Deliberation Day is a proposed national holiday in the

United States The United States of America (USA), also known as the United States (U.S.) or America, is a country primarily located in North America. It is a federal republic of 50 U.S. state, states and a federal capital district, Washington, D.C. The 48 ...

aimed at enhancing democratic engagement through structured public discussions prior to major elections. Conceived by the

constitutional law Constitutional law is a body of law which defines the role, powers, and structure of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, the parliament or legislature, and the judiciary; as well as the basic rights of citizens and, in ...

scholar

Bruce Ackerman Bruce Arnold Ackerman (born August 19, 1943) is an American legal scholar who serves as a Sterling Professor at Yale Law School. In 2010, he was named by ''Foreign Policy'' magazine to its list of top global thinkers. Ackerman was also identified ...

and the

political scientist Political science is the scientific study of politics. It is a social science dealing with systems of governance and Power (social and political), power, and the analysis of political activities, political philosophy, political thought, polit ...

James S. Fishkin, who laid out the rationale for their proposal in their 2005 book, ''Deliberation Day'', the initiative seeks to foster informed citizen participation in the electoral process.

Proposed structure

Ackerman and Fishkin propose that Deliberation Day would occur two weeks before major elections, with government-sponsored events held in accessible community spaces such as schools and

civic centers Civic is something related to a city or municipality. It also can refer to multiple other things: Civic or CIVIC can also refer to: General *Honda Civic, a car produced by the Honda Motor Co. *Civics, the science of comparative government *Civic e ...

. Attendees would engage in structured conversations facilitated by trained moderators. The day’s schedule would be divided into sessions featuring discussions among small groups, large assemblies for expert presentations, and question-and-answer segments with political representatives. Participants would receive financial compensation to incentivize broad involvement, particularly among individuals less inclined toward political participation.

Arguments in support

Informing the electorate

Deliberation Day would offer participants access to balanced briefing materials and expert insights, enabling them to make well-informed decisions at the polls. This approach addresses the issue of voters making choices based on limited or biased information, thereby enhancing the overall quality of electoral outcomes.

Enhancing democratic engagement

Supporters argue that Deliberation Day would deepen democratic engagement. By allocating time for citizens to deliberate on electoral matters, the initiative aims to transform passive voters into active participants. This process encourages individuals to consider diverse perspectives, leading to more informed voting decisions. Experiments in deliberative democracy have shown that such engagement reduces polarization and fosters mutual respect among participants, even amid significant disagreements.

Improving public discourse

Deliberation Day seeks to elevate the quality of public discourse by providing a platform for reasoned discussion. In small groups, citizens would deliberate on key campaign issues, guided by balanced informational materials and moderated discussions. This structure ensures that various viewpoints are considered, promoting a more comprehensive understanding of complex topics. Such deliberative settings have been found to prevent discussions from devolving into unproductive arguments, instead facilitating productive exchanges where participants are open to changing their minds based on new evidence.

Counteracting political polarization

In an era marked by increasing political polarization, supporters argue that Deliberation Day offers a means to bridge divides. By bringing together individuals from diverse backgrounds to discuss political issues, the initiative encourages empathy and reduces partisan animosity. Deliberative processes have been shown to blunt polarization, as participants listen to and respect differing viewpoints, fostering a more cohesive society.

Criticism

Financial and logistical challenges

Critics of the proposed holiday cite the substantial financial burden associated with compensating participants. Providing monetary incentives to all citizens nationwide could lead to significant expenses for governmental institutions. Additionally, organizing such a large-scale event presents logistical complexities, including the recruitment and training of moderators, securing appropriate venues, and ensuring equitable access across diverse communities.

Potential for group polarization

Empirical studies Empirical research is research using empirical evidence. It is also a way of gaining knowledge by means of direct and indirect observation or experience. Empiricism values some research more than other kinds. Empirical evidence (the record of one ...

suggest that deliberation among like-minded individuals can lead to

group polarization In social psychology, group polarization refers to the tendency for a group to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclination of its members. These more extreme decisions are towards greater risk if individuals' initial tendenci ...

, where discussions reinforce and intensify pre-existing views, resulting in more extreme positions. For instance, an experiment involving citizens from predominantly

liberal Liberal or liberalism may refer to: Politics * Generally, a supporter of the political philosophy liberalism. Liberals may be politically left or right but tend to be centrist. * An adherent of a Liberal Party (See also Liberal parties by country ...

and

conservative Conservatism is a cultural, social, and political philosophy and ideology that seeks to promote and preserve traditional institutions, customs, and values. The central tenets of conservatism may vary in relation to the culture and civiliza ...

cities demonstrated that intra-group deliberation increased ideological divisions, reducing diversity of thought within groups.

Influence of existing political structures

Critics argue that Deliberation Day may inadvertently reinforce existing political structures, particularly the

two-party system A two-party system is a political party system in which two major political parties consistently dominate the political landscape. At any point in time, one of the two parties typically holds a majority in the legislature and is usually referr ...

, by relying on major political parties to organize and manage deliberative sessions. This reliance could marginalize alternative viewpoints and limit the scope of discussions, thereby constraining the deliberative process.

Challenges in ensuring fair deliberation

Ensuring fair and balanced deliberation is another significant challenge. The assumption that structured time limits and the presence of moderators can guarantee equitable participation may be overly optimistic. In practice, discussions could be dominated by more vocal participants, leading to unequal representation of perspectives and potential conflicts among participants.

Reception

Writer and activist

Naomi Wolf Naomi Rebekah Wolf (born 1962) is an American feminist author, journalist, and conspiracy theorist. After the 1991 publication of her first book, '' The Beauty Myth'', Wolf became a prominent figure in the third wave of the feminist movemen ...

endorsed the idea in 2008, citing studies that describe 3 of every 4 participants finding their deliberative experience very valuable.