Torosyan v Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

''Torosyan v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'', 662 A2d 89 (1995) is a
US labor law United States labor law sets the rights and duties for employees, labor unions, and employers in the United States. Labor law's basic aim is to remedy the "inequality of bargaining power" between employees and employers, especially employers "org ...
case, concerning the
contract of employment An employment contract or contract of employment is a kind of contract used in labour law to attribute rights and responsibilities between parties to a bargain. The contract is between an "employee" and an "employer". It has arisen out of the old ...
in state law for labor rights. It represents the approach in
Connecticut Connecticut () is the southernmost state in the New England region of the Northeastern United States. It is bordered by Rhode Island to the east, Massachusetts to the north, New York to the west, and Long Island Sound to the south. Its capita ...
.


Facts

Anushavan Torosyan claimed that he was unjustly terminated, because he was promised in an old staff handbook that he could be dismissed for good cause only. This was left out of the new handbook, but Torosyan had not agreed to any change.


Judgment

The Supreme Court of Connecticut held the original promise was one an employee could rely upon. An employer could not unilaterally convert an employee’s status to an at-will relation simply by issuing a second handbook. It would be improper to infer the employee consented to the new terms, simply because he or she wanted to continue work. The only alternative was to resign, giving up the
job security Job security is the probability that an individual will keep their job; a job with a high level of security is such that a person with the job would have a small chance of losing it. Many factors threaten job security: globalization, outsourcing ...
the employer originally promised.


See also


References

{{reflist, 2 United States labor case law