Phrygian Language

The Phrygian language () was the Indo-European language of the Phrygians, spoken in Anatolia (in modern Turkey), during classical antiquity (c. 8th century BCE to 5th century CE).

Phrygian ethno-linguistic homogeneity is debatable. Ancient Greek authors used "Phrygian" as an umbrella term to describe a vast ethno-cultural complex located mainly in the central areas of Anatolia rather than a name of a single "tribe" or "people". Plato observed that some Phrygian words resembled Greek ones.

Because of the fragmentary evidence of Phrygian, its exact position within the Indo-European language family is uncertain. Phrygian shares important features mainly with Greek, but also with Armenian and Albanian. Evidence of a Thraco- Armenian separation from Phrygian and other Paleo-Balkan languages at an early stage, Phrygian's classification as a centum language, and the high frequency of phonetic, morphological, and lexical isoglosses shared with Greek, have led to a current consensus which regards Greek as the closest relative of Phrygian. "Unquestionably, however, Phrygian is most closely linked with Greek." (p. 72).

Discovery and decipherment

Ancient authors like Herodotus and Hesychius have provided us with a few dozen words assumed to be Phrygian, so-called glosses. In modern times the first monument with a Phrygian text, found at Ortaköy (classical Orcistus), was described in 1752. In 1800 at Yazılıkaya (classical Nakoleia) two more inscriptions were discovered. On one of them the word ΜΙΔΑΙ (''Midai''), 'to Midas', could be read, which prompted the idea that they were part of a building, possibly the grave, of the legendary Phrygian king Midas. Later, when Western archeologists, historians and other scholars began to travel through Anatolia to become acquainted with the geographical background of Homer's world and the New Testament, more monuments were discovered. By 1862 sixteen Phrygian inscriptions were known, among them a few Greek-Phrygian bilinguals. This allowed German scholar Andreas David Mordtmann to undertake the first serious attempt to decipher the script, though he overstressed the parallels of Phrygian to Armenian, which led to some false conclusions. After 1880, the Scottish Bible scholar William Mitchell Ramsay discovered many more inscriptions. In the 20th century, the understanding of Phrygian has increased, due to a steady flow of new texts, more reliable transcriptions, and better knowledge of the Indo-European sound change laws. The alphabet is now well-known, though minor revisions of the rarer signs of the alphabet are still possible, one sign ( = /j/, transcribed ''y'') was only securely identified in 1969.

Classification

Phrygian is a member of the Indo-European linguistic family, but because of the fragmentary evidence, its exact position within that family is uncertain. Phrygian is placed among the Palaeo-Balkan languages, either through areal contact or genetic relationship. Phrygian shares important features mainly with Greek, but also with Armenian and Albanian. Also Macedonian and Thracian, ancient languages of the Balkans, are often regarded as being closely related to Phrygian, however they are considered problematic sources for comparison due to their scarce attestation.

Between the 19th and the first half of the 20th century, Phrygian was mostly considered a satem language, and thus closer to Armenian and Thracian, while today it is commonly considered to be a centum language and thus closer to Greek. The reason that in the past Phrygian had the guise of a satem language was due to two secondary processes that affected it. Namely, Phrygian merged the old labiovelar with the plain velar, and secondly, when in contact with palatal vowels /e/ and /i/, especially in initial position, some consonants became palatalized. Furthermore, Kortlandt (1988) presented common sound changes of Thracian and Armenian and their separation from Phrygian and the rest of the palaeo-Balkan languages from an early stage.

Modern consensus views Greek as the closest relative of Phrygian. Furthermore, out of 36 isoglosses collected by Obrador Cursach, Phrygian shared 34 with Greek, with 22 being exclusive between them. The last 50 years of Phrygian scholarship developed a hypothesis that proposes a proto-Graeco-Phrygian stage out of which Greek and Phrygian originated, and if Phrygian was more sufficiently attested, that stage could perhaps be reconstructed.: "The mutual relationship between the "Balkanic" languages – Greek (Chapter 11), Armenian (Chapter 12), Albanian (Chapter 13) as well as scantily attested languages such as Phrygian and Messapic – is evaluated differently by the authors of this book. While Greek is thought to constitute a phylogenetic unit together with Phrygian in all three chapters, the hypothesis of a Graeco-Armenian subgroup is given a negative appraisal by van Beek (Chapter 11), while Olsen and Thorsø (Chapter 12) are positive. A third position is taken by Hyllested and Joseph (Chapter 13), who argue that Greek forms a subgroup with the notoriously difficult Albanian."

An alternative theory, suggested by Eric P. Hamp, is that Phrygian was most closely related to Italo-Celtic languages.

Inscriptions

The Phrygian epigraphical material is divided into two distinct subcorpora, Old Phrygian and New Phrygian. These attest different stages of the Phrygian language, are written with different alphabets and upon different materials, and have different geographical distributions.

Old Phrygian is attested in 395 inscriptions in Anatolia and beyond. They were written in the Phrygian alphabet between 800 and 330 BCE. The ''Corpus des inscriptions paléo-phrygiennes'' (CIPPh) and its supplements contain most known Old Phrygian inscriptions, though a few graffiti are not included. The oldest inscriptions—from the mid-8th century BCE—have been found on silver, bronze, and alabaster objects in tumuli (grave mounds) at Gordion (Yassıhüyük, the so-called " Midas Mound") and Bayındır (East Lycia).

New Phrygian is attested in 117 funerary inscriptions, mostly curses against desecrators added after a Greek epitaph. New Phrygian was written in the Greek alphabet between the 1st and 3rd centuries CE and is restricted to the western part of ancient Phrygia, in central Anatolia. Most New Phrygian inscriptions have been lost, so they are only known through the testimony of the first compilers. New Phrygian inscriptions have been cataloged by William M. Ramsay (ca. 1900) and by Obrador-Cursach (2018).

Some scholars identify a third division, Middle Phrygian, which is represented by a single inscription from Dokimeion. It is a Phrygian epitaph consisting of six hexametric verses written in eight lines, and dated to the end of the 4th century BCE, following the Macedonian conquest. It is considered the first Phrygian text to be inscribed with the Greek alphabet. Its phraseology has some echoes of an Old Phrygian epitaph from Bithynia, but it anticipates phonetic and spelling features found in New Phrygian. Three graffiti from Gordion, from the 4th to the 2nd centuries BCE, are ambiguous in terms of the alphabet used as well as their linguistic stage, and might also be considered Middle Phrygian.

File:Map Phrygian inscriptions.png, Map showing where Phrygian inscriptions have been found.
File:MidasSehri.TombDetail.jpg, 6th century BCE inscription with the Phrygian alphabet from the Midas Tomb, Midas City: ΒΑΒΑ: ΜΕΜΕϜΑΙΣ: ΠΡΟΙΤΑϜΟΣ: ΚΦΙJΑΝΑϜΕJΟΣ: ΣΙΚΕΝΕΜΑΝ: ΕΔΑΕΣ (''Baba, memevais, proitavos kziyanaveyos sikeneman edaes''; Baba, advisor, leader from Tyana, dedicated this niche).
The last mentions of the language date to the 5th century CE, and it was likely extinct by the 7th century CE.

Alphabet

From ca. 800 till 300 BCE, Phrygians used the Old-Phrygian alphabet of nineteen letters derived from the Phoenician alphabet. This script was usually written from left to right ("dextroverse"). The signs of this script are:

About 15 percent of the inscriptions are written from right to left ("sinistroverse"), like Phoenician; in those cases, the signs are drawn mirrored:... etc. instead of BΓ.... A few dozen inscriptions are written in alternating directions ( boustrophedon).

From ca. 300 BCE, this script was replaced by the Greek alphabet. A single inscription dates from ca. 300 BCE (sometimes called "Middle-Phrygian"), all other texts are much later, from the 1st till 3rd centuries CE (New-Phrygian). The Greek letters Θ, Ξ, Φ, Χ, and Ψ were rarely used—mainly for Greek names and loanwords (Κλευμαχοι, ''to Kleomakhos''; θαλαμει, ''funerary chamber'').

Phonology

It has long been claimed that Phrygian exhibits a sound change of stop consonants, similar to Grimm's Law in Germanic and, more to the point, sound laws found in Proto-Armenian; i.e., voicing of PIE aspirates, devoicing of PIE voiced stops and aspiration of voiceless stops. This hypothesis was rejected by Lejeune (1979) and Brixhe (1984) but revived by Lubotsky (2004) and Woodhouse (2006), who argue that there is evidence of a partial shift of obstruent series; i.e., voicing of PIE aspirates (''*bʱ'' > ''b'') and devoicing of PIE voiced stops (''*d'' > ''t'').

The affricates ''ts'' and ''dz'' may have developed from velars before front vowels.

Grammar

What can be recovered of the grammatical structure of Phrygian was typically Indo-European. Declensions and conjugations are strikingly similar to ancient Greek.

Nouns

Phrygian nouns belong to three genders: masculine, feminine, and neuter. Forms are singular or plural; dual forms are not known. Four cases are known: nominative, accusative, genitive, and dative.

Substantives

Nouns belong to three stem groups: ''o''-stems, ''a''-stems, and consonant stems ("''C''-stems"); the latter group also includes ''i''- and ''u''-stems. In addition there is a group of personal names with an e-stem.

The paradigm for nouns is as follows (to keep the paradigm clear, the many minor spelling variants, including New-Phrygian ones in Greek characters, are omitted):

Examples:
* ''a''-stem: μανκα 'manka''(''stele''): Nom. μανκα 'manka'' Acc. μανκαν 'mankan'' Dat. μανκαι 'mankai'' μανκα, μανκης, μανκε.
* ''o''-stem: ''devos'' ('god', cf. Greek θεός): Nom. ''devos''; Acc. (or Gen.?) ''devun''; Pl. Dat. δεως 'deos'' διως, δεος, δδεω, διος, δυως.
* ''C''- (''r''-)stem: ''daker'' (meaning not clear): Nom. ''daker'', δακαρ; Acc. ''dakeran''; Pl. Nom. δακερης 'dakeres'' Pl. Acc. ''dakerais''.
* ''C''- (''n''-)stem: ορουαν 'orouan''('keeper, protector'): Nom. ορουεναν 'orouenan'' Acc. ορουαν 'orouan'' Gen. ορουενος 'orouenos''
* ''C''- (''k''-)stem: ''knays'' ('woman, wife', cf. Greek γυνή): Nom. ''knays, knais''; Acc. κναικαν 'knaikan'' Gen. κναικος 'knaikos'' Pl. Nom. ''knaykes''.
* ''i''-stem: *''Tis'' ('Zeus'): Acc. Τιαν 'Tian'' Dat. Τιε 'Tie'' Τι, Τιη, Tiei; Gen. Τιος 'Tios''
* ''e''-stem: ''Manes'' ('Manes'): Nom. ''Manes, Mane'', Μανεις; Acc. ''Manin''; Gen. ''Manitos''.

Pronouns

The most frequently used pronouns are demonstrative, relative, and anaphoric. Their declensions are similar to those of nouns. Two rare pronouns, ''autos'' and ''tis'', may be loanwords from Greek.

The demonstrative pronoun, ''this'', has a short (''ses'') and a long form (''semoun''). Its declension:

There is also a clitic particle variant ''s-'', prefixed to names: sManes (''this Manes'').

The relative pronoun is ''yos'' (''who, whoever''). Though appearing often, only three different cases are attested. Paradigm:

A reduplicated form ''yosyos'', ''whoever'', is also known (cf. Latin ''quisquis'').

An anaphoric pronoun is ''tos'' (''the one mentioned, this one, he''). It is often used in the standard expression ιος νι..., τος νι...: ''whoever (damages this tomb), this one (will be damned)''; ''whoever (...), he (...)''.
Declension:

''Tos'' has a particle variant, τι, του, ''-t, -τ''. The particles τι and του, used after a demonstrative pronoun, or suffixed to it as ''-t'' or -τ, seem to emphasize the following noun: (''whoever does damage'') σεμουν του κνουμανει, ''to this very tomb''.

Another anaphoric pronoun is ''oy'' / ''ioi''. It only occurs as a Dative Singular, ''oy'', ιοι, οι (''to him, to her'').

The emphatic pronoun ''autos'' (''the very one, the same''; cf. Greek αὐτός) can also be used anaphorically. Its composite ''ve(n)autos'' is a reflexive pronoun, ''himself'' (Greek ἑαυτός).

The indefinite pronoun ''kos'' (''somebody, something'') is only attested in the nominative singular: masculine kos, κος; neuter kin, κιν. A synonym is the very rare Greek loanword ''tis'' (τις, neuter τι).

The personal or possessive pronoun ''her'' (only the feminine is attested) is ''va'' (Nom. va, ουα; Acc. ουαν, οαν; Gen. vay).

Adjectives

The declension of adjectival nouns is entirely similar to that of substantives.

Examples (note that ''mekas'' corresponds to Greek μέγας, ''big, great'', and that -τετικμενος and γεγρειμενος parallel Greek Perfect Passive participles with reduplication and ending in ''-menos''):

Verbs

Due to the limited textual material, the conjugation of Phrygian verbs can only be determined very incompletely. However, it is clear that it closely resembles the Ancient Greek verbal system. Three tenses are known: present, aorist (with augment and ''-s-'' infix), and perfect. Future forms have not yet been discovered. Neither has a pluperfect; a few forms may be an imperfect. There are two voices, active and mediopassive. As to mood, indicative and imperative are clearly documented, but suspected subjunctive forms and an optative (the latter with typical ''-oi-'' infix) need confirmation. Participles are present, most of them perfect passive forms with reduplication and ending in ''-menos''. Infinitives are not known. As to person and number, most finite forms are 3rd person singular, a few 3rd person plural, and only very few 1st person singular.

Examples:

The augment Phrygian seems to exhibit, is like Greek, Indo-Iranian, and Armenian; cf. , probably corresponding to Proto-Indo-European ' (' with loss of the final ''t'', '')'', although comparison to examples like ''ios... addaket'' 'who does... to', which is not a past tense form (perhaps subjunctive), shows that ''-et'' may be from the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) primary ending .

Syntax

Normal word order in Phrygian sentences is Subject – Object – Verb (" SOV"). However, if a direct object (DO) needs to be emphasized, it may be placed at the head of the sentence, before the subject. Part of an indirect object (IO) may be placed after the verb. Example:

::

The function of the several nominal cases (nominative, accusative, etc.) presents no surprises. The dative is perhaps also used as a locative. When the subject of a sentence is compounded of more than one item ("''A and B and C...''"), that vary in gender or number, the verb or predicate agrees in gender and number with the ''first'' item (''A'') ( Lubotsky's rection rule). Adjectives follow their noun, except when emphasis is intended.

Vocabulary

Phrygian is attested fragmentarily, known only from a comparatively small corpus of inscriptions.
A few hundred Phrygian words are attested; however, the meaning and etymologies of many of these remain unknown.

A famous Phrygian word is ''bekos'', meaning 'bread'. According to Herodotus (''Histories'' 2.2), Pharaoh Psammetichus I wanted to determine the oldest nation and establish the world's original language. For this purpose, he ordered two children to be reared by a shepherd, forbidding him to let them hear a single word, and charging him to report the children's first utterance. After two years, the shepherd reported that on entering their chamber, the children came up to him, extending their hands, calling ''bekos''. Upon enquiry, the pharaoh discovered that this was the Phrygian word for 'wheat bread', after which the Egyptians conceded that the Phrygian nation was older than theirs. The word ''bekos'' is also attested several times in Palaeo-Phrygian inscriptions on funerary stelae. It may be cognate to the English ''bake'' (PIE *''bʰeh₃g-''). Hittite, Luwian (both also influenced Phrygian morphology), Galatian and Greek (which also exhibits a high amount of isoglosses with Phrygian) all influenced Phrygian vocabulary.Brixhe, Cl. "Le Phrygien". In Fr. Bader (ed.), ''Langues indo-européennes'', pp. 165–178, Paris: CNRS Editions.

According to Clement of Alexandria, the Phrygian word ''bedu'' () meaning 'water' (PIE *''wed-'') appeared in Orphic ritual.

The Greek theonym Zeus appears in Phrygian with the stem ''Ti-'' (genitive ''Tios'' = Greek ''Dios'', from earlier ''*Diwos''; the nominative is unattested); perhaps with the general meaning 'god, deity'. It is possible that ''tiveya'' means 'goddess'. The shift of ''*d'' to ''t'' in Phrygian and the loss of ''*w'' before ''o'' appears to be regular. Stephanus Byzantius records that according to Demosthenes, Zeus was known as ''Tios'' in Bithynia.

Another possible theonym is ''bago-'' (cf. Old Persian ''baga-'', Proto-Slavic '' *bogъ'' "god"), attested as the accusative singular ''bag̣un'' in G-136. Lejeune identified the term as ''*bʰagom'', in the meaning 'a gift, dedication' (PIE ''*bʰag-'' 'to apportion, give a share'). But Hesychius of Alexandria mentions a ''Bagaios, Phrygian Zeus'' () and interprets the name as 'giver of good things'. Mallory and Adams agree that the word ''Bagaios'' was an epithet to the Phrygian worship of Zeus that derived from the same root.

Phrygian poetry

Phrygian poetry is rare. The only examples date from after Alexander the Great's conquest of Asia Minor (334 BCE), and they probably originated in imitation of Greek metrical epitaphs. The clearest example is the so-called "Middle Phrygian" inscription mentioned above, which consists of six dactylic hexameter lines. Also, as Lubotsky has proposed, the traditional Phrygian damnation formula on grave monuments may have been slightly reformulated to fit into a two-line hexametric shape (the stress accents, or ictus, on the first syllable of each dactylus are in boldface):
: ιος νι σεμουν κνουμανει κακουν αδδακετ αινι τεαμας
: με ζεμελως κε δεως κε Τιη τιτετικμενος ειτου.
:: ios ni semoun knoumanei kakoun addaket aini teamas
:: me zemelōs ke deōs ke tiē titetikmenos eitou.
::: ''Whoever to this tomb harm does, or to the grave,''
::: ''among humans and gods by Zeus accursed let him be.''

Alliteration ''('b-, b-, b-')'' may be intended in a peculiar clause found on two New-Phrygian grave monuments from Erten (near Yazılıkaya) and Güney:
: 'If someone damages this grave, then...'':... Βας ιοι βεκος με βερετ. (— pronounced, ''Bas ioi bekos me beret.'')
::''... may '' 'the god''' Bas not bring him bread.''

(''Bas'' is suspected to be a Phrygian fertility god. Note that ''bekos'' is the word for 'bread' given by Herodotus, while ''me'' conforms to Greek μή, 'not', and ''beret'' is cognate with Greek φέρειν, Latin ''ferre'', 'to bear'.Obrador Cursach (2018), pp. 156, 430, 431.)

Isoglosses

Comparison with Greek, Armenian, Albanian and Indo-Iranian:

See also

* Ancient Macedonian language
* Dacian language#Anatolia

Footnotes

References

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

Further reading

*
* Avram, Alexandru. "Chapter 15 – PHRYGIAN PERSONAL NAMES IN PHRYGIAN INSCRIPTIONS". In Baştürk, Mahmut Bilge; Hargrave, James (eds.). ''Phrygia in Antiquity: From the Bronze Age to the Byzantine Period'': Proceedings of an International Conference "The Phrygian Lands over Time: From Prehistory to the Middle of the 1st Millennium AD", Held at Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey, 2–8 November 2015. Edited by GOCHA R. TSETSKHLADZE. Peeters Publishers, 2019. 24: pp. 305–50.
*
*
*
*
*

External links

Corpus of Phrygian InscriptionsLubotsky's Phrygian Etymological Database (Incomplete)Encyclopædia Britannica – Phrygian LanguageLinguistic Bibliography OnlinePalaeolexicon – Dictionary, History and Translations of the Phrygian LanguageMidas and the Mushki, by Miltiades E. Bolaris (2010)

{{DEFAULTSORT:Phrygian Language
Languages attested from the 8th century BC
Languages extinct in the 5th century
Graeco-Phrygian
Languages of ancient Anatolia
Paleo-Balkan languages
Extinct languages of Asia
Language
Unclassified Indo-European languages