Krull–Akizuki theorem
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
commutative algebra Commutative algebra, first known as ideal theory, is the branch of algebra that studies commutative rings, their ideal (ring theory), ideals, and module (mathematics), modules over such rings. Both algebraic geometry and algebraic number theo ...
, the Krull–Akizuki theorem states the following: Let ''A'' be a one-dimensional reduced
noetherian ring In mathematics, a Noetherian ring is a ring that satisfies the ascending chain condition on left and right ideals. If the chain condition is satisfied only for left ideals or for right ideals, then the ring is said left-Noetherian or right-Noethe ...
, ''K'' its
total ring of fractions In abstract algebra, the total quotient ring or total ring of fractions is a construction that generalizes the notion of the field of fractions of an integral domain to commutative rings ''R'' that may have zero divisors. The construction embedding ...
. Suppose ''L'' is a finite extension of ''K''. If A\subset B\subset L and ''B'' is reduced, then ''B'' is a noetherian ring of dimension at most one. Furthermore, for every nonzero ideal I of ''B'', B/I is finite over ''A''. Note that the theorem does not say that ''B'' is finite over ''A''. The theorem does not extend to higher dimension. One important consequence of the theorem is that the
integral closure In commutative algebra, an element ''b'' of a commutative ring ''B'' is said to be integral over a subring ''A'' of ''B'' if ''b'' is a root of some monic polynomial over ''A''. If ''A'', ''B'' are fields, then the notions of "integral over" and ...
of a
Dedekind domain In mathematics, a Dedekind domain or Dedekind ring, named after Richard Dedekind, is an integral domain in which every nonzero proper ideal factors into a product of prime ideals. It can be shown that such a factorization is then necessarily un ...
''A'' in a finite extension of the field of fractions of ''A'' is again a Dedekind domain. This consequence does generalize to a higher dimension: the
Mori–Nagata theorem In algebra, the Mori–Nagata theorem introduced by and , states the following: let ''A'' be a noetherian ring, noetherian reduced ring, reduced commutative ring with the total ring of fractions ''K''. Then the integral closure of ''A'' in ''K'' is ...
states that the integral closure of a noetherian domain is a
Krull domain In commutative algebra, a Krull ring, or Krull domain, is a commutative ring with a well behaved theory of prime factorization. They were introduced by Wolfgang Krull in 1931. They are a higher-dimensional generalization of Dedekind domains, which a ...
.


Proof

First observe that A\subset B\subset KB and ''KB'' is a finite extension of ''K'', so we may assume without loss of generality that L=KB. Then L=Kx_1+\cdots+Kx_n for some x_1,\dots,x_n\in B. Since each x_i is integral over ''K'', there exists a_i\in A such that a_ix_i is integral over ''A''. Let C=A _1x_1,\dots,a_nx_n/math>. Then ''C'' is a one-dimensional noetherian ring, and C\subset B\subset Q(C), where Q(C) denotes the total ring of fractions of ''C''. Thus we can substitute ''C'' for ''A'' and reduce to the case L = K. Let \mathfrak_i be minimal prime ideals of ''A''; there are finitely many of them. Let K_i be the field of fractions of A/ and I_i the kernel of the natural map B \to K \to K_i. Then we have: :A/ \subset B/ \subset K_i and K\simeq\prod K_i. Now, if the theorem holds when ''A'' is a domain, then this implies that ''B'' is a one-dimensional noetherian domain since each B/ is and since B \simeq \prod B/. Hence, we reduced the proof to the case ''A'' is a domain. Let 0 \ne I \subset B be an ideal and let ''a'' be a nonzero element in the nonzero ideal I \cap A. Set I_n = a^nB \cap A + aA. Since A/aA is a zero-dim noetherian ring; thus, artinian, there is an l such that I_n = I_l for all n \ge l. We claim :a^l B \subset a^B + A. Since it suffices to establish the inclusion locally, we may assume ''A'' is a local ring with the maximal ideal \mathfrak. Let ''x'' be a nonzero element in ''B''. Then, since ''A'' is noetherian, there is an ''n'' such that \mathfrak^ \subset x^ A and so a^x \in a^B \cap A \subset I_. Thus, :a^n x \in a^ B \cap A + A. Now, assume ''n'' is a minimum integer such that n \ge l and the last inclusion holds. If n > l, then we easily see that a^n x \in I_. But then the above inclusion holds for n-1, contradiction. Hence, we have n = l and this establishes the claim. It now follows: :B/ \simeq a^l B/a^ B \subset (a^B + A)/a^ B \simeq A/(a^B \cap A). Hence, B/ has finite length as ''A''-module. In particular, the image of I there is finitely generated and so I is finitely generated. The above shows that B/ has dimension at most zero and so ''B'' has dimension at most one. Finally, the exact sequence B/aB\to B/I\to (0) of ''A''-modules shows that B/I is finite over ''A''. \square


References

* {{DEFAULTSORT:Krull-Akizuki theorem Theorems in algebra Commutative algebra