Free Lattice
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In mathematics, in the area of order theory, a free lattice is the free object corresponding to a lattice. As free objects, they have the
universal property In mathematics, more specifically in category theory, a universal property is a property that characterizes up to an isomorphism the result of some constructions. Thus, universal properties can be used for defining some objects independently ...
.


Formal definition

Any set ''X'' may be used to generate the free
semilattice In mathematics, a join-semilattice (or upper semilattice) is a partially ordered set that has a join (a least upper bound) for any nonempty finite subset. Dually, a meet-semilattice (or lower semilattice) is a partially ordered set which has ...
''FX''. The free semilattice is defined to consist of all of the finite subsets of ''X'', with the semilattice operation given by ordinary
set union In set theory, the union (denoted by ∪) of a collection of sets is the set of all elements in the collection. It is one of the fundamental operations through which sets can be combined and related to each other. A refers to a union of ze ...
. The free semilattice has the
universal property In mathematics, more specifically in category theory, a universal property is a property that characterizes up to an isomorphism the result of some constructions. Thus, universal properties can be used for defining some objects independently ...
. The
universal morphism In mathematics, more specifically in category theory, a universal property is a property that characterizes up to an isomorphism the result of some constructions. Thus, universal properties can be used for defining some objects independently ...
is , where η is the unit map η: ''X'' → ''FX'' which takes ''x'' ∈ ''X'' to the singleton set . The universal property is then as follows: given any map ''f'': ''X'' → ''L'' from ''X'' to some arbitrary semilattice ''L'', there exists a unique semilattice homomorphism \tilde:FX \to L such that f = \tilde\circ\eta. The map \tilde may be explicitly written down; it is given by :S \in FX \mapsto \bigvee\left\ where \bigvee denotes the semilattice operation in ''L''. This construction may be promoted from semilattices to lattices; by construction the map \tilde will have the same properties as the lattice. The construction ''X'' ↦ ''FX'' is then a
functor In mathematics, specifically category theory, a functor is a mapping between categories. Functors were first considered in algebraic topology, where algebraic objects (such as the fundamental group) are associated to topological spaces, an ...
from the
category of sets In the mathematical field of category theory, the category of sets, denoted as Set, is the category whose objects are sets. The arrows or morphisms between sets ''A'' and ''B'' are the total functions from ''A'' to ''B'', and the composition ...
to the category of lattices. The functor ''F'' is left adjoint to the forgetful functor from lattices to their underlying sets. The free lattice is a free object.


Word problem

The word problem for free lattices and free bounded lattices is decidable using an inductive relation. The solution has several interesting corollaries. One is that the free lattice of a three-element set of generators is infinite. In fact, one can even show that every free lattice on three generators contains a sublattice which is free for a set of four generators. By induction, this eventually yields a sublattice free on
countably In mathematics, a Set (mathematics), set is countable if either it is finite set, finite or it can be made in one to one correspondence with the set of natural numbers. Equivalently, a set is ''countable'' if there exists an injective function fro ...
many generators. This property is reminiscent of SQ-universality in groups. The proof that the free lattice in three generators is infinite proceeds by inductively defining :''p''''n''+1 = ''x'' ∨ (''y'' ∧ (''z'' ∨ (''x'' ∧ (''y'' ∨ (''z'' ∧ ''p''''n''))))) where ''x'', ''y'', and ''z'' are the three generators, and ''p''0 = ''x''. One then shows, using the inductive relations of the word problem, that ''p''''n''+1 is strictly greaterthat is, ''p''''n''~ ''p''''n''+1, but not ''p''''n''+1~ ''p''''n'' than ''p''''n'', and therefore all infinitely many words ''p''''n'' evaluate to different values in the free lattice ''FX''.


The complete free lattice

Another corollary is that the complete free lattice (on three or more generators) "does not exist", in the sense that it is a
proper class Proper may refer to: Mathematics * Proper map, in topology, a property of continuous function between topological spaces, if inverse images of compact subsets are compact * Proper morphism, in algebraic geometry, an analogue of a proper map f ...
. The proof of this follows from the word problem as well. To define a
complete lattice In mathematics, a complete lattice is a partially ordered set in which ''all'' subsets have both a supremum (join) and an infimum (meet). A lattice which satisfies at least one of these properties is known as a ''conditionally complete lattice.'' S ...
in terms of relations, it does not suffice to use the finitary relations of meet and join; one must also have infinitary relations defining the meet and join of infinite subsets. For example, the infinitary relation corresponding to "join" may be defined as :\operatorname_N:(f:N\to FX) Here, ''f'' is a map from the elements of a cardinal ''N'' to ''FX''; the operator \operatorname_N denotes the supremum, in that it takes the image of ''f'' to its join. This is, of course, identical to "join" when ''N'' is a finite number; the point of this definition is to define join as a relation, even when ''N'' is an infinite cardinal. The axioms of the pre-ordering of the word problem may be adjoined by the two infinitary operators corresponding to meet and join. After doing so, one then extends the definition of p_n to an ordinally indexed p_\alpha given by :p_\alpha = \operatorname\ when \alpha is a limit ordinal. Then, as before, one may show that p_ is strictly greater than p_\alpha. Thus, there are at least as many elements in the complete free lattice as there are ordinals, and thus, the complete free lattice cannot exist as a set, and must therefore be a proper class.


References

* Peter T. Johnstone, ''Stone Spaces'', Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982. ({{ISBN, 0-521-23893-5) ''(See chapter 1)'' Lattice theory Free algebraic structures Combinatorics on words