HOME
The Info List - Frankfurt Auschwitz Trials


--- Advertisement ---



The Frankfurt
Frankfurt
Auschwitz trials, known in German as der Auschwitz-Prozess, or der zweite Auschwitz-Prozess, (the "second Auschwitz trial") was a series of trials running from 20 December 1963 to 19 August 1965, charging 22 defendants under German criminal law for their roles in the Holocaust
Holocaust
as mid- to lower-level officials in the Auschwitz-Birkenau
Auschwitz-Birkenau
death and concentration camp complex. Hans Hofmeyer led as Chief Judge the "criminal case against Mulka and others" (reference number 4 Ks 2/63). Overall, only 789 individuals of the approximately 6,500 surviving SS personnel who served at Auschwitz and its sub-camps were ever tried, of which 750 received sentences.[1] Unlike the first trial in Poland held almost two decades earlier, the trials in Frankfurt
Frankfurt
were not based on the legal definition of crimes against humanity as recognized by international law, but according to the state laws of the Federal Republic.[2]

Contents

1 Prior trial in Poland 2 Course of proceedings 3 Outcomes 4 Additional trial 5 See also 6 Notes 7 References 8 Further reading 9 External links

Prior trial in Poland[edit] Most of the senior leaders of the camp, including Rudolf Höss, the longest-standing commandant of the camp, were turned over to the Polish authorities in 1947 following their participation as witnesses in the Nuremberg Trial. Subsequently, the accused were tried in Kraków
Kraków
and many sentenced to death for violent crimes and torturing of prisoners.[3] Only SS-Untersturmführer Hans Münch
Hans Münch
was set free, having been acquitted of war crimes.[4] That original trial in Poland is usually known as the first Auschwitz Trial. Course of proceedings[edit]

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

SS-Sturmbannführer Richard Baer, the last camp commandant, died in detention while still under investigation as part of the trials. Defendants ranged from members of the SS to kapos, privileged prisoners responsible for low-level control of camp internees, and included some of those responsible for the process of "selection," or determination of who should be sent to the gas chambers directly from the "ramp" upon disembarking the trains that brought them from across Europe
Europe
("selection" generally entailed inclusion of all children held to be ineligible for work, generally under the age of 14, and any mothers unwilling to part with their "selected" children). In the course of the trial, approximately 360 witnesses were called, including around 210 survivors. Proceedings began in the "Bürgerhaus Gallus", in Frankfurt
Frankfurt
am Main, which was converted into a courthouse for that purpose, and remained there until their conclusion.

Richard Baer, camp commandant at Dora-Mittelbau

State Attorney General (Hessian Generalstaatsanwalt) Fritz Bauer, himself briefly interned in 1933 at the Heuberg concentration camp, led the prosecution. Bauer was concerned with pursuing individual defendants serving at Auschwitz-Birkenau; only 22 SS members were charged of an estimated 6,000 to 8,000 thought to have been involved in the administration and operation of the camp. The men on trial in Frankfurt
Frankfurt
were tried only for murders and other crimes that they committed on their own initiative at Auschwitz and were not tried for genocidal actions perpetrated "when following orders", considered by the courts to be the lesser crime of accomplice to murder.[5] At a 1963 trial, KGB assassin Bohdan Stashynsky, who had committed several murders in the Federal Republic in the 1950s, was found by a German court not legally guilty of murder.[6] Instead, Stashynsky was found to be only an accomplice to murder as the courts ruled that the responsibility for his murders rested only with his superiors in the KGB who had given him his orders.[6] The legal implication of the Stashynsky case were that the courts had ruled that in a totalitarian system only executive decision-makers could be convicted of murder and that anyone who followed orders and killed someone could be convicted only of being accomplices to murder.[6] The term executive decision-maker was so defined by the courts to apply only to the highest levels of the Reich leadership during the National Socialist period, and that all who just followed orders when killing were just accomplices to murder.[6] Someone could be only convicted of murder if it was shown that they had killed someone on their own initiative, and thus all of the accused of murder at the Auschwitz trial
Auschwitz trial
were tried only for murders that they done on their own initiative.[5] Thus, Bauer could only indict for murder those who killed when not following orders, and those who had killed while following orders could be indicted as accomplices to murder. Moreover, because of the legal distinction between murderers and accomplices to murder, this meant that an SS man who killed thousands while operating the gas chambers at Auschwitz could only be found guilty of being accomplice to murder because he had been following orders, while an SS man who had beaten one inmate to death on his own initiative could be convicted of murder because he had not been following orders.[5] Bauer is said to have been opposed in the former purpose by the young Helmut Kohl, then a junior member of the Christian Democratic Union. In furtherance of that purpose Bauer sought and received support from the Institute for Contemporary History in Munich.[citation needed] The following historians from the Institute served as expert witnesses for the prosecution; Helmut Krausnick, Hans-Adolf Jacobsen, Hans Buchheim, and Martin Broszat. Subsequently, the information the four historians gathered for the prosecution served as the basis for their 1968 book, Anatomy of the SS State, the first thorough survey of the SS based on SS records.[citation needed] Information about the actions of those accused and their whereabouts had been in the possession of West German authorities since 1958, but action on their cases was delayed by jurisdictional disputes, among other considerations. The court's proceedings were largely public and served to bring many details of the Holocaust
Holocaust
to the attention of the public in the Federal Republic of Germany, as well as abroad. Six defendants were given life sentences and several others received the maximum prison sentences possible for the charges brought against them.[citation needed] Outcomes[edit] The trial attracted much publicity in Germany, but was considered by Bauer to be a failure. Bauer complained that the media treated the accused in such a manner as to imply that they were all freakish monsters, which allowed the German public to distance themselves from feeling any moral guilt about what had happened at Auschwitz, which was instead presented as the work of few sick people who were not at all like normal Germans.[5] Moreover, Bauer felt that because the law treated those who had followed orders when killing as accomplices to murder it implied that the policy of genocide and the Nazi rules for treating inmates at Auschwitz were in fact legitimate.[5] Bauer wrote that the way that the media had portrayed the trial had supported the[5]

wishful fantasy that there were only a few people with responsibility ... and the rest were merely terrorized, violated hangers-on, compelled to do things completely contrary to their true nature.

Furthermore, Bauer charged that the judges, in convicting the accused, had made it appear that Germany in the Nazi era had been an occupied country, with most Germans having no choice but to follow orders. He said,[5]

But this... had nothing to do with historical reality. There were virulent nationalists, imperialists, anti-Semites and Jew-haters. Without them, Hitler was unthinkable.

A public opinion poll conducted after the Frankfurt
Frankfurt
Auschwitz trials indicated that 57% of the German public were not in favor of additional Nazi trials.[7]

Name Rank, Title, or Role Sentence

Stefan Baretzki Blockführer (block chief) Life plus 8 years imprisonment

Emil Bednarek Kapo Life imprisonment

Wilhelm Boger camp Gestapo Life & 5 years imprisonment

Wilhelm Breitwieser camp uniforms, Häftlingsbekleidungskammer Released

Perry Broad camp Gestapo 4 years imprisonment

Victor Capesius pharmacist 9 years imprisonment

Klaus Dylewski camp Gestapo 5 years imprisonment

Willi Frank Head of SS dental station 7 years imprisonment

Emil Hantl Sanitätsdienstgrad (medical orderly) 3½ years imprisonment

Karl-Friedrich Höcker adjutant 7 years imprisonment

Franz-Johann Hofmann Head of protective custody camp Life imprisonment

Oswald Kaduk Rapportführer (SS NCO) Life imprisonment

Josef Klehr medical orderly Life & 15 years imprisonment

Dr. Franz Lucas SS Obersturmführer 3 years, 3 months imprisonment

Robert Mulka adjutant 14 years imprisonment

Gerhard Neubert HKB Monovitz Released

Hans Nierzwicki HKB Auschwitz 1 Released

Willi Schatz SS dentist Acquitted & released

Herbert Scherpe SS Oberscharführer 4½ years imprisonment

Bruno Schlage SS Oberscharführer 6 years imprisonment

Johann Schobert Political Division Acquitted & released

Hans Stark camp Gestapo 10 years imprisonment

Additional trial[edit] In September 1977 an additional trial was held in Frankfurt
Frankfurt
against two former members of the SS for killings in the Auschwitz satellite camp of Lagischa (Polish: Lagisza), and on the so-called "evacuation" (i.e. death march) from Golleschau (Goleszow) to Wodzisław Śląski (German: Loslau).[8] This and the previous trial inspired the one in the film The Reader. See also[edit]

The Investigation - a play by Peter Weiss
Peter Weiss
written in 1965 which depicts the Frankfurt
Frankfurt
Auschwitz trials Labyrinth of Lies
Labyrinth of Lies
- a 2014 German drama film directed by Giulio Ricciarelli that focuses on the difficulties that prosecutors had to surmount because of systemic suppression of the truth in post-war Germany. The film ends just as the trials begin in 1963.

Notes[edit]

^ Rees, Laurence (2005). Auschwitz: A New History. New York: Public Affairs. pp. 295–296. ISBN 1-58648-303-X.  ^ Shik, Naama (2014). "The Auschwitz Trials". Yad Vashem, International School for Holocaust
Holocaust
Studies. Retrieved 2014-10-12.  ^ Paweł Brojek (Nov 24, 2012), Pierwszy proces oświęcimski (The First Auschwitz Trial). Archived 2013-10-22 at the Wayback Machine. Portal
Portal
Prawy.pl. Retrieved December 29, 2014. ^ Jewish Virtual Library Biography ^ a b c d e f g Fulford, Robert (June 4, 2005). "How the Auschwitz Trial failed". National Post. Retrieved 2013-06-16.  ^ a b c d Wette, Wolfram (2006). The Wehrmacht: History, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Harvard UniversityPress. p. 245.  ^ Kinstler, Linda (31 August 2017). "The last Nazi hunters". The Guardian. Retrieved 31 August 2017.  ^ Neues Deutschland. Ausgabe vom 07.09.1977..uh(in German)

References[edit]

Essay (in German) from the Fritz Bauer Institute Part One of World Socialist Web Site coverage Part Two of World Socialist Web Site coverage Part Three of World Socialist Web Site coverage Summary of Sentences from Jewish Virtual Library Fritz-Bauer-Institut (Frankfurt) / Staatliches Museum Auschwitz-Birkenau
Auschwitz-Birkenau
(Hrsg): Der Auschwitz-Prozeß. Tonbandmitschnitte, Protokolle, Dokumente. DVD/ROM. Directmedia Publishing, Berlin 2004, ISBN 3-89853-501-0 (also via D. Czech: Kalendarium) Verdict on Auschwitz, The Frankfurt
Frankfurt
Auschwitz Trial 1963-65 at DEFA Film Library, 2006.

Further reading[edit]

G. Álvarez, Mónica. "Guardianas Nazis. El lado femenino del mal". Madrid: Grupo Edaf, 2012. ISBN 978-84-414-3240-6 Devin O. Pendas,The Frankfurt
Frankfurt
Auschwitz Trial, 1963–65: Genocide, History and the Limits of the Law[permanent dead link] (Cambridge University Press, 2006) Rebecca Wittmann, Beyond Justice: the Auschwitz Trial (Harvard University Press, 2005) Hermann Langbein, Der Auschwitz-Prozess.Eine Dokumentation. 2 vols, Europa Verlag, Vienna, Frankfurt, Zurich, 1965. Review of "The Investigation," a play written by Peter Weiss
Peter Weiss
(1965)

External links[edit]

Fritz Bauer Institute Book review comparing Wittmann's and Pendas's monographs about the trial Subset: " Frankfurt
Frankfurt
Auschwitz Trials Witnesses", Archive "Forced Labor 1939-1945" Shortfilm "Testifying in Nazi Trials", Archive "Forced Labor 1939-1945" Sonderkommando page (in French)

v t e

The Holocaust
Holocaust
in Poland

Main article The Holocaust Related articles by country Belarus Belgium Croatia Denmark Estonia France Latvia Lithuania Norway Russia Ukraine

v t e

Camps, ghettos and operations

Camps

Extermination

Auschwitz-Birkenau Chełmno Majdanek Operation Reinhard
Operation Reinhard
death camps

Bełżec Sobibór Treblinka

Concentration

Kraków-Płaszów Potulice Soldau Stutthof Szebnie Trawniki Warsaw

Mass shootings

AB Action Bronna Góra Erntefest Jedwabne Kielce cemetery Aktion Krakau Lviv pogroms Lwów professors Palmiry Sonderaktion Krakau Tannenberg Tykocin Bydgoszcz Wąsosz Bloody Sunday

Ghettos

List of 277 Jewish ghettos in German-occupied Poland
Poland
(1939–1942) Będzin Białystok Brest Częstochowa Grodno Kielce Kraków Lwów Łódź Lubartów Lublin Międzyrzec Podlaski Mizocz Nowy Sącz Pińsk Radom Siedlce Sambor Słonim Sosnowiec Stanisławów Tarnopol Wilno Warsaw

Other atrocities

Action T4 Grossaktion Warsaw Human medical experimentation

v t e

Perpetrators, participants, organizations, and collaborators

Major perpetrators

Organizers

Josef Bühler Eichmann Eicke Ludwig Fischer Hans Frank Globocnik Glücks Greiser Himmler Hermann Höfle Fritz Katzmann Wilhelm Koppe Friedrich-Wilhelm Krüger Kutschera Erwin Lambert Ernst Lerch Oswald Pohl Reinefarth Scherner Seyss-Inquart Sporrenberg Streckenbach Thomalla Otto Wächter Wisliceny

Camp command

Aumeier Baer Boger Braunsteiner Eberl Eupen Kurt Franz Karl Frenzel Karl Fritzsch Göth Grabner Hartjenstein Hering Höss Hössler Josef Kramer Liebehenschel Mandel Matthes Michel Möckel Mulka Johann Niemann Oberhauser Reichleitner Heinrich Schwarz Stangl Gustav Wagner Christian Wirth

Gas chamber executioners

Erich Bauer Bolender Hackenholt Klehr Hans Koch Herbert Lange Theuer

Physicians

von Bodmann Clauberg Gebhardt Fritz Klein Mengele Horst Schumann Trzebinski Eduard Wirths

Ghetto command

Auerswald Biebow Blösche Bürkl Konrad Palfinger von Sammern-Frankenegg Stroop

Einsatzgruppen

Wolfgang Birkner Blobel Felix Landau Schaper Schöngarth von Woyrsch

Personnel

Camp guards

Juana Bormann Danz Demjanjuk Margot Dreschel Kurt Gerstein Grese Höcker Kaduk Kollmer Muhsfeldt Orlowski Volkenrath

By camp

Sobibór Treblinka

Organizations

Einsatzgruppen
Einsatzgruppen
(SS) Ordnungspolizei
Ordnungspolizei
(Orpo battalions) WVHA RKFDV VoMi General Government Hotel Polski

Collaboration

Belarusian

Belarusian Auxiliary Police BKA battalions Brigade Siegling Black Cats Central Rada

Jewish

Jewish Ghetto Police Żagiew ("Torch Guard") Group 13 Kapos Judenräte

Russian

Waffen-SS "RONA" Waffen-SS "Russland" Ostlegionen, Bataillone (Cossack Division, Russian "ROA")

Ukrainian

Ukrainian Auxiliary Police SS Galizien Ukrainian Liberation Army Schutzmannschaft
Schutzmannschaft
(Battalion 118, Brigade Siegling, 30. Waffen SS Grenadier Division) Trawnikimänner

Other nationalities

Estonian Auxiliary Police Latvian Auxiliary Police
Latvian Auxiliary Police
(Arajs Kommando) Lithuanian Auxiliary Police Battalions
Lithuanian Auxiliary Police Battalions
(Schutzmannschaft, Ypatingasis būrys) Pieter Menten
Pieter Menten
(Nederlandsche SS)

v t e

Resistance: Judenrat, victims, documentation and technical

Organizations

AK AOB Bund GL PKB ŻOB ŻZA

Uprisings

Ghetto uprisings Białystok Częstochowa Sobibór Treblinka Warsaw Ghetto
Warsaw Ghetto
Uprising

Leaders

Mordechai Anielewicz Icchak Cukierman Mordechai Tenenbaum Marek Edelman Leon Feldhendler Paweł Frenkiel Henryk Iwański Itzhak Katzenelson Michał Klepfisz Miles Lerman Alexander Pechersky Witold Pilecki Frumka Płotnicka Roza Robota Szmul Zygielbojm

Judenrat

Jewish Ghetto Police Adam Czerniaków Mordechai Chaim Rumkowski

Victim lists

Ghettos

Kraków Łódź Lvov (Lwów) Warsaw

Camps

Auschwitz Bełżec Gross-Rosen Izbica Majdanek Sobibór Soldau Stutthof Trawniki Treblinka

Documentation

Nazi sources

Auschwitz Album Frank Memorandum Höcker Album Höfle Telegram Katzmann Report Korherr Report Nisko Plan Posen speeches Special
Special
Prosecution Book-Poland Stroop Report Wannsee Conference

Witness accounts

Graebe affidavit Gerstein Report Vrba–Wetzler report Witold's Report Sonderkommando photographs

Concealment

Sonderaktion 1005

Technical and logistics

Identification in camps Gas chamber Gas van Holocaust
Holocaust
train Human medical experimentation Zyklon B

v t e

Aftermath, trials and commemoration

Aftermath

Holocaust
Holocaust
survivors Polish population transfers (1944–1946) Bricha Kielce pogrom Anti-Jewish violence, 1944–46 Ministry of Public Security

Trials

West German trials

Frankfurt
Frankfurt
Auschwitz trials Treblinka trials

Polish, East German, and Soviet trials

Auschwitz trial
Auschwitz trial
(Poland) Stutthof trials Extraordinary (Soviet) State Commission

Memorials

Museum of the History of Polish Jews Auschwitz-Birkenau
Auschwitz-Birkenau
Memorial and Museum Majdanek State Museum Sobibór Museum International Youth Meeting Center in Oświęcim/Auschwitz March of the Living

Righteous Among the Nations

Polish Righteous Among the Nations Rescue of Jews by Poles during the Holocaust Garden of the Righteous

Coordinates: 50°07′01″N 8°40′59″E / 50.1170°N 8.6830°E / 50.1170; 8.6830

Authority control

.