Lycian language

The Lycian language ( )Bryce (1986) page 30. was the language of the ancient Lycians who occupied the Anatolian region known during the Iron Age as Lycia. Most texts date back to the fifth and fourth century BC. Two languages are known as Lycian: regular Lycian or Lycian A, and Lycian B or Milyan.
Lycian became extinct around the beginning of the first century BC, replaced by the Ancient Greek language during the Hellenization of Anatolia. Lycian had its own alphabet, which was closely related to the Greek alphabet but included at least one character borrowed from Carian as well as characters proper to the language. The words were often separated by two points.

Area

Lycia covered the region lying between the modern cities of Antalya and Fethiye in southern Turkey, especially the mountainous headland between Fethiye Bay and the Gulf of Antalya. The '' Lukka'', as they were referred to in ancient Egyptian sources, which mention them among the Sea Peoples, probably also inhabited the region called Lycaonia, located along the next headland to the east, also mountainous, between the modern cities of Antalya and Mersin.

Discovery and decipherment

From the late eighteenth century Western European travellers began to visit Asia Minor to deepen their acquaintance with the worlds of Homer and the New Testament. In southwest Asia Minor (Lycia) they discovered inscriptions in an unknown script. The first four texts were published in 1820, and within months French Orientalist Antoine-Jean Saint-Martin used a bilingual showing individuals' names in Greek and Lycian as a key to transliterate the Lycian alphabet and determine the meaning of a few words. During the next century the number of texts increased, especially from the 1880s when Austrian expeditions systematically combed through the region. However, attempts to translate any but the most simple texts had to remain speculative, although combinatorial analysis of the texts cleared up some grammatical aspects of the language. The only substantial text with a Greek counterpart, the Xanthos stele, was hardly helpful because the Lycian text was quite heavily damaged, and worse, its Greek text does not anywhere come near to a close parallel.

It was only after the decipherment of Hittite, by Bedřich Hrozný in 1917, that a language became known that was closely related to Lycian and could help etymological interpretations of the Lycian vocabulary. A next leap forward could be made with the discovery in 1973 of the Letoon trilingual in Lycian, Greek and Aramaic. Though much remains unclear, comprehensive dictionaries of Lycian have been composed since by Craig Melchert and Günter Neumann.

Sources

Lycian is known from these sources, some of them fairly extensive:
* 172 inscriptions on stone in the Lycian script dating from the 5th and 4th century BC (until ca. 330 BC). They include:
** The Xanthus stele. The inscribed upper part of a tomb at Xanthos, called the Xanthus Stele or the Xanthus Obelisk. A Lycian A inscription covers the south, east and part of the north faces. The north side also contains a 12 line poem in Greek and additional text, found mainly on the west side, in Milyan. Milyan appears only there and on a tomb in Antiphellos. The total number of lines on the stele is 255, including 138 in Lycian A, 12 in Greek, and 105 in Milyan.
** The Letoon trilingual, in Lycian A, Greek and Aramaic.
** 150 burial instructions carved on rock tombs.
** 20 votive or dedicatory inscriptions.
* About 100 inscriptions on coins minted at Xanthus from the reign of Kuprili, 485-440 BC, to the reign of Pericle, 380-360 BC.
* Personal and place names in Greek.

Lycian alphabet

The Lycian alphabet consists of about 29 signs, many of them reminiscent of the Greek alphabet:

Classification

Lycian was an Indo-European language, one in the Luwian subgroup of Anatolian languages. A number of principal features help identify Lycian as being in the Luwian group:
* Assibilation of Proto-Indo-European (PIE) palatals (''satem'' change): ''*h₁éḱwos'' to Luwian ''á-zú-wa/i-'', Lycian ''esbe'' 'horse'.
* Replacement of genitive case with adjectives ending in ''-ahi'' or ''-ehi'', Luwian ''-assi-''.
* A preterite active formed with PIE secondary middle endings:
**PIE ''*-to'' to Luwian ''-ta'', Lycian ''-te'' or ''-de'' in the third person singular
**PIE ''*-nto'' to Luwian ''-nta'', Lycian ''-(n)te'' in the third person plural
* Similarity of words: Luwian ''māssan(i)-'', Lycian ''māhān(i)'' 'god'.

The Luwian subgroup also includes cuneiform and hieroglyphic Luwian, Carian, Sidetic, Milyan and Pisidic. The pre-alphabetic forms of Luwian extended back into the Late Bronze Age and preceded the fall of the Hittite Empire. These vanished at about the time of the Neo-Hittite states in southern Anatolia (and Syria); thus, the Iron Age members of the subgroup are localized daughter languages of Luwian.

Of the Luwic languages, only the Luwian parent language is attested prior to 1000 BC, so it is unknown when the classical-era dialects diverged. Whether the Lukka people always resided in southern Anatolia or whether they always spoke Luwian are different topics.

From the inscriptions, scholars have identified at least two languages that were termed ''Lycian''. One is considered standard Lycian, also termed Lycian A; the other, which is attested on side D of the Xanthos stele, is Milyan or Lycian B, separated by its grammatical particularities.

Grammar

Nouns

Nouns and adjectives distinguish singular and plural forms. A dual has not been found in Lycian. There are two genders: animate (or 'common') and inanimate (or 'neuter'). Instead of the genitive singular case normally a so-called possessive (or "genitival adjective") is used, as is common practice in the Luwic languages: a suffix -(e)h- is added to the root of a substantive, and thus an adjective is formed that is declined in turn.

Nouns can be divided in five declension groups: ''a''-stems, ''e''-stems, ''i''-stems, consonant stems, and mixed stems; the differences between the groups are very minor. The declension of nouns goes as follows: (in Russian)

Pronouns

Demonstrative pronoun

The paradigm for the demonstrative pronoun ''ebe'', "this" is:

Personal pronoun

The demonstrative ''ebe'', 'this', is also used as a personal pronoun: 'this one', therefore 'he, she, it'. Here is a paradigm of all attested personal pronouns:

Other pronouns

Other pronouns are:
* Relative or interrogative pronouns: ''ti-'', 'who, which'; ''teri'' or ''ẽke'', 'when'; ''teli'', 'where'; ''km̃mẽt(i)-'', 'how many' (also indefinite: 'however many').

* Indefinite pronouns: ''tike-'', 'someone, something'; ''tise'', 'anyone, anything'; ''tihe'', 'any'.

* Reflexive pronoun: ''-ti'' ( suffixed), 'himself'.

Numerals

The following numerals are attested:

Verbs

Just as in other Anatolian languages (Luwian, Lydian) verbs in Lycian were conjugated in the present-future and preterite tenses and in the imperative with three persons singular and plural. Some endings have many variants, due to nasalization (''-a- → -añ-, -ã-; -e- → -eñ-, -ẽ-''), lenition (''-t- → -d-''), gemination (''-t- → -tt-; -d- → -dd-''), and vowel harmonization (''-a- → -e-'': ''prñnawãtẽ → prñnewãtẽ'').

About a dozen conjugations can be distinguished, on the basis of (1) the verbal root ending (''a''-stems, consonant stems, ''-ije''-stems, etc.), and (2) the endings of the third person singular being either unlenited (present ''-ti''; preterite ''-te''; imperative ''-tu'') or lenited (''-di''; ''-de''; ''-du''). For example, ''prñnawa-''^(ti) (to build) is an unlenited ''a''-stem (''prñnawati'', he builds), ''a(i)-''^(di) (to make) is a lenited ''a(i)''-stem (''adi'', he makes). Differences between the various conjugations are minor.

Verbs are conjugated as follows; Mediopassive ''(MP)'' forms are in brown:

A suffix -s- (cognate with Greek, Latin -/sk/-), appended to the stem and attested with half a dozen verbs, is thought to make a verb iterative:
: stem ''a(i)-'', 'to do, to make', ''s''-stem ''as-''; (Preterite 3 Singular:) ''ade, adẽ'', 'he did, made', ''astte'', 'he always did, has made repeatedly';
: stem ''tuwe-'', 'to erect, place (upright)', ''s''-stem ''tus-''; (Present/future 3 Plural:) ''tuwẽti'', 'they erect', ''tusñti '', 'they will erect repeatedly'.

Syntax

Emmanuel Laroche, who analysed the Lycian text of the Letoon trilingual, concluded that word order in Lycian is slightly more free than in the other Anatolian languages. Sentences in plain text mostly have the structure
: ''ipc (initial particle cluster) - V (Verb) - S (Subject) - O (direct Object)''.

The verb immediately follows an "initial particle cluster", consisting of a more or less meaningless particle "''se-''" or "''me-''" (literally, 'and') followed by a series of up to three suffixes, often called emphatics. The function of some of these suffixes is mysterious, but others have been identified as pronomina like "he", "it", or "them". The subject, direct object, or indirect object of the sentence may thus proleptically be referred to in the initial particle cluster. As an example, the sentence "X built a house" might in Lycian be structured: "and-he-it / he-built / X / a-house".

Other constituents of a sentence, like an indirect object, predicate, or complimentary adjuncts, can be placed anywhere after the verb.

Contrary to this pattern, funeral inscriptions as a rule have a standard form with the object at the head of the sentence: "This tomb built X"; literally: "This tomb / it / he built / X" (order: ''O - ipc - V - S''). Laroche suspects the reason for this deviation to be that in this way emphasis fell on the funerary object: "This object, it was built by X". Example:

::

In line 1 ''mẽti = m-ẽ-ti'' is the initial particle cluster, where ''m- = me-'' is the neutral "steppingstone" to which two suffixes are affixed: ''-ẽ-'' = "it", and the relative pronoun ''-ti'', "who, he who".

Subject-verb-object hypothesis

Kim McCone proposed in the 1970s that Lycian's unmarked word order was instead subject-verb-object. The apparent VSO and OVS orders come from various frontings and dislocations of a basic SVO structure.

Lycian's SVO is itself a shift from the typical Anatolian subject-object-verb order, of which Lycian preverbal object pronouns like ''ẽ'' "him/her/it" would be a relic.

In spite of McCone's alternative analysis, the assumption that verb-subject-object was Lycian's unmarked word order went unchallenged until the 2010s, when Alwin Kloekhorst independently formulated and adopted the SVO hypothesis. This led to other linguists like Heiner Eichner and H. Craig Melchert to adopt the SVO hypothesis after him. The principal unmarked example cited by SVO supporters comes from the following sentence:

Further examples of subject-initial unmarked clauses cited by Melchert include:

Endonym

A few etymological studies of the Lycian language endonym are present. These are:
* Language of the mountain people (Laroche): Luwian tarmi- "pointed object" becomes a hypothetical *tarmašši- "mountainous" used in Trm̃mis- "Lycia." Lycia and Pisidia each had a hill-town named Termessos.
* Attarima (Carruba): A previously unknown Late Bronze Age place name among the Lukka.
* Termilae ( Bryce): A people displaced from Crete about 1600 BC.
* Termera ( Strabo): A Lelege people displaced by the Trojan War, first settling in Caria and assigning such names as Telmessos, Termera, Termerion, Termeros, Termilae, then displaced to Lycia by the Ionians.Strabo 14.1.3, 14.2.18.

See also

* Letoon trilingual
* Lycia
* Lycian script

References

External links

*
*
* in the Universal Character Set
*

References

*
*

Further reading

* Goldstein, David M. "Object agreement in Lycian". In: ''Historische Sprachforschung'' Vol. 127, Number 1 (2014): 101-124. 10.13109/hisp.2014.127.1.10

{{DEFAULTSORT:Lycian Language
Lycian language,