Operation Sharp Guard

Operation Sharp Guard was a multi-year joint naval blockade in the Adriatic Sea by NATO and the Western European Union on shipments to the former Yugoslavia. Warships and maritime patrol aircraft from 14 countries were involved in searching for and stopping blockade runners. The operation began on 15 June 1993. It was suspended on 19 June 1996, and was terminated on 2 October 1996.

Background

The operation replaced naval blockades Operation Maritime Guard (of NATO; begun by the U.S. in November 1992) and Sharp Fence (of the WEU). It put them under a single chain of command and control (the "Adriatic Military Committee", over which the NATO and WEU Councils exerted joint control), to address what their respective Councils viewed as wasteful duplication of effort. Some maintain that despite the nominal official joint command and control of the operation, in reality it was NATO staff that ran the operation.

Purpose

The operation's purpose was, through a blockade on shipments to the former Yugoslavia, to enforce economic sanctions and an arms embargo of weapons and military equipment against the former Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and rival factions in Croatia and Bosnia.Kathleen M. Reddy, "Operation Sharp Guard: Lesson Learned for the Policymaker and Commander"
, June 13, 1997, retrieved June 7, 2010 The Yugoslav Wars were being waged, and the participants of the blockade hoped to limit the fighting and destruction by limiting supplies being imported into the area.

Blockade

Fourteen nations contributed ships and patrol aircraft to the operation. At any given time, 22 ships and 8 aircraft were enforcing the blockade, with ships from Standing Naval Force Atlantic and Standing Naval Force Mediterranean establishing a rotating duty. (Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, the U.K., and the U.S.), and eight maritime patrol aircraft, were involved in searching for and stopping blockade runners.
Most contributors to the operation supplied one or two ships. The Turkish Navy, for example, participated with frigates, submarines, and tankers.

The operational area was divided into a series of "sea boxes", each the responsibility of a single warship. Each boarding team was composed of a "guard team" to board and wrest control of the target ship, and a "search team", to conduct the search.

The ships were authorized to board, inspect, and seize both ships seeking to break the blockade and their cargo. The Combined Task Force 440 was commanded by Admiral Mario Angeli of Italy. It marked the first time since its founding in 1949 that NATO was involved in combat operations.

''Jadran Express'' incident

On 11 March 1994, a combined British and Italian intelligence operation led to the capture of the Maltese merchant ship ''Jadran Express'' by the Italian frigate ''Zeffiro'', which forced the freighter into the port of Taranto. The ship had departed from Odessa bound to Venice with a cache of 2,000 tons of Soviet-designed weaponry, valued at US$200 million. Manned by a boarding party of Italian marines from the San Marco battalion, the ''Jadran Express'' was eventually escorted by ''Zeffiro'' to the naval base of La Maddalena, where her cargo was unloaded under heavy security.

''Lido II'' incident

The issue of differing views among nations in the coalition as to the use of force authorized by rules of engagement arose in April 1994.Stacey A. Poe, "Rules of Engagement: Complexities of Coalition Interaction in Military Operations Other than War"
, Faculty of the Nava War College, February 13, 1995 Faced with the Maltese tanker ''Lido II'' making its way towards a Montenegrin port with 45,000 tons of fuel oil, the American cruiser USS ''Philippine Sea'' asked the NATO commander (a British Commodore) for guidance, and received authorization to use "disabling fire" to stop the tanker, if necessary. He received confirmation that he should follow the British commodore's guidance from his own higher authority. Under U.S. Navy standards, "disabling fire" means firing rounds into the ship's engineering space. The U.S. cruiser was about to pass the order along to the Dutch HNLMS ''Van Kinsbergen''. However, the fact that the Dutch definition of "disabling fire" involves launching rounds into the bridge of the target ship, with an increased risk of loss of life, became important. The ship was boarded by Dutch Marines inserted by helicopter from HNLMS ''Van Kinsbergen'' and eventually stopped without firing a shot on the first of May. Three Yugoslav Navy corvettes challenged the NATO operation and one of them tried to ram the British frigate as it was assisting ''Van Kinsberger''. The corvettes eventually fled following the reaction of the British warship, supported by Italian Tornado aircraft which scrambled from an airbase at Gioia Del Colle. ''Lido II'' had to undergo repairs before being diverted to Italy, since the crew had sabotaged the ship's engine room. The leaking was contained by an engineer party from HMS ''Chatham''. Seven Yugoslav stowaways, all of them members of the special forces of the Yugoslav Navy, were found on board."NATO and WEU ships encounter Yugoslav Navy while preventing violation of UN embargo". Press Release by NATO/WEU force conducting the Operation Sharp Guard in the Adriatic Sea, 1 May 1994. Release 94/13McLaughlin, Rob (2009). ''United Nations Naval Peace Operations in the Territorial Sea''. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, p. 42, note 81. A similar incident had taken place off Montenegro a year before, on 8 February 1993, when a boarding party from the Italian frigate '' Espero'' forcibly seized the Maltese freighter ''Dimitrakis'', which feigned an emergency in order to divert her route to the port of Bar. The merchant was smuggling coal to the Serbs from Romania.

Suspension

The blockade was suspended following a UN decision to end the arms embargo, and NATO's Southern Command said that: "NATO and WEU ships will no longer challenge, board or divert ships in the Adriatic". ''The Independent'' warned at the time that "In theory, there could now be a massive influx of arms to Bosnia, Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), although senior military and diplomatic sources yesterday said that they thought this would be unlikely."

NATO naval forces inspected 5800 ships at sea . Of them, 1400 were diverted and inspected in port. No vessels were reported as having broken the embargo, although six were seized while attempting to do so.

Applicable UN resolutions

The blockade was conducted in accordance with numerous United Nations Security Council Resolutions: UNSCR 713, UNSCR 757, UNSCR 787 UNSCR 820, and UNSCR 943. Resolution 787 authorized participating states to "use such measures ... as may be necessary ... to halt all inward and outward maritime shipping ... to insure strict implementation of" the arms embargo and economic sanctions against the former Yugoslavia. Over the course of the operation, the blockade was redefined in accordance with UNSCR 1021 and UNSCR 1022.

Ships participating (Extract)

* Belgian Navy:
**
**
* Canadian Forces Maritime Command:
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
* Royal Danish Navy:
** HDMS ''Niels Juel''
* French Navy:
** ''Commandant Blaison''
**
**
** ''Premier Maitre L'HER''
** ''CDT de Pimodan''
* German Navy:
** ''Emden''
** ''Rheinland-Pfalz''
** ''Rommel''
** ''Niedersachsen''
* Hellenic Navy:
**
**
**
**
* Italian Navy:
** ''Espero''
** ''Euro''
** ''Fenice''
** ''Libeccio''
** ''Grecale''
** ''Luigi Durand de la Penne''
** ''Lupo''
** ''Zeffiro''
* Royal Netherlands Navy:
** HNLMS ''Jacob van Heemskerk''
**
** HNLMS ''Karel Doorman''
** HNLMS ''Abraham van der Hulst''
**
**
** HNLMS ''Pieter Florisz''
** HNLMS Bloys van Treslong (F824)
** HNLMS ''Van Kinsbergen''
** HNLMS ''Witte de With''
** HNLMS Zuiderkruis (A832)
** HNLMS De Ruyter (F806)
* Portuguese Navy:
**
* Spanish Navy:
**
**
**
**
**
* Royal Norwegian Navy:
**
**
* Turkish Navy:
**
** TCG ''Kocatepe''
* Royal Navy:
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
* U.S. Navy:
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
** "Military News"
, ''Pittsburgh Post-Gazette'', January 6, 1994, retrieved June 8, 2010
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**

See also

* Yugoslav Wars
*Legal assessments of the Gaza flotilla raid

References

External links

Security Council resolutions

UN Security Council Official Website, including all resolutions


* ttps://web.archive.org/web/20061008082029/http://www.afsouth.nato.int/archives/gopher/facts-afs-ops-07DECEMBER95.txt Update on Operation Sharp Guard December 1995

General Framework Agreement


NATO Handbook, December 18, 2002
"Operation Sharp Guard: the sea embargo of Serbia and Montenegro"
Barberan, J. F., ''Revista de Aeronáutica y Astronáutica'', no. 727, pp. 750–57. October 2003

{{DEFAULTSORT:Sharp Guard
Naval operations of the European Union
NATO intervention in the former Yugoslavia
United Nations operations in the former Yugoslavia
Blockades by the United States
Blockades
Battles and conflicts without fatalities
1993 in Europe
1994 in Europe
1995 in Europe
1996 in Europe
Military operations of the Yugoslav Wars involving Germany
Blockades by the United Kingdom
Military operations involving the United States
Battles of the Yugoslav Wars
Military history of the Mediterranean