HOME
The Info List - Dakota Language





Dakota (Dakhótiyapi, Dakȟótiyapi), also referred to as Dakhota, is a Siouan language spoken by the Dakota people
Dakota people
of the Sioux
Sioux
tribes. Dakota is closely related to and mutually intelligible with the Lakota language. It is critically endangered, with only around 290 fluent speakers left out of an ethnic population of almost 20,000.

Contents

1 Morphology

1.1 Nouns 1.2 Verbs 1.3 Possessive pronouns and pronominal affixes

2 Syntax

2.1 Nouns and verbs

3 Dialects 4 Writing systems 5 Sound system

5.1 Vowels 5.2 Consonants

6 Comparison of the dialects

6.1 Phonological differences 6.2 Lexical differences 6.3 Grammatical differences

7 Learning Dakota: language revitalization efforts

7.1 Software and mobile apps for learning Dakhóta 7.2 Curriculum, textbooks, and other materials for teaching and learning Dakhóta

8 Notable speakers 9 References 10 Bibliography 11 External links

Morphology[edit] Nouns[edit] Dakota, similar to many Native American languages, is a mainly polysynthetic language, meaning that different morphemes in the form of affixes can be combined to form a single word. Nouns in Dakota can be broken down into two classes, primitive and derivative. Primitive nouns are nouns whose origin cannot be deduced from any other word (for example make or earth, peta or fire, and ate or father), while derivative nouns are nouns that are formed in various ways from words of other grammatical categories. Primitive nouns stand on their own and are separate from other words. Derivative nouns, on the other hand, are formed by the addition of affixes to words in other grammatical categories, such as verbs, adjectives, and other nouns.[3] Verbs[edit] Verbs in Dakota can appropriate, through agglutination and synthesis, many of the pronominal, prepositional, and adverbial or modal affixes of the language. There are many verbal roots, all of which are only used once certain causative prefixes are added, forming participles. Like in English, Dakota verbs also have three persons, the first, the second, and the third. Person is indicated through the addition (first and second person) or subtraction (third person, the verb is used in its simplest form) of personal pronoun affixes. There are two forms of tense in the language, the aorist (sometimes called the indefinite) and the future. In order to express the future tense, the words kta or kte are placed after the verb, much in contrast to expressing the aorist tense, which requires no marking, but is instead derived from the context of what is being said.[4] Possessive pronouns and pronominal affixes[edit] In order to show possession in Dakota, a possessive pronoun must be prefixed onto whichever noun is being possessed. Two forms of possessive nouns occur, the natural class and the artificial or alienable class. Natural class pronouns express possession that cannot be alienated, and when prefixed to a noun, signifies the different parts of one’s self. For example, the possessive natural article pronoun mi-, which means “my,” can be added to nouns such as “eye,” in miista, or “words,” in mioie. Meanwhile, artificial possessive pronouns are used to signify property and possessions that can be transferred or traded. For example, the artificial pronoun ta- or ti-, which is equivalent to the singular her or him, can be prefixed onto nouns such as “bow,” in tinazipe, and “friend,” in takodaku.[5] Syntax[edit] Nouns and verbs[edit] Dakota is mainly a subject-object-verb (SOV) language, where nouns, whether they are the subject or object, always come before the verb. And when two nouns are used in the same clause, where one is the subject and the other is the object, the subject is most usually placed first. Verbs are also usually placed after adjectives that are used to qualify either the subject or the object and adverbs that qualify the verb. When additional words are used within a clause that are not either nouns or verbs, the nouns, both subject and object, are always placed at the beginning of the clause.[6] Dialects[edit] Dakota has two major dialects with two sub-dialects each (and minor variants, too):[7]

Eastern Dakota (a.k.a. Santee-Sisseton or Dakhóta)

Santee (Isáŋyáthi: Bdewákhaŋthuŋwaŋ,[8] Waȟpékhute) Sisseton (Sisíthuŋwaŋ, Waȟpéthuŋwaŋ)

Western Dakota (a.k.a. Yankton-Yanktonai or Dakȟóta/Dakhóta, and erroneously classified, for a very long time, as “Nakota”[9])

Yankton (Iháŋktȟuŋwaŋ) Yanktonai (Iháŋktȟuŋwaŋna)

Upper Yanktonai (Wičhíyena)

The two dialects differ phonologically, grammatically, and to a large extent, also lexically. They are mutually intelligible to a high extent, although Western Dakota is lexically closer to the Lakota language with which it has higher mutual intelligibility. Writing systems[edit] For a comparative table of the various writing systems conceived over time for the Sioux
Sioux
languages, cf. the specific section of the article Sioux
Sioux
language. Sound system[edit] Vowels[edit] Dakota has five oral vowels, /a e i o u/, and three nasal vowels, /ã ĩ ũ/.

Front Central Back

high oral i

u

nasal ĩ

ũ

mid

e

o

low oral

a

nasal

ã

Consonants[edit]

Labial (-ized) Dental/ Alveolar Palatal (-ized) Velar/ Uvular Glottal

Nasal m [m] n [n]

Stop aspirated ph [pʰ] pȟ [pˣ] th [tʰ] tȟ [tˣ] čh [tʃʰ]   kh [kʰ] kȟ [kˣ]

voiceless p [p] t [t] č [tʃ] k [k] ’ [ʔ]

ejective p’ [pʼ] t’ [tʼ] č’ [tʃʼ] k’ [kʼ]

voiced b [b] d [d]

g [ɡ]

Fricative voiceless

s [s] š [ʃ] ȟ [χ]

ejective

s’ [sʼ] š’ [ʃʼ] ȟ’ [χʼ]

voiced

z [z] ž [ʒ] ǧ [ʁ]

Approximant w [w]

y [j]

h [h]

Comparison of the dialects[edit] Phonological differences[edit] In respect to phonology Eastern and Western Dakota differ particularly in consonant clusters. The table below gives the possible consonant clusters and shows the differences between the dialects:[7]

Dakota consonant clusters

Santee Sisseton Yankton Yanktonai

b ȟ k m p s š t h k[10] g

bd ȟč kč mn pč sč šk tk hm km gm

ȟd kp

ps sk šd

hn kn gn

ȟm ks

pš sd šb

hd kd gd

ȟn kš

pt sm šn

hb kb gb

ȟp kt

sn šp

ȟt

sp št

ȟb

st šb

sb

The two dialects also differ in the diminutive suffix (-daŋ in Santee, and -na in Yankton-Yanktonai and in Sisseton) and in a number of other phonetic issues that are harder to categorize. The following table gives examples of words that differ in their phonology.[7]

Eastern Dakota Western Dakota gloss

Santee Sisseton Yankton Yanktonai

hokšídaŋ hokšína hokšína boy

nína nína nína / dína[11] very

hdá kdá gdá to go back[12]

hbéza kbéza gbéza ridged

hnayáŋ knayáŋ gnayáŋ to deceive

hmúŋka kmúŋka gmúŋka to trap

ahdéškadaŋ ahdéškana akdéškana agdéškana lizard

Lexical differences[edit] There are also numerous lexical differences between the two Dakota dialects as well as between the sub-dialects. Yankton-Yanktonai is in fact lexically closer to the Lakota language than it is to Santee-Sisseton. The following table gives some examples:[7]

English gloss Santee-Sisseton Yankton-Yanktonai Lakota

Northern Lakota Southern Lakota

child šičéča wakȟáŋyeža wakȟáŋyeža

knee hupháhu čhaŋkpé čhaŋkpé

knife isáŋ / mína mína míla

kidneys phakšíŋ ažúŋtka ažúŋtka

hat wapháha wapȟóštaŋ wapȟóštaŋ

still hináȟ naháŋȟčiŋ naháŋȟčiŋ

man wičhášta wičháša wičháša

hungry wótehda dočhíŋ ločhíŋ

morning haŋȟ’áŋna híŋhaŋna híŋhaŋna híŋhaŋni

to shave kasáŋ kasáŋ kasáŋ glak’óǧa

Grammatical differences[edit] Yankton-Yanktonai has the same three ablaut grades as Lakota (a, e, iŋ),[13] while in Santee-Sisseton there are only two (a, e). This significantly impacts word forms, especially in fast speech and it is another reason why Yankton-Yanktonai has better mutual intelligibility with Lakota than with Santee-Sisseton. Some examples:

English gloss to go [12] I shall go to go back [12] he/she/it will go back

santee-sisseton yá bdé kte hdá hdé kte

yankton-yanktonai yá mníŋ kte kdá/gdá kníŋ/gníŋ kte

lakota yá mníŋ kte glá gníŋ kte

There are other grammatical differences between the dialects. Learning Dakota: language revitalization efforts[edit] Software and mobile apps for learning Dakhóta[edit] A Dakota 1 app was previously available for iPhone, iPad, and other iOS devices.[14] The Association on American Indian Affairs website offers an extensive selection of Dakotah learning resources, including CDs, DVDs, flashcards, and software.[15] Curriculum, textbooks, and other materials for teaching and learning Dakhóta[edit] A Level 1 Speak Dakota! textbook is available from the Dakhóta Iápi Okhódakičhiye. Developed by Dakota language speakers, teachers, and linguists, the textbook is the first fully illustrated Dakota language textbook that is linguistically and pedagogically consistent. Dakota language learning materials are also available on their website.[16] Notable speakers[edit]

Dallas Goldtooth, Dakota member of the 1491s, language teacher and environmental activist Gwen Westerman, Dakota educator, writer and artist

References[edit]

^ Dakota at Ethnologue
Ethnologue
(19th ed., 2016) ^ Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2017). "Dakota". Glottolog
Glottolog
3.0. Jena, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.  ^ Riggs, Stephen Return; Dorsey, James Owen (1983). Dakota Grammar: With Texts and Ethnography (reprint ed.). Minnesota
Minnesota
Historical Society Press. ISBN 0873514726.  ^ Riggs, Stephen Return; Dorsey, James Owen (1983). Dakota Grammar: With Texts and Ethnography (reprint ed.). Minnesota
Minnesota
Historical Society Press. ISBN 0873514726.  ^ Riggs, Stephen Return; Dorsey, James Owen (1983). Dakota Grammar: With Texts and Ethnography (reprint ed.). Minnesota
Minnesota
Historical Society Press. ISBN 0873514726.  ^ Riggs, Stephen Return; Dorsey, James Owen (1983). Dakota Grammar: With Texts and Ethnography (reprint ed.). Minnesota
Minnesota
Historical Society Press. ISBN 0873514726.  ^ a b c d Ullrich, Jan (2008). New Lakota Dictionary (Incorporating the Dakota Dialects of Yankton-Yanktonai and Santee-Sisseton). Lakota Language Consortium. ISBN 0-9761082-9-1.  ^ Formerly Mdewákhaŋthuŋwaŋ ^ for a report on the long-established blunder of misnaming “Nakota” the Yankton and the Yanktonai, see the article Nakota ^ many Yankton speakers pronounce the following clusters in the same way as the Yanktonai (Ullrich, p. 5). ^ in Upper Yanktonay ^ a b c more precisely: ‘he/she/it is going (back)’ (hence elsewhere). ^ which means that, in many words ending in -a (which are conventionally cited, in Ullrich’s dictionary (cf. pp. 699/700), with a capitalized final –A/Aŋ), the same -a turns into -e or into -iŋ when some circumstances occur (the word is the last in a sentence, or is modified by suffixes that trigger the ablaut, or, still, is followed by a word that triggers the ablaut, as well). ^ "App Shopper: Dakota 1 (Education)". Retrieved 2012-09-12.  ^ "AAIA Native Language Program". Archived from the original on 2012-12-01. Retrieved 2013-01-19.  ^ "Dakhóta Iápi Okhódakičhiye/Dakota Language Society". Retrieved 2014-08-29. 

Bibliography[edit]

DeMallie, Raymond J. (2001). Sioux
Sioux
until 1850. In R. J. DeMallie (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Plains (Vol. 13, Part 2, pp. 718–760). W. C. Sturtevant (Gen. Ed.). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. ISBN 0-16-050400-7. Parks, Douglas R.; & Rankin, Robert L. (2001). The Siouan languages. In Handbook of North American Indians: Plains (Vol. 13, Part 1, pp. 94–114). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. de Reuse, Willem J. (1987). One hundred years of Lakota linguistics (1887–1987). Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 12, 13-42. de Reuse, Willem J. (1990). A supplementary bibliography of Lakota languages and linguistics (1887–1990). Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 15 (2), 146-165. (Studies in Native American languages 6). Rood, David S.; & Taylor, Allan R. (1996). Sketch of Lakhota, a Siouan language. In Handbook of North American Indians: Languages (Vol. 17, pp. 440–482). Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution. Parks, D.R.; DeMallie, R.J. (1992). "Sioux, Assiniboine, and Stoney Dialects: A Classification". Anthropological Linguistics. 34 (1–4): 233–255. JSTOR 30028376.  Riggs, S.R., & Dorsey, J.O. (Ed.). (1973). Dakota grammar, texts, and ethnography. Minneapolis: Ross & Haines, Inc. Shaw, P.A. (1980). Theoretical issues in Dakota phonology and morphology. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc. Ullrich, Jan. (2008). New Lakota Dictionary & Incorporating the Dakota Dialects of Santee-Sisseton and Yankton-Yanktonai (Lakota Language Consortium). ISBN 0-9761082-9-1.

External links[edit]

Dakota Language Texts, from the Boston Athenæum: Schoolcraft Collection of Books in Native American Languages. Digital Collection.

v t e

Siouan languages

Western

Missouri River

Crow Hidatsa

Mandan

Mandan

Mississippi Valley

Dakotan

Assiniboine Sioux

Dakota Lakota

Stoney

Chiwere–Winnebago

Chiwere Winnebago

Dhegihan

Kansa–Osage Omaha–Ponca Quapaw

Unclassified

Mitchigamea

Ohio Valley

Virginia Siouan

Moneton Tutelo-Saponi

Mississippi Siouan

Biloxi Ofo

Eastern

Catawban

Catawba Woccon

Italics indicate extinct languages

v t e

Languages of Minnesota

Indigenous

Algonquian

Ojibwe

Western Siouan

Sioux

Dakota Lakota

Winnebago

Non-Indigenous

Indo-European

American English

Minnesota
Minnesota
regional dialect

Danish French German

Hutterite

Irish Norwegian Spanish Swedish

Uralic

Finnish

Hmong–Mien

Hmong

Afroasiatic

Arabic Somali

Sign languages

American Sign Language Plains Indian S

.