Terminology
The term ''rational'' in reference to the set refers to the fact that a rational number represents a '' ratio'' of two integers. In mathematics, "rational" is often used as a noun abbreviating "rational number". The adjective ''rational'' sometimes means that the coefficients are rational numbers. For example, a rational point is a point with rational coordinates (i.e., a point whose coordinates are rational numbers); a ''rational matrix'' is aEtymology
Although nowadays ''rational numbers'' are defined in terms of ''ratios'', the term ''rational'' is not a derivation of ''ratio''. On the opposite, it is ''ratio'' that is derived from ''rational'': the first use of ''ratio'' with its modern meaning was attested in English about 1660, while the use of ''rational'' for qualifying numbers appeared almost a century earlier, in 1570. This meaning of ''rational'' came from the mathematical meaning of ''irrational'', which was first used in 1551, and it was used in "translations of Euclid (following his peculiar use of )". This unusual history originated in the fact that ancient Greeks "avoided heresy by forbidding themselves from thinking of those rrationallengths as numbers". So such lengths were ''irrational'', in the sense of ''illogical'', that is "not to be spoken about" ( in Greek). This etymology is similar to that of ''imaginary'' numbers and ''real'' numbers.Arithmetic
Irreducible fraction
Every rational number may be expressed in a unique way as an irreducible fraction , where and are coprime integers and . This is often called the canonical form of the rational number. Starting from a rational number , its canonical form may be obtained by dividing and by their greatest common divisor, and, if , changing the sign of the resulting numerator and denominator.Embedding of integers
Any integer can be expressed as the rational number , which is its canonical form as a rational number.Equality
: if and only if If both fractions are in canonical form, then: : if and only if andOrdering
If both denominators are positive (particularly if both fractions are in canonical form): : if and only if On the other hand, if either denominator is negative, then each fraction with a negative denominator must first be converted into an equivalent form with a positive denominator—by changing the signs of both its numerator and denominator.Addition
Two fractions are added as follows: : If both fractions are in canonical form, the result is in canonical form if and only if and are coprime integers.Subtraction
: If both fractions are in canonical form, the result is in canonical form if and only if and are coprime integers.Multiplication
The rule for multiplication is: : where the result may be a reducible fraction—even if both original fractions are in canonical form.Inverse
Every rational number has an additive inverse, often called its ''opposite'', : If is in canonical form, the same is true for its opposite. A nonzero rational number has a multiplicative inverse, also called its ''reciprocal'', : If is in canonical form, then the canonical form of its reciprocal is either or , depending on the sign of .Division
If , , and are nonzero, the division rule is : Thus, dividing by is equivalent to multiplying by theExponentiation to integer power
If is a non-negative integer, then : The result is in canonical form if the same is true for . In particular, : If , then : If is in canonical form, the canonical form of the result is if or is even. Otherwise, the canonical form of the result is .Continued fraction representation
A finite continued fraction is an expression such as : where are integers. Every rational number can be represented as a finite continued fraction, whose coefficients can be determined by applying the Euclidean algorithm to .Other representations
* common fraction: * mixed numeral: * repeating decimal using a vinculum: * repeating decimal using parentheses: * continued fraction using traditional typography: * continued fraction in abbreviated notation: * Egyptian fraction: * prime power decomposition: * quote notation: are different ways to represent the same rational value.Formal construction
The rational numbers may be built as equivalence classes of ordered pairs of integers. More precisely, let be the set of the pairs of integers such . An equivalence relation is defined on this set by : Addition and multiplication can be defined by the following rules: : : This equivalence relation is a congruence relation, which means that it is compatible with the addition and multiplication defined above; the set of rational numbers is the defined as the quotient set by this equivalence relation, , equipped with the addition and the multiplication induced by the above operations. (This construction can be carried out with any integral domain and produces its field of fractions.) The equivalence class of a pair is denoted . Two pairs and belong to the same equivalence class (that is are equivalent) if and only if . This means that if and only . Every equivalence class may be represented by infinitely many pairs, since : Each equivalence class contains a unique '' canonical representative element''. The canonical representative is the unique pair in the equivalence class such that and are coprime, and . It is called the representation in lowest terms of the rational number. The integers may be considered to be rational numbers identifying the integer with the rational number . A total order may be defined on the rational numbers, that extends the natural order of the integers. One has : if :Properties
The set of all rational numbers, together with the addition and multiplication operations shown above, forms a field. has no field automorphism other than the identity. (A field automophism must fix 0 and 1; as it must fix the sum and the difference of two fixed elements, it must fix every integer; as it must fix the quotient of two fixed elements, it must fix every rational number, and is thus the identity.) is a prime field, which is a field that has no subfield other than itself. The rationals are the smallest field with characteristic zero. Every field of characteristic zero contains a unique subfield isomorphic to . With the order defined above, is an ordered field that has no subfield other than itself, and is the smallest ordered field, in the sense that every ordered field contains a unique subfield isomorphic to . is the field of fractions of the integers . The algebraic closure of , i.e. the field of roots of rational polynomials, is the field of algebraic numbers. The rationals are a densely ordered set: between any two rationals, there sits another one, and, therefore, infinitely many other ones. For example, for any two fractions such that : (where are positive), we have : Any totally ordered set which is countable, dense (in the above sense), and has no least or greatest element isCountability
The set of all rational numbers is countable, as is illustrated in the figure to the right. As a rational number can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, it is possible to assign two integers to any point on a square lattice as in a Cartesian coordinate system, such that any grid point corresponds to a rational number. This method, however, exhibits a form of redundancy, as several different grid points will correspond to the same rational number; these are highlighted in red on the provided graphic. An obvious example can be seen in the line going diagonally towards the bottom right; such ratios will always equal 1, as any non-zero number divided by itself will always equal one. It is possible to generate all of the rational numbers without such redundancies: examples include the Calkin–Wilf tree and Stern–Brocot tree. As the set of all rational numbers is countable, and the set of all real numbers (as well as the set of irrational numbers) is uncountable, the set of rational numbers is a null set, that is, almost all real numbers are irrational, in the sense of Lebesgue measure.Real numbers and topological properties
The rationals are a dense subset of the real numbers every real number has rational numbers arbitrarily close to it. A related property is that rational numbers are the only numbers with finite expansions as regular continued fractions. In the usual topology of the real numbers, the rationals are neither an open set nor a closed set. By virtue of their order, the rationals carry an order topology. The rational numbers, as a subspace of the real numbers, also carry a subspace topology. The rational numbers form a metric space by using the absolute difference metric , and this yields a third topology on . All three topologies coincide and turn the rationals into a topological field. The rational numbers are an important example of a space which is not locally compact. The rationals are characterized topologically as the unique countable metrizable space without isolated points. The space is also totally disconnected. The rational numbers do not form a complete metric space, and the real numbers are the completion of under the metric above.-adic numbers
In addition to the absolute value metric mentioned above, there are other metrics which turn into a topological field: Let be aSee also
* Dyadic rational * Floating point * Ford circles * Gaussian rational * Naive height—height of a rational number in lowest term * Niven's theorem * Rational data type *'' Divine Proportions: Rational Trigonometry to Universal Geometry''References
External links
*