HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In the
Germanic languages The Germanic languages are a branch of the Indo-European language family spoken natively by a population of about 515 million people mainly in Europe, North America, Oceania and Southern Africa. The most widely spoken Germanic language, ...
, a strong verb is a verb that marks its past tense by means of changes to the stem vowel ( ablaut). The majority of the remaining verbs form the past tense by means of a dental
suffix In linguistics, a suffix is an affix which is placed after the stem of a word. Common examples are case endings, which indicate the grammatical case of nouns, adjectives, and verb endings, which form the conjugation of verbs. Suffixes can carr ...
(e.g. ''-ed'' in English), and are known as '' weak verbs''. In modern English, strong verbs include ''sing'' (present ''I sing'', past ''I sang'', past participle ''I have sung'') and ''drive'' (present ''I drive'', past ''I drove'', past participle ''I have driven''), as opposed to weak verbs such as ''open'' (present ''I open'', past ''I opened'', past participle ''I have opened''). Not all verbs with a change in the stem vowel are strong verbs, however; they may also be irregular weak verbs such as ''bring, brought, brought'' or ''keep, kept, kept''. The key distinction is that most strong verbs have their origin in the earliest sound system of
Proto-Indo-European Proto-Indo-European (PIE) is the reconstructed common ancestor of the Indo-European language family. Its proposed features have been derived by linguistic reconstruction from documented Indo-European languages. No direct record of Proto-Indo ...
, whereas weak verbs use a dental ending (in English usually ''-ed'' or ''-t'') that developed later with the branching off of
Proto-Germanic Proto-Germanic (abbreviated PGmc; also called Common Germanic) is the reconstructed proto-language of the Germanic branch of the Indo-European languages. Proto-Germanic eventually developed from pre-Proto-Germanic into three Germanic br ...
. As in English, in all Germanic languages, weak verbs outnumber strong verbs. The "
strong Strong may refer to: Education * The Strong, an educational institution in Rochester, New York, United States * Strong Hall (Lawrence, Kansas), an administrative hall of the University of Kansas * Strong School, New Haven, Connecticut, United S ...
" vs. "
weak Weak may refer to: Songs * "Weak" (AJR song), 2016 * "Weak" (Melanie C song), 2011 * "Weak" (SWV song), 1993 * "Weak" (Skunk Anansie song), 1995 * "Weak", a song by Seether from '' Seether: 2002-2013'' Television episodes * "Weak" (''Fear t ...
" terminology was coined by the German philologist
Jacob Grimm Jacob Ludwig Karl Grimm (4 January 1785 – 20 September 1863), also known as Ludwig Karl, was a German author, linguist, philologist, jurist, and folklorist. He is known as the discoverer of Grimm's law of linguistics, the co-author of t ...
in the 1800s, and the terms "strong verb" and "weak verb" are direct translations of the original German terms and .


Origin and development

Strong verbs have their origin in the ancestral
Proto-Indo-European Proto-Indo-European (PIE) is the reconstructed common ancestor of the Indo-European language family. Its proposed features have been derived by linguistic reconstruction from documented Indo-European languages. No direct record of Proto-Indo ...
(PIE) language. In PIE, vowel alternations called '' ablaut'' were frequent and occurred in many types of word, not only in verbs. The vowel that appeared in any given syllable is called its "grade". In many words, the basic vowel was *''e'' (e-grade), but, depending on what syllable of a word the stress fell on in PIE, this could change to *''o'' (o-grade), or disappear altogether (zero grade). Both ''e'' and ''o'' could also be lengthened to ''ē'' and ''ō'' (lengthened grade). Thus ablaut turned short ''e'' into the following sounds: As the Germanic languages developed from PIE, they dramatically altered the Indo-European verbal system. PIE verbs could occur in three distinct '' aspects'': the
aorist Aorist (; abbreviated ) verb forms usually express perfective aspect and refer to past events, similar to a preterite. Ancient Greek grammar had the aorist form, and the grammars of other Indo-European languages and languages influenced by th ...
, present and perfect aspect. The aorist originally denoted events without any attention to the specifics or ongoing nature of the event ("ate", perfective aspect). The present implied some attention to such details and was thus used for ongoing actions ("is eating", imperfective aspect). The perfect was a
stative verb According to some linguistics theories, a stative verb is a verb that describes a state of being, in contrast to a dynamic verb, which describes an action. The difference can be categorized by saying that stative verbs describe situations that are ...
, and referred not to the event itself, but to the state that resulted from the event ("has eaten" or "is/has been eaten"). In Germanic, the aorist eventually disappeared and merged with the present, while the perfect took on a past tense meaning and became a general past tense. The strong Germanic present thus descends from the PIE present, while the past descends from the PIE perfect. The inflections of PIE verbs also changed considerably. In the course of these changes, the different root-vowels caused by PIE ablaut became markers of tense. Thus in Germanic, *''bʰer-'' became in the infinitive (e-grade); *''bar'' in the past singular (o-grade); *''bērun'' in the past plural (ē-grade); and *''buranaz'' in the past participle (zero-grade). In
Proto-Germanic Proto-Germanic (abbreviated PGmc; also called Common Germanic) is the reconstructed proto-language of the Germanic branch of the Indo-European languages. Proto-Germanic eventually developed from pre-Proto-Germanic into three Germanic br ...
, the system of strong verbs was largely regular. As sound changes took place in the development of Germanic from PIE, the vowels of strong verbs became more varied, but usually in predictable ways, so in most cases all of the
principal parts In language learning, the principal parts of a verb are those forms that a student must memorize in order to be able to conjugate the verb through all its forms. The concept originates in the humanist Latin schools, where students learned verbs ...
of a strong verb of a given class could be reliably predicted from the infinitive. Thus we can reconstruct Common Germanic as having seven coherent classes of strong verbs. This system continued largely intact in the first attested Germanic languages, notably
Gothic Gothic or Gothics may refer to: People and languages *Goths or Gothic people, the ethnonym of a group of East Germanic tribes **Gothic language, an extinct East Germanic language spoken by the Goths **Crimean Gothic, the Gothic language spoken b ...
,
Old English Old English (, ), or Anglo-Saxon, is the earliest recorded form of the English language, spoken in England and southern and eastern Scotland in the early Middle Ages. It was brought to Great Britain by Anglo-Saxon settlers in the mid-5th ...
,
Old High German Old High German (OHG; german: Althochdeutsch (Ahd.)) is the earliest stage of the German language, conventionally covering the period from around 750 to 1050. There is no standardised or supra-regional form of German at this period, and Old Hig ...
and
Old Norse Old Norse, Old Nordic, or Old Scandinavian, is a stage of development of North Germanic dialects before their final divergence into separate Nordic languages. Old Norse was spoken by inhabitants of Scandinavia and their overseas settlement ...
.


Gradual disappearance

Germanic strong verbs, mostly deriving directly from PIE, are slowly being supplanted by or transformed into weak verbs. As well as developing the strong verb system, Germanic also went on to develop two other classes of verbs: the weak verbs and a third, much smaller, class known as the
preterite-present verb The Germanic language family is one of the language groups that resulted from the breakup of Proto-Indo-European (PIE). It in turn divided into North, West and East Germanic groups, and ultimately produced a large group of mediaeval and modern ...
s, which are continued in the English auxiliary verbs, e.g. ''can/could, shall/should, may/might, must''. Weak verbs originally derived from other types of word in PIE and originally occurred only in the present aspect. They did not have a perfect aspect, meaning that they came to lack a past tense in Germanic once the perfect had become the past. Not having a past tense at all, they obviously also had no vowel alternations between present and past. To compensate for this, a new type of past tense was eventually created for these verbs by adding a ''-d-'' or ''-t-'' suffix to the stem. This is why only strong verbs have vowel alternations: their past tense forms descend from the original PIE perfect aspect, while the past tense forms of weak verbs were created later. The development of weak verbs in Germanic meant that the strong verb system ceased to be productive: no new strong verbs developed. Practically all new verbs were weak, and few new strong verbs were created. Over time, strong verbs tended to become weak in some languages, so that the total number of strong verbs in the languages was constantly decreasing. The coherence of the strong verb system is still present in modern
German German(s) may refer to: * Germany (of or related to) **Germania (historical use) * Germans, citizens of Germany, people of German ancestry, or native speakers of the German language ** For citizens of Germany, see also German nationality law **Ge ...
, Dutch, Icelandic and Faroese. For example, in German and Dutch, strong verbs are consistently marked with a past participle in ''-en'', while weak verbs have a past participle in ''-t'' in German and ''-t'' or ''-d'' in Dutch. In English, however, the original regular strong conjugations have largely disintegrated, with the result that in modern English grammar, a distinction between strong and weak verbs is less useful than a distinction between "regular" and "irregular" verbs. Thus, the verb ''to help'', which used to be conjugated ''help-holp-holpen'', is now ''help-helped-helped''. The reverse phenomenon, whereby a weak verb becomes strong by analogy, is rare (one example in American English, considered informal by some authorities, is ''sneak, snuck, snuck.'' Another is the humorous past tense of "sneeze" which is "snoze"). Some verbs, which might be termed "semi-strong", have formed a weak preterite but retained the strong participle, or rarely vice versa. This type of verb is most common in Dutch: * ''lachen lachte'' (formerly ''loech'') ''gelachen'' ("to laugh") * ''vragen vroeg'' (formerly ''vraagde'') ''gevraagd'' ("to ask") An instance of this phenomenon in English is ''swell, swelled, swollen'' (though ''swelled'' is also found for the past participle, and the older strong form ''swole'' persists in some dialects as the preterite and past participle and has found new use in recent years

.


Conjugation

As an example of the conjugation of a strong verb, we may take the Old English class 2 verb , "to offer" (cf. English "bid"). This has the following forms: While the inflections are more or less regular, the vowel changes in the stem are not predictable without an understanding of the Indo-European ''ablaut'' system, and students have to learn five "
principal parts In language learning, the principal parts of a verb are those forms that a student must memorize in order to be able to conjugate the verb through all its forms. The concept originates in the humanist Latin schools, where students learned verbs ...
" by heart. For this verb they are '' ''. These are: # The infinitive: '. The same vowel is used through most of the present tense. In most verbs (other than classes 6 and 7), this represents the original ablaut e-grade. # The present tense 3rd singular: '. The same vowel is used in the 2nd singular. In many verbs, this has the same vowel as part 1. When it is distinct, as here, it is always derived from part 1 by Umlaut. For this reason, some textbooks do not treat it as a principal part. # The preterite (i.e. past indicative) 1st singular: ', which is identical to the 3rd singular. In this verb, part 3 comes from a PIE o-grade. # The preterite plural: '. The same vowel is used in the 2nd singular. In this verb, part 4 comes from a PIE zero-grade. # The past participle: '. This vowel is used only in the participle. In some verbs, part 5 is a discrete ablaut grade, but in this class 2 verb it is derived from part 4 by an a-mutation.


Strong verb classes

Germanic strong verbs are commonly divided into 7 classes, based on the type of vowel alternation. This is in turn based mostly on the type of consonants that follow the vowel. The Anglo-Saxon scholar
Henry Sweet Henry Sweet (15 September 1845 – 30 April 1912) was an English philologist, phonetician and grammarian.''Concise Oxford Companion to the English Language'', as hosted oencyclopedia.com/ref> As a philologist, he specialized in the Germanic l ...
gave names to the seven classes: # The "drive" conjugation # The "choose" conjugation # The "bind" conjugation # The "bear" conjugation # The "give" conjugation # The "shake" conjugation # The "fall" conjugation However, they are normally referred to by numbers alone. In
Proto-Germanic Proto-Germanic (abbreviated PGmc; also called Common Germanic) is the reconstructed proto-language of the Germanic branch of the Indo-European languages. Proto-Germanic eventually developed from pre-Proto-Germanic into three Germanic br ...
, the common ancestor of the Germanic languages, the strong verbs were still mostly regular. The classes continued largely intact in
Old English Old English (, ), or Anglo-Saxon, is the earliest recorded form of the English language, spoken in England and southern and eastern Scotland in the early Middle Ages. It was brought to Great Britain by Anglo-Saxon settlers in the mid-5th ...
and the other older historical Germanic languages:
Gothic Gothic or Gothics may refer to: People and languages *Goths or Gothic people, the ethnonym of a group of East Germanic tribes **Gothic language, an extinct East Germanic language spoken by the Goths **Crimean Gothic, the Gothic language spoken b ...
,
Old High German Old High German (OHG; german: Althochdeutsch (Ahd.)) is the earliest stage of the German language, conventionally covering the period from around 750 to 1050. There is no standardised or supra-regional form of German at this period, and Old Hig ...
and
Old Norse Old Norse, Old Nordic, or Old Scandinavian, is a stage of development of North Germanic dialects before their final divergence into separate Nordic languages. Old Norse was spoken by inhabitants of Scandinavia and their overseas settlement ...
. However, idiosyncrasies of the phonological changes led to a growing number of subgroups. Also, once the ablaut system ceased to be productive, there was a decline in the speakers' awareness of the regularity of the system. That led to anomalous forms and the six big classes lost their cohesion. This process has advanced furthest in English, but in some other modern Germanic languages (such as German), the seven classes are still fairly well preserved and recognisable. The reverse process in which anomalies are eliminated and subgroups reunited by the force of analogy is called " levelling", and it can be seen at various points in the history of the verb classes. In the later Middle Ages, German, Dutch and English eliminated a great part of the old distinction between the vowels of the singular and plural preterite forms. The new uniform preterite could be based on the vowel of the old preterite singular, on the old plural, or sometimes on the participle. In English, the distinction remains in the verb "to be": ''I was, we were''. In Dutch, it remains in the verbs of classes 4 & 5 but only in
vowel length In linguistics, vowel length is the perceived length of a vowel sound: the corresponding physical measurement is duration. In some languages vowel length is an important phonemic factor, meaning vowel length can change the meaning of the word ...
: ''ik brak'' (I broke – short ''a''), ''wij braken'' (we broke – long ''ā''). In German and Dutch it also remains in the present tense of the preterite presents. In Limburgish there is a little more left. E.g. the preterite of to help is ''(weer) hólpe'' for the plural but either ''(ich) halp'' or ''(ich) hólp'' for the singular. In the process of development of English, numerous sound changes and analogical developments have fragmented the classes to the extent that most of them no longer have any coherence: only classes 1, 3 and 4 still have significant subclasses that follow uniform patterns. Before looking at the seven classes individually, the general developments that affected all of them will be noted. The following phonological changes that occurred between Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Germanic are relevant for the discussion of the ''ablaut'' system. * The development of grammatischer Wechsel as a result of Verner's law (the voicing of fricatives after an unstressed vowel). This created variations in the consonant following the ''ablaut'' vowel. * When the zero grade appears before ''l'', ''r'', ''m'' or ''n'', the vowel ''u'' was inserted, effectively creating a new "u-grade". * ''o'' → ''a'' (also ''oy'' → ''ai'', ''ow'' → ''au''). * ''e'' → ''i'' when ''i'', ''ī'' or ''j'' followed in the next syllable. This change is known as umlaut, and was extended to affect other vowels in most later languages. * ''ey'' → ''ī'' as a result of the above. * ''e'' → ''i'' before ''m'' or ''n'' followed by another consonant. This had the effect of splitting class 3 into 3a and 3b. For the purpose of explanation, the different verb forms can be grouped by the vowel they receive, and given a "principal part" number: # All forms of the present tense, including the indicative mood,
subjunctive mood The subjunctive (also known as conjunctive in some languages) is a grammatical mood, a feature of the utterance that indicates the speaker's attitude towards it. Subjunctive forms of verbs are typically used to express various states of unreality ...
,
imperative mood The imperative mood is a grammatical mood that forms a command or request. The imperative mood is used to demand or require that an action be performed. It is usually found only in the present tense, second person. To form the imperative mood, ...
, the infinitive and present participle. # The singular forms of the past tense in the indicative mood. # All other past tense forms, which includes the past dual and plural in the indicative mood, and all forms of the past subjunctive mood. # The past participle, alone. In West Germanic, the 2nd person singular past indicative deviates from this scheme and uses the vowel of Part 3. Its ending is also an ''-i'' of unclear origin, rather than the expected ''-t'' < PIE *''-th₂e'' of North and East Germanic, which suggests that this state of affairs is an innovation.


Classes 1 to 6

The first 5 classes appear to continue the following PIE ablaut grades: Except for the apparent ē-grade in part 3 of classes 4 and 5, these are in fact straightforward survivals of the PIE situation. The standard pattern of PIE is represented in Germanic by classes 1, 2 and 3, with the present (part 1) in the e-grade, past indicative singular (part 2) in the o-grade, and remaining past (part 3) and past participle (part 4) in the zero grade. The differences between classes 1, 2, and 3 arise from semivowels coming after the root vowel, as shown in the table below. As can be seen, the e-grade in part 1 and o-grade in part 2 are shared by all of these five classes. The difference between them is in parts 3 and 4: * In classes 1 and 2, the semivowel following the vowel was converted in the zero grade into a full vowel. * In class 3 and the past participle of class 4, there was no semivowel but there were PIE syllabic resonants which developed in Germanic to ''u'' plus resonant; thus ''u'' became the Germanic sign of these parts. There is some evidence that this may have been the original behaviour of the past nonsingular / nonindicative of class 4 as well: to wit, preterite-presents whose roots have the class 4 shape show ''u'' outside the present indicative singular, such as *''man-'' ~ *''mun-'' "to remember", *''skal-'' ~ *''skul-'' "to owe". * In class 5, the zero grade of the past participle had probably been changed to e-grade already in PIE, because these verbs had combinations of consonants that were
phonotactically Phonotactics (from Ancient Greek "voice, sound" and "having to do with arranging") is a branch of phonology that deals with restrictions in a language on the permissible combinations of phonemes. Phonotactics defines permissible syllable st ...
illicit as a word-initial cluster, as they would be in the zero grade. * The *ē in part 3 of classes 4 and 5 is not in fact a PIE lengthened grade but arose in Germanic. Ringe suggests that it was analogically generalised from the inherited part 3 of the verb *''etaną'' "to eat" before it had lost its reduplicant syllable, PIE *''h1eh1d-'' regularly becoming Germanic *''ēt-''. Class 6 appears in Germanic with the vowels ''a'' and ''ō''. PIE sources of the ''a'' vowel included ''*h2e'', ''*o'', and a laryngeal between consonants; possibly in some cases the ''a'' may be an example of the a-grade of ablaut, though the existence of such a grade is controversial. It is not clear exactly how the ''ō'' is to be derived from an earlier ablaut alternant in PIE, but believable sources include contraction of the reduplicant syllable in PIE *''h2''-initial verbs, or o-grades of verbs with interconsonantal laryngeal. In any event, within Germanic the resulting ''a'' ~ ''ō'' behaved as just another type of vowel alternation. In
Proto-Germanic Proto-Germanic (abbreviated PGmc; also called Common Germanic) is the reconstructed proto-language of the Germanic branch of the Indo-European languages. Proto-Germanic eventually developed from pre-Proto-Germanic into three Germanic br ...
, this resulted in the following vowel patterns: * Class 2b is of unknown origin, and does not seem to reflect any PIE ablaut pattern. * In class 3, there are also a few cases where the vowel is followed, at least in Proto-Germanic, by two consonants, neither of which is a nasal or a liquid. Examples: *''brestaną'' "to burst", *''þreskaną'' "to thresh" *''fehtaną'' "to fight". All but one have a nasal or a liquid ''in front'' of the vowel. This will have become syllabic and resulted regularly in ''u'' before the nasal or liquid, which was then metathesised on the analogy of the remaining principle parts. E.g. part 3 of *''brestaną'' will have been *''bʰr̥st-'' > *''burst-'', reformed to *''brust-''. * Similarly, class 6 includes some cases where the vowel is followed by two obstruents, like *''wahsijaną'' "to grow". * In classes 5, 6 and 7, there is also a small subgroup called "j-presents". These form their present tense with an extra ''-j-'', which causes umlaut in the present where possible. In West Germanic, it also causes the West Germanic gemination.


Class 7

The forms of class 7 were very different and did not neatly reflect the standard ablaut grades found in the first 5 classes. Instead of (or in addition to) vowel alternations, this class displayed reduplication of the first consonants of the stem in the past tense. It is generally believed that reduplication was once a feature of all Proto-Indo-European perfect-aspect forms. It was then lost in most verbs by Proto-Germanic times due to haplology. However, verbs with vowels that did not fit in the existing pattern of alternation retained their reduplication. Class 7 is thus not really one class, but can be split into several subclasses based on the original structure of the root, much like the first 5 classes. The first three subclasses are parallel with classes 1 to 3 but with ''e'' replaced with ''a'': 7a is parallel to class 1, class 7b to class 2, and class 7c to class 3. The following is a general picture of the Proto-Germanic situation as reconstructed by Jay Jasanoff. Earlier reconstructions of the 7th class were generally based mostly on Gothic evidence. The situation sketched above did not survive intact into any of the Germanic languages. It was changed significantly, but rather differently in Gothic on the one hand, and in the Northwest Germanic languages on the other.


Gothic

Reduplication was retained in Gothic, with the vowel ''ai'' inserted. However, as in all other strong verbs, consonant alternations were almost eliminated in favour of the voiceless alternants. The present and past singular stem was extended to the plural, leaving the reduplication as the only change in the stem between the two tenses. The vowel alternation was retained in a few class 7d verbs, but eliminated otherwise by generalising the present tense stem throughout the paradigm. The verb ''lētan'' "to allow" retained the past form ''lailōt'' with ablaut, while ''slēpan'' "to sleep" had the past tense form ''saislēp'' without it. The form ''saizlēp'', with Verner-law alternation, is occasionally found as well, but it was apparently a relic formation with no other examples of alternation elsewhere.


Northwest Germanic

In the Northwest Germanic languages, which include all modern surviving Germanic languages, class 7 was drastically remodelled. Reduplication was almost eliminated, except for a few relics, and new ablaut patterns were introduced. Many attempts have been made to explain this development. Jasanoff posits the following series of events within the history of Northwest Germanic: # Root-initial consonant clusters were transferred to the beginning of the reduplicating syllable, to preserve the same word onset across the paradigm. The clusters were simplified and reduced medially. (Compare Latin ''scindō'' ~ ''scicidī'' and ''spondeō'' ~ ''spopondī'', which show the same development) #: *hlaupaną: *hehlaup, *hehlupun > *hlelaup, *hlelupun #: *stautaną: *stestaut, *stestutun > *stezaut, *stezutun #: *blōtaną: *beblōt, *beblutun > *blelōt, *blelutun #: *grōaną: *gegrō, *gegrōun > *grerō, *grerōun #: *swōganą: *sezwōg, *sezwōgun > *swewōg, *sweugun (English ) # Root compression: ## Based on the pattern of verbs such as singular *''lelōt'', *''rerōd'' ~ plural *''leltun'', *''rerdun'', as well as verbs like singular *''swewōg'' ~ plural *''sweugun'', the root vowel or diphthong was deleted in the past plural stem. The Germanic spirant law caused devoicing in certain consonants where applicable. ##: *haitaną: *hegait, *hegitun > *hegait, *hehtun ##: *bautaną: *bebaut, *bebutun > *bebaut, *beftun ("to ") ##: *hlaupaną: *hlelaup, *hlelupun > *hlelaup, *hlelpun ##: *stautaną: *stezaut, *stezutun > *stezaut, *stestun ##: *blōtaną: *blelōt, *blelutun > *blelōt, *bleltun ## In class 7c verbs, this resulted in consonant clusters that were not permissible (e.g. **''hegldun''); these clusters were simplified by dropping the root-initial consonant(s). ##: *haldaną: *hegald, *heguldun > *hegald, *heldun ##: *fanhaną: *febanh, *febungun > *febanh, *fengun # The past plural stem of class 7c verbs no longer appeared to be reduplicated because of the above change, and was extended to the singular. This created what appeared to be a new form of ablaut, with ''a'' in the present and ''e'' in the past plural. #: *haldaną: *hegald, *heldun > *held, *heldun #: *fanhaną: *febanh, *fengun > *feng, *fengun # This new form of ablaut was then extended to other classes, by alternating *a with *e in classes 7a and 7b, and *ā with *ē in class 7d (after Proto-Germanic *ē had become *ā in Northwest Germanic). In class 7a, this resulted in the vowel *ei, which soon merged with *ē (from Germanic *ē2). #: *haitaną: *hegait, *hehtun > *heit, *heitun > *hēt, *hētun #: *hlaupaną: *hlelaup, *hlelpun > *hleup, *hleupun #: *lātaną: *lelōt, *leltun > *lēt, *lētun # It is at this point that North and West Germanic begin to diverge. #* In West Germanic, class 7e took *eu as the past stem vowel, by analogy with existing verbs with initial *(s)w- such as *wōpijaną, *weup(un) and *swōganą, *swewg(un). #*: *blōtaną: *blelōt(un) > *bleut(un) #*: *hrōpaną: *hrerōp(un) > *hreup(un) ("to cry, ") #*: *grōaną: *grerō(un) > *greu, *gre(u)wun #* In North Germanic, class 7e instead took *ē as the past stem vowel, probably by analogy with class 7c which also had a long stem vowel. #*: *blōtaną: *blelōt(un) > *blēt(un) Stages 4 and 5 were not quite complete by the time of the earliest written records. While most class 7 verbs had replaced reduplication with ablaut entirely, several vestigial remains of reduplication are found throughout the North and West Germanic languages. Various other changes occurred later in the individual languages. *e in class 7c was replaced by *ē (> ia) in Old High German and Old Dutch, but by *eu (> ēo) in Old English. The following "Late Proto-Northwest-Germanic" can be reconstructed as descendants of the earlier Proto-Germanic forms given above. Note that ē became ā in Northwest Germanic.


Proto-Germanic

The Proto-Germanic language most likely used more than 500 strong roots. Although some roots are speculative, the language can be reconstructed with the following strong roots based on the work of Elmar Seebold (1970), Robert Mailhammer (2007) and Guus Kroonen (2013). Proto-Germanic had aorist-present roots, a remnant of the aorist aspect found in
Proto-Indo-European Proto-Indo-European (PIE) is the reconstructed common ancestor of the Indo-European language family. Its proposed features have been derived by linguistic reconstruction from documented Indo-European languages. No direct record of Proto-Indo ...
. These verbs used the former aorist as a present tense form. The aorist had a zero-grade vowel, like parts 3 and 4 of the perfect. So these verbs have an anomalous vowel in the present tense, they decline regularly otherwise. * Class 1 with 113 roots: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , *glīnaną, , *gnīdaną, , , *hlīdaną, *hnīgwaną - - , *hnīpaną, , , , , , *kībaną, , , , *knīdaną, *knīpaną, , *kwīnaną, *krīaną, , *kwīþaną, , , , , , *nīþaną, *nīwaną, *pīpaną, , , *rīhaną, *rīkaną, , , , *rīstaną , , *sīkaną, *sīpaną, *sīþaną, *skīdaną, , , *skrīaną – , , *skrītaną, , , , , , , , *snīgwaną - , , , , , , , , , , *strīmaną, , *swīganą, , *swīnaną, *swīþaną, , *þīhaną, *þīnaną, , *þrīnaną, *þwīnaną, *þwītaną, *wīhaną, , *wīpaną, *wīsaną, , , , , *wrīnaną, , ; ::Aorist-present roots: , , ; * Class 2a with 72 roots: , , *bewwaną, , *breusaną, , , , *dreupaną, , , , , , , , , *freuþaną, *geubaną, *geupaną, , , *gleupaną, *greupaną, , *heubaną,, , , , *hneutaną, , *hreudaną, *hreusaną, *hreutaną, *hreupaną, , , , , *kreudaną, *kreukaną, , *kreustaną, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , *sleupaną, , , *smeukaną, *snewwaną, , , *steukaną, , , , *þeutaną, *þleuhaną, ; * Class 2b with 29 roots: *būganą, , , *drūpaną, *fūkaną, *glūpaną, *grūpaną, *gūbaną, *hrūtaną, *hūkaną, , *krūkaną, *krūpaną, , , *rūkaną, *skūbaną, *slūkaną, *slūpaną, *slūtaną, , *smūkaną, , *stūbaną, *strūdaną, , , , *þūtaną; * Class 3a with 78 roots: , *brimmaną, , , , , , , *finkaną, *flinganą,*gimbaną, *ginnaną (), *gintaną, , , , *hinkaną, , *hlimmaną, *hrimpaną, , *hrinkwaną,, , *klimpaną, , *klinkwaną, *klinnaną, *krimmaną, , , *krintaną, , , , , *miskaną, , , , , , , *skrimbaną – *skrimmaną, *skrimpaną, *skrindaną, , *slimpaną, , *slingwaną, , *slintaną, , - *sprinkaną , *sprintaną, , , , , *swingwaną - , *swinkaną, , , , *tinþaną, *trimpaną, *trinnaną, *þindaną, , , *þrimmaną, *þrinhaną, , *þrintaną, *þwinganą, , , ,; * Class 3b with 75 roots: , , , , , , , , *dwerganą, , , , , , , , *gelpaną, , , *gleppaną, *gnellaną, *gnestaną, , , *hneskwaną, , , , *hwekkaną, , *kersaną - *kerzaną, *kwellaną, , *leskaną, , , , , *skeldaną, *skellaną, *skerbaną - *skerfaną, *skerpaną, , *skersaną, *skrellaną, *smellaną, , , *snerhaną, , *snerpaną, *snertaną, , *stregdaną, , , , , , , , , , *þwersaną, *weltaną, *welwaną, *werganą, *werkaną, , - , *wersaną, , ; ::Aorist-present roots: , , * Class 4 with 26 roots: , , , , *felaną, , *hlemaną, *klenaną, , *kweraną, , , , , *swelaną, *swemaną, , , , , ; ::Aorist-present roots: – , – *kumaną, – *sufaną, – , *welaną – . * Class 5 with 49 roots: , , *esaną, , , , , , , , *hreganą, *hreþaną, *hrewaną, *hwekaną, , , , *kewaną, *kresaną, , , , *mekaną, , , *neþaną, , , *rekwaną, , , *skrekaną - *skrekkaną, *skrepaną, *slekwaną,, *streþaną, *trekaną - *trekkaną, , *þrekaną, *þrewaną, , *wedaną (), , , ; ::J present roots: , *frigjaną, , ,; * Class 6 with 41 roots: , , , - *bakkaną, , *drabaną, , , , , , , , , *hnabaną, , , *lapaną, , , , , , , *spananą, , *takaną, , *wahwaną (), , ; ::J present roots: , – *hafjaną, , *kwabjaną, – , , , , , ; * Class 7 : 7a with 11 roots: *aihaną, *aikaną, , , , , *skaidaną – , *spaitaną, , , *þlaihaną; : 7b with 14 roots: *audaną, , , , *brautaną, *dauganą, , *haufaną, , , *klawjaną, *naupaną, , ; : 7c with 23 roots: , , , *faldaną – , *falganą, , *faltaną, , , , , *pranganą, , *skaldaną, *spaldaną, , , *stanganą, , , , *waltaną, ; : 7d with 27 roots: , , , , , , , *drēdaną, *fēaną, *gēaną, , *hwētaną, *hwēsaną, , , *lējaną, , , , , , , *stēaną, *swēþaną, , , ; : 7e with 24 roots: , , *bnōwwaną, *bōaną, *bōwwaną, , *brōkaną, , , , , , *hnōaną, , , , *knōdaną, , *snōwaną, , *swōganą, *þrōwaną, , ;


Gothic

Being the oldest Germanic language with any significant literature, it is not surprising that Gothic preserves the strong verbs best. However, some changes still occurred: * ''e'' > ''i'', eliminating the distinction between the two vowels, except in the reduplicated syllable where ''e'' (spelled ) was retained in all cases. * ''i'' > ''e'' (spelled ) and ''u'' > ''o'' (spelled ) when followed by ''r'', ''h'' or ''ƕ''. * Consonant alternations are almost eliminated by generalising the voiceless alternant across all forms. Also, long ''ī'' was spelled in Gothic. * Note: The sounds ''kw'' and ''hw'' are transcribed in Gothic as ''q'' and ''ƕ'' respectively.


West Germanic

Changes that occurred in the West Germanic languages: * ē > ā * a-mutation: ''u'' > ''o'' when ''a'' follows in the next syllable. This affected the past participles of classes 2–4. However, an intervening ''m'' or ''n'' + consonant blocked this, so the past participle of class 3a kept ''u''. * Extension of umlaut to back vowels, causing it to apply also to verbs of class 6. * The perfective prefix ''ga-'' came to be used (but neither exclusively nor invariably) as a marker of the participle. In English this prefix disappeared again in the Middle Ages.


English


Old English

The following changes occurred from West Germanic to Old English: * ''ai'' > ''ā'' * ''eu'' > ''ēo'' * ''au'' > ''ēa'' * ''a'' > ''æ'' except when a back vowel followed in the next syllable * ''ā'' > ''ǣ'' * Breaking before certain consonants: ''æ'' > ''ea'' and ''e'' > ''eo'' * West Saxon Palatalisation: ''i > ie'' after ''g'' The following are the paradigms for Old English: With j-presents (and other anomalies): * '' hōf hōfon hafen'' ("to raise, heave") * '' scōp scōpon scapen'' ("to create, shape") * '' swōr swōron sworen'' ("to swear") The verb "to stand" follows class 6. The anomalous ''-n-'' in the present is a relic of the PIE
nasal infix The nasal infix is a reconstructed nasal consonant or syllable that was inserted ( infixed) into the stem or root of a word in the Proto-Indo-European language. It has reflexes in several ancient and modern Indo-European languages. It is one of ...
: * '' stōd stōdon standen'' Some relics of class 7 reduplication remain in Old English, mostly in texts from Anglia (infinitive and past singular shown): * ''bēatan beoft'' ("to beat") * ''hātan hēht'' ("to call") * ''lācan leolc'' ("to move about, leap") * ''lǣtan leort'' ("to let") * ''on-drǣdan on-dreord'' ("to dread") * ''rēdan reord'' ("to advise") * ''spātan speoft'' ("to spit") Changes that occurred from Old English to Modern English: * ā > ō * Great Vowel Shift * The old second-person singular ("thou") form acquires the ending "-st" in the past, but the second-person singular falls out of common use and is replaced with the second-person plural. * Elimination of almost all verb inflection in strong verbs, except for the third-person singular present ending ''-s'' (and the second-person ending "-(e)st", when used). * Either the past singular form or the past plural form is generalised to the other number. As a result, only one form exists for all past tense forms and parts 2 and 3 are no longer distinguished. * Combined with the above, all consonant alternations are eliminated by generalising the consonant of the present. Only ''be'' preserves the alternation: ''was'' versus ''were''.


Modern English

In Modern English, generally speaking, the verb classes have disintegrated and are not easily recognisable.
For the principal parts of all English strong verbs see: '' Wiktionary appendix: Irregular English verbs''. The following modern English verbs resemble the original paradigm: Class 1 Class 1 is still recognisable, as in most other Germanic languages. The modern past is taken from either the old past singular (''ride rode ridden'') or the old past plural (''bite bit bitten''). In the case of ''shine shone shone'', the past participle has also assimilated to the past singular. Class 1 roots in modern English (excluding derived verbs such as ''abide'' and ''override'') are '', , , , , , , , , /, , , , , , , , ''. Note that ''bide, chide, rive, shine, shrive, strive, thrive'' can also be weak. However, although most of these verbs have uniformity in their infinitive vowel, they no longer form a coherent class in further inflected forms – for example, ''bite'' (''bit, bitten''), ''ride'' (''rode, ridden''), ''shine'' (''shone, shone''), and ''strike'' (''struck, struck/stricken'', with ''struck'' and ''stricken'' used in different meanings) all show different patterns from one another – but ''bide, drive, ride, rise, smite, stride, strive, write'' do form a (more or less) coherent subclass. Most of these verbs are descended from Old English class 1 verbs. However: *''strive'' is a French loan-word which is class 1 by analogy to ''drive''. (By coincidence it is ultimately descended from an
Old Frankish Frankish ( reconstructed endonym: *), also known as Old Franconian or Old Frankish, was the West Germanic language spoken by the Franks from the 5th to 9th century. After the Salian Franks settled in Roman Gaul, its speakers in Picardy ...
class 1 verb.) *''thrive'' is a class 1 verb formed by analogy to ''drive'', its Old English ancestor being weak and descended from Old Norse ''þrífa'' (itself a class 1 strong verb, meaning "to grasp"). *''hide'' is a class 1 verb whose Old English ancestor, ''hȳdan'', was weak. In American English, the past tense of the verb ' is usually ''dove'', as though it is in Class 1, but the past participle is still ''dived''. Class 2 Class 2 does not form a coherent class, as each verb has developed different irregularities. It includes '', , , '' and ' (whose usual passive participle is ''shot'' rather than ''shotten''). The verb ' (in the sense of "to offer") was in Class 2, but now the past and past participle are ''bid''. The obsolete verb is now used only as the passive participle ''forlorn''. Class 3 Class 3 in English is still fairly large and regular. The past is formed either from the old past singular or from the past plural. Many of the verbs have two past forms, one of which may be dialectal or archaic (''begin, drink, ring, shrink, sing, slink, spin, spring, stink, swing, swim'' and ''wring''). The class 3a verbs in modern English are: * normal past in ''a'': '', , , , , , '' * normal past in ''u'' or ''ou'': '', , , , , , , , , , , , '' * past can have either ''a'' or ''u'': '', , , , '' (in colloquial language, ' can be analogically brought into this subclass) English ''fling'' does not go back to Old English, and may be a loan-word from Norse. It seems to have adopted class 3 forms by analogy with ''cling'' etc. Similarly, ''ring'' and ''string'' were historically weak. The verb ''ding'' (in the meaning of to hit) was in this class as well, but is now usually treated as a weak verb. Class 3b has shrunk to only four members: * ' (the past tense is weak, but retains the strong participle ‘molten’ ) * ' (but the past tense is now often ''swelled'' instead of ''swole'', and sometimes the passive participle as well) * ' * ', its past tense and participle have both become the same as the present tense. This is also the case for its variant ' Class 4 In Modern English, regular class 4 verbs have all kept the ''–n'' in the participle, though eliminating the medial ''e'' after ''r'', this class exhibits near homogeneity of vowel pattern: *''break broke broken'' but several verbs have archaic preterites that preserve the "a" of Middle English (''bare, brake, gat, sware, tare'', and ''spake'' or Scots ''spak''). Class 4 verbs in English (not including derivatives such as ''beget'') are '', , , , , , , , , , ''; and without the ''-n'' and of irregular vowel progression: '. ''Get, speak, tread'' and ''weave'' (''weave'', and occasionally ''tread'', can also be weak) were originally of class 5, whereas ''swear'' was originally class 6. ''Wake'' was also originally class 6, and in fact retains the "a" of the present tense – the preterite ''woke'' (Middle English ''wook'') only conforms to the modern class 4 preterite, not to the historic class 4 preterite in "a". The verb ' is anomalous in all the West Germanic languages because it originally began with ''qu-'', and the subsequent loss of the ''w'' sound coloured the vowel of the present stem. modern English "come came come", compared to Old English '' cymþ – cōm cōmon – cumen'' and Middle English ''comen – cam or com – comen''. Class 5 In Modern English this group has lost all group cohesion. *''eat ate eaten'' *''give gave given'' *''lie lay lain'' *''see saw seen'' *''sit sat sat'' (archaic ''sitten'') Class 5 verbs in Modern English: ' (in the sense of "to command" or "to invite"), '', , , '' (= lie down), '', ''. The verb ' is only used poetically now. ''Get, speak, tread'', and ''weave'', which come from Class 5 verbs, are now Class 4. The verb ' comes from a Class 2 verb in Old English, as did ' in the sense of "to offer, proclaim", but ''forbid'' is conflated with the other verb ''bid'' ("to command"). The preterite can be ''forbad'' or ''forbade'', or even ''forbid''. The preterite ''ate'' is pronounced "et" in some British dialects; historically the form ''eat'', homophonous with the present stem was also found for the preterite. Although the verb ''to be'' is suppletive and highly irregular, its past follows the pattern of a class 5 strong verb, with grammatischer Wechsel (the alternation of "s" and "r" in "was" versus "were"), and has uniquely retained the singular/plural distinction of both ablaut grade and consonant in the modern languages. Old English: ', English: ''was/were''. For full paradigms and historical explanations see
Indo-European copula A feature common to all Indo-European languages is the presence of a verb corresponding to the English verb ''to be''. General features This verb has two basic meanings: *In a less marked context it is a simple copula (''I’m tired''; ''That ...
. Class 6 Class 6 has disintegrated as well. The verbs ''shake'', ''take'' and ''forsake'' come closest to the original vowel sequence. The consonant anomaly in ''stand'' is still visible, and is extended to the participle. *''shake shook shaken'' *''stand stood stood'' Class 6 verbs in modern English: '', , , , , , , , , ''. The verb is in this class when used in a nautical context. Like most other classes in Modern English, this class has lost cohesion and now forms principal parts according to many different patterns. Two preterites (''drew'' and ''slew'') are now spelled with "ew", which is similar in sound to the "oo" of the others that still use a strong form. ''Swear'' is now class 4. The adjective ''graven'' was originally a past participle of the now obsolete verb ''grave''. Note that ''lade, shape, shave, '' are now weak outside of their optionally strong past participle forms (''laden, shapen'', ''shaven'', and ''waxen'' respectively). ''Fare'' has archaic past tense ''fore'' and rare past participle ''faren'', but is normally weak now. Class 7 In Modern English this class has lost its homogeneity: *''fall fell fallen'' *''hang hung hung'' (Note that, in the transitive sense of hanging someone by the neck, ''hang'' usually has regular weak conjugation ''hanged'') *''hold held held'' (the original past participle is preserved in the adjective ''beholden'') *''throw threw thrown'' The following modern English verbs descend from class 7 verbs, and still retain strong-verb endings: '', , , , , , , , ''. (''Hew'' can be a preterite or present, although the usual preterite, and sometimes the participle too, is ''hewed''.) The verb ' can be considered Class 7, though the past participle now lacks the ending ''-en''. The verbs ' and ' sometimes retain the strong-verb participles ''mown'' and ''sown'' but the preterites are now usually ''mowed'' and ''sowed''. (The verb ' was always weak, even though one can say ''sewn'' for the past participle.) The verb ', originally a weak verb, has acquired a strong past participle ''shown'', and in some dialects even a class 7 strong past tense ''shew'' (This "shew" is not to be confused with present "shew", which is an older spelling of, and pronounced the same as, "show"). Archaic English still retained the reduplicated form ''hight'' ("called", originally a past tense, usually with a passive meaning, but later also used as a passive participle). The verb ' was also in class 7, as in the
King James Version The King James Version (KJV), also the King James Bible (KJB) and the Authorized Version, is an English translation of the Christian Bible for the Church of England, which was commissioned in 1604 and published in 1611, by sponsorship of K ...
"while he yet spake, the cock crew".


Dutch

Old Dutch is attested only fragmentarily, so it is not easy to give forms for all classes. Hence, Middle Dutch is shown here in that role instead. The situation of Old Dutch generally resembled that of Old Saxon and Old High German in any case. Changes from West Germanic to Old Dutch: * ''ai'' > ''ē'' (but sometimes ''ei'' is preserved) * ''au'' > ''ō'' * ''eu'' > ''iu'' * ''ē'' > ''ie'' * ''ō'' > ''uo'' (later becomes , spelled in Middle Dutch) From Old Dutch to Middle Dutch: * ''u'' > ''o'' * ''ū'' > ''ȳ'' (spelled ) * ''iu'' > ''ȳ'' (northern dialects) * ''iu'' > ''io'' > ''ie'' (southern dialects) * Lengthening of vowels in open syllables: ''e'' > ''ē'', ''o'' > ''ō'', ''a'' > ''ā'', although it continues to be written with a single vowel. ''i'' is lengthened to ''ē'', and short ''y'' (from umlaut of ''u'') to ''ue'' . * Unlike most other languages, umlaut does not affect long vowels or diphthongs except in the eastern dialects. * Because of the combined effect of the two above points, umlaut is eliminated as a factor in verb conjugation. From Middle Dutch to Modern Dutch: * Diphthongisation of long high vowels: > , > (spelled and ) * Monophthongisation of opening diphthongs: > , > (still spelled and ) Class 1 This class is well preserved and has the most strong verbs. Not only has it preserved many strong verbs inherited from the proto language, it was also able to expand by introducing the strong inflection to a large number of weak verbs by analogy. Sound changes caused the historical ‘ai’ and ‘i’ in open syllables, to merge as a long ‘e’ essentially merging parts 2,3,4. Regular class 1 pattern (ɛi-e:-e:-e:): * Inherited strong roots: '', , , , , , , , , , , '' (can also be a weak verb), ' ("to cry"), '', , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ''. * Historically weak: ' (influenced by ''lijden''), '', , , , , , '' (Flemish), ' (also weak), '', ''. * Two verbs with 'ei' have also joined this class by analogy, as 'ij' and 'ei' are pronounced the same: '', ''. * Non-standard, archaic or dialectal strong verbs: ' (strong verb forms are archaic), ' (strong forms are common but non-standard), ' (strong forms are common but non-standard), ' (a dialectal strong verb), ' (strong forms are common but non-standard), ' / ' (a dialectal strong verb), ' (archaic strong verb, in the sense of playing a windinstrument), ' (an archaic strong verb), ' (archaic/dialectal strong verb), ' (dialectal strong verb), ' (the past tense ''gedee(g)'' is dialectal, the strong past participle ' has the meaning ''thorough'' whereas the weak past participle ''gedijd'' means ''thriving'', which corresponds to the regular meaning of the verb). Class 2 A notable development in Dutch is the growth of class 2b at the expense of class 2a. Like class 1, sound changes caused the historical ‘au’ and ‘u’ in open syllables, to merge as a long ‘o’ merging parts 2,3,4. Regular class 2a roots (i-o:-o:-o:): * Inherited strong roots: '', , , , , , , , , , '' ("to seethe", weak in the sense "to be agitated"). :* Restricted to literary or poetic use: , , . Regular class 2b roots (œy-o:-o:-o:): * Inherited strong roots: '', , , , , , , , , , , , , ''. * Historically weak: '', , , , , ''. * Non-standard, archaic or dialectal strong verbs: ' (strong forms are used in colloquial Flemish), ' (a weak verb, strong forms are archaic), ' (weak verb, strong forms are archaic), ' (an archaic strong verb), ' (strong forms are used in southern dialects), ' (an archaic strong verb), ' (an archaic strong verb), ' (strong forms are common but non-standard). Anomalous class 2 roots: * The verbs ' and ' preserved the grammatischer Wechsel: ''verliezen-verloor-verloren, vriezen-vroor-gevroren''. Although the root ''kiezen'' has lost the alternation, the derived verb ''(uit)'' still displays it in poetic or archaic contexts: ''verkiezen-verkoor-verkoren''. * The verb ' has a class 2 past tense and participle when it means 'to pull'. * The verb ' can also be declined with a class 2 past tense and participle. Class 3 Class 3a and 3b have generalised part 3 to part 2, eliminating the ''-a-'' from this class. Some 3b verbs have a past in ''-ie-'' like class 7: ''helpen – hielp – geholpen''. This can be considered a new "class 3 + 7". Regular class 3a roots (ɪ-ɔ-ɔ-ɔ): * Inherited strong roots: '', , , , , -ginnen ( – ), , , , , (archaic), , , , , , (literary/poetic), , , , , , , ''. * Historically weak: '', ''. Regular class 3b roots (ɛ-ɔ-ɔ-ɔ): * Inherited strong roots: '', , , , , , , , , , , (archaic)''. * Three verbs of another class have joined with 3b: ', ' (both class 5)'', '' (class 3a). * Historically weak: '', , ''; These verbs became strong by reinterpreting the Rückumlaut that was present in some Old and Middle Dutch weak verbs as a strong vowel alternation. Class 3 + 7 roots (ɛ-i-i-ɔ): * Inherited strong verbs: ''-derven ( – ), , , , , ''. Anomalous class 3 roots: * The verb ' (to become) also belonged to class 3b, but the past and present vowels appear to have been swapped: ''worden werd geworden''. * Semi-strong with a weak past tense and a strong participle: ', the verb changed the older vowels 'e' and 'o' into 'a': ''barsten – barstte – gebarsten'' Class 4 Class 4 and 5 verbs still show the distinction in vowel between the past singular (part 2) and plural (part 3), although this is not obvious due to the rules of Dutch orthography: ''ik nam'' ("I took") has the plural ''wij namen'' (not ''*nammen''), that is, the 'short' vowel of the singular is replaced by the 'long' in the plural. (Note the relationship of consonant doubling to vowel length, which is explained at Dutch orthography). The pattern is therefore: ''breken brak (braken) gebroken'' ("to break") Regular class 4 roots (eː-ɑ-a:-oː): '', , , , , ''. Class 4 roots with 'o(o)' in the preterite (eː-o:-o:-oː): ', ' and ' ("to hurt, to sore"). Anomalous roots: * The present tense vowel of the verb ' was influenced by a preceding ''w'', which was subsequently lost. The etymological ''w'' is retained in the past, unlike English or German: ''komen – kwam – kwamen – gekomen''. * Semi-strong with a weak past tense and a strong participle: ' (''helen'' is a weak verb however)'', ''. Class 5 Regular class 5 roots (eː-ɑ-a:-eː): '', , , , , , , '' Class 5 j-present roots (ɪ--ɑ-a:-eː): '', , ''. These have a short 'i' in part 1 because of the gemination of the consonants, they retain the long 'e' vowel in part 4. Anomalous roots: * The root ' ("to see") has experienced a loss of the original , with a resulting assimilation of the stem vowel to the vowel of the inflection, and shows Grammatischer Wechsel between this original and a in the past: ''zien – zag – zagen – gezien''. * The preterite of '' / '' ("to be") still shows both (quantitative) ablaut and grammatischer Wechsel between the singular and plural: ''was/waren''. * Semi-strong with a weak past tense and a strong participle: '. Class 6 Class 6 has become very small, many of its verbs have gone weak or have become semi-strong. Regular class 6 roots (a-u-u-a): '', , ''. Anomalous roots: * The verb ' (to hit) like the verb ''zien'' has experienced a loss of the original , with a resulting assimilation of the stem vowel to the vowel of the inflection, and shows Grammatischer Wechsel between this original and a in the past: ''slaan – sloeg – sloegen – geslagen''. * The suppleted past tense of the verb ' ("to stand") also belonged to this class, it now declines with a short 'o': ''staan – stond – stonden – gestaan''. * The three inherited j-presents, '', ,'' and '', '' ("to swear an oath") historically decline with 'e'-'oe'-'oe'-'a(a)'. In the modern language they decline irregularly, two have taken 'ie' in the past tense, all three have taken separate vowels in the participle: ''scheppen – schiep – geschapen'' ("to create"), ''heffen – hief – geheven'' ("to lift, raise"), ''zweren – zwoer – gezworen'' ("to swear an oath"),. * Semi-strong roots with a strong past tense and a weak participle: '', '' (Flemish, colloquially)'', , ''. * Semi-strong roots with a weak past tense and a strong participle: '', , , '' ("to fare" The sense "to travel by boat" has a class 6 past ''voer'') Class 7 Class 7 has shrunk in the modern language, like class 6 many of its verbs have become semi-strong. This class has an -ie- in the past tense, the past participle has the same vowel as the present tense. (The verbs with * are nowadays mostly semi-strong) * Class 7a has disappeared. The verbs ' ("to call") and ' ("to separate") have become semi-strong. * Class 7b: '', *''. * Class 7c: '', , , , , , *'' (The meaning to "to grow" is always strong but is archaic, the meaning "to wash" is mostly semi-strong). :* One verb displays L-vocalization: ''houden – hield – gehouden'' ("to hold") :* As in German, two anomalous class 7c verbs have formed new present stems, and shortened the vowel in the past tense: ''vangen – ving – gevangen'' ("to catch") and ''hangen – hing – gehangen'' ("to hang"). The suppleted past tense of the verb ''gaan'' ("to go") also belongs to this class and is declined: ''gaan – ging – gegaan''. * Class 7d: '', , , *''. * Class 7e: '. * Semi-strong roots with a weak past tense and a strong participle: '', , , , , , '' (''uitscheiden'' is a class 1 verb however)'', , ,'' (in the meaning 'to split')'', , '' (the past had -ield-, like ''houden'')'', , '' (the past had -ielt-, like ''houden''). Other A special case is ', which is a weak verb that can decline a strong participle in some circumstances, even though the verb was never strong to begin with.


Afrikaans

The distinction between simple past, present and past perfect has been lost in
Afrikaans Afrikaans (, ) is a West Germanic language that evolved in the Dutch Cape Colony from the Dutch vernacular of Holland proper (i.e., the Hollandic dialect) used by Dutch, French, and German settlers and their enslaved people. Afrikaans gr ...
, as the original past tense has fallen out of use almost entirely, being replaced with the old present perfect tense using (usually) a strong past participle. For example, the ancestral Dutch ''hij zong'' has become ''hy het gesing'' ("he sang/has sung/had sung"). Modal verbs tend to retain their strong past tense, and a handful of other verbs do so too. Verbs almost never retain both a strong past tense and a strong past participle, due to the loss of the grammatical distinction. The exception is ''wees'' ("to be"), which does retain both ''was'' and ''gewees''. Nonetheless, there are many verbs for which the new past tense is formed with a strong past participle, such as ''geboë'' from ''buig'' ("bend") or ''gedrewe'' from ''dryf'' ("drive" to set into motion). The notion exists that strong past participles always have a figurative meaning, and weak and strong past participles sometimes coexist within the language. Sometimes, this seems to be the case. For instance, compare strong and figurative ''bedorwe jeug'' ("spoiled youth") to weak and literal ''bederfde yoghurt'' ("spoiled yoghurt"), or strong and figurative ''gebroke hart'' ("broken heart") to weak and literal ''gebreekte vaas'' ("broken vase"). Nonetheless, this notion is not 100% accurate. Sometimes the strong past participle just happens to be more common. For instance, the strong participles are used in ''bevrore groente'' ("frozen vegetables") and ''aangenome kinders'' ("adopted children").


German

From West Germanic to Old High German: *
High German consonant shift In historical linguistics, the High German consonant shift or second Germanic consonant shift is a phonological development ( sound change) that took place in the southern parts of the West Germanic dialect continuum in several phases. It probabl ...
* ''ē'' > ''ia'' * ''ai'' > ''ei'', then ''ei > ē'' before ''r'', '' h'' and ''w'' * ''au'' > ''ou'', then ''ou > ō'' before dentals (''þ'', ''d'', ''t'', ''n'', ''l'', ''s'', ''z'', ''r'') and ''h''. * ''e > i'' before ''u'' * Class 1 has two subclasses, depending on the vowel in the past singular: ** 1a ''rītan rītu reit ritum giritan'' ("to ride") ** 1b ''līhan līhu lēh ligum giligan'' ("to loan" – note grammatischer Wechsel.) * Class 2b verbs are rare, unlike in the more northern languages. * A few relics of reduplication remain: ** ''ana-stōzan ana-sterōz'' ("to strike") ** ''pluozan pleruzzun'' ("to sacrifice"), in Upper German with the change b > p ** ''ki-scrōtan ki-screrōt'' ("to cut"), in Upper German with the change g > k ** ''būan biruun'' ("to dwell"); this was not a class 7 strong verb originally Changes from Old High German to Modern German: * ''io'', ''ia'', ''ie'' > ''ī'' (spelled ) * ''ei, ī > ai'' (retaining the spelling ) * ''ou, ū > au'' * ''ȳ > ɔy'' (spelled or <äu>) * ''i > ī'' (spelled ) before a single consonant. * Alternations between past singular and plural are eliminated by generalising part 3 or part 2. If part 3 is generalised in verbs with alternations of the ''s-r'' type, it is not just generalised to the past singular but also to the present. The classes are still well preserved in modern German. Class 1 In class 1, part 3 is generalised, eliminating the older ''-ei-'' or ''-e-''. However, a new subdivision arises because the ''i'' of the past tense forms is lengthened to ''ie'' before a single consonant. ''reiten ritt geritten'' ("to ride") versus ''leihen lieh geliehen'' ("to loan"). Class 1 verbs in modern German are: * Class 1 with a long vowel in the preterite and participle (aɪ̯-i:-i:) : , , , , , , , , , / , , , :* Historically weak roots: '' (Swiss german), , , (Swiss german), '' * Class 1 with a short vowel in the preterite and participle (aɪ̯-ɪ-ɪ) : '', (archaic), , (dialectal), , , , , , , , , , , , , (archaic), , , ''. :* Historically weak roots: , * Anomalous class 1 roots: The verbs ' and ' preserved the verner alternation: "leiden – litt – gelitten, schneiden – schnitt – geschnitten". Class 2 In class 2, part 2 is generalised, eliminating older ''-u-''. Class 2b verbs are rare, as in Old High German. * Class 2a with a long vowel in the preterite and participle (i:-o:-o:) : '', , , , , , , , , , ''. * Class 2a with a short vowel in the preterite and participle (i:-ɔ-ɔ) : '', , , , , , , , , , ''. Anomalous class 2a roots: :* The roots ' and ' have preserved the verner alternation: "sieden – sott – gesotten" and "ziehen – zog – gezogen" :* The roots ' ("to tell a lie") and ' ("to deceive"), have changed their present tense vowels from 'ie' to 'ü'. This no doubt arises from a desire to disambiguate Middle High German ''liegen'' from ''ligen'' (class 5), which would have sounded the same after vowel lengthening. ''Trügen'' would have followed in its wake, because the two words form a common rhyming collocation. :* The verb ' has become obsolete, however the strong past tense and past participle are still used. Some speakers reinterpreted these forms as if they are part of the related verb ', creating the pattern: ''küren''-''kor''-''gekoren''. In German class 2b was never large, the modern language retains the following verbs: '', , , ''. Class 3 In class 3, part 2 is generalised. The ''o'' of the 3b participle has been passed by analogy to some 3a verbs, and also to the past of some verbs of both groups: ''beginnen begann begonnen'', ''bergen barg geborgen'' ("to rescue"), ''quellen quoll gequollen'' ("to well up"). Thus, there are now 5 subgroups: Class 3a * regular (ɪ-a-ʊ) : '', (by analogy), , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (by analogy), , ''. * with substitution of o in the participle (ɪ-a-ɔ) : '', , , , , ''. * with substitution of o in the preterite and participle (ɪ-ɔ-ɔ) : '', ''. Class 3b * regular (ɛ-a-ɔ) : '', , , , , , , , ''. * with substitution of o in preterite (ɛ-ɔ-ɔ) : '', , , , , , , ''. Anomalous class 3 roots: :* The root ' generalizes part 3 instead of part 2 (ɛ-ʊ-ɔ), and also suffixes -e; ''werden, wurde, geworden''. The original (part 2) singular preterite ''ward'' is still recognizable to Germans, but is archaic. :* The root ' replaced the vowel of the infintive with 'ö' (œ-ɔ-ɔ). :* The root ' can be declined with a strong past tense in 'o'. :* The root ' which was originally weak, acquired an anomalous strong inflection with 'u' (ɪ-ʊ-ʊ). Class 4 In class 4, the long ''-a-'' of part 3 was generalised to part 2. Example: ''nehmen nahm genommen'' ("to take"). * Class 4 with long vowels in the present tense (eː-a:-o:) : '', , ''. * Class 4 with long vowels and substitution with o in preterite (eː-o:-o:) : '', , , , , ''. * Class 4 with a long vowel in the present tense and short in the participle (eː-a:-ɔ) : '. * Class 4 with short vowels in the present tense and participle (ɛ-a:-ɔ) : '', , , , ''. : Anomalous: :*' ("to come") still has the anomalous ''o'' in the present stem (although some dialects have regularised it to ''kemmen''): ''kommen kam gekommen'' :* The preterite of ' ("to be") is Old High German: ''was/wârum'', but levelled in modern German: ''war/waren''. Class 5 Class 5 is little changed from Old High German, like class 4 the long ''-a-'' of part 3 was generalised. * Class 5 with long vowels in the present tense and participle (eː-a:-e:) : '', , , , , ''. * Class 5 with short vowels in the present tense and participle (ɛ-a:-ɛ) : '', , , ''. :* The verb ''essen'' ("to eat") had a past participle ''giezzan'' in OHG; in MHG this became ''geezzen'' which was contracted to ''gezzen'' and then re-prefixed to ''gegezzen''. :* j-presents: '', , ''. Class 6 Class 6 is also preserved. In Modern German the ''uo'' is monophthongised to ''u''. * Class 6 with long vowels in present tense and participle (aː-u:-a:) : '', , , , , ''. * Class 6 with short vowels in present tense and participle (a-u:-a) : '', , , ''. ''backen'' and ''fragen'' are usually weak nowadays. Anomalous class 6 roots: * The j-presents '', '' have taken an ''o'' in the preterite and participle, perhaps by analogy with class 2: ''heben hob gehoben''. The verb ''schwören'' has changed ''e'' to ''ö''. * The past tense and participle of ' (''stand'', older ''stund'', ''gestanden''), which derive from a lost verb ''*standen'', also belong to this class. * With a strong participle only: ' Class 7 In class 7, the various past tense vowels have merged into a single uniform ''--''. * Class 7a: only , as has become a class 1 strong verb. * Class 7b: , , * Class 7c: '', '' :* '', '' have back-formed new present stems from the past stem, and have eliminated ''grammatischer Wechsel'' and shortened the vowel in the past tense: ''fangen fing gefangen'' ("to catch"), ''hängen hing gehangen'' ("to hang"). :* The past tense and participle of German ', ''ging'' ''gegangen'', derive from a lost verb ''*gangen'' which belongs to this class. (The verb still exists in other languages, such as the verb ''gang'' used in Scotland and northern England.) :* With a strong participle only: '', , '' * Class 7d: '', , , , '' * Class 7e: '


Low German

The following changes occurred from West Germanic to Old Saxon: * ''ai'' > ''ē'' * ''au'' > ''ō'' * ''eu'' > ''io'' From Old Saxon to Middle Low German: * ''u'' > ''o'' * ''io'' > ''e'' As in Middle Dutch Lengthening of vowels in open syllables: ''e'' > ''ē'', ''o'' > ''ō'', ''a'' > ''ā'', ''ö'' > ''ȫ'', ü > ''ǖ''. ''i'' Is often lengthened to ''ē''. There is no single Modern Low German, and some sources gives different forms than this. E.g. see * Alfred v. d. Velde: ''Zu Fritz Reuter! Praktische Anleitung zum Verständniß des Plattdeutschen an der Hand des ersten Kapitels des Fritz Reuter'schen Romanes: "Ut mine Stromtid". Zweite Auflage.'' Leipzig, 1881, p. 60–63 * Julius Wiggers: ''Grammatik der plattdeutschen Sprache. In Grundlage der Mecklenburgisch-Vorpommerschen Mundart. Zweite Auflage.'' Hamburg, 1858, p. 57 ff. Some differences: * They have ''böd, böden'' instead of ''bood, boden'', ''föll, föllen'' instead of ''full, fullen'', ''stürw, stürwen, storwen'' instead of ''storv, storven, storven''. * They have ''spreken'' with ''sprök'' (thus not "4 regular (e-o-a)") From Middle Low German to Modern Low German: * ''ā'' > ''ē'' * ''ō'' > ''ā'' except before ''r'' * ''a'' > ''o'' in preterite forms * ''e'' > ''a''/''ö'' when followed by two different consonants Most classes are quite well preserved, although the cohesion of some has been lost substantially or even entirely. * Class 1 verbs in Low German are ''bieten, blieven, blieken, diegen/diehen, drieven, glieden, griepen, kieken, lieden, lieken, mieden, rieten, schienen, schieten, schrieden, schrien/schriegen, schrieven, slieken, sliepen, slieten, smieten, snieden, splieten, stiegen, strieden, strieken, swiegen, verdwienen, wieken, wiesen, wrieven'' and the originally weak verbs ''glieken'', ''kniepen'', ''priesen'' by analogy. Some other verbs take either strong or weak past endings: ''piepen'', ''riesen'' and ''spieten''. * In class 2, part 2 is generalised, eliminating older -u-. Unlike in German but as in Dutch and English, class 2b has grown by moving older class 2a verbs into it. They are ''beden, bedregen, kesen, legen, flegen, fleten, freren/fresen, geneten, geten, krepen, reken, scheten, spreten, tehn, verleren/verlesen''; with ū-present: ''bugen, krupen, schuven, snuven, sluten, supen, sugen, stuven''. The verbs ''rüken'' and ''stöven'' show anomalous infinitive forms. Some verbs can take either strong or weak past endings: ''duken'' and ''schulen''. * In class 3, the form of the past participle seems to have been generalised to preterite forms. There are now 5 subgroups + two olders subgroups reduced to one verb each: ** 3a regular (i-u-u): ''binnen, dringen, drinken, dwingen, finnen, gelingen, klingen, ringen, slingen, swinnen, swingen, singen, sinken, springen, stinken, wringen''. Verbs that may take either strong or weak past endings: ''blinken, glimmen'' and ''klimmen''. ** 3a with ü-infinitive (ü-u-u): ''begünnen, swümmen'' ** 3b regular (a-o-o): ''bargen, basten/barsten, starven, verdarven, warpen, warrn, warven'' ** 3b with ö-infinitive (ö-o-o): ''hölpen, smölten'' ** 3b with e-infinitive and -u- past forms because of phonetical influence of -ll- (e-u-u): ''gellen, schellen, swellen'' ** 3b with e-infinitive (e-o-o): ''fechten'' ** 3b with e-infinitive and different preterite and past participle forms (e-o-a) due to analogy with class 4 verbs: ''befehlen''. * In class 4, parts 2 and 3 seem to have merged into -ē-, but due to the influence of past participle forms mostly with a -ō- sound (nowadays written -ā-) a new ending -ō- has arisen: ** 4 regular (e-o-a): ''breken, schrecken'' (with vowel lengthening: ''schrook, schraken''), ''spreken, stehlen''. ** 4 with two possible preterite forms (e-o/e-a): ''nehmen, steken'' ** 4 with a-infinitive (a-o-a): ''drapen'' :The verb ''kamen'' still shows the -u- infinitive which became -a-: ''kamen, keem, kamen''. The verb to be, ''wesen'', levelled its old preterite forms ''was''/''weren'' into ''weer''/''weren'', although ''was'' still appears in some dialects. * In class 5 too the -ē- forms of past participle seem to have influenced the preterite forms. Class 5 regular verbs (ē-ē-ē) include: ''eten, geven, schehn'' (preterite ''scheh'' or ''scheeg'')'', lesen'' (nowadays mostly a weak verb)'', meten, sehn'' (preterite ''seeg'') ''and vergeten''. Verbs with j-presents: ''bidden'' (sometimes confused with ''beden'')'', liggen, sitten''. :The verb ''treden'' is anomalous as it has kept the -a- infinitive forms in the preterite and with the variation in vowel length, thus it has ''tradd'', ''traddst'', ''tradd'' in the singular with but ''traden'' in the plural with . However, normal class 5 preterite forms ''treed, treedst, treed, treden'' may also be found. * Class 6 is preserved as well however it has lost its cohesion. Regular class 6 verbs (ā-ō-ā) are ''graven'' and ''slaan'' (with anomalous infinitive and past participle ''slaan'' from earlier ''slagen''). The 3 inherited j-presents have chosen different paths to make their past forms: ''heven'' is now similar to a class 5 verb and has ''heev'' in the preterite and ''heven'' in the past participle, ''schapen'' is a weak verb with strong past participle ''schapen'' and ''swören'' kept its preterite ''swoor'' as well as its past participle ''sworen'' – even though it may found with weak past forms. :The verb ''fohren'' is now merging with ''föhren'' and takes weak past endings. The verb ''dregen'' has an anomalous infinitive in -ē- but has kept its class 6 past forms ''droog'', ''drogen'' (preterite) and ''dragen'' (past participle). The verb laden has gone weak but has ''laden'' beside ''laadt'' in the past participle. The past tense of ''stahn'' (''stunn''), which derives from Middle Low German ''standen'', also belongs to this class. :Finally the verb ''waschen'' shows preterite ''wusch'' and past participle ''wuschen'', just like ''fallen, fangen'' and ''hangen'', they seem to make a new strong verb class. * In class 7, the various past tense forms have merged into a uniform -ee-. ** 7a (ē-ē-ē) has one single verb: ''heten'' since ''scheden'' has gone weak. ** 7b (ō-ē-ō) also includes one verb: ''lopen'', ''stoten'' has gone weak but it kept its strong past participle ''stoten''. ** 7c has lost cohesion. 7c verb ''holen'' (from Old Saxon ''haldan'') has regular ''heel'' in the past tense and past participle ''holen'', but ''fallen, fangen, hangen'' and ''gahn'' (from Old Saxon ''gangan'') show ''full'' and ''fullen'', ''fung'' and ''fullen'', ''hung'' and ''hungen'', ''gung/güng'' (but past participle''gahn'') in the preterite and past participle, all with a short -u-. Class 6 verb ''waschen'' has also joined this "new class" and has preterite and past participle ''wusch'' and ''wuschen''. ** 7d (ā-ē-ā) verbs include: ''laten'' and ''slapen'', ''raden'' and ''braden'' are semi-strong as they still have their strong past participles ''raden'' and ''braden'' (though a weak form ''braadt'' may be encountered). ''Blasen'' has gone weak. ** 7e (ō-ē-ō) is reduced to one single verb: ''ropen''. This subgroup had become similar to 7b already in Old Saxon.


North Germanic

Changes from Proto-Germanic to
Old Norse Old Norse, Old Nordic, or Old Scandinavian, is a stage of development of North Germanic dialects before their final divergence into separate Nordic languages. Old Norse was spoken by inhabitants of Scandinavia and their overseas settlement ...
: * ē > ā * a-mutation: ''u'' > ''o'' when ''a'' follows in the next syllable. This affected the past participles of classes 2–4. However, an intervening ''m'' or ''n'' + consonant blocked this, so the past participle of class 3a kept ''u''. * Extension of umlaut to back vowels, causing it to apply also to verbs of class 6. * ''v-'' is lost before ''u'' or ''o''. * ''-n'' is lost from the infinitive and many inflectional endings. * Voiced plosives (but not fricatives) are devoiced word-finally. In Old West Norse, this later causes loss of a preceding nasal. * Breaking of ''e'' to ''ja'' in most environments, and of ''eu'' to ''jū''/''jō''. * In class 7, several reduplicated verbs are retained: ''róa reri'' ("to row"), ''sá seri'' ("to sow"), ''snúa sneri'' ("to turn").


Danish

Class 1 This class has generalised part 2 over part 3 creating a past tense in 'e'. The class can be split up by the different vowels the supine can take: * with 'e' supine: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , / , , , . * with 'i' supine: , , , , , , , . Class 2 This class has generalised part 2 over part 3 creating a past tense in 'ø'. The class can be split up by the different vowels the supine can take: * with 'u' supine: , , , , . * with 'y' supine: , , , , , , , , . * with 'ø' supine: , , , , . Anomalous: * – frøs – frosset * – fløj – fløjet * – løj – løjet Class 3 This class has disintegrated into a number of smaller subgroups, all its members have generalised part 2 over part 3 creating a past tense with 'a'. class 3a: * with 'i' in present tense and 'u' supine: '', , , , , , , , , , , , ''. * with 'i' in present tense and 'i' supine: '', , ''. * with 'y' in present tense and 'u' supine: '', ''. class 3b: * with 'æ' in present tense and 'u' supine: ' (strong forms are archaic), '', , , ''. * with 'æ' in present tense and 'æ' supine: '', , '' Class 4 Class 4 has most of its members moved to class 3. It is marked by 'a' in the past tense and å in the supine. Regular class 4 strong roots: '', , '' Anomalous: These two verbs were influenced by a preceding 'w': * ' – sov – sovet * ' – kom – kommet Class 5 Class 5 this class has lost cohesion. It is marked by 'å' or 'a' in the past tense and the supine has the same vowel as the infinitive. * With å in the past: '', '' * With a in the past: '', , , , '' Anomalous: * ' – lå – ligget * ' – tav – tied * ' – var – været used to belong to this class as well but has irregular present tense in ''er''. Class 6 Class 6 is marked by 'o' in the past tense and the supine has the same vowel as the infinitive. Regular strong roots: '', , , , ''. Anomalous: * ' – lo – let/leet * ' – slog – slået (slaget) * ' – stod – stået * ' – svor – svoret Class 7 Danish has removed the vowel alternation between the past and present tenses (except for få and gå) * class 7a: ' – hed – heddet * class 7b: ' – løb – løbet * class 7c: ' – faldt – faldet, ' – holdt – holdt :* anomalous: ' – fik – fået, ' – gik – gået * class 7d: ' – græd – grædt


Norwegian Nynorsk

Changes from Old Norse to modern Norwegian Nynorsk: * á > å * Long vowels are usually no longer marked as such: é > e, í > i, ó > o, ú > u, ý > y, œ/ǿ > ø * jó/jú > y *In class 6, one verb, ''fara'' (to fare, travel), has retained its marked long vowel: ''fór''. *Multiple of the verbs found in class 7 in Old Norse have gone weak. For instance, although ''heite'' (7a) have retained its strong preterite, it has lost its strong supine.


Swedish

Class 1 Unlike Danish, this class is still uniform in Swedish, all verbs have an ‘e’(eː) in the past tense, the supine has the same vowel as the present tense. Regular class 1 verbs (iː-eː-iː): , / , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Verbs for which the strong forms are dated: , , , Class 2 In Swedish this class split up into multiple patterns all verbs have an ‘ö’ (øː) in the past tense: 2a * With 'y' in the present tense and 'u' in the supine (yː-øː-ʉː): , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , * With 'y' in the present tense and a shortend 'y' in the supine (yː-øː-ʏ): , , , , , , , , , * With 'ju' in the present tense and 'ju' in the supine (ʉː-øː-ʉː): , , , , , , , , 2b * Class 2b looks similar to the 2a verbs with ‘ju’ (ʉː-øː-ʉː): , , , , , (former preterite-presens) Other * A new pattern that is associated with the class 2 inflections emerged in the modern language with short vowel instead of the normal long ones (ɵ-œ-ɵ). It contains , (both former class 3a verbs), and by analogy (former class 7b) which adopted this pattern as well. Class 3 Class 3a is well preserved and has a predictable pattern, with 'a' in the past tense and 'u'(ɵ) in the supine. Class 3b on the other hand has shrunk in the modern language to only a few members, most of the remaining verbs now often appear with weak forms as well, making this subclass fairly unstable. Regular class 3a verbs (ɪ-a-ɵ): , , , , , , (originally class 4), (Danish loan word), , , , , (also weak), (originally class 5), , , , , (also weak), , , , , , , , (), , Regular class 3b verbs (ɛ-a-ɵ:): , , , , Anomalous: The verb , is declined ''vart-vorten''. But it is now only used in the past tense (as an alternative for the past tense of ''bliva'') Class 4 This class has become small, only three regular verbs remain, they have a long ‘a’ (ɑː) in the past tense and a long ‘u’ (ʉː) in the supine. Regular class 4 verbs (ɛː-ɑː-ʉː): , , The following verbs are influenced by a preceding ‘w’ which was lost: * – kom – kommit * – sov – sovit Class 5 With å (oː) past: , , With a (ɑː) past: / , (strong forms are poetic), , / , Anomalous: * used to belong to this class as well but has irregular present tense in 'är'. Class 6 With 'a' in present tense and supine (ɑː-u:-ɑː): , / , , , / With 'å' in present tense and 'a' in the supine (oː-u:-ɑː): , (now mostly weak) Anomalous: * – dog – dött * – log – lett * – stod – stått * / – svor – svurit * – växte – vuxit Class 7 * 7b: – lopp – lupit (nowadays mostly weak) * 7c: – höll – hållit, – föll – fallit :* anomalous: – fick – fått, – gick – gått * 7d: – grät – gråtit, – lät – låtit


References


Sources

* Alfred Bammesberger, ''Der Aufbau des germanischen Verbalsystems'', Heidelberg 1986. * Cornelius van Bree, ''Historische grammatica van het Nederlands'', Dordrecht 1987. * W. G. Brill, ''Nederlandsche spraakleer; ten gebruike bij inrichtingen van hooger onderwijs'', Leiden 1871 *
Frans van Coetsem Frans (Camille Cornelis) Van Coetsem (April 14, 1919 – February 11, 2002) was a Belgian ( Flemish) linguist. After an academic career in Flanders and the Netherlands he was appointed professor at Cornell University in 1968, and consequently h ...
, ''Ablaut and Reduplication in the Germanic Verb'' (=Indogermanische Bibliothek. vol 3), Heidelberg: Winter Verlag, 1993, . * Jerzy Kuryłowicz and Manfred Mayrhofer, ''Indogermanische Grammatik'', Heidelberg 1968–9. * Marcin Krygier, ''The Disintegration of the English Strong Verb System'', Frankfurt c.1994. * Richard Hogg, ''A Grammar of Old English'', Oxford 1992. * Wilhelm Braune, revised by Walther Mitzka, ''Althochdeutsche Grammatik'', Tübingen 1961. * Donald Ringe, ''From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic'', Oxford 2006. * Elmar Seebold, Vergleichendes und etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen starken Verben, The Hague 1970. * Guus Kroonen, Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic, Leiden 2013. {{DEFAULTSORT:Germanic Strong Verb Indo-European linguistics Germanic language histories German grammar English grammar Linguistic morphology Verb types Germanic languages Indo-European verbs