Martin's maximum
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
set theory Set theory is the branch of mathematical logic that studies sets, which can be informally described as collections of objects. Although objects of any kind can be collected into a set, set theory, as a branch of mathematics, is mostly conce ...
, a branch of
mathematical logic Mathematical logic is the study of formal logic within mathematics. Major subareas include model theory, proof theory, set theory, and recursion theory. Research in mathematical logic commonly addresses the mathematical properties of formal ...
, Martin's maximum, introduced by and named after Donald Martin, is a generalization of the
proper forcing axiom In the mathematical field of set theory, the proper forcing axiom (''PFA'') is a significant strengthening of Martin's axiom, where forcings with the countable chain condition (ccc) are replaced by proper forcings. Statement A forcing or part ...
, itself a generalization of
Martin's axiom In the mathematical field of set theory, Martin's axiom, introduced by Donald A. Martin and Robert M. Solovay, is a statement that is independent of the usual axioms of ZFC set theory. It is implied by the continuum hypothesis, but it is consist ...
. It represents the broadest class of forcings for which a forcing axiom is consistent. Martin's maximum (MM) states that if ''D'' is a collection of \aleph_1 dense subsets of a notion of forcing that preserves stationary subsets of ''ω''1, then there is a ''D''-generic filter. Forcing with a ccc notion of forcing preserves stationary subsets of ''ω''1, thus MM extends \operatorname(\aleph_1). If (''P'',≤) is not a stationary set preserving notion of forcing, i.e., there is a stationary subset of ''ω''1, which becomes nonstationary when forcing with (''P'',≤), then there is a collection ''D'' of \aleph_1 dense subsets of (''P'',≤), such that there is no ''D''-generic filter. This is why MM is called the maximal extension of Martin's axiom. The existence of a supercompact cardinal implies the consistency of Martin's maximum. The proof uses Shelah's theories of semiproper forcing and iteration with revised countable supports. MM implies that the value of the continuum is \aleph_2 and that the ideal of nonstationary sets on ω1 is \aleph_2-saturated. It further implies stationary reflection, i.e., if ''S'' is a stationary subset of some regular cardinal ''κ'' ≥ ''ω''2 and every element of ''S'' has countable cofinality, then there is an ordinal ''α'' < ''κ'' such that ''S'' ∩ ''α'' is stationary in ''α''. In fact, ''S'' contains a closed subset of order type ''ω''1.


Notes


References


correction
* *


See also

*
Transfinite number In mathematics, transfinite numbers are numbers that are " infinite" in the sense that they are larger than all finite numbers, yet not necessarily absolutely infinite. These include the transfinite cardinals, which are cardinal numbers used to q ...
Forcing (mathematics) {{settheory-stub