Prime avoidance lemma
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
algebra Algebra is a branch of mathematics that deals with abstract systems, known as algebraic structures, and the manipulation of expressions within those systems. It is a generalization of arithmetic that introduces variables and algebraic ope ...
, the prime avoidance lemma says that if an ideal ''I'' in a
commutative ring In mathematics, a commutative ring is a Ring (mathematics), ring in which the multiplication operation is commutative. The study of commutative rings is called commutative algebra. Complementarily, noncommutative algebra is the study of ring prope ...
''R'' is contained in a union of finitely many
prime ideal In algebra, a prime ideal is a subset of a ring (mathematics), ring that shares many important properties of a prime number in the ring of Integer#Algebraic properties, integers. The prime ideals for the integers are the sets that contain all th ...
s ''P''''i'''s, then it is contained in ''P''''i'' for some ''i''. There are many variations of the lemma (cf. Hochster); for example, if the ring ''R'' contains an infinite field or a
finite field In mathematics, a finite field or Galois field (so-named in honor of Évariste Galois) is a field (mathematics), field that contains a finite number of Element (mathematics), elements. As with any field, a finite field is a Set (mathematics), s ...
of sufficiently large cardinality, then the statement follows from a fact in
linear algebra Linear algebra is the branch of mathematics concerning linear equations such as :a_1x_1+\cdots +a_nx_n=b, linear maps such as :(x_1, \ldots, x_n) \mapsto a_1x_1+\cdots +a_nx_n, and their representations in vector spaces and through matrix (mathemat ...
that a
vector space In mathematics and physics, a vector space (also called a linear space) is a set (mathematics), set whose elements, often called vector (mathematics and physics), ''vectors'', can be added together and multiplied ("scaled") by numbers called sc ...
over an infinite field or a finite field of large cardinality is not a finite union of its proper vector subspaces.


Statement and proof

The following statement and argument are perhaps the most standard. Statement: Let ''E'' be a subset of ''R'' that is an additive subgroup of ''R'' and is multiplicatively closed. Let I_1, I_2, \dots, I_n, n \ge 1 be ideals such that I_i are prime ideals for i \ge 3. If ''E'' is not contained in any of I_i's, then ''E'' is not contained in the union \cup I_i. Proof by induction on ''n'': The idea is to find an element that is in ''E'' and not in any of I_i's. The basic case ''n'' = 1 is trivial. Next suppose ''n'' ≥ 2. For each ''i'', choose :z_i \in E - \cup_ I_j where the set on the right is nonempty by inductive hypothesis. We can assume z_i \in I_i for all ''i''; otherwise, some z_i avoids all the I_i's and we are done. Put :z = z_1 \dots z_ + z_n. Then ''z'' is in ''E'' but not in any of I_i's. Indeed, if ''z'' is in I_i for some i \le n - 1, then z_n is in I_i, a contradiction. Suppose ''z'' is in I_n. Then z_1 \dots z_ is in I_n. If ''n'' is 2, we are done. If ''n'' > 2, then, since I_n is a prime ideal, some z_i, i < n is in I_n, a contradiction.


E. Davis' prime avoidance

There is the following variant of prime avoidance due t
E. Davis
Proof:Adapted from the solution to We argue by induction on ''r''. Without loss of generality, we can assume there is no inclusion relation between the \mathfrak_i's; since otherwise we can use the inductive hypothesis. Also, if x \not\in \mathfrak_i for each ''i'', then we are done; thus, without loss of generality, we can assume x \in \mathfrak_r. By inductive hypothesis, we find a ''y'' in ''J'' such that x + y \in I - \cup_1^ \mathfrak_i. If x + y is not in \mathfrak_r, we are done. Otherwise, note that J \not\subset \mathfrak_r (since x \in \mathfrak_r) and since \mathfrak_r is a prime ideal, we have: :\mathfrak_r \not\supset J \, \mathfrak_1 \cdots \mathfrak_. Hence, we can choose y' in J \, \mathfrak_1 \cdots \mathfrak_ that is not in \mathfrak_r. Then, since x + y \in \mathfrak_r, the element x + y + y' has the required property. \square


Application

Let ''A'' be a
Noetherian ring In mathematics, a Noetherian ring is a ring that satisfies the ascending chain condition on left and right ideals. If the chain condition is satisfied only for left ideals or for right ideals, then the ring is said left-Noetherian or right-Noethe ...
, ''I'' an ideal generated by ''n'' elements and ''M'' a finite ''A''- module such that IM \ne M. Also, let d = \operatorname_A(I, M) = the maximal length of ''M''- regular sequences in ''I'' = the length of ''every'' maximal ''M''-regular sequence in ''I''. Then d \le n; this estimate can be shown using the above prime avoidance as follows. We argue by induction on ''n''. Let \ be the set of associated primes of ''M''. If d > 0, then I \not\subset \mathfrak_i for each ''i''. If I = (y_1, \dots, y_n), then, by prime avoidance, we can choose :x_1 = y_1 + \sum_^n a_i y_i for some a_i in A such that x_1 \not\in \cup_1^r \mathfrak_i = the set of zero divisors on ''M''. Now, I/(x_1) is an ideal of A/(x_1) generated by n - 1 elements and so, by inductive hypothesis, \operatorname_(I/(x_1), M/x_1M) \le n - 1. The claim now follows.


Notes


References

* Mel Hochster
Dimension theory and systems of parameters
a supplementary note *{{cite book , last1 = Matsumura , first1 = Hideyuki , year = 1986 , title = Commutative ring theory , series = Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics , volume = 8 , url = {{google books, yJwNrABugDEC, Commutative ring theory, plainurl=yes, page=123 , publisher = Cambridge University Press , isbn = 0-521-36764-6 , mr = 0879273 , zbl = 0603.13001 Abstract algebra