Emergencies
An exception to this rule, however, is if a doctor gives medical treatment to an unconscious victim. Although the unconscious person did not ''request'' the doctor's services, a court may deem it reasonable for the doctor to presume that such services would be desired by the person, had they been conscious.Quasi-contracts
Another exception to this rule, in certain jurisdictions, is the existence of a quasi-contract. In general, in order for a contract to exist, there must be mutual consent among all parties. In the case of an intermeddler, be he officious or necessitous, this element of a contract is missing: consideration (goods or services) was provided by one party, but without the mutual consent of the receiving party. Therefore, no contract was made, and the intermeddler has no legal recourse to claim reimbursement. However, certain legal jurisdictions provide for an implied-in-law contract, called a '' quasi-contract'', that exists solely for the purposes of remedying this unjust enrichment by giving a court legal means to enforce compensation. The distinction between an officious intermeddler and a necessitous or beneficial intervener operating under a quasi-contract, is that in the latter case the enriched party (''accipiens'') of the goods or services has knowingly accepted the goods or services, with the intention of benefiting from them without providing compensation.References
Citations
Sources
* Second Restatement of Contracts Sec. 74 * Restatement of Restitution Sec. 2 * Restatement of Restitution Sec. 116 * Black's Law DictionarySee also
* Quasi-contract * Implied-in-fact contract Common law Contract law Contract law legal terminology {{law-stub