John the Evangelist

John the Evangelist ( grc-gre, Ἰωάννης, Iōánnēs; Aramaic: ܝܘܚܢܢ; Ge'ez: ዮሐንስ; ar, يوحنا الإنجيلي, la, Ioannes, he, יוחנן cop, ⲓⲱⲁⲛⲛⲏⲥ or ⲓⲱ̅ⲁ) is the name traditionally given to the author of the Gospel of John. Christians have traditionally identified him with John the Apostle, John of Patmos, and John the Presbyter, although this has been disputed by most modern scholars.

Identity

The Gospel of John refers to an otherwise unnamed "disciple whom Jesus loved", who "bore witness to and wrote" the Gospel's message.Theissen, Gerd and Annette Merz. The historical Jesus: a comprehensive guide. Fortress Press. 1998. translated from German (1996 edition). Chapter 2. Christian sources about Jesus. The author of the Gospel of John seemed interested in maintaining the internal anonymity of the author's identity, although interpreting the Gospel in the light of the Synoptic Gospels and considering that the author names (and therefore is not claiming to be) Peter, and that James was martyred as early as AD 44, it has been widely believed that the author was the Apostle John (though some believe he was pretending to be).Theissen, Gerd and Annette Merz. The historical Jesus: a comprehensive guide. Fortress Press. 1998. translated from German (1996 edition)

Christian tradition says that John the Evangelist was John the Apostle. The Apostle John was one of the "pillars" of the Jerusalem church after Jesus' death. Harris, Stephen L., ''Understanding the Bible''. Palo Alto: Mayfield. 1985. "John" p. 302-310 He was one of the original twelve apostles and is thought to be the only one to have not been killed for his faith. It had been believed that he was exiled (around AD 95) to the Aegean island of Patmos, where he wrote the Book of Revelation. However, some attribute the authorship of Revelation to another man, called John the Presbyter, or to other writers of the late first century AD. Bauckham argues that the early Christians identified John the Evangelist with John the Presbyter.Bauckham, Richard (2007))
The Testimony of the Beloved Disciple
'.

Authorship of the Johannine works

The authorship of the Johannine works has been debated by scholars since at least the 2nd century AD. The main debate centers on who authored the writings, and which of the writings, if any, can be ascribed to a common author.

Eastern Orthodox tradition attributes all of the Johannine books to John the Apostle.Stephen L Harris, ''Understanding the Bible,'' (Palo Alto: Mayfield, 1985), 355

In the 6th century, the ''Decretum Gelasianum'' argued that Second and Third John have a separate author known as "John, a priest" (see John the Presbyter). Historical critics, like H.P.V. Nunn, the non-Christians Reza Aslan, and Bart Ehrman, reject the view that John the Apostle authored any of these works.

Most modern scholars believe that the apostle John wrote none of these works,"Although ancient traditions attributed to the Apostle John the Fourth Gospel, the Book of Revelation, and the three Epistles of John, modern scholars believe that he wrote none of them." Harris, Stephen L., ''Understanding the Bible'' (Palo Alto: Mayfield, 1985) p. 355 although some, such as J.A.T. Robinson, F. F. Bruce, Leon Morris, and Martin Hengel, hold the apostle to be behind at least some, in particular the gospel.Morris, Leon (1995)
The Gospel According to John
' Volume 4 of The new international commentary on the New Testament, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, , pp. 4–5, 24, 35–7. "Continental scholars have ... abandoned the idea that this gospel was written by the apostle John, whereas in Great Britain and America scholarship has been much more open to the idea." Abandonment is due to changing opinion rather "than to any new evidence." "Werner, Colson, and I have been joined, among others, by I. Howard Marshall and J.A.T. Robinson in seeing the evidence as pointing to John the son of Zebedee as the author of this Gospel." The view that John's history is substandard "is becoming increasingly hard to sustain. Many recent writers have shown that there is good reason for regarding this or that story in John as authentic. ... It is difficult to ... regard John as having little concern for history. The fact is John is concerned with historical information. ... John apparently records this kind of information because he believes it to be accurate. ... He has some reliable information and has recorded it carefully. ... The evidence is that where he can be tested John proves to be remarkably accurate."
*Bruce 1981 pp. 52–4, 58. "The evidence ... favor the apostolicity of the gospel. ... John knew the other gospels and ... supplements them. ... The synoptic narrative becomes more intelligible if we follow John." John's style is different so Jesus' "abiding truth might be presented to men and women who were quite unfamiliar with the original setting. ... He does not yield to any temptation to restate Christianity. ... It is the story of events that happened in history. ... John does not divorce the story from its Palestinian context."
*Dodd p. 444. "Revelation is distinctly, and nowhere more clearly than in the Fourth Gospel, a historical revelation. It follows that it is important for the evangelist that what he narrates happened."
*Temple, William. "Readings in St. John's Gospel". MacMillan and Co, 1952. "The synoptists give us something more like the perfect photograph; St. John gives us the more perfect portrait".
*Edwards, R. A. "The Gospel According to St. John" 1954, p 9. One reason he accepts John's authorship is because "the alternative solutions seem far too complicated to be possible in a world where living men met and talked".
*Hunter, A. M. "Interpreting the New Testament" P 86. "After all the conjectures have been heard, the likeliest view is that which identifies the Beloved Disciple with the Apostle John.Dr. Craig Blomberg, cited in Lee Strobel ''The Case for Christ'', 1998, Chapter 2.
*Marshall, Howard. "The Illustrated Bible Dictionary", ed J. D. Douglas et al. Leicester 1980. II, p 804
*Robinson, J. A. T. "The Priority of John" P 122
*Cf. Marsh, "John seems to have believed that theology was not something which could be used to read a meaning into events but rather something that was to be discovered in them. His story is what it is because his theology is what it is; but his theology is what it is because the story happened so" (p 580–581).

There may have been a single author for the gospel and the three epistles. Some scholars conclude the author of the epistles was different from that of the gospel, although all four works originated from the same community. The gospel and epistles traditionally and plausibly came from Ephesus, ''c.'' 90–110, although some scholars argue for an origin in Syria.

In the case of Revelation, most modern scholars agree that it was written by a separate author, John of Patmos, ''c.'' 95 with some parts possibly dating to Nero's reign in the early 60s.

Feast day

The feast day of Saint John in the Catholic Church, Anglican Communion, and the Lutheran Calendar, is on 27 December, the third day of Christmastide. In the Tridentine Calendar he was commemorated also on each of the following days up to and including 3 January, the Octave of the 27 December feast. This Octave was abolished by Pope Pius XII in 1955. The traditional liturgical color is white.

Freemasons celebrate this feast day, dating back to the 18th century when the Feast Day was used for the installation of Presidents and Grand Masters.

In art

John is traditionally depicted in one of two distinct ways: either as an aged man with a white or gray beard, or alternatively as a beardless youth.Sources:
*James Hall, ''Dictionary of Subjects and Symbols in Art,'' (New York: Harper & Row, 1979), 129, 174-75.
*Carolyn S. Jerousek, "Christ and St. John the Evangelist as a Model of Medieval Mysticism," ''Cleveland Studies in the History of Art,'' Vol. 6 (2001), 16.
The first way of depicting him was more common in Byzantine art, where it was possibly influenced by antique depictions of Socrates; the second was more common in the art of Medieval Western Europe and can be dated back as far as 4th-century Rome.

In medieval works of painting, sculpture and literature, Saint John is often presented in an androgynous or feminized manner. Historians have related such portrayals to the circumstances of the believers for whom they were intended. For instance, John's feminine features are argued to have helped to make him more relatable to women. Likewise, Sarah McNamer argues that because of John's androgynous status, he could function as an 'image of a third or mixed gender' and 'a crucial figure with whom to identify' for male believers who sought to cultivate an attitude of affective piety, a highly emotional style of devotion that, in late-medieval culture, was thought to be poorly compatible with masculinity.

Legends from the "Acts of John" contributed much to medieval iconography; it is the source of the idea that John became an apostle at a young age. One of John's familiar attributes is the chalice, often with a snake emerging from it.James Hall, "John the Evangelist," ''Dictionary of Subjects and Symbols in Art,'' rev. ed. (New York: Harper & Row, 1979) According to one legend from the Acts of John, John was challenged to drink a cup of poison to demonstrate the power of his faith, and thanks to God's aid the poison was rendered harmless. The chalice can also be interpreted with reference to the Last Supper, or to the words of Christ to John and James: "My chalice indeed you shall drink."Fonck, L. (1910)
St. John the Evangelist
In ''The Catholic Encyclopedia'' (New York: Robert Appleton Company). Retrieved 14 August 2017 from New Advent. According to the 1910 ''Catholic Encyclopedia'', some authorities believe that this symbol was not adopted until the 13th century. There was also a legend that John was at some stage boiled in oil and miraculously preserved.J K Elliott, "Graphic Versions: Did non-biblical stories about Jesus and the saints originate more in art than text?", ''Times Literary Supplement'', 14 December 2018, pp. 15-16, referring to a thirteenth-century manuscript in Cambridge known as the Trinity College Apocalypse. Another common attribute is a book or a scroll, in reference to his writings. John the Evangelist is symbolically represented by an eagle, one of the creatures envisioned by Ezekiel (1:10) and in the Book of Revelation (4:7).

Gallery

File: Joan_de_Joanes_-_St_John_the_Evangelist_-_WGA12061.jpg, ''St. John the Evangelist'' by Joan de Joanes (1507–1579), oil on panel
File:Zampieri St John Evangelist.jpg, '' Saint John the Evangelist'' by Domenichino (1621–29)
File:1490 Gleismüller Johannes auf Patmos anagoria.JPG, ''Saint John the Evangelist on Patmos'', 1490
File:Piero di Cosimo (Piero di Lorenzo) - St. John the Evangelist, c. 1500.jpg, Piero di Cosimo, ''Saint John the Evangelist'', oil on panel, 1504–6, Honolulu Museum of Art

File:El Greco, The Vision of Saint John (1608-1614).jpg , ''The Vision of Saint John'' (1608–1614), by El Greco
File:Simone Cantarini - São João Batista em Meditação.jpg, ''Saint John the Evangelist in meditation'' by Simone Cantarini
(1612–1648), Bologna
File:Sts-john-and-bartholomew-with-donor-dosso-dossi.jpg, ''Saints John and Bartholomew'', by Dosso Dossi
File:Enniscorthy St. Aidan's Cathedral East Aisle Second Window Evangelist John Detail 2009 09 28.jpg, Stained glass window in St. Aidan’s Cathedral, Ireland
File:Cano - San Juan.jpg,
''Saint John and the Poisoned Cup'' by Alonzo Cano in Kazan Cathedral, Saint Petersburg
File:KellsFol291vPortJohn.jpg, A portrait from the Book of Kells, c. 800
File:El Greco 034.jpg, ''Saint John and the cup'' by El Greco
File:St-johns-seminary-st-john.jpg, Statue of ''John the Evangelist'' outside St. John's Seminary, Boston
File:De Grey Hours f.26.v St. John the Evangelist.png, St John the Evangelist depicted in a 14th-century manuscript in the Flemish style
File:San Juan Evangelista, por Francisco Pacheco.jpg, ''St John the Evangelist'', by Francisco Pacheco (1608, Museo del Prado)
File:Prochorus and St John Miniature, 1224.jpg, Prochorus and St John depicted in Xoranasat's gospel manuscript in 1224. Armenian manuscript.

See also

* Eagle of Saint John
* Luke the Evangelist
* Mark the Evangelist
* Matthew the Evangelist
* St. John the Evangelist Church

References

External links

"Saint John the Apostle." ''Encyclopædia Britannica'' Online.

Answers.com


at th
Christian Iconography
web site
* Caxton's translations of the ''Golden Legend''s two chapters on St. John
Of St. John the Evangelist
an

{{DEFAULTSORT:John The Evangelist
15 births
100 deaths
Year of death unknown
1st-century writers
Christian saints from the New Testament
Four Evangelists
Saints from the Holy Land
John the Apostle