Statement
A precise statement of the theorem requires careful consideration of what it means to prescribe the derivative of a function on a closed set. One difficulty, for instance, is that closed subsets of Euclidean space in general lack a differentiable structure. The starting point, then, is an examination of the statement of Taylor's theorem. Given a real-valued ''C''''m'' function ''f''(x) on R''n'', Taylor's theorem asserts that for each a, x, y ∈ R''n'', there is a function ''R''''α''(x,y) approaching 0 uniformly as x,y → a such that where the sum is over multi-indices ''α''. Let ''f''''α'' = ''D''''α''''f'' for each multi-index ''α''. Differentiating (1) with respect to x, and possibly replacing ''R'' as needed, yields where ''R''''α'' is ''o''(, x − y, ''m''−, ''α'', ) uniformly as x,y → a. Note that () may be regarded as purely a compatibility condition between the functions ''f''α which must be satisfied in order for these functions to be the coefficients of the Taylor series of the function ''f''. It is this insight which facilitates the following statement: Theorem. Suppose that ''f''''α'' are a collection of functions on a closed subset ''A'' of R''n'' for all multi-indices α with satisfying the compatibility condition () at all points ''x'', ''y'', and ''a'' of ''A''. Then there exists a function ''F''(x) of class ''C''''m'' such that: # ''F'' = ''f''0 on ''A''. # ''D''''α''''F'' = ''f''''α'' on ''A''. # ''F'' is real-analytic at every point of R''n'' − ''A''. Proofs are given in the original paper of , and in , and .Extension in a half space
proved a sharpening of the Whitney extension theorem in the special case of a half space. A smooth function on a half space R''n'',+ of points where ''x''''n'' ≥ 0 is a smooth function ''f'' on the interior ''x''''n'' for which the derivatives ∂α ''f'' extend to continuous functions on the half space. On the boundary ''x''''n'' = 0, ''f'' restricts to smooth function. By Borel's lemma, ''f'' can be extended to a smooth function on the whole of R''n''. Since Borel's lemma is local in nature, the same argument shows that if is a (bounded or unbounded) domain in R''n'' with smooth boundary, then any smooth function on the closure of can be extended to a smooth function on R''n''. Seeley's result for a half line gives a uniform extension map : which is linear, continuous (for the topology of uniform convergence of functions and their derivatives on compacta) and takes functions supported in ,''R''into functions supported in ��''R'',''R'' To define set : where φ is a smooth function of compact support on ''R'' equal to 1 near 0 and the sequences (''a''''m''), (''b''''m'') satisfy: * tends to ; * for with the sum absolutely convergent. A solution to this system of equations can be obtained by taking and seeking an entire function : such that That such a function can be constructed follows from the Weierstrass theorem and Mittag-Leffler theorem. It can be seen directly by setting : an entire function with simple zeros at The derivatives ''W'' '(2''j'') are bounded above and below. Similarly the function : meromorphic with simple poles and prescribed residues at By construction : is an entire function with the required properties. The definition for a half space in R''n'' by applying the operator ''E'' to the last variable ''x''''n''. Similarly, using a smooth partition of unity and a local change of variables, the result for a half space implies the existence of an analogous extending map : for any domain in R''n'' with smooth boundary.See also
* The Kirszbraun theorem gives extensions of Lipschitz functions. * *Notes
References
* * * * * * * * *{{citation, last=Fefferman, first=Charles, authorlink=Charles Fefferman, title=A sharp form of Whitney's extension theorem, journal=