Case of Prohibitions
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

''Case of Prohibitions'' EWHC_J23_(KB)
is_a_UK_constitutional_law.html" ;"title="607
EWHC J23 (KB)
is a UK constitutional law">607
EWHC J23 (KB)
is a UK constitutional law case decided by Sir Edward Coke. Before the Glorious Revolution of 1688, when the Parliamentary sovereignty in the United Kingdom, sovereignty of Parliament was confirmed, this case wrested supremacy from the King in favour of the courts.


Facts

King
James I James I may refer to: People *James I of Aragon (1208–1276) *James I of Sicily or James II of Aragon (1267–1327) *James I, Count of La Marche (1319–1362), Count of Ponthieu *James I, Count of Urgell (1321–1347) *James I of Cyprus (1334–13 ...
placed himself in the position of judge for a dispute, a "controversy of land between parties was heard by the King, and sentence given".


Judgments

When the case went before
Edward Coke Edward is an English given name. It is derived from the Anglo-Saxon name ''Ēadweard'', composed of the elements '' ēad'' "wealth, fortune; prosperous" and '' weard'' "guardian, protector”. History The name Edward was very popular in Anglo-Sax ...
, the Chief Justice of the
Court of Common Pleas A court of common pleas is a common kind of court structure found in various common law jurisdictions. The form originated with the Court of Common Pleas at Westminster, which was created to permit individuals to press civil grievances against one ...
, he overturned the decision of the King, and held that cases may be tried only by those with legal training and subject to the
rule of law The rule of law is the political philosophy that all citizens and institutions within a country, state, or community are accountable to the same laws, including lawmakers and leaders. The rule of law is defined in the ''Encyclopedia Britannic ...
. Coke stated that common law cases were "not to be decided by natural reason but by artificial reason and judgment of law, which law is an art which requires long study and experience": In another report, Coke is quoted as saying all causes were "to be measured by the golden and straight met-wand of the law, and not to the incertain and crooked cord of discretion". Institutes of the Lawes of England, volume 4, page 41


See also

* * * *


Notes


References

{{reflist


Sources

* Owen Hood Phillips, ''Leading Cases in Constitutional Law'' (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1957) Ch. 13, pp 46–47


External links


Full text of judgment on Bailii
1607 in English law Edward Coke cases Royal prerogative Parliament of England Sovereignty Court of Common Pleas (England) cases United Kingdom constitutional case law