L.; Risch, R.; Rojo Guerra, M. A.; et al. (2015), "Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages
Indo-European languages
in Europe" (PDF), Nature, 522: 207–211, Bibcode:2015Natur.522..207H, doi:10.1038/nature14317, PMC 5048219 , PMID 25731166  Krell, Kathrin (1998). "Gimbutas' Kurgans-PIE homeland hypothesis: a linguistic critique". Chapter 11 in "Archaeology and Language, II", Blench and Spriggs. Mallory, J.P.; Adams, D.Q., eds. (1997), Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture, London: Fitzroy Dearborn, ISBN 1-884964-98-2 . Mallory, J.P. (1989), In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archaeology, and Myth, London: Thames & Hudson, ISBN 0-500-27616-1 . Mallory, J.P. (1996), Fagan, Brian M., ed., The Oxford Companion to Archaeology, New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-507618-4  Renfrew, Colin. (1999). "Time depth, convergence theory, and innovation in Proto-Indo-European: 'Old Europe' as a PIE linguistic area." J INDO-EUR STUD, 27(3–4), 257–293. Schmoeckel, Reinhard (1999), Die Indoeuropäer. Aufbruch aus der Vorgeschichte ("The Indo-Europeans: Rising from pre-history"), Bergisch-Gladbach (Germany): Bastei Lübbe, ISBN 3-404-64162-0  Strazny, Philipp (Ed). (2000), Dictionary of Historical and Comparative Linguistics (1 ed.), Routledge, ISBN 978-1-57958-218-0  Zanotti, D. G. (1982), "The Evidence for Kurgan
Wave One As Reflected By the Distribution of 'Old Europe' Gold Pendants", Journal of Indo-European Studies, 10, pp. 223–234 .

Further reading[edit]

Gimbutas, Marija (1997). Dexter, Miriam Robbins; Jones-Bley, Karlene, eds. The Kurgan
Culture and the Indo-Europeanization of Europe: Selected Articles From 1952 to 1993. Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series No. 18. Institute for the Study of Man. ISBN 978-094169456-8.  Mallory, J.P. (1999), In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archaeology, and Myth (reprint ed.), London: Thames & Hudson, ISBN 0-500-27616-1  Anthony, David W. (2007). The Horse The Wheel And Language. How Bronze-Age Riders From the Eurasian Steppes Shaped The Modern World. Princeton University Press. 

External links[edit]

humanjourney.us, The Indo-Europeans Charlene Spretnak (2011), Anatomy of a Backlash: Concerning the Work of Marija Gimbutas, Journal of Archaeomythology

v t e

Proto-Indo-European language


Accent Centum and satem Glottalic theory Laryngeal theory s-mobile Sound laws

boukólos rule kʷetwóres rule Glossary of sound laws Bartholomae's Grassmann's Osthoff's Pinault's Siebs' Sievers' (Edgerton's converse) Stang's Szemerényi's


Ablaut Caland system h₂e-conjugation Narten present Nasal infix Root Thematic vowel Vṛddhi-derivation

Parts of speech

Nominals (nouns and adjectives) Numerals Particles Pronouns Verbs



Main sources

Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (IEW) Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben
Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben
(LIV) Lexikon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominalstämme
Lexikon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominalstämme
(LIPP) Nomina im Indogermanischen Lexikon
Nomina im Indogermanischen Lexikon
(NIL) Indo-European Etymological Dictionary (IEED)


Indo-European migrations
Indo-European migrations
& Proto-Indo-European Urheimat
hypotheses Salmon problem

Artificial compositions

Schleicher's fable The king and the god

See also

Proto-Indo-European religion Proto-Indo-European society Indo-European studies Encyclopedia of Indo-European C