Greater earless lizard

The greater earless lizard (''Cophosaurus texanus'') is the only species in the monotypic genus ''Cophosaurus''. It is closely related to the smaller, lesser earless lizards and other species in the genus ''Holbrookia'', and in fact was placed in that genus and referred to ''Holbrookia texana'' from 1852 into the 1970s. Earless lizards lack external ear openings, an adaptation to burrowing in the sand, as are the recessed lower jaw and flared upper labial scales. Greater earless lizards are sexually dimorphic, males grow larger and are more colorful than females, exhibiting pink and green colors that are particularly bright in the breeding season. Two bold black bars mark the lateral region of males but are greatly reduced and vague, or occasionally entirely absent in females.

The greater earless lizard is native to the Chihuahua Desert and other arid and semi-arid regions of Southwestern United States and northern Mexico, where they most often occupy moderately open areas of sparse vegetation with rocks, gravel, and sand. The overall color of individual lizards frequently match the colors of the rocks and soils of the local area they inhabit. They will often rely on camouflage and their speed to elude threats and predators before retreating into rock crevices. They are primarily insectivores, preying on wide variety of crickets, grasshoppers, caterpillars, ants, flies, beetles, and bugs. Spiders and small lizards are occasionally eaten as well. ''Cophosaurus'' are oviparous. Females lay 1 to 4 clutches of 2 – 9 eggs a year, with hatchlings emerging from June to October, and reaching adult size and sexual maturity in one year.

Etymology

The generic name ''Cophosaurus'', is derived from the Greek words ''copho'' (κουφός) meaning deaf, and ''saurus'' meaning lizard, in reference to the absents of external ear openings in the species. The trivial name, or specific epithet ''texanus'', is a toponym in reference to the state of Texas where the specimens used in the original description were collected.Lemos Espinal, Julio A., Hobart M. Smith, James R. Dixon, and Alexander Cruz. 2015. ''Amphibians and Reptiles of Sonora, Chihuahua, and Coahuila, Mexico, Vol. I & II''. CONABIO, Mexico D. F. 668 pp. (Vol. II pages 202-203 & 595)
The subspecies names are both Latin, ''reticulatus'' meaning reticulated or a net-like pattern, Lewis, Charlton Thomas 1879. ''A Latin Dictionary: Founded on Andrew's Edition of Freund's Latin Dictionary, revised, enlarged, and in great part rewritten by Charlton Thomas Lewis, Ph. D.'' Oxford University Press. Oxford. xiv, 2019 pp. 1993 edition and ''scitulus'' meaning handsome or pretty.

Taxonomy

Within the family Phrynosomatidae, ''Cophosaurus'' is most closely related to Zebra-Tailed Lizards (''Callisaurus''), Lesser Earless Lizards (''Holbrookia''), and Fringe-Toed Lizards (''Uma''), collectively forming the Tribe Callisaurini, commonly referred to as sand lizards.de Queiroz, Kevin. 1992.
Phylogenetic relationships and rates of allozyme evolution among the lineages of sceloporine sand lizards
'. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 45: 333-362.Uetz, Peter, Paul Freed, R. Aguilar, and J. Hošek (editors). 2022. The Reptile Database, http://www.reptile-database.org
Cophosaurus texanus TROSCHEL, 1852
(accessed June 5, 2022) The genus ''Cophosaurus'' is monotypic, meaning ''Cophosaurus texanus'' is the only species in the genus. Franz Hermann Troschel described the genus ''Cophosaurus'' as well as the species ''C. texanus'' in his paper dated 1850, but not published until 1852. Later that same year the species was transferred to the genus ''Holbrookia'' in a review by Spencer Fullerton Baird and Charles Frédéric Girard, and subsequent literature used the name ''Holbrookia texana'' for well over a century.Baird, Spencer F. and Charles F. Girard. 1852.
Characteristics of some new reptiles in the Museum of the Smithsonian Institution, part 2
'' Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 6: 125-129. (page 125) Troschlel's description was based on two specimens, cotypes or syntypes, both lost in the Second World War. In 1951 James A. Peters published a review of the species recognizing three subspecies and designating a neotype for ''C. t. texanus'', although still placing them in the genus ''Holbrookia''.Peters, James A. 1951.
Studies on the lizard Holbrookia texana (Troschel) with descriptions of two new subspecies
'. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology University of Michigan, (537): 1-20. In a 1958 Ph. D. dissertation reviewing the genus ''Holbrookia'', herpetologist Ralph W. Axtell excluded ''Holbrookia texana'' with little comment,Axtell, Ralph W.1958. ''A monographic revision of the iguanid genus Holbrookia.'' Ph. D. dissertation. Univ. Texas, viii + 222 pp. and this was noted by Robert F. Clarke in his 1965 Ph. D. dissertation who placed it back in the original genus ''Cophosaurus''.Clarke, Robert F. 1965.
An ethological study of the iguanid lizard genera Callisaurus, Cophosaurus, and Holbrookia
'' The University of Oklahoma, Ph.D. Dissertation,. Emporia Slate Research Studies, 13: 1-66. (page 5 Both combinations, ''Cophosaurus texanus'' and ''Holbrookia texana'', were used by various authors in the 1970s, but despite arguments for the placement of the species in ''Holbrookia'',Guttman, S. I. 1970. ''An electrophoretic study of the hemoglobins of the sand lizards, Callisaurus, Cophosaurus, Holbrookia, and Uma.'' Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 34(3): 569-574.Cox, Douglas C. & Wilmer W. Tanner. 1977.
Ostelolgy and Myology of the Head and Neck Regions of Callisaurus, Cophosaurus, Holbrookia, and Uma (Reptilia: Iguanidae)
'' Great Basin Naturalist 37: 35-56. ''Cophosaurus'' was in predominant use by the 1980s and later allozymes analysis supported the recognition of the genus.

Three subspecies are currently recognized (2022), with standardized English names.Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles
Checklist of the Standard English Names of Amphibians & Reptiles
(accessed June 3, 2022)
* Texas greater earless lizard,Liner, E. A. and G. Casas-Andreu. 2008. ''Standard Spanish, English and scientific names of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico.'' Society for the Study Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular 38: i-iv, 1-162. (page 57) Crother, B. I. (ed.). 2017.
'Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in Our Understanding.
' SSAR Herpetological Circular 43, 1–102 pp. ee page 43-44 ''Cophosaurus texanus texanus'', Troschlel 1852 850ref name="Troschel (1852)">Troschel, F. H. 1852. ''Cophosaurus texanus, neue Eidechsengattung aus Texas''. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 16 (1): 388-394 850
* Sonoran greater earless lizard, ''Cophosaurus texanus reticulatus'', (Peters 1951)
* Chihuahuan greater earless lizard, ''Cophosaurus texanus scitulus'', (Peters 1951)

Description

The greater earless lizard is a medium sized lizard (relative to other species in its range) and the largest of the earless lizards. A range of sizes have been reported by various authors: Texas greater earless lizard (''C. t. texanus''), males 8.3 – 18.1 cm. .25 – 7.1 in. females 7 – 14.3 cm. .75 – 5.6 in. Chihuahuan greater earless lizard (''C. t. scitulus''), males 9 – 18.4 cm. .5 – 7.25 in. females 6.7 – 13.5 cm. .6 – 5.3 in.in total lengths are representative of the species.Conant, Roger and Joseph T. Collins. 1998. ''A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians: Eastern and Central North America.'' Houghton Mifflin Company. New York, N. Y. xviii, 616 pp. (pages 222–223)

Greater earless lizards do not have external ear openings. The scales on the body are small and granular, with the dorsal scales slightly smaller than the ventral scales. Their legs, particularly the hind legs, are relatively long. The tail is slightly flattened and longer than head and body combined. The underside of the tail is white with 5 to 9 (usually 6 or 7) bold, contrasting black bands (excluding individuals with regenerated tails). The base color can be various shades of grays, browns, tans, or reddish brown and generally close to the prevailing colors of the local substrate. ''Cophosaurus texanus'' is a sexually dimorphic species, in addition to size differences, males and females differ in some aspects of colors and markings. Most noticeable in males are a pair of black bands located on the posterior third on the sides of the body, rising from two blue patches on the margins of the belly up sides and arching forward and ending before meeting on the back. The body anterior to the black bands is suffused with some shade of pink, orange, or red, and the body posterior to the black bands tented green, aqua-green, or lime-green. The colors are most prominent in the Chihuahuan greater earless lizard (''C. t. scitulus'') and are greatly enhanced and most noticeable in the breeding season in all subspecies. In parts of their range they are colloquially referred to as "the lizard with the pink shirt and green pants." In contrast, females either lack the black lateral bands entirely or they are very faint and indistinct. Females and young often exhibit a lateral white or near white stripe running between the forelimbs and hind limbs and on the back of the legs.Howland, Jeffrey M. 2009. ''Greater Earless Lizard Cophosaurus texanus, Troschlel, 1852.'' pages 146-149 IN Lawrence L. C. Jones and Robert E. Lovich (editors). ''Lizards of the American Southwest, A Photographic Field Guide.'' Rio Nuevo Publishers. Tucson, Arizona. 567 pp. Stebbins, Robert C. and Samuel M. McGinnis. 2018. Peterson Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians, 4th ed. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publidhing Co. New York, N.Y. xi, 560 pp. (pages 276-277)

The subspecies were diagnosed in the original description with the following characters. ''Cophosaurus t. texana'': typically, 80–86%, have 79 ventral scales or less from collar (last gular fold) to anus, 40 or more scales in head length, and 27 or less total femoral pores. ''Cophosaurus t. scitula'': 80–84% have 80 or more ventral scales, 39 or less head scales, 28 or more femoral pores. ''Cophosaurus t. reticulata'': 85–100% have 82 ventral scales, 36 or less head scales, less than 31 femoral pores, and the black lateral bars are faint and do not extend above the lateral fold in males.

Distribution

The Greater earless lizard occurs in southwestern United States (Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas) and northern Mexico ( Chihuahua, Coahuila, Durango, Nuevo Leon, San Luis Potosi, Sonora, Tamaulipas, and Zacatecas). Elevations ranging from 127 to 2100 meters have been reported.Farr, William L., David Lazcano, and Paablo A. Lavin-Murcio. 2013. ''New Distributional Records for Amphibians and Reptiles from the State of Tamaulipas, Mexico III''. Herpetological Review 44(4): 631-645. (pages 634-635)
Thomason, Libby. 2018.
Cophosaurus texanus, Greater Earless Lizard.
' Animal Diversity Web. University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology. (accessed 22 June 2022)

The Texas greater earless lizard (''C. t. texanus'') occurs in the Edwards Plateau region of central Texas and northward to the state border and southeastern areas of the Texas panhandle.Axtell, Ralph W. 1991. ''Interpretive Atlas of Texas Lizards, No. 10, Cophosaurus texanus''. Published by Ralph W. Axtell, Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois. 1-41 pp. It ranges southward into the Tamaulipan mezquital ecoregion, along the Rio Grande into northeast Coahuila and north-central Nuevo León, Mexico.Lemos Espinal, Julio A., Geoffrey R. Smith, and Alexander Cruz. 2018. ''Amphibians and Reptiles of Nuevo León''. Eco Herpetological Publishing and Distribution. Rodeo, New Mexico. x, 370 pp. (pages 93-94 & 339) In south-central Tamaulipas it's occurrence becomes increasingly spotty and localized with records just across southern state line in eastern San Luis Potosí. Martin, Paul S. 1958. ''A Biogeography of Reptiles and Amphibians in the Gomez Farias Region, Tamaulipas, Mexico''. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology University of Michigan, 101: 1-102. (page 58)Lemos Espinal, Julio A. and James R. Dixon. 2013. ''Amphibians and Reptiles of San Luis Potosí.'' Eagle Mountain Publishing, LC. Eagle Mountain, Utah. i-xii, 1-300 pp. (pages 117-118, & 287) Several accounts have commented on the problematic and poorly defined zone of integration between the subspecies ''C. t. texanus'' and ''C. t. scitulu''. Degenhardt, William G., Charles W. Painter, and Andrew H. Price. 1996. ''Amphibians and Reptiles of New Mexico''. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, New Mexico. xix, 431 pp. (pages 141-144)

The Chihuahuan greater earless lizard (''C. t. scitulus'') occurs throughout much of the Chihuahua Desert, including much of the Trans-Pecos region of west Texas, the southern third of New Mexico (following the Pecos and Rio Grande river basins northward), into southeast Arizona east of the Sonora Desert, and following a zone of semi-arid habitat around the northeast margins of the Sonora Desert almost to the California border.Brennan, Thomas C. and Andrew T. Holycross. 2006. ''A Field Guide to Amphibians and Reptiles in Arizona''. Arizona Game and Fish Department. Phoenix, Arizona. v, 150 pp. (page 62) In Mexico it ranges into northeast Chihuahua, much of Coahuila, northeast Durango, extreme northeast Zacatecas, extreme southern Nuevo León, northern San Luis Potosí, and extreme southwest Tamaulipas. It is absent from the higher elevations in the Sierra Madre Oriental but it does range deep into the canyons and valleys on both the eastern and western versants of the mountain range.Lemos Espinal, Julio A., Geoffrey R. Smith, and Rosaura Valdez Laresz. 2019. ''Amphibians and Reptiles of Durango, Mexico''. Eco Herpetological Publishing and Distribution. Rodeo, New Mexico. xii, 416 pp. (pages 115-116 & 391)

The Sonoran greater earless lizard (''C. t. reticulatus'') is endemic to northeastern Sonora, Mexico, between 470 – 1300 meters, where as recently as 2016 it was reportedly known from only eight localities.Rorabaugh, J. C. and Julio Lemos-Espinal. 2016. ''A Field Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of Sonora, Mexico''. ECO Herpetological Publishing and Distribution. Rodeo, New Mexico. 688 pp. (pages 298-300)

Ecology and natural history

Reproduction

The longevity of the greater earless lizard is typicality 3 years, but records of individuals surviving five reproductive seasons in the wild have been documented. Both males and females reach adult size in a year, attaining maturity and mating before their second winter. Mating occurs from April to August, peeking in late April to early July. Gravid females often exhibit pink, orange, or yellow colors on their throats and sides. In one study gravid females were only found in May and June. Multiple clutches, up to four a year, are scattered over a wide area, with clutch size ranging from 2 to 9 eggs, average 3–5. Older females produce larger clutches than young females. One study reported finding single eggs buried in the sand on three occasions but never locating a clutch.Johnson, Clifford 1960. ''Reproductive cycle in females of the greater earless lizard, Holbrookia texana.'' Copeia, 1960(4): 297-300. The incubation period is about 50 days. The hatchlings emerge June to October with reports of sizes varying from 20–25 mm. to 26–31 mm. snout–vent length.Ballinger, Royce E., Earl D. Tyler, and Donald W. Tinkle. 1972. ''Reproductive ecology of a west Texas population of the greater earless lizard, Cophosaurus texanus.'' The American Midland Naturalist, 88/2: 419-428.Schrank, Gordon D., and Royce E. Ballinger. 1973. ''Male reproductive cycles in two species of lizards (Cophosaurus texanus and Cnemidophorus gularis).'' Herpetologica, 29(3): 289-293.Smith, Donald D., Philip A. Medica, and Sherburn R. Sanborn. 1987.
Ecological comparison of sympatric populations of sand lizards (Cophosaurus texanus and Callisaurus draconoides).
' Great Basin Naturalist, 47(2): 175-185.Sugg, Derrick W., Lee A. Fitzgerald, and Howard L. Snell. 1995. ''Growth rate, timing of reproduction, and size dimorphism in the southwestern earless lizard (Cophosaurus texanus scitulus).'' The Southwestern Naturalist, 40(2): 193-202.

Diet

The greater earless lizard is predominantly an insectivore and a generalist. A study in Mohave County, Arizona found insects comprised 85% of the diet, including 18.2% Orthoptera (crickets, grasshoppers, locusts), 15.8% Hymenoptera (ants, bees, sawflies, wasps), and 10.1% Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), 9.2% Diptera (flies), 9.2% Coleoptera (beetles), and 8.4% Hemiptera (true bugs). Spiders made up 7.9% of the diet and ''Cophosaurus'' were found to occasionally feed on small lizards, particularly ornate tree lizards ('' Urosaurus ornatus''), in the late summer and early spring when hatchling emerged and were abundant. Another study conducted in the Mapimí Biosphere Reserve in Durango, Mexico, found the most frequent prey items were spiders, Hymenoptera, Lepidopteran (caterpillars) adult and nymph Orthoptera, beetles, and true bugs.Maury, Ma Eugenia. 1995. ''Diet Composition of the Greater Earless Lizard (Cophosaurus texanus) in central Chihuahuan Desert.'' Journal of Herpetology, 29(2): 266-272. Less frequent prey identified in these studies included Neuroptera (lacewings, mantidflies, antlions), mites, pseudoscorpions, termites, Homoptera, adult Lepidoptera, and Odonata (dragonflies, damselflies) The Arizona study found that plants made up 5.5% of the diet, while the Durango study found only two cases of plant ingestion and interpret them as accidental intake. The most common, or highest percentage of prey items (e.g. Hymenoptera, caterpillars, etc.) in the diet were found to change annually in the Durango study.

''Cophosaurus'' use a sit and wait foraging strategy, often situating themselves on a high vantage point such as a rock, bolder, or fallen limb, in a relatively open space and dashing out to take passing insects. They have been observed leaping into the air or at low hanging vegetation to catch their prey. In one study, months with rain were significantly correlated with an increase of arthropods in the environment and in the dietary intake of the lizards. There was not a significant deference in the diet of males and females. Competition for food between adults and juveniles, as well as other species of sympatric lizards is at least partially alleviated by resource partitioning, determined by differences in body size and jaw length.Hardy, S., W. Lutterschmidt, M. Fuller, P. Gier, R. Durtsche, R. Bradley, K. Meier. 1997. ''Ontogenetic variation in the autecology of the greater earless lizard, Cophosaurus texanus.'' Ecography, 20(4): 336-346.

Habitat

The greater earless lizard native to the arid environment of the Chihuahua Desert, extending into western areas of the Tamaulipan mezquital, and the northeastern margins of the Meseta Central matorral, as well as the semi-arid Edwards Plateau and Central Great Plains in Texas, and the Arizona transition zone (between the Sonoran Desert and Arizona Mountains forests) in the west.

Within these ecoregions it typically occupies open scrubland and areas of sparse vegetation, with rocks and boulder. Limestone ledges and outcrops near streams with boulders and crevices, and dry gulches, arroyos, and canyons with alluvium deposits of silt, sand, gravel, and rocks are often preferred, but it is not strictly limited to these areas.Cagle, Fred R. 1950. ''Notes on Holbrookia texana in Texas.'' Copeia. 1950(3): 230. Gentle to moderate slopes of limestone and gravel and hills of granite and igneous rock are also habitat for the lizard.Axtell, Ralph W. 1959. ''Amphibians and Reptiles of the Black Gap Wildlife management Area, Brewster County, Texas.'' The Southwestern Naturalist 4(2): 88–109. Plants identified in association with greater earless lizards include honey mesquite (''Prosopis glandulosa''), creosote bush (''Larrea tridentata''), ocotillo (''Fouquieria splendens''), sotol (''Dasylirion''), lechuguilla ('' Agave lecheguilla''), prickly pear cactus ('' Opuntia''), leatherstem ('' Jatropha dioica''), and candelilla ('' Euphorbia antisyphilitica'').

The color of an individual lizard often bears a striking correlation to the prevailing colors of the rocks and substrates where it lives: ''e.g.'' specimens from Llano County, Texas have been noted for their rusty brown color similar to the red granite characteristic of much of the Llano Uplift. ''Cophosaurus'' can be locally abundant and among the most common species of herpetofauna in some areas, and yet absent from seemingly appropriate habitat other areas.

Behavior

Greater earless lizards are diurnal, with most populations exhibiting a bimodal daily activity pattern, peeking late in the morning, followed by a period of reduced activity in the afternoon heat, and a second activity period in the late afternoon. They have a high optimum temperature range, typical active body is 37–41°C (98.6–105.8°F).Bashey, Farrah and Arthur E. Dunham. 1997. ''Elevational Variation in the Thermal Constraints on and Microhabitat Preferences of the Greater Earless Lizard, Cophosaurus texanus''. Copeia, 1997(4): 725-737 At night, ''Cophosaurus'' will often burrow in loose sand as deep as 15.3 cm. (6 in.) or in areas without sand, they may partially bury in loose gravel or shale, or sleep on the surface.Vermersch, Thomas G. 1992. ''Lizards and Turtles of South-Central Texas.'' Eakin Press. Austin, Texas. xiv, 170 pp. (pages 27–30) Females have been found communally buried under shale on cold winter days.Ramsey, L. W. 1948. ''Hibernation of Holbrookia texana.'' Herpetologica, 4 (6): 223.Ramsey, L. W. 1949. ''Hibernation, and the Effect of a Flood on Holbrookia texana.'' Herpetologica, 5(6): 125-126.

They are predominantly ground dwelling lizards that often seek a high perch, such as a protruding rock, to survey their area for passing prey and approaching predators. They are reluctant to retreat into crevices or borrows to evade predators, but instead will run from one rock to another with great speed, or rapidly dash a few yards only to make an abrupt stop and then freeze, at which point their remarkable camouflage seems to make them disappear.Garrett, Judith M. and David G. Barker. 1987. ''A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Texas.'' Texas Monthly Press. Austin, Texas. xi, 225 pp. (pages 137–139) Cophosaurus are known to engage in bipedal locomotion (running on two feet) during short burst of speed.

Males, females, and even hatchlings only five minutes old exhibit territorial displays including head bobbing, pushups, lateral body compression. Another conspicuous behavior is the habit of lifting its tail and curling it over its back while running and waving the striking black and white banded tail in the air, diverting attention away from the head and body to the relatively expendable tail. The practice of curling the tail over the body while of running also serves a functional purpose as a counter-balance, shifting the center of gravity closer to the force exert by the lizard's rear legs. A 32% decrease in running speed was reported for lizards that had lost their tails.Punzo, Fred. 1982. Tail Autonomy and Running Speed in the Lizards Cophosaurus texanus and Uma notata. Journal of Herpetology, 16(3): 329-331.

Gallery

File:Earless lizard (cropped).jpg, Chihuahuan greater earless lizard (''Cophosaurus t. scitulus''), male, (20 May 2015)
File:1. Cophosaurus t. texanus, male, Llano Co. Texas (2022).jpg, Texas greater earless lizard (''Cophosaurus t. texanus''), male, Llano County, Texas (26 April 2022)
File:2. Cophosaurus t. texanus, female, Llano Co. Texas (2022).jpg, Texas greater earless lizard (''Cophosaurus t. texanus''), female, Llano County, Texas (26 April 2022)
File:Cophosaurus texanus - Flickr - aspidoscelis (3) (cropped).jpg, Chihuahuan greater earless lizard (''Cophosaurus t. scitulus''), male, Doña Ana County, New Mexico, (30 April 2015)
File:Cophosaurus texanus - Flickr - aspidoscelis (9) (cropped).jpg, Chihuahuan greater earless lizard (''Cophosaurus t. scitulus''), female, Doña Ana County, New Mexico, (14 September 2013)

References

{{DEFAULTSORT:Greater Earless Lizard
Phrynosomatidae
Reptiles of the United States
Reptiles of Mexico
Reptiles described in 1852
Fauna of the Chihuahuan Desert