Background
Section 108 ofThe Study Group
The Copyright Office and the NDIIPP convened the Section 108 Study Group in 2005. The group was tasked with deciding how best to update Section 108 in light of the emergence of digital technologies, and to present its findings to the Librarian of Congress by mid-2006. The group was composed of nineteen members, with membership split close to evenly between copyright experts and library and archives professionals, and was co-chaired by Laura N. Gasaway, a former president of the American Association of Law Libraries, and Richard S. Rudick, the vice-president of the International Publishers Association. The Study Group held three public roundtables for people in fields related to libraries or copyright law to weigh in on proposed changes. These took place on March 8, 2006, in Los Angeles; March 16, 2006, in Washington, D.C.; and January 31, 2007, in Chicago. Additionally, the group held nineteen closed-door meetings between April 2005 and January 2008. The Study Group released their report in March 2008. The report provided a series of recommendations for updating Section 108. These included: * Expanding Section 108 eligibility to include museums. * Allowing institutions to make copies of at-risk copyrighted works in the interests of preservation. * Allowing institutions to capture and preserve online content that has been made publicly available. * Allowing institutions to make view-only copies of television news programs available online. * Reorganizing the text of Section 108 in a more logical and clearly understandable manner. However, the Study Group failed to reach a consensus on other issues related to Section 108, including whether to eliminate the exclusion on non-text materials such as audiovisual, pictorial, or graphic works.Outcomes
Following the publication of the Study Group's report, the Copyright Office continued to review the issues associated with Section 108. On April 2, 2014, the House Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet held a hearing on preservation and reuse of copyright, including Section 108; witnesses at the hearing disagreed over whether updating Section 108 was practical or even necessary. A new review of Section 108 began in the summer of 2016. In response to a draft revision to Section 108, the Society of American Archivists (SAA) issued a statement to the effect that the SAA did not consider Section 108 to need reform, and that the Study Group's report, now over eight years old, had become obsolete in light of legal and technological changes since its publication. In September 2017, the Copyright Office published a discussion document on Section 108 in "an effort to facilitate a final resolution of this topic". The discussion document restated the belief that Section 108 should be updated to reflect changes in technology, outlined the current proposals for updates, and laid out model statutory language for future discussions of the subject.References
External links
* Section 108 Study Group